🚨 CVE-2025-10735
The Block For Mailchimp – Easy Mailchimp Form Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.12 via the mcbSubmit_Form_Data(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
🎖@cveNotify
The Block For Mailchimp – Easy Mailchimp Form Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.12 via the mcbSubmit_Form_Data(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-10744
The File Manager, Code Editor, and Backup by Managefy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.1 through publicly exposed log files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view information like full paths and full paths to backup files information contained in the exposed log files.
🎖@cveNotify
The File Manager, Code Editor, and Backup by Managefy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.1 through publicly exposed log files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view information like full paths and full paths to backup files information contained in the exposed log files.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-9075
The ZoloBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple Gutenberg blocks in versions up to, and including, 2.3.10. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied attributes within multiple block components including Google Maps markers, Lightbox captions, Image Gallery data attributes, Progress Pie prefix/suffix fields, and Text Path URL fields. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
The ZoloBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple Gutenberg blocks in versions up to, and including, 2.3.10. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied attributes within multiple block components including Google Maps markers, Lightbox captions, Image Gallery data attributes, Progress Pie prefix/suffix fields, and Text Path URL fields. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-9512
The Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP WordPress plugin before 1.50 does not properly handles HTML tag attribute modifications, making it possible for unauthenticated attackers to conduct Stored XSS attacks via post comments.
🎖@cveNotify
The Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP WordPress plugin before 1.50 does not properly handles HTML tag attribute modifications, making it possible for unauthenticated attackers to conduct Stored XSS attacks via post comments.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP < 1.50 - Unauthenticated Stored-XSS
See details on Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP < 1.50 - Unauthenticated Stored-XSS CVE 2025-9512. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2025-7493
A privilege escalation flaw from host to domain administrator was found in FreeIPA. This vulnerability is similar to CVE-2025-4404, where it fails to validate the uniqueness of the krbCanonicalName. While the previously released version added validations for the admin@REALM credential, FreeIPA still does not validate the root@REALM canonical name, which can also be used as the realm administrator's name. This flaw allows an attacker to perform administrative tasks over the REALM, leading to access to sensitive data and sensitive data exfiltration.
🎖@cveNotify
A privilege escalation flaw from host to domain administrator was found in FreeIPA. This vulnerability is similar to CVE-2025-4404, where it fails to validate the uniqueness of the krbCanonicalName. While the previously released version added validations for the admin@REALM credential, FreeIPA still does not validate the root@REALM canonical name, which can also be used as the realm administrator's name. This flaw allows an attacker to perform administrative tasks over the REALM, leading to access to sensitive data and sensitive data exfiltration.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-36852
The Custom Searchable Data Entry System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthenticated database wiping in versions up to, and including 1.7.1, due to a missing capability check and lack of sufficient validation on the ghazale_sds_delete_entries_table_row() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to completely wipe database tables such as wp_users.
🎖@cveNotify
The Custom Searchable Data Entry System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthenticated database wiping in versions up to, and including 1.7.1, due to a missing capability check and lack of sufficient validation on the ghazale_sds_delete_entries_table_row() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to completely wipe database tables such as wp_users.
🎖@cveNotify
Wordfence
Active Attack on Zero Day in Custom Searchable Data Entry System Plugin
The Wordfence Threat Intelligence team is tracking a series of attacks against an unpatched vulnerability in the Custom Searchable Data Entry System plugin for WordPress. The estimated 2,000+ sites running the plugin are vulnerable to Unauthenticated Data…
🚨 CVE-2025-58246
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in WordPress allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. The WordPress Core security team is aware of the issue and is already working on a fix. This is a low-severity vulnerability. Contributor-level privileges required in order to exploit it.
This issue affects WordPress: from 6.8 through 6.8.2, from 6.7 through 6.7.3, from 6.6 through 6.6.3, from 6.5 through 6.5.6, from 6.4 through 6.4.6, from 6.3 through 6.3.6, from 6.2 through 6.2.7, from 6.1 through 6.1.8, from 6.0 through 6.0.10, from 5.9 through 5.9.11, from 5.8 through 5.8.11, from 5.7 through 5.7.13, from 5.6 through 5.6.15, from 5.5 through 5.5.16, from 5.4 through 5.4.17, from 5.3 through 5.3.19, from 5.2 through 5.2.22, from 5.1 through 5.1.20, from 5.0 through 5.0.23, from 4.9 through 4.9.27, from 4.8 through 4.8.26, from 4.7 through 4.7.30.
