π¨ CVE-2026-22899
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 6. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5208 and later
π@cveNotify
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 6. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5208 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-24716
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:
QTS 5.2.9.3492 build 20260507 and later
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3499 build 20260514 and later
QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later
QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later
π@cveNotify
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:
QTS 5.2.9.3492 build 20260507 and later
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3499 build 20260514 and later
QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later
QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-24717
A path traversal vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to read the contents of unexpected files or system data.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:
QTS 5.2.9.3492 build 20260507 and later
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3499 build 20260514 and later
QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later
QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later
π@cveNotify
A path traversal vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to read the contents of unexpected files or system data.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:
QTS 5.2.9.3492 build 20260507 and later
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3499 build 20260514 and later
QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later
QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-24719
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:
QTS 5.2.9.3492 build 20260507 and later
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3499 build 20260514 and later
π@cveNotify
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:
QTS 5.2.9.3492 build 20260507 and later
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3499 build 20260514 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-24720
An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 6. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5243 and later
π@cveNotify
An allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 6. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to prevent other systems, applications, or processes from accessing the same type of resource.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5243 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-24724
An incorrect authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 6. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to bypass intended access restrictions.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5243 and later
π@cveNotify
An incorrect authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 6. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to bypass intended access restrictions.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5243 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-26237
A missing authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect QuMagie. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to access unauthorized data or perform unauthorized actions.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
QuMagie 2.9.0 and later
π@cveNotify
A missing authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect QuMagie. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to access unauthorized data or perform unauthorized actions.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
QuMagie 2.9.0 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-26239
A buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 5. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5208 and later
π@cveNotify
A buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 5. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
File Station 5 5.5.6.5208 and later
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-10846
NLnet Labs ldns 1.2.0 up to and including versions 1.9.0, when used in applications as (stub) resolver over UDP, lacks matching the query destination address and port with the response source address and port. Furthermore not the query ID, neither the question of the query is matched with that of the response. This makes applications, that use ldns for (stub) resolver functionality over UDP, vulnerable for off-path poisoning attacks. The drill tool, which is shipped with ldns, suffers from this vulnerability.
π@cveNotify
NLnet Labs ldns 1.2.0 up to and including versions 1.9.0, when used in applications as (stub) resolver over UDP, lacks matching the query destination address and port with the response source address and port. Furthermore not the query ID, neither the question of the query is matched with that of the response. This makes applications, that use ldns for (stub) resolver functionality over UDP, vulnerable for off-path poisoning attacks. The drill tool, which is shipped with ldns, suffers from this vulnerability.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-11815
An attacker who intercepts and tampers with traffic between the client application and the API Gateway server could potentially deserialize arbitrary objects. This vulnerability could lead to broken security expectations or remote code execution.
π@cveNotify
An attacker who intercepts and tampers with traffic between the client application and the API Gateway server could potentially deserialize arbitrary objects. This vulnerability could lead to broken security expectations or remote code execution.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-29114
A vulnerability has been found in some Dahua products. An attacker
may obtain the deviceβs CA root certificate. If that CA is installed and
trusted on client systems, the attacker could issue fraudulent certificates
trusted by those clients and undermine the certificate trust chain.
π@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in some Dahua products. An attacker
may obtain the deviceβs CA root certificate. If that CA is installed and
trusted on client systems, the attacker could issue fraudulent certificates
trusted by those clients and undermine the certificate trust chain.
π@cveNotify
Dahua Technology
DHCC-SA-202606-001: Security Advisory β Vulnerabilities found in some Dahua products
CVE-2026-29114, CVE-2026-29115, CVE-2026-29116
π¨ CVE-2026-29115
A vulnerability has been found in some Dahua products could allow an authenticated remote attacker to send a specially crafted packet, triggering an exception that causes the system to reboot unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service.
π@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in some Dahua products could allow an authenticated remote attacker to send a specially crafted packet, triggering an exception that causes the system to reboot unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service.
π@cveNotify
Dahua Technology
DHCC-SA-202606-001: Security Advisory β Vulnerabilities found in some Dahua products
CVE-2026-29114, CVE-2026-29115, CVE-2026-29116
π¨ CVE-2026-29116
A vulnerability has been found in some Dahua products could
allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to send a specially crafted packet,
triggering an exception that causes the system to reboot unexpectedly,
resulting in a denial of service.
π@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in some Dahua products could
allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to send a specially crafted packet,
triggering an exception that causes the system to reboot unexpectedly,
resulting in a denial of service.
