π¨ CVE-2024-30406
A Cleartext Storage in a File on Disk vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved ACX Series devices using the Paragon Active Assurance Test Agent software installed on network devices allows a local, authenticated attacker with high privileges to read all other users login credentials.
This issue affects only Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved ACX Series devices using the Paragon Active Assurance Test Agent software installed on these devices from 23.1R1-EVO through 23.2R2-EVO.
This issue does not affect releases before 23.1R1-EVO.
π@cveNotify
A Cleartext Storage in a File on Disk vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved ACX Series devices using the Paragon Active Assurance Test Agent software installed on network devices allows a local, authenticated attacker with high privileges to read all other users login credentials.
This issue affects only Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved ACX Series devices using the Paragon Active Assurance Test Agent software installed on these devices from 23.1R1-EVO through 23.2R2-EVO.
This issue does not affect releases before 23.1R1-EVO.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2022-49852
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: process: fix kernel info leakage
thread_struct's s[12] may contain random kernel memory content, which
may be finally leaked to userspace. This is a security hole. Fix it
by clearing the s[12] array in thread_struct when fork.
As for kthread case, it's better to clear the s[12] array as well.
π@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: process: fix kernel info leakage
thread_struct's s[12] may contain random kernel memory content, which
may be finally leaked to userspace. This is a security hole. Fix it
by clearing the s[12] array in thread_struct when fork.
As for kthread case, it's better to clear the s[12] array as well.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2022-49865
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: addrlabel: fix infoleak when sending struct ifaddrlblmsg to network
When copying a `struct ifaddrlblmsg` to the network, __ifal_reserved
remained uninitialized, resulting in a 1-byte infoleak:
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-network-infoleak in __netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4841
__netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4841
netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4857
xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3590
dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1dc/0x800 net/core/dev.c:3606
__dev_queue_xmit+0x17e8/0x4350 net/core/dev.c:4256
dev_queue_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:3009
__netlink_deliver_tap_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:307
__netlink_deliver_tap+0x728/0xad0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:325
netlink_deliver_tap net/netlink/af_netlink.c:338
__netlink_sendskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1263
netlink_sendskb+0x1d9/0x200 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1272
netlink_unicast+0x56d/0xf50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1360
nlmsg_unicast ./include/net/netlink.h:1061
rtnl_unicast+0x5a/0x80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:758
ip6addrlbl_get+0xfad/0x10f0 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c:628
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xb33/0x1570 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082
...
Uninit was created at:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x118/0xb00 mm/slab.h:742
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3398
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4f2/0x930 mm/slub.c:3437
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:954
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x117/0x3d0 mm/slab_common.c:975
kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:437
__alloc_skb+0x27a/0xab0 net/core/skbuff.c:509
alloc_skb ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1267
nlmsg_new ./include/net/netlink.h:964
ip6addrlbl_get+0x490/0x10f0 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c:608
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xb33/0x1570 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082
netlink_rcv_skb+0x299/0x550 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
rtnetlink_rcv+0x26/0x30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6109
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319
netlink_unicast+0x9ab/0xf50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0xebc/0x10f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
...
This patch ensures that the reserved field is always initialized.
π@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: addrlabel: fix infoleak when sending struct ifaddrlblmsg to network
When copying a `struct ifaddrlblmsg` to the network, __ifal_reserved
remained uninitialized, resulting in a 1-byte infoleak:
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-network-infoleak in __netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4841
__netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4841
netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4857
xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3590
dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1dc/0x800 net/core/dev.c:3606
__dev_queue_xmit+0x17e8/0x4350 net/core/dev.c:4256
dev_queue_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:3009
__netlink_deliver_tap_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:307
__netlink_deliver_tap+0x728/0xad0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:325
netlink_deliver_tap net/netlink/af_netlink.c:338
__netlink_sendskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1263
netlink_sendskb+0x1d9/0x200 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1272
netlink_unicast+0x56d/0xf50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1360
nlmsg_unicast ./include/net/netlink.h:1061
rtnl_unicast+0x5a/0x80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:758
ip6addrlbl_get+0xfad/0x10f0 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c:628
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xb33/0x1570 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082
...
