🚨 CVE-2026-48506
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePackReader.TrySkip() recursively descends into nested arrays and maps without incrementing the reader depth or calling the configured depth checks. This bypasses MessagePackSecurity.MaximumObjectGraphDepth, the library's documented protection against deeply nested object graphs. Many generated and dynamic formatters call reader.Skip() when they encounter unknown map keys, unknown array members, ignored fields, or data that should be skipped for forward compatibility. A deeply nested value in one of these skipped positions can therefore cause unbounded recursion and an uncatchable StackOverflowException. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePackReader.TrySkip() recursively descends into nested arrays and maps without incrementing the reader depth or calling the configured depth checks. This bypasses MessagePackSecurity.MaximumObjectGraphDepth, the library's documented protection against deeply nested object graphs. Many generated and dynamic formatters call reader.Skip() when they encounter unknown map keys, unknown array members, ignored fields, or data that should be skipped for forward compatibility. A deeply nested value in one of these skipped positions can therefore cause unbounded recursion and an uncatchable StackOverflowException. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
MessagePackReader.Skip can recurse without enforcing maximum object graph depth
## Summary
`MessagePackReader.TrySkip()` recursively descends into nested arrays and maps without incrementing the reader depth or calling the configured depth checks. This bypasses `MessagePack...
`MessagePackReader.TrySkip()` recursively descends into nested arrays and maps without incrementing the reader depth or calling the configured depth checks. This bypasses `MessagePack...
🚨 CVE-2026-48509
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, the parameterless MessagePackInputFormatter() constructor uses default serializer options, which resolve to MessagePackSerializerOptions.Standard with MessagePackSecurity.TrustedData. The formatter is designed for ASP.NET Core MVC request bodies, which commonly cross an HTTP trust boundary. This insecure default can expose applications to denial-of-service attacks that MessagePackSecurity.UntrustedData is intended to mitigate, such as hash-collision attacks against dictionary-like model properties. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, the parameterless MessagePackInputFormatter() constructor uses default serializer options, which resolve to MessagePackSerializerOptions.Standard with MessagePackSecurity.TrustedData. The formatter is designed for ASP.NET Core MVC request bodies, which commonly cross an HTTP trust boundary. This insecure default can expose applications to denial-of-service attacks that MessagePackSecurity.UntrustedData is intended to mitigate, such as hash-collision attacks against dictionary-like model properties. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
ASP.NET Core MessagePackInputFormatter defaults to TrustedData for HTTP request bodies
## Summary
The parameterless `MessagePackInputFormatter()` constructor uses default serializer options, which resolve to `MessagePackSerializerOptions.Standard` with `MessagePackSecurity.Trusted...
The parameterless `MessagePackInputFormatter()` constructor uses default serializer options, which resolve to `MessagePackSerializerOptions.Standard` with `MessagePackSecurity.Trusted...
🚨 CVE-2026-48510
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, when MessagePack-CSharp decompresses Lz4Block or Lz4BlockArray payloads, it reads declared uncompressed lengths from the wire and allocates output buffers based on those lengths before validating that the compressed data is valid or that the declared expansion is reasonable. A small payload can claim a very large uncompressed length and force a large allocation before LZ4 decoding begins. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, when MessagePack-CSharp decompresses Lz4Block or Lz4BlockArray payloads, it reads declared uncompressed lengths from the wire and allocates output buffers based on those lengths before validating that the compressed data is valid or that the declared expansion is reasonable. A small payload can claim a very large uncompressed length and force a large allocation before LZ4 decoding begins. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
LZ4 decompression allocates from unbounded declared output lengths
## Summary
When MessagePack-CSharp decompresses `Lz4Block` or `Lz4BlockArray` payloads, it reads declared uncompressed lengths from the wire and allocates output buffers based on those lengths b...
When MessagePack-CSharp decompresses `Lz4Block` or `Lz4BlockArray` payloads, it reads declared uncompressed lengths from the wire and allocates output buffers based on those lengths b...
