π¨ CVE-2026-9612
The WhatsOrder β Instant Checkout for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1 via the yapacdev_generate_order_pdf. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive customer PII and order details β including full name, email address, phone number, billing address, ordered items with quantities and prices, applied coupons, shipping method, and order total β from any customer's invoice by enumerating sequential order IDs. Invoice HTML files are written to the publicly accessible wp-content/uploads/whatsorder_invoices/ directory, which is created without an .htaccess deny rule or index.php guard, making every invoice directly downloadable over HTTP with no authentication check.
π@cveNotify
The WhatsOrder β Instant Checkout for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1 via the yapacdev_generate_order_pdf. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive customer PII and order details β including full name, email address, phone number, billing address, ordered items with quantities and prices, applied coupons, shipping method, and order total β from any customer's invoice by enumerating sequential order IDs. Invoice HTML files are written to the publicly accessible wp-content/uploads/whatsorder_invoices/ directory, which is created without an .htaccess deny rule or index.php guard, making every invoice directly downloadable over HTTP with no authentication check.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-9616
The Generate Security.txt plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.12. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete the site's security.txt file from the server filesystem or create the .well-known directory by directly invoking the delete_securitytxt or create_wellknown_folder AJAX actions.
π@cveNotify
The Generate Security.txt plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.12. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete the site's security.txt file from the server filesystem or create the .well-known directory by directly invoking the delete_securitytxt or create_wellknown_folder AJAX actions.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-9619
The Reviews and Rating β Docplanner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to trigger outbound scraping of external websites and write scraped review data into the wp_dp_reviews database table, as well as send feature-request emails from the site administrator's email address.
π@cveNotify
The Reviews and Rating β Docplanner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to trigger outbound scraping of external websites and write scraped review data into the wp_dp_reviews database table, as well as send feature-request emails from the site administrator's email address.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-9620
The WP Latest Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via crafted image src attributes in post content in versions up to, and including, 5.0.11. This is due to insufficient output escaping in the field() and loop() functions, which extract the raw src attribute value from <img> tags within post_content using a regular expression and then reconstruct new <img> elements or CSS background-image declarations by directly concatenating the unescaped value β bypassing WordPress's kses filtering entirely. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
π@cveNotify
The WP Latest Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via crafted image src attributes in post content in versions up to, and including, 5.0.11. This is due to insufficient output escaping in the field() and loop() functions, which extract the raw src attribute value from <img> tags within post_content using a regular expression and then reconstruct new <img> elements or CSS background-image declarations by directly concatenating the unescaped value β bypassing WordPress's kses filtering entirely. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-9643
The WP Meta SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the REQUEST_URI server variable in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.18. When the plugin's `wpmsTemplateRedirect()` hook detects a 404, it concatenates `$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']` with the raw `$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']` and inserts that value verbatim into the `wp_wpms_links.link_url` column via `$wpdb->insert()`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute whenever an administrator views the plugin's 404 & Redirects admin page (`/wp-admin/admin.php?page=metaseo_broken_link`).
π@cveNotify
The WP Meta SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the REQUEST_URI server variable in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.18. When the plugin's `wpmsTemplateRedirect()` hook detects a 404, it concatenates `$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']` with the raw `$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']` and inserts that value verbatim into the `wp_wpms_links.link_url` column via `$wpdb->insert()`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute whenever an administrator views the plugin's 404 & Redirects admin page (`/wp-admin/admin.php?page=metaseo_broken_link`).