Uninit was created at:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x118/0xb00 mm/slab.h:742
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3398
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4f2/0x930 mm/slub.c:3437
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:954
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x117/0x3d0 mm/slab_common.c:975
kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:437
__alloc_skb+0x27a/0xab0 net/core/skbuff.c:509
alloc_skb ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1267
nlmsg_new ./include/net/netlink.h:964
ip6addrlbl_get+0x490/0x10f0 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c:608
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xb33/0x1570 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082
netlink_rcv_skb+0x299/0x550 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
rtnetlink_rcv+0x26/0x30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6109
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319
netlink_unicast+0x9ab/0xf50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0xebc/0x10f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
...
This patch ensures that the reserved field is always initialized.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-24976
Distribution is a toolkit to pack, ship, store, and deliver container content. Systems running registry versions 3.0.0-beta.1 through 3.0.0-rc.2 with token authentication enabled may be vulnerable to an issue in which token authentication allows an attacker to inject an untrusted signing key in a JSON web token (JWT). The issue lies in how the JSON web key (JWK) verification is performed. When a JWT contains a JWK header without a certificate chain, the code only checks if the KeyID (`kid`) matches one of the trusted keys, but doesn't verify that the actual key material matches. A fix for the issue is available at commit 5ea9aa028db65ca5665f6af2c20ecf9dc34e5fcd and expected to be a part of version 3.0.0-rc.3. There is no way to work around this issue without patching if the system requires token authentication.
π@cveNotify
Distribution is a toolkit to pack, ship, store, and deliver container content. Systems running registry versions 3.0.0-beta.1 through 3.0.0-rc.2 with token authentication enabled may be vulnerable to an issue in which token authentication allows an attacker to inject an untrusted signing key in a JSON web token (JWT). The issue lies in how the JSON web key (JWK) verification is performed. When a JWT contains a JWK header without a certificate chain, the code only checks if the KeyID (`kid`) matches one of the trusted keys, but doesn't verify that the actual key material matches. A fix for the issue is available at commit 5ea9aa028db65ca5665f6af2c20ecf9dc34e5fcd and expected to be a part of version 3.0.0-rc.3. There is no way to work around this issue without patching if the system requires token authentication.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix registry token authentication bug Β· distribution/distribution@f4a500c
When a JWT contains a JWK header without a certificate chain,
the original code only checked if the KeyID (kid) matches one of the trusted keys,
but doesn't verify that the actual key mater...
the original code only checked if the KeyID (kid) matches one of the trusted keys,
but doesn't verify that the actual key mater...
π¨ CVE-2025-29786
Expr is an expression language and expression evaluation for Go. Prior to version 1.17.0, if the Expr expression parser is given an unbounded input string, it will attempt to compile the entire string and generate an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) node for each part of the expression. In scenarios where input size isnβt limited, a malicious or inadvertent extremely large expression can consume excessive memory as the parser builds a huge AST. This can ultimately lead to*excessive memory usage and an Out-Of-Memory (OOM) crash of the process. This issue is relatively uncommon and will only manifest when there are no restrictions on the input size, i.e. the expression length is allowed to grow arbitrarily large. In typical use cases where inputs are bounded or validated, this problem would not occur. The problem has been patched in the latest versions of the Expr library. The fix introduces compile-time limits on the number of AST nodes and memory usage during parsing, preventing any single expression from exhausting resources. Users should upgrade to Expr version 1.17.0 or later, as this release includes the new node budget and memory limit safeguards. Upgrading to v1.17.0 ensures that extremely deep or large expressions are detected and safely aborted during compilation, avoiding the OOM condition. For users who cannot immediately upgrade, the recommended workaround is to impose an input size restriction before parsing. In practice, this means validating or limiting the length of expression strings that your application will accept. For example, set a maximum allowable number of characters (or nodes) for any expression and reject or truncate inputs that exceed this limit. By ensuring no unbounded-length expression is ever fed into the parser, one can prevent the parser from constructing a pathologically large AST and avoid potential memory exhaustion. In short, pre-validate and cap input size as a safeguard in the absence of the patch.
