π¨ CVE-2026-35538
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. Unsanitized IMAP SEARCH command arguments could lead to IMAP injection or CSRF bypass during mail search.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. Unsanitized IMAP SEARCH command arguments could lead to IMAP injection or CSRF bypass during mail search.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix IMAP Injection + CSRF bypass in mail search Β· roundcube/roundcubemail@5fe8a69
Reported by Martila Security Research Team
π¨ CVE-2026-35539
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. XSS exists because of insufficient HTML attachment sanitization in preview mode. A victim must preview a text/html attachment.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. XSS exists because of insufficient HTML attachment sanitization in preview mode. A victim must preview a text/html attachment.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix XSS issue in a HTML attachment preview Β· roundcube/roundcubemail@10a6d1f
Reported by aikido_security
π¨ CVE-2026-35540
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail 1.6.0 before 1.6.14. Insufficient Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) sanitization in HTML e-mail messages may lead to SSRF or Information Disclosure, e.g., if stylesheet links point to local network hosts.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail 1.6.0 before 1.6.14. Insufficient Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) sanitization in HTML e-mail messages may lead to SSRF or Information Disclosure, e.g., if stylesheet links point to local network hosts.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix SSRF + Information Disclosure via stylesheet links to a local net⦠· roundcube/roundcubemail@27ec6cc
β¦work hosts
Reported by Georgios Tsimpidas (aka Frey), Security Researcher at https://i0.rs/
Reported by Georgios Tsimpidas (aka Frey), Security Researcher at https://i0.rs/
π¨ CVE-2026-35541
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. Incorrect password comparison in the password plugin could lead to type confusion that allows a password change without knowing the old password.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. Incorrect password comparison in the password plugin could lead to type confusion that allows a password change without knowing the old password.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix bug where a password could get changed without providing the old β¦ Β· roundcube/roundcubemail@2e6a99b
β¦password
The password plugin uses loose comparison, leading to a type juggling vulnerability that
allows password changes without knowing the old password in specific cases.
Reported by flydrago...
The password plugin uses loose comparison, leading to a type juggling vulnerability that
allows password changes without knowing the old password in specific cases.
Reported by flydrago...
π¨ CVE-2026-35542
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. The remote image blocking feature can be bypassed via a crafted background attribute of a BODY element in an e-mail message. This may lead to information disclosure or access-control bypass.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. The remote image blocking feature can be bypassed via a crafted background attribute of a BODY element in an e-mail message. This may lead to information disclosure or access-control bypass.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix remote image blocking bypass via a crafted body background attribute Β· roundcube/roundcubemail@e052328
Reported by nullcathedral
π¨ CVE-2026-35543
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. The remote image blocking feature can be bypassed via SVG content (with animate attributes) in an e-mail message. This may lead to information disclosure or access-control bypass.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.14 and 1.6.14. The remote image blocking feature can be bypassed via SVG content (with animate attributes) in an e-mail message. This may lead to information disclosure or access-control bypass.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix remote image blocking bypass via various SVG animate attributes Β· roundcube/roundcubemail@1a63e01
Reported by nullcathedral
π¨ CVE-2026-35545
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.15 and 1.6.15. The remote image blocking feature can be bypassed via SVG content in an e-mail message. This may lead to information disclosure or access-control bypass. This involves the animate element with attributeName=fill/filter/stroke.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.15 and 1.6.15. The remote image blocking feature can be bypassed via SVG content in an e-mail message. This may lead to information disclosure or access-control bypass. This involves the animate element with attributeName=fill/filter/stroke.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix SVG Animate FUNCIRI Attribute Bypass β Remote Image Loading via fβ¦ Β· roundcube/roundcubemail@7ad62de
β¦ill/filter/stroke
π¨ CVE-2026-31059
A remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability in the /goform/formDia component of UTT Aggressive HiPER 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted string.
