🚨 CVE-2026-27234
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security updates available for Adobe Experience Manager | APSB26-24
🚨 CVE-2026-27235
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security updates available for Adobe Experience Manager | APSB26-24
🚨 CVE-2026-27236
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security updates available for Adobe Experience Manager | APSB26-24
🚨 CVE-2026-27237
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security updates available for Adobe Experience Manager | APSB26-24
🚨 CVE-2025-6723
Chef InSpec versions up to 5.23 and before 7.0.107 creates named pipes with overly permissive default Windows access controls. A local attacker may interfere with the pipe connection process and exploit the insufficient access restrictions to assume the InSpec execution context, potentially resulting in elevated privileges or operational disruption.
This issue affects Chef Inspec: through 5.23 and before 7.0.107
🎖@cveNotify
Chef InSpec versions up to 5.23 and before 7.0.107 creates named pipes with overly permissive default Windows access controls. A local attacker may interfere with the pipe connection process and exploit the insufficient access restrictions to assume the InSpec execution context, potentially resulting in elevated privileges or operational disruption.
This issue affects Chef Inspec: through 5.23 and before 7.0.107
🎖@cveNotify
docs.chef.io
Chef InSpec
Chef InSpec resource packs
Chef InSpec 7.0
Chef InSpec 6.8
Chef InSpec 5.24
Chef InSpec 5.23
Chef InSpec 7.0
Chef InSpec 6.8
Chef InSpec 5.24
Chef InSpec 5.23
🚨 CVE-2025-69649
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed header fields. During relocation processing, an invalid or null section pointer may be passed into display_relocations(), resulting in a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and abrupt termination. No evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, nor any possibility of code execution, was observed.
🎖@cveNotify
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed header fields. During relocation processing, an invalid or null section pointer may be passed into display_relocations(), resulting in a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and abrupt termination. No evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, nor any possibility of code execution, was observed.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-69650
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a double free vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed relocation data. During GOT relocation handling, dump_relocations may return early without initializing the all_relocations array. As a result, process_got_section_contents() may pass an uninitialized r_symbol pointer to free(), leading to a double free and terminating the program with SIGABRT. No evidence of exploitable memory corruption or code execution was observed; the impact is limited to denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a double free vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed relocation data. During GOT relocation handling, dump_relocations may return early without initializing the all_relocations array. As a result, process_got_section_contents() may pass an uninitialized r_symbol pointer to free(), leading to a double free and terminating the program with SIGABRT. No evidence of exploitable memory corruption or code execution was observed; the impact is limited to denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-69652
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a vulnerability that leads to an abort (SIGABRT) when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed DWARF abbrev or debug information. Due to incomplete state cleanup in process_debug_info(), an invalid debug_info_p state may propagate into DWARF attribute parsing routines. When certain malformed attributes result in an unexpected data length of zero, byte_get_little_endian() triggers a fatal abort. No evidence of memory corruption or code execution was observed; the impact is limited to denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a vulnerability that leads to an abort (SIGABRT) when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed DWARF abbrev or debug information. Due to incomplete state cleanup in process_debug_info(), an invalid debug_info_p state may propagate into DWARF attribute parsing routines. When certain malformed attributes result in an unexpected data length of zero, byte_get_little_endian() triggers a fatal abort. No evidence of memory corruption or code execution was observed; the impact is limited to denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-30843
Wekan is an open source kanban tool built with Meteor. Versions 8.32 and 8.33 have a critical Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) issue which could allow unauthorized users to modify custom fields across boards through its custom fields update endpoints, potentially leading to unauthorized data manipulation. The PUT /api/boards/:boardId/custom-fields/:customFieldId endpoint in Wekan validates that the authenticated user has access to the specified boardId, but the subsequent database update uses only the custom field's _id as a filter without confirming the field actually belongs to that board. This means an attacker who owns any board can modify custom fields on any other board by supplying a foreign custom field ID, and the same flaw exists in the POST, PUT, and DELETE endpoints for dropdown items under custom fields. The required custom field IDs can be obtained by exporting a board (which only needs read access), since the exported JSON includes the IDs of all board components. The authorization check is performed against the wrong resource, allowing cross-board custom field manipulation. This issue has been fixed in version 8.34.
🎖@cveNotify
Wekan is an open source kanban tool built with Meteor. Versions 8.32 and 8.33 have a critical Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) issue which could allow unauthorized users to modify custom fields across boards through its custom fields update endpoints, potentially leading to unauthorized data manipulation. The PUT /api/boards/:boardId/custom-fields/:customFieldId endpoint in Wekan validates that the authenticated user has access to the specified boardId, but the subsequent database update uses only the custom field's _id as a filter without confirming the field actually belongs to that board. This means an attacker who owns any board can modify custom fields on any other board by supplying a foreign custom field ID, and the same flaw exists in the POST, PUT, and DELETE endpoints for dropdown items under custom fields. The required custom field IDs can be obtained by exporting a board (which only needs read access), since the exported JSON includes the IDs of all board components. The authorization check is performed against the wrong resource, allowing cross-board custom field manipulation. This issue has been fixed in version 8.34.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix GHSL-2026-044_Wekan. · wekan/wekan@73eb98c
Thanks to GHSL and xet7.