π@cveNotify
Expr is an expression language and expression evaluation for Go. Prior to version 1.17.0, if the Expr expression parser is given an unbounded input string, it will attempt to compile the entire string and generate an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) node for each part of the expression. In scenarios where input size isnβt limited, a malicious or inadvertent extremely large expression can consume excessive memory as the parser builds a huge AST. This can ultimately lead to*excessive memory usage and an Out-Of-Memory (OOM) crash of the process. This issue is relatively uncommon and will only manifest when there are no restrictions on the input size, i.e. the expression length is allowed to grow arbitrarily large. In typical use cases where inputs are bounded or validated, this problem would not occur. The problem has been patched in the latest versions of the Expr library. The fix introduces compile-time limits on the number of AST nodes and memory usage during parsing, preventing any single expression from exhausting resources. Users should upgrade to Expr version 1.17.0 or later, as this release includes the new node budget and memory limit safeguards. Upgrading to v1.17.0 ensures that extremely deep or large expressions are detected and safely aborted during compilation, avoiding the OOM condition. For users who cannot immediately upgrade, the recommended workaround is to impose an input size restriction before parsing. In practice, this means validating or limiting the length of expression strings that your application will accept. For example, set a maximum allowable number of characters (or nodes) for any expression and reject or truncate inputs that exceed this limit. By ensuring no unbounded-length expression is ever fed into the parser, one can prevent the parser from constructing a pathologically large AST and avoid potential memory exhaustion. In short, pre-validate and cap input size as a safeguard in the absence of the patch.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
feat: add node budget and memory limits (#762) Β· expr-lang/expr@0d19441
* feat: add node budget and memory limits
Implement compile-time and runtime safeguards against deeply nested expressions:
- Add MaxNodes limit to track and limit AST node count during parsing
- ...
Implement compile-time and runtime safeguards against deeply nested expressions:
- Add MaxNodes limit to track and limit AST node count during parsing
- ...
π¨ CVE-2025-31478
Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Zulip supports a configuration where account creation is limited solely by being able to authenticate with a single-sign on authentication backend, meaning the organization places no restrictions on email address domains or invitations being required to join, but has disabled the EmailAuthBackend that is used for email/password authentication. A bug in the Zulip server means that it is possible to create an account in such organizations, without having an account with the configured SSO authentication backend. This issue is patched in version 10.2. A workaround includes requiring invitations to join the organization prevents the vulnerability from being accessed.
π@cveNotify
Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Zulip supports a configuration where account creation is limited solely by being able to authenticate with a single-sign on authentication backend, meaning the organization places no restrictions on email address domains or invitations being required to join, but has disabled the EmailAuthBackend that is used for email/password authentication. A bug in the Zulip server means that it is possible to create an account in such organizations, without having an account with the configured SSO authentication backend. This issue is patched in version 10.2. A workaround includes requiring invitations to join the organization prevents the vulnerability from being accessed.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
signup: Prevent unauthorized signup for realms without EmailAuthBackend. Β· zulip/zulip@b5ab90a
Zulip supports a configuration where account creation is limited solely
by being able to authenticate with a single-sign on authentication
backend, such as Google Authentication, SAML, or LDAP (i.e...
by being able to authenticate with a single-sign on authentication
backend, such as Google Authentication, SAML, or LDAP (i.e...
π¨ CVE-2025-30167
Jupyter Core is a package for the core common functionality of Jupyter projects. When using Jupyter Core prior to version 5.8.0 on Windows, the shared `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory is searched for configuration files (`SYSTEM_CONFIG_PATH` and `SYSTEM_JUPYTER_PATH`), which may allow users to create configuration files affecting other users. Only shared Windows systems with multiple users and unprotected `%PROGRAMDATA%` are affected. Users should upgrade to Jupyter Core version 5.8.0 or later to receive a patch. Some other mitigations are available. As administrator, modify the permissions on the `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory so it is not writable by unauthorized users; or as administrator, create the `%PROGRAMDATA%\jupyter` directory with appropriately restrictive permissions; or as user or administrator, set the `%PROGRAMDATA%` environment variable to a directory with appropriately restrictive permissions (e.g. controlled by administrators _or_ the current user).