π@cveNotify
A remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability in the /goform/formDia component of UTT Aggressive HiPER 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted string.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Vul202601/9.md at main Β· zxq0408/Vul202601
Contribute to zxq0408/Vul202601 development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2026-31062
UTT Aggressive 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the filename parameter of the formFtpServerDirConfig function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
π@cveNotify
UTT Aggressive 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the filename parameter of the formFtpServerDirConfig function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Vul202601/7.md at main Β· zxq0408/Vul202601
Contribute to zxq0408/Vul202601 development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2026-31065
UTT Aggressive 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the addCommand parameter of the formConfigCliForEngineerOnly function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
π@cveNotify
UTT Aggressive 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the addCommand parameter of the formConfigCliForEngineerOnly function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Vul202601/8.md at main Β· zxq0408/Vul202601
Contribute to zxq0408/Vul202601 development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2026-33494
ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Versions prior to 26.2.0 are vulnerable to an authorization bypass via HTTP path traversal. An attacker can craft a URL containing path traversal sequences (e.g. `/public/../admin/secrets`) that resolves to a protected path after normalization, but is matched against a permissive rule because the raw, un-normalized path is used during rule evaluation. Version 26.2.0 contains a patch.
π@cveNotify
ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Versions prior to 26.2.0 are vulnerable to an authorization bypass via HTTP path traversal. An attacker can craft a URL containing path traversal sequences (e.g. `/public/../admin/secrets`) that resolves to a protected path after normalization, but is matched against a permissive rule because the raw, un-normalized path is used during rule evaluation. Version 26.2.0 contains a patch.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: clean path while matching to prevent path traversal Β· ory/oathkeeper@8e00021
GitOrigin-RevId: b435835e8d0dbe811dcb12e654deec0477a15040
π¨ CVE-2026-33496
ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Versions prior to 26.2.0 are vulnerable to authentication bypass due to cache key confusion. The `oauth2_introspection` authenticator cache does not distinguish tokens that were validated with different introspection URLs. An attacker can therefore legitimately use a token to prime the cache, and subsequently use the same token for rules that use a different introspection server. Ory Oathkeeper has to be configured with multiple `oauth2_introspection` authenticator servers, each accepting different tokens. The authenticators also must be configured to use caching. An attacker has to have a way to gain a valid token for one of the configured introspection servers. Starting in version 26.2.0, Ory Oathkeeper includes the introspection server URL in the cache key, preventing confusion of tokens. Update to the patched version of Ory Oathkeeper. If that is not immediately possible, disable caching for `oauth2_introspection` authenticators.
π@cveNotify
ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Versions prior to 26.2.0 are vulnerable to authentication bypass due to cache key confusion. The `oauth2_introspection` authenticator cache does not distinguish tokens that were validated with different introspection URLs. An attacker can therefore legitimately use a token to prime the cache, and subsequently use the same token for rules that use a different introspection server. Ory Oathkeeper has to be configured with multiple `oauth2_introspection` authenticator servers, each accepting different tokens. The authenticators also must be configured to use caching. An attacker has to have a way to gain a valid token for one of the configured introspection servers. Starting in version 26.2.0, Ory Oathkeeper includes the introspection server URL in the cache key, preventing confusion of tokens. Update to the patched version of Ory Oathkeeper. If that is not immediately possible, disable caching for `oauth2_introspection` authenticators.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: scope cache config key to introspection URL Β· ory/oathkeeper@198a2bc
GitOrigin-RevId: 37e21364bf54c471dab10d829ee23004ec9a820e
π¨ CVE-2026-33504
Ory Hydra is an OAuth 2.0 Server and OpenID Connect Provider. Prior to version 26.2.0, the listOAuth2Clients, listOAuth2ConsentSessions, and listTrustedOAuth2JwtGrantIssuers Admin APIs in Ory Hydra are vulnerable to SQL injection due to flaws in its pagination implementation. Pagination tokens are encrypted using the secret configured in `secrets.pagination`. If this value is not set, Hydra falls back to using `secrets.system`. An attacker who knows this secret can craft their own tokens, including malicious tokens that lead to SQL injection. This issue can be exploited when one or more admin APIs listed above are directly or indirectly accessible to the attacker; the attacker can pass a raw pagination token to the affected API; and the configuration value `secrets.pagination` is set and known to the attacker, or `secrets.pagination` is not set and `secrets.system` is known to the attacker. An attacker can execute arbitrary SQL queries through forged pagination tokens. As a first line of defense, immediately configure a custom value for `secrets.pagination` by generating a cryptographically secure random secret. Next, upgrade Hydra to the fixed version, 26.2.0 as soon as possible.