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-9721
The Book a Room Event Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_form()/update_settings() functionality. The plugin's options page handler dispatches on the 'action' POST parameter and calls update_settings(), which persists plugin configuration (including the external database host, username, password, prefix, database name, encryption key, and registration page URL) via update_option(), without ever generating a nonce field in the settings form or verifying one (no wp_nonce_field(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_verify_nonce() exists anywhere in the plugin). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's database connection settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
π@cveNotify
The Book a Room Event Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_form()/update_settings() functionality. The plugin's options page handler dispatches on the 'action' POST parameter and calls update_settings(), which persists plugin configuration (including the external database host, username, password, prefix, database name, encryption key, and registration page URL) via update_option(), without ever generating a nonce field in the settings form or verifying one (no wp_nonce_field(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_verify_nonce() exists anywhere in the plugin). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's database connection settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-9724
The MotorDesk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the motordesk_admin_home function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's configuration settings, including the search page URI and custom template directory path via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
π@cveNotify
The MotorDesk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the motordesk_admin_home function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's configuration settings, including the search page URI and custom template directory path via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-56052
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in FunnelKit Funnel Builder by FunnelKit allows Blind SQL Injection.
This issue affects Funnel Builder by FunnelKit: from n/a through 3.15.0.5.
π@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in FunnelKit Funnel Builder by FunnelKit allows Blind SQL Injection.
This issue affects Funnel Builder by FunnelKit: from n/a through 3.15.0.5.
π@cveNotify
Patchstack
SQL Injection in WordPress Funnel Builder by FunnelKit Plugin
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress, Drupal and Joomla security issues.
π¨ CVE-2026-7761
The Ultimate Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Account Takeover via Password Reset Link Disclosure in all versions up to and including 2.11.4. This is due to a chain of three logic bugs: (1) an MD5 hash fallback in get_directory_by_hash() that allows any post to be used as a member directory by computing SUBSTRING(MD5(post_id), 11, 5), (2) a strstr() parsing logic flaw in post_data() that allows bypassing WordPress's protected meta key restrictions by placing '_um_' anywhere in the meta key name rather than at the start, and (3) missing field name validation in build_user_card_data() that allows arbitrary field names including 'password_reset_link' to be passed to um_filtered_value(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to create a malicious post via XMLRPC with crafted meta fields, use the MD5 fallback to point the member directory AJAX handler to their post, inject 'password_reset_link' into the tagline_fields configuration, and leak live password reset URLs for all users in the member directory response, including administrators.
π@cveNotify
The Ultimate Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Account Takeover via Password Reset Link Disclosure in all versions up to and including 2.11.4. This is due to a chain of three logic bugs: (1) an MD5 hash fallback in get_directory_by_hash() that allows any post to be used as a member directory by computing SUBSTRING(MD5(post_id), 11, 5), (2) a strstr() parsing logic flaw in post_data() that allows bypassing WordPress's protected meta key restrictions by placing '_um_' anywhere in the meta key name rather than at the start, and (3) missing field name validation in build_user_card_data() that allows arbitrary field names including 'password_reset_link' to be passed to um_filtered_value(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to create a malicious post via XMLRPC with crafted meta fields, use the MD5 fallback to point the member directory AJAX handler to their post, inject 'password_reset_link' into the tagline_fields configuration, and leak live password reset URLs for all users in the member directory response, including administrators.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-12242
The AdRotate Banner Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 5.17.7 via the 'banner' attribute of the adrotate shortcode. This is due to insufficient input validation and sanitization of the banner shortcode attribute before concatenation into a PHP code string wrapped in W3 Total Cache mfunc or Borlabs Cache fragment markers. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server. This vulnerability requires W3 Total Cache or Borlabs Cache support to be enabled in AdRotate settings.
π@cveNotify
The AdRotate Banner Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 5.17.7 via the 'banner' attribute of the adrotate shortcode. This is due to insufficient input validation and sanitization of the banner shortcode attribute before concatenation into a PHP code string wrapped in W3 Total Cache mfunc or Borlabs Cache fragment markers. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server. This vulnerability requires W3 Total Cache or Borlabs Cache support to be enabled in AdRotate settings.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-56223
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-domain SSO account takeover vulnerability in the provision-user endpoint that allows attackers to merge arbitrary victim accounts based on email match without validating SSO provider domain authorization. An attacker with enterprise org admin access and a malicious IdP can forge SAML assertions containing victim email addresses to trigger account merge and gain full access to victim accounts, organizations, and data.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-domain SSO account takeover vulnerability in the provision-user endpoint that allows attackers to merge arbitrary victim accounts based on email match without validating SSO provider domain authorization. An attacker with enterprise org admin access and a malicious IdP can forge SAML assertions containing victim email addresses to trigger account merge and gain full access to victim accounts, organizations, and data.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Cross-Domain SSO Email Assertion Allows Account Takeover via Identity Merge in provision-user
## Summary
The SSO user provisioning merge path in `provision-user.ts` transfers SSO identities and deletes duplicate accounts based solely on email address match without verifying that the auth...