π@cveNotify
Jupyter Core is a package for the core common functionality of Jupyter projects. When using Jupyter Core prior to version 5.8.0 on Windows, the shared `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory is searched for configuration files (`SYSTEM_CONFIG_PATH` and `SYSTEM_JUPYTER_PATH`), which may allow users to create configuration files affecting other users. Only shared Windows systems with multiple users and unprotected `%PROGRAMDATA%` are affected. Users should upgrade to Jupyter Core version 5.8.0 or later to receive a patch. Some other mitigations are available. As administrator, modify the permissions on the `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory so it is not writable by unauthorized users; or as administrator, create the `%PROGRAMDATA%\jupyter` directory with appropriately restrictive permissions; or as user or administrator, set the `%PROGRAMDATA%` environment variable to a directory with appropriately restrictive permissions (e.g. controlled by administrators _or_ the current user).
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge commit from fork Β· jupyter/jupyter_core@5e89656
* %PROGRAMDATA% is not safe by default on Windows, require opt-in
require setting JUPYTER_USE_PROGRAMDATA=1 in order to look here for system-wide config
# Conflicts:
#
jupyter_core/paths.py
* te...
require setting JUPYTER_USE_PROGRAMDATA=1 in order to look here for system-wide config
# Conflicts:
#
jupyter_core/paths.py
* te...
π¨ CVE-2025-52982
An Improper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability in the SIP ALG of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MS-MPC allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).
When an MX Series device with an MS-MPC is configured with two or more service sets which are both processing SIP calls, a specific sequence of call events will lead to a crash and restart of the MS-MPC.
This issue affects Junos OS:
* all versions before 21.2R3-S9,
* 21.4 versions from 21.4R1,
* 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6.
As the MS-MPC is EoL after Junos OS 22.4, later versions are not affected.
This issue does not affect MX-SPC3 or SRX Series devices.
π@cveNotify
An Improper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability in the SIP ALG of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MS-MPC allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).
When an MX Series device with an MS-MPC is configured with two or more service sets which are both processing SIP calls, a specific sequence of call events will lead to a crash and restart of the MS-MPC.
This issue affects Junos OS:
* all versions before 21.2R3-S9,
* 21.4 versions from 21.4R1,
* 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6.
As the MS-MPC is EoL after Junos OS 22.4, later versions are not affected.
This issue does not affect MX-SPC3 or SRX Series devices.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-52983
A UI Discrepancy for Security Feature
vulnerability in the UI of Juniper Networks Junos OS on VM Host systems allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to access the device.
On VM Host Routing Engines (RE), even if the configured public key for root has been removed, remote users which are in possession of the corresponding private key can still log in as root.
This issue affects Junos OS:
* all versions before 22.2R3-S7,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S5,
* 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3,
* 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S3,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2.
π@cveNotify
A UI Discrepancy for Security Feature
vulnerability in the UI of Juniper Networks Junos OS on VM Host systems allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to access the device.
On VM Host Routing Engines (RE), even if the configured public key for root has been removed, remote users which are in possession of the corresponding private key can still log in as root.
This issue affects Junos OS:
* all versions before 22.2R3-S7,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S5,
* 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3,
* 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S3,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-52984
A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause impact to the availability of the device.
When static route points to a reject next hop and a gNMI query is processed for that static route, rpd crashes and restarts.
This issue affects:
Junos OS: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9,
* 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S10,
* 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6,
* 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3,
* 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2;
Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO,
* 23.2-EVO
versions before 23.2R2-S3-EVO,
* 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO,
* 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO.
π@cveNotify
A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause impact to the availability of the device.
When static route points to a reject next hop and a gNMI query is processed for that static route, rpd crashes and restarts.
This issue affects:
Junos OS: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9,
* 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S10,
* 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6,
* 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3,
* 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2;
Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO,
* 23.2-EVO
versions before 23.2R2-S3-EVO,
* 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO,
* 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-52985
A Use of Incorrect Operator
vulnerability in the Routing Engine firewall of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass security restrictions.
