𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
S.179(1) BNSS | Police Cannot Compel Presence Of 'Any Person' Acquainted With Case As Matter Of Right: Andhra Pradesh High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/andhra-pradesh-high-court/andhra-pradesh-high-court-ruling-section-179-bnss-power-police-officer…
VD MOORTHY V STATE OF AP 2025 (APHC)

1. CAN POLICE ISSUE NOTICE TO PERSON RESIDING OUT THE JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF POLICE STATION?

❌A Police Officer has no power to issue notice under Section 179(1) to any person who is not residing within the limits of his own station or any adjoining station. However, the same does not preclude him from making an investigation to examine such a person by approaching him at his place.

2. CAN POLICE ISSUE NOTICE TO PERSONS MENTIONED IN 179(1) PROVISO

βœ…Yes police can issue notice to them as well i.e. male below and above 15 and 60 and women and mentally disabled person. But these are persons are not legally bound to attend the station however police may approach them in their place.

OBJECT OF 179 BNSS PROVISO
The object of this proviso appears to be, such persons, being vulnerable, cannot be troubled by the Police Officer in the name of investigation.”

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
❀4🐳1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Explained: The Right to Education Act and minority educational institutions πŸ”— #express_premium #supreme_court
two-judge Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, while deciding on whether the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) was mandatory for minority schools, held that the ruling in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v Union of India (2014) requires reconsideration by a larger Bench of the SC.
The court observed that by taking minority schools out of the ambit of the RTE Act, the Pramati judgment may have jeopardised the fundamental right to quality education for children studying in them.
❀2
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK

On a lighter note, the SG opined that Newton's Law also failed before the virality on social media. 
"This is serious also, we used to know Newton's law- every action has an equal reaction, now every action has a disproportionate social media reaction." 
πŸ‘2
0d6ef5296f368e964a20c62ddad0d1a74d29b6d81452012111c700c5ee9d51f91758226369.pdf
333.3 KB
5οΈβƒ£πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ REV. STAINISLAUS
v
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1977

Right to Freedom of religion -Article 25-Right to propogate doesn't mean Right to religion.

Similarly, section 3 of the Orissa Act prohibits forcible conversion by the use of force or by inducement or by any fraudulent means, and section 4 penalises such forcible conversion. The Acts therefore clearly provide for the maintenance of public order for, if forcible conversion had not been prohibited, that would have created public disorder in the States.

Under Entry 1 list 2 (state list) states are competent to enact anti conversion laws and it would not fall in Entry 97 of Union list which delas with residuary powers to enact laws.

Fundamental Right to Propogation of tenets of religion is allowed but not forceful conversion which fallls within exception of public order.
β€”__β€”

You have right to profess any religion so right to be converted.

#COI@CurrentLegalGK
❀4
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Islam Permits Polygamy Only When A Man Can Do Justice Between Wives : Kerala High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-islam-polygamy-man-justice-between-wives-304548
β€œThe spirit and intention of these verses is monogamy, and polygamy is only an exception. The Holy Quran greatly stresses 'justice'. If a Muslim man can give justice to his first wife, second wife, third wife and fourth wife, then only marriage more than once is permissible. The majority of the people in the muslim community are followers of Monogamy, even if they have the wealth to maintain more than one wife. That is the true spirit of the Holy Quran also.” the court observed
 "The small minority among the muslim community who are following polygamy, forgetting the verses of the Holy Quran, are to be educated by the religious leaders and society." the Court added.

Chapter 4, verse 3 reads like this:
β€œ(3) And if you fear that you will not deal justly with
the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of
[other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear
that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or
those your right hand possesses. That is more
suitable that you may not incline [to injustice].”

#Muslimlaw@CurrentLegalGK
❀1