🚨 CVE-2026-48511
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, ExpandoObjectFormatter.Deserialize populates System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject by calling IDictionary<string, object>.Add for each map entry. ExpandoObject internally maintains member names in array-like structures, so inserting many distinct keys can require repeated linear scans and array copies. For large attacker-controlled maps, this produces quadratic CPU and allocation behavior. The issue is especially surprising because ExpandoObjectResolver.Options is configured with MessagePackSecurity.UntrustedData, but collision-resistant dictionary comparers cannot protect ExpandoObject insertion internals. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, ExpandoObjectFormatter.Deserialize populates System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject by calling IDictionary<string, object>.Add for each map entry. ExpandoObject internally maintains member names in array-like structures, so inserting many distinct keys can require repeated linear scans and array copies. For large attacker-controlled maps, this produces quadratic CPU and allocation behavior. The issue is especially surprising because ExpandoObjectResolver.Options is configured with MessagePackSecurity.UntrustedData, but collision-resistant dictionary comparers cannot protect ExpandoObject insertion internals. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
ExpandoObject formatter can perform quadratic insertion work on untrusted maps
## Summary
`ExpandoObjectFormatter.Deserialize` populates `System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject` by calling `IDictionary<string, object>.Add` for each map entry. `ExpandoObject` internally maintai...
`ExpandoObjectFormatter.Deserialize` populates `System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject` by calling `IDictionary<string, object>.Add` for each map entry. `ExpandoObject` internally maintai...
🚨 CVE-2026-48512
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePack-CSharp's JSON conversion helpers contain multiple recursion paths that do not consistently enforce a depth limit. These paths are in the JSON conversion component rather than normal typed MessagePack deserialization. MessagePackSerializer.ConvertFromJson recursively processes nested JSON arrays and objects in FromJsonCore() without consulting MessagePackSecurity.MaximumObjectGraphDepth. TinyJsonReader.ReadNextToken() recursively consumes comma and colon separator characters, allowing even malformed JSON with long separator runs to consume one stack frame per character. MessagePackSerializer.ConvertToJson applies depth checks to arrays and maps, but the typeless extension branch for ext-100 recursively calls ToJsonCore() without applying MessagePackSecurity.DepthStep(ref reader). Each path can allow attacker-controlled input to exhaust the process stack and trigger an uncatchable StackOverflowException instead of failing with a catchable parse or serialization exception. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePack-CSharp's JSON conversion helpers contain multiple recursion paths that do not consistently enforce a depth limit. These paths are in the JSON conversion component rather than normal typed MessagePack deserialization. MessagePackSerializer.ConvertFromJson recursively processes nested JSON arrays and objects in FromJsonCore() without consulting MessagePackSecurity.MaximumObjectGraphDepth. TinyJsonReader.ReadNextToken() recursively consumes comma and colon separator characters, allowing even malformed JSON with long separator runs to consume one stack frame per character. MessagePackSerializer.ConvertToJson applies depth checks to arrays and maps, but the typeless extension branch for ext-100 recursively calls ToJsonCore() without applying MessagePackSecurity.DepthStep(ref reader). Each path can allow attacker-controlled input to exhaust the process stack and trigger an uncatchable StackOverflowException instead of failing with a catchable parse or serialization exception. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
JSON conversion APIs can recurse without consistent depth enforcement
## Summary
MessagePack-CSharp's JSON conversion helpers contain multiple recursion paths that do not consistently enforce a depth limit. These paths are in the JSON conversion component rath...
MessagePack-CSharp's JSON conversion helpers contain multiple recursion paths that do not consistently enforce a depth limit. These paths are in the JSON conversion component rath...
🚨 CVE-2026-48514
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, UnsafeBlitFormatterBase<T>.Deserialize reads an attacker-controlled byteLength from an extension payload and allocates an array based on that value before validating it against the extension header length or remaining payload bytes. The outer extension header is bounded by available input, but that bound is not used to constrain the inner byteLength before allocation. A very small payload can therefore request a very large T[] allocation. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, UnsafeBlitFormatterBase<T>.Deserialize reads an attacker-controlled byteLength from an extension payload and allocates an array based on that value before validating it against the extension header length or remaining payload bytes. The outer extension header is bounded by available input, but that bound is not used to constrain the inner byteLength before allocation. A very small payload can therefore request a very large T[] allocation. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Unity unsafe blit formatter allocates from unbounded byte length
## Summary
`UnsafeBlitFormatterBase<T>.Deserialize` reads an attacker-controlled `byteLength` from an extension payload and allocates an array based on that value before validating it agai...