When a firewall filter which is applied to the lo0 or re:mgmt interface references a prefix list with 'from prefix-list', and that prefix list contains more than 10 entries, the prefix list doesn't match and packets destined to or from the local device are not filtered.
This issue affects firewall filters applied to the re:mgmt interfaces as input and output, but only affects firewall filters applied to the lo0 interface as output.
This issue is applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 as a prefix list can contain IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes.
This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:
* 23.2R2-S3-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,
* 23.4R2-S3-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO,
* 24.2R2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO,
* 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO.
This issue doesn't affect Junos OS Evolved versions before 23.2R1-EVO.
π@cveNotify
A Use of Incorrect Operator
vulnerability in the Routing Engine firewall of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass security restrictions.
When a firewall filter which is applied to the lo0 or re:mgmt interface references a prefix list with 'from prefix-list', and that prefix list contains more than 10 entries, the prefix list doesn't match and packets destined to or from the local device are not filtered.
This issue affects firewall filters applied to the re:mgmt interfaces as input and output, but only affects firewall filters applied to the lo0 interface as output.
This issue is applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 as a prefix list can contain IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes.
This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:
* 23.2R2-S3-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,
* 23.4R2-S3-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO,
* 24.2R2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO,
* 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO.
This issue doesn't affect Junos OS Evolved versions before 23.2R1-EVO.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-52986
A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low privileged user to cause an impact to the availability of the device.
When RIB sharding is enabled and a user executes one of several routing related 'show' commands, a certain amount of memory is leaked. When all available memory has been consumed rpd will crash and restart.
The leak can be monitored with the CLI command:
show task memory detail | match task_shard_mgmt_cookie
where the allocated memory in bytes can be seen to continuously increase with each exploitation.
This issue affects:
Junos OS:
* all versions before 21.2R3-S9,
* 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S11,
* 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S7,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S7,
* 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4,
* 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R2,
* 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2;
Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 22.2R3-S7-EVO
* 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO,
* 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,
* 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO,
* 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO,
* 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R2-EVO.
π@cveNotify
A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low privileged user to cause an impact to the availability of the device.
When RIB sharding is enabled and a user executes one of several routing related 'show' commands, a certain amount of memory is leaked. When all available memory has been consumed rpd will crash and restart.
The leak can be monitored with the CLI command:
show task memory detail | match task_shard_mgmt_cookie
where the allocated memory in bytes can be seen to continuously increase with each exploitation.
This issue affects:
Junos OS:
* all versions before 21.2R3-S9,
* 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S11,
* 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S7,
* 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S7,
* 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4,
* 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R2,
* 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2;
Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 22.2R3-S7-EVO
* 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO,
* 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,
* 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO,
* 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO,
* 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R2-EVO.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-21911
An Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control
Protocol
Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a flood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.
When the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:
op:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0 rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0 fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP,
This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,
* from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,
* from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,
* from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,
* from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,
* from 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
π@cveNotify
An Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control
Protocol
Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a flood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.
When the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:
op:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0 rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0 fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP,
This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:
* all versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,
* from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,
* from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,
* from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,
* from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,
* from 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-23769
lucy-xss-filter before commit e5826c0 allows an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript due to improper sanitization caused by misconfigured default superset rule files.
π@cveNotify
lucy-xss-filter before commit e5826c0 allows an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript due to improper sanitization caused by misconfigured default superset rule files.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-14757
The Cost Calculator Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Payment Status Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.9 only when used in combination with Cost Calculator Builder PRO. This is due to the complete_payment AJAX action being registered via wp_ajax_nopriv, making it accessible to unauthenticated users, and the complete() function only verifying a nonce without checking user capabilities or order ownership. Since nonces are exposed to all visitors via window.ccb_nonces in the page source, any unauthenticated attacker can mark any order's payment status as "completed" without actual payment.