🎖@cveNotify
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in WordPress allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. The WordPress Core security team is aware of the issue and is already working on a fix. This is a low-severity vulnerability. Contributor-level privileges required in order to exploit it.
This issue affects WordPress: from 6.8 through 6.8.2, from 6.7 through 6.7.3, from 6.6 through 6.6.3, from 6.5 through 6.5.6, from 6.4 through 6.4.6, from 6.3 through 6.3.6, from 6.2 through 6.2.7, from 6.1 through 6.1.8, from 6.0 through 6.0.10, from 5.9 through 5.9.11, from 5.8 through 5.8.11, from 5.7 through 5.7.13, from 5.6 through 5.6.15, from 5.5 through 5.5.16, from 5.4 through 5.4.17, from 5.3 through 5.3.19, from 5.2 through 5.2.22, from 5.1 through 5.1.20, from 5.0 through 5.0.23, from 4.9 through 4.9.27, from 4.8 through 4.8.26, from 4.7 through 4.7.30.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress <= 6.8.2 - (Contributor+) Sensitive Data Exposure Vulnerability - Patchstack
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress, Drupal and Joomla security issues.
🚨 CVE-2025-58674
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WordPress allows Stored XSS. WordPress core security team is aware of the issue and working on a fix. This is low severity vulnerability that requires an attacker to have Author or higher user privileges to execute the attack vector.This issue affects WordPress: from 6.8 through 6.8.2, from 6.7 through 6.7.3, from 6.6 through 6.6.3, from 6.5 through 6.5.6, from 6.4 through 6.4.6, from 6.3 through 6.3.6, from 6.2 through 6.2.7, from 6.1 through 6.1.8, from 6.0 through 6.0.10, from 5.9 through 5.9.11, from 5.8 through 5.8.11, from 5.7 through 5.7.13, from 5.6 through 5.6.15, from 5.5 through 5.5.16, from 5.4 through 5.4.17, from 5.3 through 5.3.19, from 5.2 through 5.2.22, from 5.1 through 5.1.20, from 5.0 through 5.0.23, from 4.9 through 4.9.27, from 4.8 through 4.8.26, from 4.7 through 4.7.30.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WordPress allows Stored XSS. WordPress core security team is aware of the issue and working on a fix. This is low severity vulnerability that requires an attacker to have Author or higher user privileges to execute the attack vector.This issue affects WordPress: from 6.8 through 6.8.2, from 6.7 through 6.7.3, from 6.6 through 6.6.3, from 6.5 through 6.5.6, from 6.4 through 6.4.6, from 6.3 through 6.3.6, from 6.2 through 6.2.7, from 6.1 through 6.1.8, from 6.0 through 6.0.10, from 5.9 through 5.9.11, from 5.8 through 5.8.11, from 5.7 through 5.7.13, from 5.6 through 5.6.15, from 5.5 through 5.5.16, from 5.4 through 5.4.17, from 5.3 through 5.3.19, from 5.2 through 5.2.22, from 5.1 through 5.1.20, from 5.0 through 5.0.23, from 4.9 through 4.9.27, from 4.8 through 4.8.26, from 4.7 through 4.7.30.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress core <= 6.8.2 - (Author+) Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability - Patchstack
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress, Drupal and Joomla security issues.
🚨 CVE-2025-10725
A flaw was found in Red Hat Openshift AI Service. A low-privileged attacker with access to an authenticated account, for example as a data scientist using a standard Jupyter notebook, can escalate their privileges to a full cluster administrator. This allows for the complete compromise of the cluster's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attacker can steal sensitive data, disrupt all services, and take control of the underlying infrastructure, leading to a total breach of the platform and all applications hosted on it.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in Red Hat Openshift AI Service. A low-privileged attacker with access to an authenticated account, for example as a data scientist using a standard Jupyter notebook, can escalate their privileges to a full cluster administrator. This allows for the complete compromise of the cluster's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attacker can steal sensitive data, disrupt all services, and take control of the underlying infrastructure, leading to a total breach of the platform and all applications hosted on it.