`UnsafeBlitFormatterBase<T>.Deserialize` reads an attacker-controlled `byteLength` from an extension payload and allocates an array based on that value before validating it agai...
🚨 CVE-2026-48515
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePack-CSharp's multi-dimensional array formatters read dimension lengths directly from the payload and allocate T[,], T[,,], or T[,,,] before validating that the dimension product matches the encoded element count. The formatter reads a guarded element array header, but allocation of the target multi-dimensional array happens before the dimensions are checked against that element count. A small payload can therefore declare large dimensions, provide an empty or tiny inner array, and cause a large heap allocation before element data is validated. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePack-CSharp's multi-dimensional array formatters read dimension lengths directly from the payload and allocate T[,], T[,,], or T[,,,] before validating that the dimension product matches the encoded element count. The formatter reads a guarded element array header, but allocation of the target multi-dimensional array happens before the dimensions are checked against that element count. A small payload can therefore declare large dimensions, provide an empty or tiny inner array, and cause a large heap allocation before element data is validated. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Multi-dimensional array formatters allocate from unchecked dimensions
## Summary
MessagePack-CSharp's multi-dimensional array formatters read dimension lengths directly from the payload and allocate `T[,]`, `T[,,]`, or `T[,,,]` before validating that the dimen...
MessagePack-CSharp's multi-dimensional array formatters read dimension lengths directly from the payload and allocate `T[,]`, `T[,,]`, or `T[,,,]` before validating that the dimen...
🚨 CVE-2026-48516
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, InterfaceLookupFormatter<TKey,TElement> constructs an internal Dictionary<TKey, IGrouping<TKey,TElement>> with the default equality comparer instead of the security-aware comparer supplied by options.Security.GetEqualityComparer<TKey>(). This formatter omission allows hash-collision CPU denial of service against ILookup<TKey,TElement> even when the application has opted into the untrusted-data security posture This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, InterfaceLookupFormatter<TKey,TElement> constructs an internal Dictionary<TKey, IGrouping<TKey,TElement>> with the default equality comparer instead of the security-aware comparer supplied by options.Security.GetEqualityComparer<TKey>(). This formatter omission allows hash-collision CPU denial of service against ILookup<TKey,TElement> even when the application has opted into the untrusted-data security posture This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
InterfaceLookupFormatter bypasses collision-resistant comparer settings
## Summary
`InterfaceLookupFormatter<TKey,TElement>` constructs an internal `Dictionary<TKey, IGrouping<TKey,TElement>>` with the default equality comparer instead of the secur...
`InterfaceLookupFormatter<TKey,TElement>` constructs an internal `Dictionary<TKey, IGrouping<TKey,TElement>>` with the default equality comparer instead of the secur...
🚨 CVE-2026-48517
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePack-CSharp's typeless deserialization includes MessagePackSerializerOptions.ThrowIfDeserializingTypeIsDisallowed(Type) as a safety check for dangerous types. The default implementation checks the outer type name, but it does not recursively inspect array element types or generic type arguments. As a result, a type that would be blocked directly can be wrapped inside an array or constructed generic type and pass the outer type check. The formatter machinery can then materialize formatters for the inner blocked type. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePack-CSharp's typeless deserialization includes MessagePackSerializerOptions.ThrowIfDeserializingTypeIsDisallowed(Type) as a safety check for dangerous types. The default implementation checks the outer type name, but it does not recursively inspect array element types or generic type arguments. As a result, a type that would be blocked directly can be wrapped inside an array or constructed generic type and pass the outer type check. The formatter machinery can then materialize formatters for the inner blocked type. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Typeless deserialization type restrictions do not recurse into arrays or generic arguments
## Summary
MessagePack-CSharp's typeless deserialization includes `MessagePackSerializerOptions.ThrowIfDeserializingTypeIsDisallowed(Type)` as a safety check for dangerous types. The default...
MessagePack-CSharp's typeless deserialization includes `MessagePackSerializerOptions.ThrowIfDeserializingTypeIsDisallowed(Type)` as a safety check for dangerous types. The default...
🚨 CVE-2026-54281
Nest is a framework for building scalable Node.js server-side applications. Prior to 11.1.24, an authentication bypass vulnerability exists in @nestjs/platform-fastify. When middleware is registered through NestJS's MiddlewareConsumer.forRoutes() API on the Fastify adapter, an unauthenticated client can bypass the Nest middleware registered for that route by simply appending a trailing slash (/) to the request URL. This bypass works on the default Fastify adapter configuration. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.1.24.
