π¨ CVE-2026-12892
A flaw was found in GStreamer's gst-plugins-bad package. When processing a specially crafted H.264 video file containing malformed MVC or SVC extension slice NAL units, a 1-byte heap out-of-bounds read can occur during parsing. This happens when the parser attempts to check slice boundary information without first verifying that the NAL unit contains enough data beyond the extension header. An attacker could exploit this by tricking a user into opening a malicious H.264 video file, potentially causing the application to crash or leak a single byte of heap memory.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in GStreamer's gst-plugins-bad package. When processing a specially crafted H.264 video file containing malformed MVC or SVC extension slice NAL units, a 1-byte heap out-of-bounds read can occur during parsing. This happens when the parser attempts to check slice boundary information without first verifying that the NAL unit contains enough data beyond the extension header. An attacker could exploit this by tricking a user into opening a malicious H.264 video file, potentially causing the application to crash or leak a single byte of heap memory.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-46549
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.04.1, the OAuth token strategy attached oauth_scope and oauth_granted_resources to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricted scope (e.g. MCP-only) therefore inherited the full permissions of the underlying user across all routes; the granted_resources.base_id restriction was bypassed on org-level endpoints that don't populate req.context.base_id. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.04.1.
π@cveNotify
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.04.1, the OAuth token strategy attached oauth_scope and oauth_granted_resources to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricted scope (e.g. MCP-only) therefore inherited the full permissions of the underlying user across all routes; the granted_resources.base_id restriction was bypassed on org-level endpoints that don't populate req.context.base_id. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.04.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
OAuth Token Scope Not Enforced in ACL Layer
### Summary
The OAuth token strategy attached `oauth_scope` and `oauth_granted_resources` to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricte...
The OAuth token strategy attached `oauth_scope` and `oauth_granted_resources` to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricte...
π¨ CVE-2026-47279
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the public shared-view relation endpoints accepted a caller-supplied column ID without verifying that the column was visible in the shared view, so anyone holding a share UUID could read links from any LTAR column on the view's table β including columns the view owner had hidden. publicMmList, publicHmList, and relDataList already ensured that the requested column belonged to the view's model, but did not check the view-column entry's show flag. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the public shared-view relation endpoints accepted a caller-supplied column ID without verifying that the column was visible in the shared view, so anyone holding a share UUID could read links from any LTAR column on the view's table β including columns the view owner had hidden. publicMmList, publicHmList, and relDataList already ensured that the requested column belonged to the view's model, but did not check the view-column entry's show flag. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Hidden LTAR Column Exposure in Public Shared-View Relation Endpoints
### Summary
The public shared-view relation endpoints accepted a caller-supplied column
ID without verifying that the column was visible in the shared view, so
anyone holding a share UUID could rea...
The public shared-view relation endpoints accepted a caller-supplied column
ID without verifying that the column was visible in the shared view, so
anyone holding a share UUID could rea...
π¨ CVE-2026-47382
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the connection-test endpoint opened a raw TCP socket to the user-supplied database host without resolving and range-checking the destination, so private and link-local addresses (including IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms and localhost) reached the driver. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the connection-test endpoint opened a raw TCP socket to the user-supplied database host without resolving and range-checking the destination, so private and link-local addresses (including IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms and localhost) reached the driver. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Server-Side Request Forgery via Database Connection Host
### Summary
The connection-test endpoint opened a raw TCP socket to the user-supplied database
host without resolving and range-checking the destination, so private and link-local
addresses (includ...
The connection-test endpoint opened a raw TCP socket to the user-supplied database
host without resolving and range-checking the destination, so private and link-local
addresses (includ...
π¨ CVE-2026-47385
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, an authenticated user with base-create permission can attach a SQLite source pointing at an arbitrary file on the NocoDB host, including NocoDB's own internal databases. The SQLite client and the base/integration create services accepted a caller-supplied filename and passed it to fs.exists and fs.open('w') without restricting the location. A user could point a source at noco.db, at a tenant database under nc_minimal_dbs/, or at any writable path the NocoDB process can reach, and then read or overwrite its contents through the regular table APIs.This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, an authenticated user with base-create permission can attach a SQLite source pointing at an arbitrary file on the NocoDB host, including NocoDB's own internal databases. The SQLite client and the base/integration create services accepted a caller-supplied filename and passed it to fs.exists and fs.open('w') without restricting the location. A user could point a source at noco.db, at a tenant database under nc_minimal_dbs/, or at any writable path the NocoDB process can reach, and then read or overwrite its contents through the regular table APIs.This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Path Traversal via SQLite Source Filename
### Summary
An authenticated user with base-create permission can attach a SQLite source pointing at
an arbitrary file on the NocoDB host, including NocoDB's own internal databases.