π@cveNotify
The Cost Calculator Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Payment Status Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.9 only when used in combination with Cost Calculator Builder PRO. This is due to the complete_payment AJAX action being registered via wp_ajax_nopriv, making it accessible to unauthenticated users, and the complete() function only verifying a nonce without checking user capabilities or order ownership. Since nonces are exposed to all visitors via window.ccb_nonces in the page source, any unauthenticated attacker can mark any order's payment status as "completed" without actual payment.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-14844
The Membership Plugin β Restrict Content plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authentication in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.16 via the 'rcp_stripe_create_setup_intent_for_saved_card' function due to missing capability check. Additionally, the plugin does not check a user-controlled key, which makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to leak Stripe SetupIntent client_secret values for any membership.
π@cveNotify
The Membership Plugin β Restrict Content plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authentication in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.16 via the 'rcp_stripe_create_setup_intent_for_saved_card' function due to missing capability check. Additionally, the plugin does not check a user-controlled key, which makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to leak Stripe SetupIntent client_secret values for any membership.
π@cveNotify
cwe.mitre.org
CWE -
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (4.19.1)
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (4.19.1)
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) is a list of software weaknesses.
π¨ CVE-2025-59870
HCL MyXalytics is affected by improper management of a static JWT signing secret in the web application, where the secret lacks rotation , introducing a security risk
π@cveNotify
HCL MyXalytics is affected by improper management of a static JWT signing secret in the web application, where the secret lacks rotation , introducing a security risk
π@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin : HCL MyXalytics v6.7 is affected by improper management of a static JWT signing secret - Customer Support
HCL MyXalytics v6.7 is affected by improper management of a static JWT signing secret.
π¨ CVE-2025-14894
Livewire Filemanager, commonly used in Laravel applications, contains LivewireFilemanagerComponent.php, which does not perform file type and MIME validation, allowing for RCE through upload of a malicious php file that can then be executed via the /storage/ URL if a commonly performed setup process within Laravel applications has been completed.
π@cveNotify
Livewire Filemanager, commonly used in Laravel applications, contains LivewireFilemanagerComponent.php, which does not perform file type and MIME validation, allowing for RCE through upload of a malicious php file that can then be executed via the /storage/ URL if a commonly performed setup process within Laravel applications has been completed.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - livewire-filemanager/filemanager: A simple, friendly and practical Livewire filemanager for your applications
A simple, friendly and practical Livewire filemanager for your applications - livewire-filemanager/filemanager
π¨ CVE-2026-0612
The Librarian contains a information leakage vulnerability through the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used to retrieve arbitrary external content provided by an attacker, which can be used to proxy requests through The Librarian infrastructure. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all versions of TheLibrarian.
π@cveNotify
The Librarian contains a information leakage vulnerability through the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used to retrieve arbitrary external content provided by an attacker, which can be used to proxy requests through The Librarian infrastructure. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all versions of TheLibrarian.
π@cveNotify
mindgard.ai
TheLibrarian.io's AI Security Is Checked Out, and Their Disclosure Response - Mindgard
The Mindgard platform identified high severity vulnerabilities in TheLibrarian.io platform
π¨ CVE-2026-0613
The Librarian contains an internal port scanning vulnerability, facilitated by the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used with SSRF-style behavior to perform GET requests to internal IP addresses and services, enabling scanning of the Hertzner cloud environment that TheLibrarian uses. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all affected versions.
π@cveNotify
The Librarian contains an internal port scanning vulnerability, facilitated by the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used with SSRF-style behavior to perform GET requests to internal IP addresses and services, enabling scanning of the Hertzner cloud environment that TheLibrarian uses. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all affected versions.
π@cveNotify
mindgard.ai
TheLibrarian.io's AI Security Is Checked Out, and Their Disclosure Response - Mindgard
The Mindgard platform identified high severity vulnerabilities in TheLibrarian.io platform
π¨ CVE-2026-0615
The Librarian `supervisord` status page can be retrieved by the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used to retrieve running processes within TheLibrarian backend. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all affected versions.
π@cveNotify
The Librarian `supervisord` status page can be retrieved by the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used to retrieve running processes within TheLibrarian backend. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all affected versions.
π@cveNotify
mindgard.ai
TheLibrarian.io's AI Security Is Checked Out, and Their Disclosure Response - Mindgard
The Mindgard platform identified high severity vulnerabilities in TheLibrarian.io platform