π@cveNotify
Ory Hydra is an OAuth 2.0 Server and OpenID Connect Provider. Prior to version 26.2.0, the listOAuth2Clients, listOAuth2ConsentSessions, and listTrustedOAuth2JwtGrantIssuers Admin APIs in Ory Hydra are vulnerable to SQL injection due to flaws in its pagination implementation. Pagination tokens are encrypted using the secret configured in `secrets.pagination`. If this value is not set, Hydra falls back to using `secrets.system`. An attacker who knows this secret can craft their own tokens, including malicious tokens that lead to SQL injection. This issue can be exploited when one or more admin APIs listed above are directly or indirectly accessible to the attacker; the attacker can pass a raw pagination token to the affected API; and the configuration value `secrets.pagination` is set and known to the attacker, or `secrets.pagination` is not set and `secrets.system` is known to the attacker. An attacker can execute arbitrary SQL queries through forged pagination tokens. As a first line of defense, immediately configure a custom value for `secrets.pagination` by generating a cryptographically secure random secret. Next, upgrade Hydra to the fixed version, 26.2.0 as soon as possible.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
SQL injection via forged pagination tokens
## Description
Following Admin APIs in Ory Hydra are vulnerable to SQL injection due to flaws in its pagination implementation:
- listOAuth2Clients
- listOAuth2ConsentSessions
- listTrusted...
Following Admin APIs in Ory Hydra are vulnerable to SQL injection due to flaws in its pagination implementation:
- listOAuth2Clients
- listOAuth2ConsentSessions
- listTrusted...
π¨ CVE-2026-34385
Fleet is open source device management software. Prior to 4.81.0, a second-order SQL injection vulnerability in Fleet's Apple MDM profile delivery pipeline could allow an attacker with a valid MDM enrollment certificate to exfiltrate or modify the contents of the Fleet database, including user credentials, API tokens, and device enrollment secrets. Version 4.81.0 patches the issue.
π@cveNotify
Fleet is open source device management software. Prior to 4.81.0, a second-order SQL injection vulnerability in Fleet's Apple MDM profile delivery pipeline could allow an attacker with a valid MDM enrollment certificate to exfiltrate or modify the contents of the Fleet database, including user credentials, API tokens, and device enrollment secrets. Version 4.81.0 patches the issue.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Second-order SQL injection in Fleet's Apple MDM profile delivery can compromise the database
### Summary
A critical second-order SQL injection vulnerability in Fleet's Apple MDM profile delivery pipeline could allow an attacker with a valid MDM enrollment certificate to exfiltrate o...
A critical second-order SQL injection vulnerability in Fleet's Apple MDM profile delivery pipeline could allow an attacker with a valid MDM enrollment certificate to exfiltrate o...
π¨ CVE-2026-34387
Fleet is open source device management software. Prior to 4.81.1, a command injection vulnerability in Fleet's software installer pipeline allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root (macOS/Linux) or SYSTEM (Windows) on managed hosts when an uninstall is triggered for a crafted software package. Version 4.81.1 patches the issue.
π@cveNotify
Fleet is open source device management software. Prior to 4.81.1, a command injection vulnerability in Fleet's software installer pipeline allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root (macOS/Linux) or SYSTEM (Windows) on managed hosts when an uninstall is triggered for a crafted software package. Version 4.81.1 patches the issue.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
OS command injection via crafted software package metadata in uninstall scripts
### Summary
A command injection vulnerability in Fleet's software installer pipeline allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root (macOS/Linux) or SYSTEM (Windows) on manag...
A command injection vulnerability in Fleet's software installer pipeline allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root (macOS/Linux) or SYSTEM (Windows) on manag...
π¨ CVE-2026-34563
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when handling backup uploads and processing backup metadata. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the backup filename via the uploaded xss.sql, which uses SQL functionality to insert the XSS payload server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely in multiple backup management views without proper output encoding, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
π@cveNotify
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when handling backup uploads and processing backup metadata. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the backup filename via the uploaded xss.sql, which uses SQL functionality to insert the XSS payload server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely in multiple backup management views without proper output encoding, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Release v0.31.0.0 - Major Security & Framework Update (CI 4.7.1 & Shield Integration) Β· ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
π Highlights
This version represents a revolutionary milestone for CI4MS. The core framework has been upgraded to CodeIgniter 4.7.1, the authentication system has been completely modernized with Co...