The SSO user provisioning merge path in `provision-user.ts` transfers SSO identities and deletes duplicate accounts based solely on email address match without verifying that the auth...
π¨ CVE-2026-56231
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the POST /build/start/:jobId and POST /build/cancel/:jobId endpoints. The handlers authorize the request based only on the attacker-controlled app_id supplied in the request body and never verify that the jobId in the URL belongs to that app_id (or the same tenant/org) before issuing privileged builder commands with the server-held builder API key. An authenticated user with the app.build_native permission for any app they control can start or cancel arbitrary builder jobs belonging to other tenants by supplying a victim jobId, resulting in cross-tenant build sabotage (denial of service), unauthorized compute actions, and potential billing impact.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the POST /build/start/:jobId and POST /build/cancel/:jobId endpoints. The handlers authorize the request based only on the attacker-controlled app_id supplied in the request body and never verify that the jobId in the URL belongs to that app_id (or the same tenant/org) before issuing privileged builder commands with the server-held builder API key. An authenticated user with the app.build_native permission for any app they control can start or cancel arbitrary builder jobs belonging to other tenants by supplying a victim jobId, resulting in cross-tenant build sabotage (denial of service), unauthorized compute actions, and potential billing impact.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Cross-tenant build job control (cancel/start) via jobId parameter enables build sabotage (BOLA)
### Summary
An authenticated user who has app.build_native permission for any app they control can invoke start and cancel actions against an arbitrary builder job by providing a victim jobId in t...
An authenticated user who has app.build_native permission for any app they control can invoke start and cancel actions against an arbitrary builder job by providing a victim jobId in t...
π¨ CVE-2026-56232
Capgo before 12.128.2 fails to enforce limited_to_orgs and limited_to_apps constraints on subkeys provided via x-limited-key-id header in middlewareKey function. Attackers can bypass subkey scope restrictions by referencing their own subkeys, causing all downstream route handlers to use the unrestricted parent key instead of the scoped subkey.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 fails to enforce limited_to_orgs and limited_to_apps constraints on subkeys provided via x-limited-key-id header in middlewareKey function. Attackers can bypass subkey scope restrictions by referencing their own subkeys, causing all downstream route handlers to use the unrestricted parent key instead of the scoped subkey.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
MiddlewareKey x-limited-key-id subkey scope bypass: limited_to_orgs and limited_to_apps constraints are completely ignored (+ missingβ¦
### Summary
`middlewareKey()` in `hono_middleware.ts` accepts `x-limited-key-id` subkeys but never enforces their `limited_to_orgs` or `limited_to_apps` scope constraints. The subkey is loaded a...
`middlewareKey()` in `hono_middleware.ts` accepts `x-limited-key-id` subkeys but never enforces their `limited_to_orgs` or `limited_to_apps` scope constraints. The subkey is loaded a...