🎖@cveNotify
Nest is a framework for building scalable Node.js server-side applications. Prior to 11.1.24, an authentication bypass vulnerability exists in @nestjs/platform-fastify. When middleware is registered through NestJS's MiddlewareConsumer.forRoutes() API on the Fastify adapter, an unauthenticated client can bypass the Nest middleware registered for that route by simply appending a trailing slash (/) to the request URL. This bypass works on the default Fastify adapter configuration. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.1.24.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Middleware Bypass on Fastify via Trailing Slash
### Impact
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in `@nestjs/platform-fastify` (confirmed on version `11.1.24`, the latest available release at time of report). When middleware is regist...
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in `@nestjs/platform-fastify` (confirmed on version `11.1.24`, the latest available release at time of report). When middleware is regist...
🚨 CVE-2026-54911
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.13.0, ujson.dumps() (or ujson.dump() or ujson.encode()) have a reject_bytes=False option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.13.0.
🎖@cveNotify
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.13.0, ujson.dumps() (or ujson.dump() or ujson.encode()) have a reject_bytes=False option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.13.0.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
More UTF-8 validation for ujson.dumps(b"...", reject_bytes=False) · ultrajson/ultrajson@169eaf3
* Fix off by one errors in detecting end of string mid sequence
* Add missing check for codepoints > max unicode
* Add missing check for bad continuation bytes
* Add missing check for codepoints > max unicode
* Add missing check for bad continuation bytes
🚨 CVE-2026-55409
Filament is a collection of full-stack components for accelerated Laravel development. From 3.0.0 until 3.3.53, a disabled RichEditor field rendered its raw state without sanitizing HTML. Where the data stored in this field's state isn't sanitized already when the form state was filled, an attacker could plant malicious HTML or JavaScript and achieve XSS that executes for users who view the form. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.3.53.
🎖@cveNotify
Filament is a collection of full-stack components for accelerated Laravel development. From 3.0.0 until 3.3.53, a disabled RichEditor field rendered its raw state without sanitizing HTML. Where the data stored in this field's state isn't sanitized already when the form state was filled, an attacker could plant malicious HTML or JavaScript and achieve XSS that executes for users who view the form. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.3.53.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Disabled RichEditor field state can be used for XSS
In Filament v3, a disabled `RichEditor` field rendered its raw state without sanitizing HTML. Where the data stored in this field's state isn't sanitized already when the form state was fil...
🚨 CVE-2026-56221
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in cloudflare.ts where user-controlled values from API request bodies are interpolated directly into SQL query strings without sanitization or parameterization. Authenticated users with read-level API key permissions can inject arbitrary SQL through deviceIds, search, version_name, cursor, and actions parameters to access analytics data belonging to other users or applications.
🎖@cveNotify
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in cloudflare.ts where user-controlled values from API request bodies are interpolated directly into SQL query strings without sanitization or parameterization. Authenticated users with read-level API key permissions can inject arbitrary SQL through deviceIds, search, version_name, cursor, and actions parameters to access analytics data belonging to other users or applications.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
SQL Injection in Cloudflare Analytics Engine Queries (cloudflare.ts)
## Summary
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities exist in `supabase/functions/_backend/utils/cloudflare.ts`. User-controlled values from API request bodies are interpolated directly into SQL quer...
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities exist in `supabase/functions/_backend/utils/cloudflare.ts`. User-controlled values from API request bodies are interpolated directly into SQL quer...
🚨 CVE-2026-56255
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the POST /app/demo endpoint that allows authenticated users with org write permissions to create unlimited demo applications without rate limiting or quota enforcement. Attackers can repeatedly invoke this endpoint to generate approximately 138 database write operations per request, causing degraded performance, increased costs, and potential service instability.
🎖@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the POST /app/demo endpoint that allows authenticated users with org write permissions to create unlimited demo applications without rate limiting or quota enforcement. Attackers can repeatedly invoke this endpoint to generate approximately 138 database write operations per request, causing degraded performance, increased costs, and potential service instability.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Authenticated Resource Exhaustion (DoS) via Unlimited Demo App Creation (POST /app/demo)
## Summary
The `POST https://api.capgo.app/app/demo` endpoint allows an authenticated user (org `write` right) to create an unlimited number of “Demo Apps”. Each request performs large, determinis...