### Detail...
An authenticated user with base-create permission can attach a SQLite source pointing at
an arbitrary file on the NocoDB host, including NocoDB's own internal databases.
### Detail...
π¨ CVE-2026-53928
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user's refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens β it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user's refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens β it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery
### Summary
A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh
JWTs even after the user reset their password.
### Details
`passwordChange` and `passwordRes...
A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh
JWTs even after the user reset their password.
### Details
`passwordChange` and `passwordRes...
π¨ CVE-2026-53930
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the base-migration endpoint accepted a caller-supplied URL that the migration worker dereferenced without enforcing protocol or destination, allowing scheme abuse (file:, ftp:, etc.) and probing of internal HTTP destinations. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the base-migration endpoint accepted a caller-supplied URL that the migration worker dereferenced without enforcing protocol or destination, allowing scheme abuse (file:, ftp:, etc.) and probing of internal HTTP destinations. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL
### Summary
The base-migration endpoint accepted a caller-supplied URL that the migration worker
dereferenced without enforcing protocol or destination, allowing scheme abuse
(`file:`, `ftp:`, e...
The base-migration endpoint accepted a caller-supplied URL that the migration worker
dereferenced without enforcing protocol or destination, allowing scheme abuse
(`file:`, `ftp:`, e...
π¨ CVE-2026-54516
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.21.0 until 2.21.4 and 3.1.4, POJOPropertiesCollector._renameProperties() allows a property with @JsonProperty("renamed") on the getter and @JsonIgnore on the setter to be renamed rather than dropped. With MapperFeature.INFER_PROPERTY_MUTATORS enabled (default), the private backing field is retained; during deserialization BeanDeserializerFactory.addBeanProps() sees hasField()==true, builds a FieldProperty, and makes the backing field writable. An attacker supplying the renamed JSON key writes the backing field directly, bypassing the @JsonIgnore on the setter. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.4.
π@cveNotify
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.21.0 until 2.21.4 and 3.1.4, POJOPropertiesCollector._renameProperties() allows a property with @JsonProperty("renamed") on the getter and @JsonIgnore on the setter to be renamed rather than dropped. With MapperFeature.INFER_PROPERTY_MUTATORS enabled (default), the private backing field is retained; during deserialization BeanDeserializerFactory.addBeanProps() sees hasField()==true, builds a FieldProperty, and makes the backing field writable. An attacker supplying the renamed JSON key writes the backing field directly, bypassing the @JsonIgnore on the setter. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.4.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Backport #5967: "Renamed `@JsonIgnore`d setters can deserialize via p⦠· FasterXML/jackson-databind@c3d56dd
β¦rivate fields" (#5968)
π¨ CVE-2026-12164
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.
π@cveNotify
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-56785
FlatPress contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
π@cveNotify
FlatPress contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - dilipk5/flatpressd-cms-sxss
Contribute to dilipk5/flatpressd-cms-sxss development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2026-5818
Incorrect check of function return value in Caliptra Core Runtime Firmware (ActivateFirmwareCmd::activate_fw modules) allows bypass of Caliptra Core's verification of the MCU FW during a hitless update.
This issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0.
π@cveNotify
Incorrect check of function return value in Caliptra Core Runtime Firmware (ActivateFirmwareCmd::activate_fw modules) allows bypass of Caliptra Core's verification of the MCU FW during a hitless update.
This issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
MCU Firmware Update Authentication Bypass on Caliptra Core
The firmware authorization check performed by Caliptra Core during MCU hitless update in activate_firmware is silently discarded. MCU is intended to independently validate this firmware update prio...
π¨ CVE-2026-6458
Missing cryptographic step in Caliptra Core Firmware (aes_256_gcm_update module) results in an incorrect GCM authentication tag. When the streaming AES-256-GCM API is used with empty AAD, the hardware GHASH accumulator state is not saved after the first update call, causing the final tag to exclude the first batch of processed ciphertext. Ciphertext produced by that call may be modified without the tag reflecting the change.
This issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0.
π@cveNotify
Missing cryptographic step in Caliptra Core Firmware (aes_256_gcm_update module) results in an incorrect GCM authentication tag. When the streaming AES-256-GCM API is used with empty AAD, the hardware GHASH accumulator state is not saved after the first update call, causing the final tag to exclude the first batch of processed ciphertext. Ciphertext produced by that call may be modified without the tag reflecting the change.
This issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
AES-256-GCM Authentication Tag Does Not Cover First Ciphertext Blocks When AAD Is Empty
The AES-256-GCM streaming operations exposed in the cryptographic mailbox discard the hardware GHASH state during the first update call if no AAD is provided. This can cause the final authenticatio...
π¨ CVE-2026-7574
Anthropic Claude Desktop Cowork VM image handling (confirmed across v1.1348.0 through v1.2278.0, including v1.1348.0, v1.1617.0, and v1.2278.0) validates only file presence and a version marker string before booting rootfs.img, but does not verify image content integrity at time-of-use. A local attacker with unprivileged code execution as the victim macOS user can modify the VM root filesystem image and have it trusted on subsequent Cowork VM boots, enabling persistent arbitrary code execution in the VM and access to host-mounted directories. The estimated CWE mapping is CWE-353 (Missing Support for Integrity Check).
π@cveNotify
Anthropic Claude Desktop Cowork VM image handling (confirmed across v1.1348.0 through v1.2278.0, including v1.1348.0, v1.1617.0, and v1.2278.0) validates only file presence and a version marker string before booting rootfs.img, but does not verify image content integrity at time-of-use. A local attacker with unprivileged code execution as the victim macOS user can modify the VM root filesystem image and have it trusted on subsequent Cowork VM boots, enabling persistent arbitrary code execution in the VM and access to host-mounted directories. The estimated CWE mapping is CWE-353 (Missing Support for Integrity Check).
π@cveNotify
cfp.recon.cx
Putting the Genie Back in the Bottle: Agentic Reverse Engineering of Claude's Security Architecture Recon 2026
The proliferation of AI agents is quickly becoming one of the foremost concerns of security teams. Engineering teams are clamoring for the increase in velocity afforded by AI coding agents. Non-technical teams have noticed, and employees of all job typesβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-54639
Style Dictionary, a build system for creating cross-platform styles, has a prototype pollution vulnerability starting in version 4.3.0 and prior to version 5.4.4. Impact users have: direct usage of `convertTokenData(tokens, { output: 'object' });`; indirect usage, via using Expand API; and/or indirect usage via SD's transform lifecycle. Impact is high for this when style-dictionary is used as an integration in a NodeJS server application. Impact is moderate for when style-dictionary is used as an integration in a Web application. Impact is low for most common cases where the user of style-dictionary also maintains the tokens, and access is limited via read/write access to the repository/workflows where it is used. A patch has been published in version `5.4.4`. The only known workaround is to sanitize token data first. Whether using DTCG format or old Style Dictionary format, check the token data object recursively for any object keys that include `__proto__`.
π@cveNotify
Style Dictionary, a build system for creating cross-platform styles, has a prototype pollution vulnerability starting in version 4.3.0 and prior to version 5.4.4. Impact users have: direct usage of `convertTokenData(tokens, { output: 'object' });`; indirect usage, via using Expand API; and/or indirect usage via SD's transform lifecycle. Impact is high for this when style-dictionary is used as an integration in a NodeJS server application. Impact is moderate for when style-dictionary is used as an integration in a Web application. Impact is low for most common cases where the user of style-dictionary also maintains the tokens, and access is limited via read/write access to the repository/workflows where it is used. A patch has been published in version `5.4.4`. The only known workaround is to sanitize token data first. Whether using DTCG format or old Style Dictionary format, check the token data object recursively for any object keys that include `__proto__`.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Add tokenMap props and convertTokenData utility (#1397) Β· style-dictionary/style-dictionary@209085d
A build system for creating cross-platform styles. - Add tokenMap props and convertTokenData utility (#1397) Β· style-dictionary/style-dictionary@209085d
π¨ CVE-2026-12681
Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input vulnerability in Google go-attestation. parseEfiSignatureList() does not advance the buffer past vendor bytes before reading entries. For hashSHA256SigGUID lists, this allows attacker-controlled vendor header bytes to be appended to the trusted SHA256 hash list. A crafted TPM event log could inject arbitrary SHA256 hashes into the verifier's trusted measurement database, enabling a remote attestation verifier to accept a compromised boot state. This issue affects go-attestation: through 0.6.0.