π¨ CVE-2026-56244
Capgo before 12.128.2 allows non-admin API keys to read webhook signing secrets via Supabase REST due to insufficient row-level security policies on the webhooks table. Attackers can retrieve the webhook secret and forge valid X-Capgo-Signature headers to send authenticated webhook events to configured receivers, breaking webhook authenticity and integrity.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 allows non-admin API keys to read webhook signing secrets via Supabase REST due to insufficient row-level security policies on the webhooks table. Attackers can retrieve the webhook secret and forge valid X-Capgo-Signature headers to send authenticated webhook events to configured receivers, breaking webhook authenticity and integrity.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Non-admin API keys can read webhook signing secrets (webhooks.secret) via Supabase REST, enabling forged Capgo webhooks
### Summary
A read-only / non-admin Capgo API key can query Supabase REST (/rest/v1/webhooks) and retrieve the webhook signing secret (whsec_*). With this secret, an attacker can generate valid X-...
A read-only / non-admin Capgo API key can query Supabase REST (/rest/v1/webhooks) and retrieve the webhook signing secret (whsec_*). With this secret, an attacker can generate valid X-...
π¨ CVE-2026-56245
Supabase Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER record_build_time RPC function that allows unauthenticated attackers to insert arbitrary build-time records. Attackers can exploit this by calling POST /rest/v1/rpc/record_build_time with a public API key to poison billing and quota data for any organization, enabling resource exhaustion and cross-tenant billing manipulation.
π@cveNotify
Supabase Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER record_build_time RPC function that allows unauthenticated attackers to insert arbitrary build-time records. Attackers can exploit this by calling POST /rest/v1/rpc/record_build_time with a public API key to poison billing and quota data for any organization, enabling resource exhaustion and cross-tenant billing manipulation.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Unauthenticated SECURITY DEFINER RPC record_build_time allows cross-tenant build-time accounting poisoning (billing/quota impact)
### Summary
An unauthenticated attacker using only the public Supabase sb_publishable_* key can call POST /rest/v1/rpc/record_build_time (granted to anon) to insert/update rows in public.build_log...
An unauthenticated attacker using only the public Supabase sb_publishable_* key can call POST /rest/v1/rpc/record_build_time (granted to anon) to insert/update rows in public.build_log...
π¨ CVE-2026-56256
Capgo before 12.128.2 enforces mandatory two-factor authentication only at the UI level. Sensitive Organization (ORG) management API endpoints (e.g., editing organization details, inviting users) do not validate 2FA completion on the backend. An authenticated Admin user who has not enabled 2FA can replay or modify a previously captured ORG API request to perform privileged organization actions, bypassing the globally enforced 2FA requirement.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 enforces mandatory two-factor authentication only at the UI level. Sensitive Organization (ORG) management API endpoints (e.g., editing organization details, inviting users) do not validate 2FA completion on the backend. An authenticated Admin user who has not enabled 2FA can replay or modify a previously captured ORG API request to perform privileged organization actions, bypassing the globally enforced 2FA requirement.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
π‘οΈ Vulnerability Report: 2FA Enforcement Bypass β Admin Can Edit Organization & Invite Users Without Enabling 2FA
π‘οΈ Vulnerability Report: 2FA Enforcement Bypass β Admin Can Edit Organization & Invite Users Without Enabling 2FA
Reported by: Vikash Gupta
Severity: High
Category: Authentication Bypass /...
Reported by: Vikash Gupta
Severity: High
Category: Authentication Bypass /...
π¨ CVE-2026-56257
Capgo before 12.128.2 allows direct patching of public.apps.owner_org through PostgREST, bypassing the transfer_app() workflow and creating split-brain ownership. Attackers can directly update apps.owner_org while leaving app_versions.owner_org unchanged, enabling old-org keys to retain access to version data while new-org keys control the app record.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 allows direct patching of public.apps.owner_org through PostgREST, bypassing the transfer_app() workflow and creating split-brain ownership. Attackers can directly update apps.owner_org while leaving app_versions.owner_org unchanged, enabling old-org keys to retain access to version data while new-org keys control the app record.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Direct PostgREST update of public.apps.owner_org bypasses transfer_app() and leaves app_versions.owner_org with the previous organization
### Summary
A caller who can directly update `public.apps.owner_org` through PostgREST can bypass the intended `transfer_app()` workflow and create a split-brain ownership state for the same app...
