CVE Notify
18.8K subscribers
4 photos
166K links
Alert on the latest CVEs

Partner channel: @malwr
Download Telegram
🚨 CVE-2019-16910
Arm Mbed TLS before 2.19.0 and Arm Mbed Crypto before 2.0.0, when deterministic ECDSA is enabled, use an RNG with insufficient entropy for blinding, which might allow an attacker to recover a private key via side-channel attacks if a victim signs the same message many times. (For Mbed TLS, the fix is also available in versions 2.7.12 and 2.16.3.)

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-10932
An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.16.6 and 2.7.x before 2.7.15. An attacker that can get precise enough side-channel measurements can recover the long-term ECDSA private key by (1) reconstructing the projective coordinate of the result of scalar multiplication by exploiting side channels in the conversion to affine coordinates; (2) using an attack described by Naccache, Smart, and Stern in 2003 to recover a few bits of the ephemeral scalar from those projective coordinates via several measurements; and (3) using a lattice attack to get from there to the long-term ECDSA private key used for the signatures. Typically an attacker would have sufficient access when attacking an SGX enclave and controlling the untrusted OS.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-27562
In Arm Trusted Firmware M through 1.2, the NS world may trigger a system halt, an overwrite of secure data, or the printing out of secure data when calling secure functions under the NSPE handler mode.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-44732
Mbed TLS before 3.0.1 has a double free in certain out-of-memory conditions, as demonstrated by an mbedtls_ssl_set_session() failure.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-45450
In Mbed TLS before 2.28.0 and 3.x before 3.1.0, psa_cipher_generate_iv and psa_cipher_encrypt allow policy bypass or oracle-based decryption when the output buffer is at memory locations accessible to an untrusted application.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-35409
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.1 and 3.x before 3.2.0. In some configurations, an unauthenticated attacker can send an invalid ClientHello message to a DTLS server that causes a heap-based buffer over-read of up to 255 bytes. This can cause a server crash or possibly information disclosure based on error responses. Affected configurations have MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CLIENT_PORT_REUSE enabled and MBEDTLS_SSL_IN_CONTENT_LEN less than a threshold that depends on the configuration: 258 bytes if using mbedtls_ssl_cookie_check, and possibly up to 571 bytes with a custom cookie check function.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-46392
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. An adversary with access to precise enough information about memory accesses (typically, an untrusted operating system attacking a secure enclave) can recover an RSA private key after observing the victim performing a single private-key operation, if the window size (MBEDTLS_MPI_WINDOW_SIZE) used for the exponentiation is 3 or smaller.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-46393
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.2 and 3.x before 3.3.0. There is a potential heap-based buffer overflow and heap-based buffer over-read in DTLS if MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID is enabled and MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_IN_LEN_MAX > 2 * MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-47630
Trusted Firmware-A through 2.8 has an out-of-bounds read in the X.509 parser for parsing boot certificates. This affects downstream use of get_ext and auth_nvctr. Attackers might be able to trigger dangerous read side effects or obtain sensitive information about microarchitectural state.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2016-6129
The rsa_verify_hash_ex function in rsa_verify_hash.c in LibTomCrypt, as used in OP-TEE before 2.2.0, does not validate that the message length is equal to the ASN.1 encoded data length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to forge RSA signatures or public certificates by leveraging a Bleichenbacher signature forgery attack.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2018-12437
LibTomCrypt through 1.18.1 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010293
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Boundary crossing. The impact is: Memory corruption of the TEE itself. The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010294
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Rounding error. The impact is: Potentially leaking code and/or data from previous Trusted Application. The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010295
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Memory corruption and disclosure of memory content. The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010296
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Code execution in context of TEE core (kernel). The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010297
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Execution of code in TEE core (kernel) context. The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010298
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE 3.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Code execution in the context of TEE core (kernel). The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: 3.4.0 and later.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-1010292
Linaro/OP-TEE OP-TEE Prior to version v3.4.0 is affected by: Boundary checks. The impact is: This could lead to corruption of any memory which the TA can access. The component is: optee_os. The fixed version is: v3.4.0.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-13799
Western Digital has identified a security vulnerability in the Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) protocol as specified in multiple standards for storage device interfaces, including all versions of eMMC, UFS, and NVMe. The RPMB protocol is specified by industry standards bodies and is implemented by storage devices from multiple vendors to assist host systems in securing trusted firmware. Several scenarios have been identified in which the RPMB state may be affected by an attacker without the knowledge of the trusted component that uses the RPMB feature.

πŸŽ–@cveNotify