π@cveNotify
Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input vulnerability in Google go-attestation. parseEfiSignatureList() does not advance the buffer past vendor bytes before reading entries. For hashSHA256SigGUID lists, this allows attacker-controlled vendor header bytes to be appended to the trusted SHA256 hash list. A crafted TPM event log could inject arbitrary SHA256 hashes into the verifier's trusted measurement database, enabling a remote attestation verifier to accept a compromised boot state. This issue affects go-attestation: through 0.6.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
attest/internal: skip SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes in parseEfiSig⦠· google/go-attestation@b6e905e
β¦natureList (#502)
* attest/internal: skip SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes in parseEfiSignatureList
Per UEFI specification section 31.4.1, an EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST contains
SignatureHeaderSize byte...
* attest/internal: skip SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes in parseEfiSignatureList
Per UEFI specification section 31.4.1, an EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST contains
SignatureHeaderSize byte...
π¨ CVE-2026-3652
The ARForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `value` parameter of the `arf_save_incomplete_form_data` AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 7.1.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that will execute whenever an administrator views the "Partial Filled Form Entries" page in the ARForms dashboard.
π@cveNotify
The ARForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `value` parameter of the `arf_save_incomplete_form_data` AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 7.1.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that will execute whenever an administrator views the "Partial Filled Form Entries" page in the ARForms dashboard.
π@cveNotify
CodeCanyon
WordPress Contact Form Plugin/Form builder - ARForms
Top Selling WordPress Form Builder Plugin
ARForms is top selling WordPress form builder plugin of 2025. Build finest respons...
ARForms is top selling WordPress form builder plugin of 2025. Build finest respons...
π¨ CVE-2026-12485
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### IP field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v3 = strlen(g_network_config->ip_addr);
memcpy(&reply_buf[36], g_network_config->ip_addr, v3);
π@cveNotify
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### IP field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v3 = strlen(g_network_config->ip_addr);
memcpy(&reply_buf[36], g_network_config->ip_addr, v3);
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-12488
A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the GV-Cloud functionality of GeoVision GV-VMS V20 20.0.2.
A specially crafted network request can lead to a denial of service. An attacker can impersonate the legitimate server to trigger this vulnerability.
π@cveNotify
A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the GV-Cloud functionality of GeoVision GV-VMS V20 20.0.2.
A specially crafted network request can lead to a denial of service. An attacker can impersonate the legitimate server to trigger this vulnerability.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-12846
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### Net Mask field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v6 = strlen(g_network_config->net_mask);
memcpy(&reply_buf[184], g_network_config->net_mask, v6);
π@cveNotify
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### Net Mask field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v6 = strlen(g_network_config->net_mask);
memcpy(&reply_buf[184], g_network_config->net_mask, v6);
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-12847
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### Gateway field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v7 = strlen(g_network_config->gateway);
memcpy(&reply_buf[216], g_network_config->gateway, v7);
π@cveNotify
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### Gateway field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v7 = strlen(g_network_config->gateway);
memcpy(&reply_buf[216], g_network_config->gateway, v7);
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-12848
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### DNS field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v8 = strlen(g_network_config->dns_addr);
memcpy(&reply_buf[248], g_network_config->dns_addr, v8);
π@cveNotify
GV-I/O Box 4E is a smart embedded device with 4 input and 4 relays output that can be controlled over Ethernet and RS-485.
DVRSearch is a service running by default on the IOBox listening for UDP messages on port 10001. Any user on the network can send messages to this service and interact with it.
Upon receiving a UDP message, the server reads at most 1460 bytes into a local buffer and a pointer to the buffer is stored in a global variable:
#### DNS field stack overflow
The following code is vulnerable to a stack overflow that is attacker-controlled:
v8 = strlen(g_network_config->dns_addr);
memcpy(&reply_buf[248], g_network_config->dns_addr, v8);
π@cveNotify