A caller who can directly update `public.apps.owner_org` through PostgREST can bypass the intended `transfer_app()` workflow and create a split-brain ownership state for the same app...
π¨ CVE-2026-56302
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an unsecured images bucket lacking any row level security controls, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read, insert, and delete stored app icons. Remote attackers can exploit this misconfiguration to delete all icons and leak sensitive app IDs and user IDs.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an unsecured images bucket lacking any row level security controls, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read, insert, and delete stored app icons. Remote attackers can exploit this misconfiguration to delete all icons and leak sensitive app IDs and user IDs.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Unsecured supabase images bucket
### Summary
The `images` bucket is used to store app icons. Currently it is not secured with ANY RLS. This allows anyone to delete, insert, select from said bucket
### Details
Here is the expl...
The `images` bucket is used to store app icons. Currently it is not secured with ANY RLS. This allows anyone to delete, insert, select from said bucket
### Details
Here is the expl...
π¨ CVE-2026-56310
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the GET /organization/members endpoint that allows org-limited API keys to bypass limited_to_orgs restrictions. Attackers with org-limited API keys can read membership data including uid, email, image_url, role, and is_tmp from organizations outside their assigned scope.
π@cveNotify
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the GET /organization/members endpoint that allows org-limited API keys to bypass limited_to_orgs restrictions. Attackers with org-limited API keys can read membership data including uid, email, image_url, role, and is_tmp from organizations outside their assigned scope.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Org-limited API keys can bypass limited_to_orgs and read other organizationsβ member data via GET /organization/members
### Summary
An API key explicitly restricted to a single organization via `limited_to_orgs` can still read membership data for a different organization through `GET /organization/members`.
Th...
An API key explicitly restricted to a single organization via `limited_to_orgs` can still read membership data for a different organization through `GET /organization/members`.
Th...
π¨ CVE-2026-56337
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the public.exist_app_v2 RPC function that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate app_ids by calling POST /rest/v1/rpc/exist_app_v2 with arbitrary appid parameters. Remote attackers can exploit this SECURITY DEFINER function to determine whether specific app_ids exist in the public.apps table, enabling cross-tenant app enumeration and privacy violations.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the public.exist_app_v2 RPC function that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate app_ids by calling POST /rest/v1/rpc/exist_app_v2 with arbitrary appid parameters. Remote attackers can exploit this SECURITY DEFINER function to determine whether specific app_ids exist in the public.apps table, enabling cross-tenant app enumeration and privacy violations.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Unauthenticated Supabase RPC exist_app_v2(appid) (SECURITY DEFINER) bypasses RLS and reveals whether an app_id exists
### Summary
An anon client can call POST /rest/v1/rpc/exist_app_v2 and learn whether an arbitrary app_id exists in public.apps, enabling cross-tenant app enumeration/existence oracle.
### Detai...
An anon client can call POST /rest/v1/rpc/exist_app_v2 and learn whether an arbitrary app_id exists in public.apps, enabling cross-tenant app enumeration/existence oracle.
### Detai...
π¨ CVE-2026-56338
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the /auth/v1/otp endpoint that prevents email verification for two-factor authentication due to captcha validation failures. Authenticated users cannot complete 2FA enrollment as the backend consistently returns HTTP 500 errors with captcha verification process failed messages, blocking access to security controls.
π@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the /auth/v1/otp endpoint that prevents email verification for two-factor authentication due to captcha validation failures. Authenticated users cannot complete 2FA enrollment as the backend consistently returns HTTP 500 errors with captcha verification process failed messages, blocking access to security controls.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
2FA email verification fails due to captcha validation error (/auth/v1/otp returns 500)
### Summary
Email verification required for enabling 2FA consistently fails due to a server-side captcha validation error. When users click βSend verification codeβ, the backend returns an HTTP 50...
Email verification required for enabling 2FA consistently fails due to a server-side captcha validation error. When users click βSend verification codeβ, the backend returns an HTTP 50...