🚨 CVE-2026-20020
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. If OSPF authentication is enabled, the attacker must know the secret key to exploit this vulnerability.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF update packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF update packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create a buffer overflow, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. If OSPF authentication is enabled, the attacker must know the secret key to exploit this vulnerability.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF update packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF update packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create a buffer overflow, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software OSPF Protocol…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the OSPF feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an adjacent attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting…
🚨 CVE-2026-27679
Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA frontend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted.
🎖@cveNotify
Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA frontend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-34264
During authorization checks in SAP Human Capital Management for SAP S/4HANA, the system returns specific messages. Due to this, an authenticated user with low privileges could guess and enumerate the content shown, beyond their authorized scope. This leads to disclosure of sensitive information causing a high impact on confidentiality, while integrity and availability are unaffected.
🎖@cveNotify
During authorization checks in SAP Human Capital Management for SAP S/4HANA, the system returns specific messages. Due to this, an authenticated user with low privileges could guess and enumerate the content shown, beyond their authorized scope. This leads to disclosure of sensitive information causing a high impact on confidentiality, while integrity and availability are unaffected.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-32650
Anviz CrossChex Standard is vulnerable when an attacker manipulates the TDS7 PreLogin to disable
encryption, causing database credentials to be sent in plaintext and
enabling unauthorized database access.
🎖@cveNotify
Anviz CrossChex Standard is vulnerable when an attacker manipulates the TDS7 PreLogin to disable
encryption, causing database credentials to be sent in plaintext and
enabling unauthorized database access.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CSAF/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-106-03.json at develop · cisagov/CSAF
CISA CSAF Security Advisories. Contribute to cisagov/CSAF development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-40434
Anviz CrossChex Standard
lacks source verification in the client/server channel, enabling TCP
packet injection by an attacker on the same network to alter or disrupt
application traffic.
🎖@cveNotify
Anviz CrossChex Standard
lacks source verification in the client/server channel, enabling TCP
packet injection by an attacker on the same network to alter or disrupt
application traffic.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CSAF/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-106-03.json at develop · cisagov/CSAF
CISA CSAF Security Advisories. Contribute to cisagov/CSAF development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-22740
A WebFlux server application that processes multipart requests creates temp files for parts larger than 10 K. Under some circumstances, temp files may remain not deleted after the request is fully processed. This allows an attacker to consume available disk space.
Older, unsupported versions are also affected.
🎖@cveNotify
A WebFlux server application that processes multipart requests creates temp files for parts larger than 10 K. Under some circumstances, temp files may remain not deleted after the request is fully processed. This allows an attacker to consume available disk space.
Older, unsupported versions are also affected.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-20022
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition when OSPF canonicalization debug is enabled by using the command debug ip ospf canon.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF LSU packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted unauthenticated OSPF packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write to memory outside of the packet data, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition when OSPF canonicalization debug is enabled by using the command debug ip ospf canon.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF LSU packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted unauthenticated OSPF packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write to memory outside of the packet data, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software OSPF Protocol…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the OSPF feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an adjacent attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting…
🚨 CVE-2026-20023
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to corrupt memory on an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to memory corruption when parsing OSPF protocol packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause memory corruption causing the affected device to reboot, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to corrupt memory on an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to memory corruption when parsing OSPF protocol packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause memory corruption causing the affected device to reboot, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software OSPF Protocol…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the OSPF feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an adjacent attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting…
🚨 CVE-2026-20024
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key.
This vulnerability is due to heap corruption in OSPF when parsing packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the OSPF service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key.
This vulnerability is due to heap corruption in OSPF when parsing packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the OSPF service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software OSPF Protocol…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the OSPF feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an adjacent attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting…
🚨 CVE-2026-1940
An incomplete fix for CVE-2024-47778 allows an out-of-bounds read in gst_wavparse_adtl_chunk() function. The patch added a size validation check lsize + 8 > size, but it does not account for the GST_ROUND_UP_2(lsize) used in the actual offset calculation. When lsize is an odd number, the parser advances more bytes than validated, causing OOB read.
🎖@cveNotify
An incomplete fix for CVE-2024-47778 allows an out-of-bounds read in gst_wavparse_adtl_chunk() function. The patch added a size validation check lsize + 8 > size, but it does not account for the GST_ROUND_UP_2(lsize) used in the actual offset calculation. When lsize is an odd number, the parser advances more bytes than validated, causing OOB read.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-33326
Keystone is a content management system for Node.js. Prior to version 6.5.2, {field}.isFilterable access control can be bypassed in findMany queries by passing a cursor. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values. The fix for CVE-2025-46720 (field-level isFilterable bypass for update and delete mutations) added checks to the where parameter in update and delete mutations however the cursor parameter in findMany was not patched and accepts the same UniqueWhere input type. This issue has been patched in version 6.5.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Keystone is a content management system for Node.js. Prior to version 6.5.2, {field}.isFilterable access control can be bypassed in findMany queries by passing a cursor. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values. The fix for CVE-2025-46720 (field-level isFilterable bypass for update and delete mutations) added checks to the where parameter in update and delete mutations however the cursor parameter in findMany was not patched and accepts the same UniqueWhere input type. This issue has been patched in version 6.5.2.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
@keystone-6/core: `isFilterable` bypass via `cursor` parameter in findMany (CVE-2025-46720 incomplete fix)
# Summary
`{field}.isFilterable` access control can be bypassed in `findMany` queries by passing a `cursor`. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values.