π@cveNotify
Dahua Technology
DHCC-SA-202606-001: Security Advisory β Vulnerabilities found in some Dahua products
CVE-2026-29114, CVE-2026-29115, CVE-2026-29116
π¨ CVE-2026-3326
The Xstore WordPress theme before 9.7.3 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement via an AJAX action available to unauthenticated users, leading to a SQL injection
π@cveNotify
The Xstore WordPress theme before 9.7.3 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement via an AJAX action available to unauthenticated users, leading to a SQL injection
π@cveNotify
WPScan
XStore < 9.7.3 - Unauthenticated SQLi
See details on XStore < 9.7.3 - Unauthenticated SQLi CVE 2026-3326. View the latest Theme Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-8071
The Anti-Spam by CleanTalk. Spam protection WordPress plugin before 6.79 does not properly sanitize content within a custom shortcode used in its email-encoding feature, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts into approved comments that will execute when any user (including administrators) views the post.
π@cveNotify
The Anti-Spam by CleanTalk. Spam protection WordPress plugin before 6.79 does not properly sanitize content within a custom shortcode used in its email-encoding feature, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts into approved comments that will execute when any user (including administrators) views the post.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Spam protection, Honeypot, Anti-Spam by CleanTalk < 6.79 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via Comment Shortcode Bypass
See details on Spam protection, Honeypot, Anti-Spam by CleanTalk < 6.79 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via Comment Shortcode Bypass CVE 2026-8071. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-9060
The Store Locator WordPress plugin before 1.6.6 does not sanitize and escape one of its settings before storing it and outputting it on the Store Locator WordPress plugin before 1.6.6 admin page, allowing high-privileged users such as administrators to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the `unfiltered_html` capability is disallowed (e.g. in a multisite network where the super admin visits the page).
π@cveNotify
The Store Locator WordPress plugin before 1.6.6 does not sanitize and escape one of its settings before storing it and outputting it on the Store Locator WordPress plugin before 1.6.6 admin page, allowing high-privileged users such as administrators to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the `unfiltered_html` capability is disallowed (e.g. in a multisite network where the super admin visits the page).
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Agile Store Locator < 1.6.6 - Admin+ Stored XSS via map_style
See details on Agile Store Locator < 1.6.6 - Admin+ Stored XSS via map_style CVE 2026-9060. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-9067
The Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP WordPress plugin before 1.60 does not check user capabilities on its frontend AJAX file-upload handlers and does not validate the actual content of uploaded files against the endpoint's intended media type, allowing unauthenticated users to upload any file type accepted by WordPress's media library through endpoints that should only accept images or videos.
π@cveNotify
The Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP WordPress plugin before 1.60 does not check user capabilities on its frontend AJAX file-upload handlers and does not validate the actual content of uploaded files against the endpoint's intended media type, allowing unauthenticated users to upload any file type accepted by WordPress's media library through endpoints that should only accept images or videos.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP < 1.60 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Media Upload
See details on Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP < 1.60 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Media Upload CVE 2026-9067. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-4775
A flaw was found in the libtiff library. A remote attacker could exploit a signed integer overflow vulnerability in the putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function by providing a specially crafted TIFF file. This flaw can lead to an out-of-bounds heap write due to incorrect memory pointer calculations, potentially causing a denial of service (application crash) or arbitrary code execution.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the libtiff library. A remote attacker could exploit a signed integer overflow vulnerability in the putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function by providing a specially crafted TIFF file. This flaw can lead to an out-of-bounds heap write due to incorrect memory pointer calculations, potentially causing a denial of service (application crash) or arbitrary code execution.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-34180
Issue summary: Parsing a crafted DER-encoded ASN.1 structure with a primitive
element whose content exceeds 2 gigabytes in length may cause a heap buffer
over-read on 64-bit Unix and Unix-like platforms.
Impact summary: The heap buffer over-read may crash the application (Denial of
Service) or to load into the decoded ASN.1 object contents of memory beyond the
end of the input buffer. More typically such ASN.1 elements would instead be
truncated.
An integer truncation in OpenSSL's ASN.1 decoder causes the content length of
an ASN.1 primitive element to be mishandled when it exceeds 2 gigabytes. In the
worst case the truncated length is treated as a request to scan the binary
content for a terminating zero byte, possibly causing OpenSSL to read either
less than or beyond the end of the allocated buffer.
Applications that pass attacker-supplied data to d2i_X509(), d2i_PKCS7(), or
any other d2i_* decoding function are affected. OpenSSL's own command-line
tools are not vulnerable, as data read through the BIO layer is checked before
it reaches the affected code. The issue only affects 64-bit Unix and Unix-like
platforms; 32-bit platforms and 64-bit Windows are not affected.