The `POST https://api.capgo.app/app/demo` endpoint allows an authenticated user (org `write` right) to create an unlimited number of “Demo Apps”. Each request performs large, determinis...
🚨 CVE-2026-56266
Crawl4AI before 0.8.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /crawl, /crawl/stream, /md, and /llm endpoints that fetch arbitrary user-supplied URLs without validation. Unauthenticated attackers can bypass the internal-address blocklist using IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints.
🎖@cveNotify
Crawl4AI before 0.8.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /crawl, /crawl/stream, /md, and /llm endpoints that fetch arbitrary user-supplied URLs without validation. Unauthenticated attackers can bypass the internal-address blocklist using IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - unclecode/crawl4ai: 🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open-source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. Don't be shy, join here: https://dis…
🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open-source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/jP8KfhDhyN - unclecode/crawl4ai
🚨 CVE-2026-56268
Flowise before 3.1.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/v1/chatflows/apikey/:apikey endpoint. When the keyonly query parameter is omitted (the default), the endpoint returns not only the chatflows bound to the supplied API key but also all chatflows across every workspace that have no API key assigned, because the underlying query lacks any workspace filter. An attacker with a valid API key for one workspace can therefore retrieve the full ChatFlow configuration (including flowData with system prompts and node configurations, chatbotConfig, apiConfig, and credential IDs) of unprotected chatflows belonging to other workspaces.
🎖@cveNotify
Flowise before 3.1.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/v1/chatflows/apikey/:apikey endpoint. When the keyonly query parameter is omitted (the default), the endpoint returns not only the chatflows bound to the supplied API key but also all chatflows across every workspace that have no API key assigned, because the underlying query lacks any workspace filter. An attacker with a valid API key for one workspace can therefore retrieve the full ChatFlow configuration (including flowData with system prompts and node configurations, chatbotConfig, apiConfig, and credential IDs) of unprotected chatflows belonging to other workspaces.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Cross-Workspace Chatflow Disclosure via chatflows/apikey Endpoint Returns All Unprotected Chatflows
## Summary
The `/api/v1/chatflows/apikey/:apikey` endpoint (whitelisted, accessible with API key auth only) returns all chatflows bound to the provided API key AND all chatflows across the entir...
The `/api/v1/chatflows/apikey/:apikey` endpoint (whitelisted, accessible with API key auth only) returns all chatflows bound to the provided API key AND all chatflows across the entir...
🚨 CVE-2026-56280
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains a privilege inversion vulnerability in GET /build/logs/:jobId that allows read-only API key holders to cancel running native builds. The endpoint registers an abort listener on the SSE stream that unconditionally invokes cancelBuildOnDisconnect() using the privileged server-side BUILDER_API_KEY when clients disconnect, bypassing the app.build_native permission check required by the explicit POST /build/cancel/:jobId endpoint. Attackers with read-only API keys can repeatedly disrupt native build operations and CI/CD workflows by opening the log stream and dropping the connection.
🎖@cveNotify
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains a privilege inversion vulnerability in GET /build/logs/:jobId that allows read-only API key holders to cancel running native builds. The endpoint registers an abort listener on the SSE stream that unconditionally invokes cancelBuildOnDisconnect() using the privileged server-side BUILDER_API_KEY when clients disconnect, bypassing the app.build_native permission check required by the explicit POST /build/cancel/:jobId endpoint. Attackers with read-only API keys can repeatedly disrupt native build operations and CI/CD workflows by opening the log stream and dropping the connection.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Read-only API key cancels running native builds via SSE disconnect privilege inversion in /build/logs/:jobId
<html><body>
<!--StartFragment--><html><head></head><body><h3>Summary</h3>
<p><code>GET /build/logs/:jobId</code> is guarde...
<!--StartFragment--><html><head></head><body><h3>Summary</h3>
<p><code>GET /build/logs/:jobId</code> is guarde...
🚨 CVE-2026-56306
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a weak parsing vulnerability in the x-limited-key-id header that allows attackers to bypass subkey enforcement by submitting malformed values, zero, or duplicate headers that result in NaN or falsy values. Remote attackers can manipulate the x-limited-key-id header to disable limited key scoping and execute requests using the main API key context instead of restricted subkey permissions.