This version represents a revolutionary milestone for CI4MS. The core framework has been upgraded to CodeIgniter 4.7.1, the authentication system has been completely modernized with Co...
π¨ CVE-2026-34564
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when adding Pages to navigation menus through the Menu Management functionality. Page-related data selected via the Pages section is stored server-side and rendered without proper output encoding. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely within administrative interfaces and public-facing navigation menus, leading to stored DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
π@cveNotify
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when adding Pages to navigation menus through the Menu Management functionality. Page-related data selected via the Pages section is stored server-side and rendered without proper output encoding. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely within administrative interfaces and public-facing navigation menus, leading to stored DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Release v0.31.0.0 - Major Security & Framework Update (CI 4.7.1 & Shield Integration) Β· ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
π Highlights
This version represents a revolutionary milestone for CI4MS. The core framework has been upgraded to CodeIgniter 4.7.1, the authentication system has been completely modernized with Co...
This version represents a revolutionary milestone for CI4MS. The core framework has been upgraded to CodeIgniter 4.7.1, the authentication system has been completely modernized with Co...
π¨ CVE-2025-54236
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
π@cveNotify
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
π@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Commerce | APSB25-88
π¨ CVE-2026-28386
Issue summary: Applications using AES-CFB128 encryption or decryption on
systems with AVX-512 and VAES support can trigger an out-of-bounds read
of up to 15 bytes when processing partial cipher blocks.
Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory
page boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information
disclosure as the over-read bytes are not written to output.
The vulnerable code path is only reached when processing partial blocks
(when a previous call left an incomplete block and the current call provides
fewer bytes than needed to complete it). Additionally, the input buffer
must be positioned at a page boundary with the following page unmapped.
CFB mode is not used in TLS/DTLS protocols, which use CBC, GCM, CCM, or
ChaCha20-Poly1305 instead. For these reasons the issue was assessed as
Low severity according to our Security Policy.
Only x86-64 systems with AVX-512 and VAES instruction support are affected.
Other architectures and systems without VAES support use different code
paths that are not affected.
OpenSSL FIPS module in 3.6 version is affected by this issue.
π@cveNotify
Issue summary: Applications using AES-CFB128 encryption or decryption on
systems with AVX-512 and VAES support can trigger an out-of-bounds read
of up to 15 bytes when processing partial cipher blocks.
Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to
Denial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory
page boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information
disclosure as the over-read bytes are not written to output.
The vulnerable code path is only reached when processing partial blocks
(when a previous call left an incomplete block and the current call provides
fewer bytes than needed to complete it). Additionally, the input buffer
must be positioned at a page boundary with the following page unmapped.
CFB mode is not used in TLS/DTLS protocols, which use CBC, GCM, CCM, or
ChaCha20-Poly1305 instead. For these reasons the issue was assessed as
Low severity according to our Security Policy.
Only x86-64 systems with AVX-512 and VAES instruction support are affected.
Other architectures and systems without VAES support use different code
paths that are not affected.
OpenSSL FIPS module in 3.6 version is affected by this issue.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Out-of-bounds read in AES-CFB-128 on X86-64 with AVX-512 support Β· openssl/openssl@61f428a
The partial-block pre-processing code in ossl_aes_cfb128_vaes_enc and
ossl_aes_cfb128_vaes_dec unconditionally loads 16 bytes from the input buffer
using unmasked vmovdqu8 instructions, even when f...
ossl_aes_cfb128_vaes_dec unconditionally loads 16 bytes from the input buffer
using unmasked vmovdqu8 instructions, even when f...
π¨ CVE-2026-28387
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based
server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may
result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences
such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both
the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate
usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672
recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX
certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable
to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and
ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a
TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the
FIPS module boundary.
π@cveNotify
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based
server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may
result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences
such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both
the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate
usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672
recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX
certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable
to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and
ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a
TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the
FIPS module boundary.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
dane_match_cert() should X509_free() on ->mcert instead Β· openssl/openssl@07e727d
of OPENSSL_free()
Fixes: 170b735820ac "DANE support for X509_verify_cert()"
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <to...
Fixes: 170b735820ac "DANE support for X509_verify_cert()"
Reviewed-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <to...