🚨 CVE-2025-54236
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Commerce | APSB25-88
🚨 CVE-2025-66509
LaraDashboard is an all-In-one solution to start a Laravel Application. In 2.3.0 and earlier, the password reset flow trusts the Host header, allowing attackers to redirect the administrator’s reset token to an attacker-controlled server. This can be combined with the module installation process to automatically execute the ServiceProvider::boot() method, enabling arbitrary PHP code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
LaraDashboard is an all-In-one solution to start a Laravel Application. In 2.3.0 and earlier, the password reset flow trusts the Host header, allowing attackers to redirect the administrator’s reset token to an attacker-controlled server. This can be combined with the module installation process to automatically execute the ServiceProvider::boot() method, enabling arbitrary PHP code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: fixed module upload security and email reset link generation · laradashboard/laradashboard@cc42f9c
⚡ Lara Dashboard - CMS by Laravel - All In One solution to start your Laravel Application from Basic to Enterprise. Manages Users, Roles, Permissions, Modules, Settings, Translations, Contents, Monitoring and every actions of your Laravel application. Complete…
🚨 CVE-2025-36938
In U-Boot of append_uint32_le(), there is a possible fault injection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
🎖@cveNotify
In U-Boot of append_uint32_le(), there is a possible fault injection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-68493
Missing XML Validation vulnerability in Apache Struts, Apache Struts.
This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 2.2.1; Apache Struts: from 2.2.1 through 6.1.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.1.1, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing XML Validation vulnerability in Apache Struts, Apache Struts.
This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 2.2.1; Apache Struts: from 2.2.1 through 6.1.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.1.1, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-59793
Rocket TRUfusion Enterprise through 7.10.5 exposes the endpoint at /axis2/services/WsPortalV6UpDwAxis2Impl to authenticated users to be able to upload files. However, the application doesn't properly sanitize the jobDirectory parameter, which allows path traversal sequences to be included. This allows writing files to arbitrary local filesystem locations and may subsequently lead to remote code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
Rocket TRUfusion Enterprise through 7.10.5 exposes the endpoint at /axis2/services/WsPortalV6UpDwAxis2Impl to authenticated users to be able to upload files. However, the application doesn't properly sanitize the jobDirectory parameter, which allows path traversal sequences to be included. This allows writing files to arbitrary local filesystem locations and may subsequently lead to remote code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
RCE Security - Your European Offensive Security Partner
RCE Security | Offensive Security Research
RCE Security provides modern penetration testing, source code reviews, and offensive security research to help you find and fix real vulnerabilities.
🚨 CVE-2025-66614
Improper Input Validation vulnerability.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected.
Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI
extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header
field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the
TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client
certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a
client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending
different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field.
The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is
only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate
authentication is enforced at the web application.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Input Validation vulnerability.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected.
Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI
extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header
field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the
TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client
certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a
client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending
different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field.
The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is
only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate
authentication is enforced at the web application.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-24733
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.
Tomcat did not limit HTTP/0.9 requests to the GET method. If a security
constraint was configured to allow HEAD requests to a URI but deny GET
requests, the user could bypass that constraint on GET requests by
sending a (specification invalid) HEAD request using HTTP/0.9.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.112.
Older, EOL versions are also affected.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.
Tomcat did not limit HTTP/0.9 requests to the GET method. If a security
constraint was configured to allow HEAD requests to a URI but deny GET
requests, the user could bypass that constraint on GET requests by
sending a (specification invalid) HEAD request using HTTP/0.9.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.112.
Older, EOL versions are also affected.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-24734
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat.
When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected.
Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue.
Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat.
When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected.
Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue.
Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-26731
TOTOLINK A3002RU V2.1.1-B20211108.1455 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the routernamer`parameter in the formDnsv6 function.
🎖@cveNotify
TOTOLINK A3002RU V2.1.1-B20211108.1455 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the routernamer`parameter in the formDnsv6 function.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
cve/TOTOLINK-A3002RU-boa-formDnsv6-StackOverflow at main · 0xmania/cve
submit cve. Contribute to 0xmania/cve development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-26732
TOTOLINK A3002RU V2.1.1-B20211108.1455 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the vpnUser or vpnPassword` parameters in the formFilter function.
🎖@cveNotify
TOTOLINK A3002RU V2.1.1-B20211108.1455 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the vpnUser or vpnPassword` parameters in the formFilter function.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
cve/TOTOLINK-A3002RU-boa-formFilter-StackOverflow at main · 0xmania/cve
submit cve. Contribute to 0xmania/cve development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2025-32355
Rocket TRUfusion Enterprise through 7.10.4.0 uses a reverse proxy to handle incoming connections. However, the proxy is misconfigured in a way that allows specifying absolute URLs in the HTTP request line, causing the proxy to load the given resource.
🎖@cveNotify
Rocket TRUfusion Enterprise through 7.10.4.0 uses a reverse proxy to handle incoming connections. However, the proxy is misconfigured in a way that allows specifying absolute URLs in the HTTP request line, causing the proxy to load the given resource.
🎖@cveNotify
RCE Security - Your European Offensive Security Partner
RCE Security | Offensive Security Research
RCE Security provides modern penetration testing, source code reviews, and offensive security research to help you find and fix real vulnerabilities.
🚨 CVE-2025-67102
A SQL injection vulnerability in the alldayoffs feature in Jorani up to v1.0.4, allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the entity parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
A SQL injection vulnerability in the alldayoffs feature in Jorani up to v1.0.4, allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the entity parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - jorani/jorani: Leave and Overtime Management System
Leave and Overtime Management System. Contribute to jorani/jorani development by creating an account on GitHub.