🎖@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a weak parsing vulnerability in the x-limited-key-id header that allows attackers to bypass subkey enforcement by submitting malformed values, zero, or duplicate headers that result in NaN or falsy values. Remote attackers can manipulate the x-limited-key-id header to disable limited key scoping and execute requests using the main API key context instead of restricted subkey permissions.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
middlewareKey: x-limited-key-id weak parsing allows silent bypass/disable of subkey enforcement (NaN/0/duplicate header ambiguity)
### Summary
Endpoints protected by middlewareKey() support a “subkey” selection mechanism via the x-limited-key-id header. The current implementation parses the header using Number(headerValue) an...
Endpoints protected by middlewareKey() support a “subkey” selection mechanism via the x-limited-key-id header. The current implementation parses the header using Number(headerValue) an...
🚨 CVE-2026-56311
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the public.get_current_plan_max_org RPC function that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve arbitrary organization plan limits. Attackers can call the RPC endpoint with any organization UUID using only the public Supabase key to disclose billing information including MAU, bandwidth, storage, and build time limits for any organization.
🎖@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the public.get_current_plan_max_org RPC function that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve arbitrary organization plan limits. Attackers can call the RPC endpoint with any organization UUID using only the public Supabase key to disclose billing information including MAU, bandwidth, storage, and build time limits for any organization.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Unauthenticated cross-tenant disclosure of org plan limits via Supabase RPC public.get_current_plan_max_org(uuid) (GRANT to anon)
### Summary
An unauthenticated attacker (using only the public Supabase sb_publishable_* key) can call POST /rest/v1/rpc/get_current_plan_max_org with an arbitrary orgid and retrieve that organiza...
An unauthenticated attacker (using only the public Supabase sb_publishable_* key) can call POST /rest/v1/rpc/get_current_plan_max_org with an arbitrary orgid and retrieve that organiza...
🚨 CVE-2026-56314
Capgo before 12.128.12 fails to filter deleted app versions when joining channels during /updates resolution, allowing deleted bundles to remain selectable. Attackers can continue deploying deleted bundles to devices by exploiting the missing app_versions.deleted filter in channel version joins.
🎖@cveNotify
Capgo before 12.128.12 fails to filter deleted app versions when joining channels during /updates resolution, allowing deleted bundles to remain selectable. Attackers can continue deploying deleted bundles to devices by exploiting the missing app_versions.deleted filter in channel version joins.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Deleted bundles remain selectable by /updates because channel version joins do not exclude app_versions.deleted=true
### Summary
An authenticated app user can delete a bundle through the normal backend API, but devices querying `/updates` can still be routed to that deleted bundle if any channel still referenc...
An authenticated app user can delete a bundle through the normal backend API, but devices querying `/updates` can still be routed to that deleted bundle if any channel still referenc...
🚨 CVE-2026-56321
Capgo (backend Supabase edge functions) before 12.128.2 does not apply the global authentication middleware to the GET /private/role_bindings/:org_id endpoint, unlike the POST and DELETE role_bindings routes, so unauthenticated requests reach the handler instead of being rejected at the middleware layer. The handler still performs its own authorization check and returns Unauthorized, so no direct data exposure occurs; the flaw is inconsistent authentication enforcement across HTTP methods that could enable authorization bypass if the handler logic changes.
🎖@cveNotify
Capgo (backend Supabase edge functions) before 12.128.2 does not apply the global authentication middleware to the GET /private/role_bindings/:org_id endpoint, unlike the POST and DELETE role_bindings routes, so unauthenticated requests reach the handler instead of being rejected at the middleware layer. The handler still performs its own authorization check and returns Unauthorized, so no direct data exposure occurs; the flaw is inconsistent authentication enforcement across HTTP methods that could enable authorization bypass if the handler logic changes.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Missing authentication middleware on GET /private/role_bindings/:org_id (inconsistent auth enforcement)
### Summary
The GET /functions/v1/private/role_bindings/:org_id endpoint is missing the global middlewareAuth used by other /private routes.
While the handler performs an internal authorization c...
The GET /functions/v1/private/role_bindings/:org_id endpoint is missing the global middlewareAuth used by other /private routes.
While the handler performs an internal authorization c...