🎖@cveNotify
🔥1
🚨 CVE-2025-57852
A container privilege escalation flaw was found in KServe ModelMesh container images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container.
🎖@cveNotify
A container privilege escalation flaw was found in KServe ModelMesh container images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container.
🎖@cveNotify
❤1
🚨 CVE-2025-61622
Deserialization of untrusted data in python in pyfory versions 0.12.0 through 0.12.2, or the legacy pyfury versions from 0.1.0 through 0.10.3: allows arbitrary code execution. An application is vulnerable if it reads pyfory serialized data from untrusted sources. An attacker can craft a data stream that selects pickle-fallback serializer during deserialization, leading to the execution of `pickle.loads`, which is vulnerable to remote code execution.
Users are recommended to upgrade to pyfory version 0.12.3 or later, which has removed pickle fallback serializer and thus fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Deserialization of untrusted data in python in pyfory versions 0.12.0 through 0.12.2, or the legacy pyfury versions from 0.1.0 through 0.10.3: allows arbitrary code execution. An application is vulnerable if it reads pyfory serialized data from untrusted sources. An attacker can craft a data stream that selects pickle-fallback serializer during deserialization, leading to the execution of `pickle.loads`, which is vulnerable to remote code execution.
Users are recommended to upgrade to pyfory version 0.12.3 or later, which has removed pickle fallback serializer and thus fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2023-46988
Path Traversal vulnerability in ONLYOFFICE Document Server before v8.0.1 allows a remote attacker to copy arbitrary files by manipulating the fileExt parameter in the /example/editor endpoint, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive files and potential Denial of Service (DoS).
🎖@cveNotify
Path Traversal vulnerability in ONLYOFFICE Document Server before v8.0.1 allows a remote attacker to copy arbitrary files by manipulating the fileExt parameter in the /example/editor endpoint, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive files and potential Denial of Service (DoS).
🎖@cveNotify
Medium
ONLYOFFICE Document server: Path Traversal (CVE-2023-46988)
A Tiny Flaw with a Huge Impact on Security
🚨 CVE-2024-21544
Versions of the package spatie/browsershot before 5.0.1 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to improper URL validation in the setUrl method.An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by using leading whitespace (%20) before the file:// protocol, resulting in Local File Inclusion, which allows the attacker to read sensitive files on the server.
🎖@cveNotify
Versions of the package spatie/browsershot before 5.0.1 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to improper URL validation in the setUrl method.An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by using leading whitespace (%20) before the file:// protocol, resulting in Local File Inclusion, which allows the attacker to read sensitive files on the server.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-10847
DX Unified Infrastructure Management (Nimsoft/UIM) and below contains an improper ACL handling vulnerability in the robot (controller) component. A remote attacker can execute commands, read from, or write to the target system.
🎖@cveNotify
DX Unified Infrastructure Management (Nimsoft/UIM) and below contains an improper ACL handling vulnerability in the robot (controller) component. A remote attacker can execute commands, read from, or write to the target system.
🎖@cveNotify
🔥1
🚨 CVE-2021-4460
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning
If get_num_sdma_queues or get_num_xgmi_sdma_queues is 0, we end up
doing a shift operation where the number of bits shifted equals
number of bits in the operand. This behaviour is undefined.
Set num_sdma_queues or num_xgmi_sdma_queues to ULLONG_MAX, if the
count is >= number of bits in the operand.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1472
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning
If get_num_sdma_queues or get_num_xgmi_sdma_queues is 0, we end up
doing a shift operation where the number of bits shifted equals
number of bits in the operand. This behaviour is undefined.