The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,
as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
π@cveNotify
Issue summary: Parsing a crafted DER-encoded ASN.1 structure with a primitive
element whose content exceeds 2 gigabytes in length may cause a heap buffer
over-read on 64-bit Unix and Unix-like platforms.
Impact summary: The heap buffer over-read may crash the application (Denial of
Service) or to load into the decoded ASN.1 object contents of memory beyond the
end of the input buffer. More typically such ASN.1 elements would instead be
truncated.
An integer truncation in OpenSSL's ASN.1 decoder causes the content length of
an ASN.1 primitive element to be mishandled when it exceeds 2 gigabytes. In the
worst case the truncated length is treated as a request to scan the binary
content for a terminating zero byte, possibly causing OpenSSL to read either
less than or beyond the end of the allocated buffer.
Applications that pass attacker-supplied data to d2i_X509(), d2i_PKCS7(), or
any other d2i_* decoding function are affected. OpenSSL's own command-line
tools are not vulnerable, as data read through the BIO layer is checked before
it reaches the affected code. The issue only affects 64-bit Unix and Unix-like
platforms; 32-bit platforms and 64-bit Windows are not affected.
The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,
as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Avoid length truncation in ASN1_STRING_set Β· openssl/openssl@1c6908e
The ASN1_STRING_set() function takes an `int` length, make sure the
argument is not inadvertently truncated when it is called from
asn1_ex_c2i().
Fixes CVE-2026-34180
Reviewed-by: Nikola Pajkovsk...
argument is not inadvertently truncated when it is called from
asn1_ex_c2i().
Fixes CVE-2026-34180
Reviewed-by: Nikola Pajkovsk...
π¨ CVE-2026-34181
Issue Summary: The PKCS#12 file processing fails to perform sufficient input
validation for files that use Password-Based Message Authentication Code 1
(PBMAC1) integrity mechanism allowing a certificate and private key forgery.
Impact Summary: An attacker impersonating a user can cause a service reading
PKCS#12 files to accept forged certificates and private keys with a 1 in 256
probability.
If a service accepting PKCS#12 files is using passwords for authenticating
the received files, the attacker can create unencrypted PKCS#12 files that
use PBMAC1 authentication that specifies an HMAC key of only one byte, allowing
them to craft a file that will be accepted with a 1 in 256 probability.
That would then cause the service to accept a certificate and private key
controlled by the attacker.
The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is
outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
π@cveNotify
Issue Summary: The PKCS#12 file processing fails to perform sufficient input
validation for files that use Password-Based Message Authentication Code 1
(PBMAC1) integrity mechanism allowing a certificate and private key forgery.
Impact Summary: An attacker impersonating a user can cause a service reading
PKCS#12 files to accept forged certificates and private keys with a 1 in 256
probability.
If a service accepting PKCS#12 files is using passwords for authenticating
the received files, the attacker can create unencrypted PKCS#12 files that
use PBMAC1 authentication that specifies an HMAC key of only one byte, allowing
them to craft a file that will be accepted with a 1 in 256 probability.
That would then cause the service to accept a certificate and private key
controlled by the attacker.
The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is
outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
pkcs12: verify that the pbmac1 key length is safe Β· openssl/openssl@0300eb9
Short mac keys (as short as 1 byte) can be used to probe the
system under attack to accept a PKCS#12 file created by an attacker
even if the attacker doesn't know the password used for MAC ...
system under attack to accept a PKCS#12 file created by an attacker
even if the attacker doesn't know the password used for MAC ...
π¨ CVE-2026-34182
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform
sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of
AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises.
Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve
key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity
validation for a given message.
In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing
AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL
erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the
message.
An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData
addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left
byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK
(the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB
(Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an
attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the
real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success.
If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator
showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the
attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the
CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message.
In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD
cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long,
allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity
bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content.
The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
π@cveNotify
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform
sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of
AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises.
Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve
key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity
validation for a given message.
In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing
AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL
erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the
message.
An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData
addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left
byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK
(the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB
(Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an
attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the
real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success.
If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator
showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the
attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the
CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message.
In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD
cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long,
allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity
bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content.
The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Reject potentially forged encrypted CMS AuthEnvelopedData messages Β· openssl/openssl@03c1f4d
1. Adjust ossl_cms_EncryptedContent_init_bio to not accept non-AEAD
ciphers.
If a forged CMS message with AuthEnvelopedData is received with
a non-AEAD cipher specified, we silently accept that an...
ciphers.
If a forged CMS message with AuthEnvelopedData is received with
a non-AEAD cipher specified, we silently accept that an...