T...
`{field}.isFilterable` access control can be bypassed in `findMany` queries by passing a `cursor`. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values.
T...
🚨 CVE-2026-34986
Go JOSE provides an implementation of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption set of standards in Go, including support for JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Signature (JWS), and JSON Web Token (JWT) standards. Prior to 4.1.4 and 3.0.5, decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the alg field indicates a key wrapping algorithm (one ending in KW, with the exception of A128GCMKW, A192GCMKW, and A256GCMKW) and the encrypted_key field is empty. The panic happens when cipher.KeyUnwrap() in key_wrap.go attempts to allocate a slice with a zero or negative length based on the length of the encrypted_key. This code path is reachable from ParseEncrypted() / ParseEncryptedJSON() / ParseEncryptedCompact() followed by Decrypt() on the resulting object. Note that the parse functions take a list of accepted key algorithms. If the accepted key algorithms do not include any key wrapping algorithms, parsing will fail and the application will be unaffected. This panic is also reachable by calling cipher.KeyUnwrap() directly with any ciphertext parameter less than 16 bytes long, but calling this function directly is less common. Panics can lead to denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.4 and 3.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
Go JOSE provides an implementation of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption set of standards in Go, including support for JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Signature (JWS), and JSON Web Token (JWT) standards. Prior to 4.1.4 and 3.0.5, decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the alg field indicates a key wrapping algorithm (one ending in KW, with the exception of A128GCMKW, A192GCMKW, and A256GCMKW) and the encrypted_key field is empty. The panic happens when cipher.KeyUnwrap() in key_wrap.go attempts to allocate a slice with a zero or negative length based on the length of the encrypted_key. This code path is reachable from ParseEncrypted() / ParseEncryptedJSON() / ParseEncryptedCompact() followed by Decrypt() on the resulting object. Note that the parse functions take a list of accepted key algorithms. If the accepted key algorithms do not include any key wrapping algorithms, parsing will fail and the application will be unaffected. This panic is also reachable by calling cipher.KeyUnwrap() directly with any ciphertext parameter less than 16 bytes long, but calling this function directly is less common. Panics can lead to denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.4 and 3.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Panic in JWE decryption
### Impact
Decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the `alg` field indicates a key wrapping algorithm ([one ending in `KW`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4#p...
Decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the `alg` field indicates a key wrapping algorithm ([one ending in `KW`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4#p...
🚨 CVE-2025-54236
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Commerce | APSB25-88
🚨 CVE-2025-70070
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXMeshGeometry.cpp, MeshGeometry::MeshGeometry()
🎖@cveNotify
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXMeshGeometry.cpp, MeshGeometry::MeshGeometry()
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-70072
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXConverter.cpp, FBXConverter::ConvertMeshMultiMaterial() components
🎖@cveNotify
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXConverter.cpp, FBXConverter::ConvertMeshMultiMaterial() components
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-23918
Double Free and possible RCE vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server with the HTTP/2 protocol.
This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: 2.4.66.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.67, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Double Free and possible RCE vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server with the HTTP/2 protocol.
This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: 2.4.66.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.67, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
httpd.apache.org
Apache HTTP Server 2.4 vulnerabilities - The Apache HTTP Server Project
🚨 CVE-2026-33007
A NULL pointer dereference in the mod_authn_socache in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.66 and earlier allows an unauthenticated remote user to crash a child process in a caching forward proxy configuration.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.67, which fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
A NULL pointer dereference in the mod_authn_socache in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.66 and earlier allows an unauthenticated remote user to crash a child process in a caching forward proxy configuration.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.67, which fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
httpd.apache.org
Apache HTTP Server 2.4 vulnerabilities - The Apache HTTP Server Project
🚨 CVE-2025-70071
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXParser.cpp, ParseVectorDataArray()
🎖@cveNotify
An issue in Assimp v.6.0.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the FBXParser.cpp, ParseVectorDataArray()
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-20082
A vulnerability in the handling of the embryonic connection limits in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause incoming TCP SYN packets to be dropped incorrectly.
This vulnerability is due to improper handling of new, incoming TCP connections that are destined to management or data interfaces when the device is under a TCP SYN flood attack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted stream of traffic to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent all incoming TCP connections to the device from being established, including remote management access, Remote Access VPN (RAVPN) connections, and all network protocols that are TCP-based. This results in a denial of service (DoS) condition for affected features.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the handling of the embryonic connection limits in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause incoming TCP SYN packets to be dropped incorrectly.
This vulnerability is due to improper handling of new, incoming TCP connections that are destined to management or data interfaces when the device is under a TCP SYN flood attack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted stream of traffic to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent all incoming TCP connections to the device from being established, including remote management access, Remote Access VPN (RAVPN) connections, and all network protocols that are TCP-based. This results in a denial of service (DoS) condition for affected features.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance Software TCP Flood Denial of Service Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the handling of the embryonic connection limits in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause incoming TCP SYN packets to be dropped incorrectly.
This vulnerability…
This vulnerability…
🚨 CVE-2026-20100
A vulnerability in the LUA interperter of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces.
This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation in the LUA interprerter. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the LUA interperter of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces.
This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation in the LUA interprerter. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software Remote Access…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Remote Access SSL VPN functionality of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow a remote attacker to cause an affected device to stop…