Set num_sdma_queues or num_xgmi_sdma_queues to ULLONG_MAX, if the
count is >= number of bits in the operand.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1472
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-50420
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: hisilicon/hpre - fix resource leak in remove process
In hpre_remove(), when the disable operation of qm sriov failed,
the following logic should continue to be executed to release the
remaining resources that have been allocated, instead of returning
directly, otherwise there will be resource leakage.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: hisilicon/hpre - fix resource leak in remove process
In hpre_remove(), when the disable operation of qm sriov failed,
the following logic should continue to be executed to release the
remaining resources that have been allocated, instead of returning
directly, otherwise there will be resource leakage.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-50421
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rpmsg: char: Avoid double destroy of default endpoint
The rpmsg_dev_remove() in rpmsg_core is the place for releasing
this default endpoint.
So need to avoid destroying the default endpoint in
rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(), this should be the same as
rpmsg_eptdev_release(). Otherwise there will be double destroy
issue that ept->refcount report warning:
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
Call trace:
refcount_warn_saturate+0xf8/0x150
virtio_rpmsg_destroy_ept+0xd4/0xec
rpmsg_dev_remove+0x60/0x70
The issue can be reproduced by stopping remoteproc before
closing the /dev/rpmsgX.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rpmsg: char: Avoid double destroy of default endpoint
The rpmsg_dev_remove() in rpmsg_core is the place for releasing
this default endpoint.
So need to avoid destroying the default endpoint in
rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(), this should be the same as
rpmsg_eptdev_release(). Otherwise there will be double destroy
issue that ept->refcount report warning:
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
Call trace:
refcount_warn_saturate+0xf8/0x150
virtio_rpmsg_destroy_ept+0xd4/0xec
rpmsg_dev_remove+0x60/0x70
The issue can be reproduced by stopping remoteproc before
closing the /dev/rpmsgX.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2022-50422
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libsas: Fix use-after-free bug in smp_execute_task_sg()
When executing SMP task failed, the smp_execute_task_sg() calls del_timer()
to delete "slow_task->timer". However, if the timer handler
sas_task_internal_timedout() is running, the del_timer() in
smp_execute_task_sg() will not stop it and a UAF will happen. The process
is shown below:
(thread 1) | (thread 2)
smp_execute_task_sg() | sas_task_internal_timedout()
... |
del_timer() |
... | ...
sas_free_task(task) |
kfree(task->slow_task) //FREE|
| task->slow_task->... //USE
Fix by calling del_timer_sync() in smp_execute_task_sg(), which makes sure
the timer handler have finished before the "task->slow_task" is
deallocated.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libsas: Fix use-after-free bug in smp_execute_task_sg()
When executing SMP task failed, the smp_execute_task_sg() calls del_timer()
to delete "slow_task->timer". However, if the timer handler
sas_task_internal_timedout() is running, the del_timer() in
smp_execute_task_sg() will not stop it and a UAF will happen. The process
is shown below:
(thread 1) | (thread 2)
smp_execute_task_sg() | sas_task_internal_timedout()
... |
del_timer() |
... | ...
sas_free_task(task) |
kfree(task->slow_task) //FREE|
| task->slow_task->... //USE
Fix by calling del_timer_sync() in smp_execute_task_sg(), which makes sure
the timer handler have finished before the "task->slow_task" is
deallocated.
🎖@cveNotify
🔥1
🚨 CVE-2025-53490
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CampaignEvents Extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - CampaignEvents Extension: from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CampaignEvents Extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - CampaignEvents Extension: from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-53489
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - GoogleDocs4MW Extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - GoogleDocs4MW Extension: from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - GoogleDocs4MW Extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - GoogleDocs4MW Extension: from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-40647
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Issabel v5.0.0, consisting of a stored XSS due to a lack of proper validation of user input, through the 'email' parameter in '/index.php?menu=address_book'.
🎖@cveNotify
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Issabel v5.0.0, consisting of a stored XSS due to a lack of proper validation of user input, through the 'email' parameter in '/index.php?menu=address_book'.
🎖@cveNotify
www.incibe.es
Multiple vulnerabilities in Issabel products
INCIBE has coordinated the publication of two medium-severity vulnerabilities affecting Issabel, a uni