A UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RESPONSIBILITIES
Proposed by the InterAction Council.

Universal Human Duties as opposed to Human Rights.

@CurrentLegalGK

Sacred Submersion: Environmental And Legal Crisis Of Idol Immersion
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/idols-immersion-and-water-pollution-prevention-act-analysis-303263

SR BOMMAI V. UNION OF INDIA 1994

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS AS LAW

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

'Unforgivable Institutional Amnesia': Retired HC Judge Slams Judiciary's Handling of Communal Disputes - The Wire
https://thewire.in/communalism/unforgivable-institutional-amnesia-justice-muralidhar-slams-judiciarys-handling-of-communal-disputes

'Cricket Not Above National Interest' : Plea In Supreme Court To Cancel India-Pakistan Asia Cup Match After Pahalgam Terror Attack
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-pil-filed-seeking-cancellation-of-india-pakistan-cricket-match-asia-cup-pahalgam-terror-attack-operation-sindoor-303481

What can be the basis of PIL? ehich Fundamental Right is getting infringed? Till what time you should not play? Sports is a different field altogether.

What's your say?

@CurrentLegalGK

https://www.barandbench.com/columns/special-enactments-and-the-need-to-broaden-the-protection-against-double-jeopardy

#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK

overlapping offences in general as well as special law

Principles required for a Judge


I had once asked Justice Iyer what his guiding principles in his role as Judge were. In his inimitable style, he said it were four and described them thus:===> The first lesson he said, fundamental to life and law, is humility without hubris and humanist hearing without “high bench” attitude; ===>the second - which he said touched his judicial heart - was the compassionate treasury of the preamble to the Constitution, particularly the words in its exordium “we, the people of India”; the ===> third, was to hear either side fairly since courage and independence obliged him to give even “the devil its due”; and ==>finally, Justice Iyer told me that his life has taught him that perfect justice is a mirage and that in pursuit of this illusion, we ought not to jeopardise that justice which is within our grasp.

By Justice Krishna Iyer (as he then was)

#BeingJudge@CurrentLegalGK

Looking beyond suicide helplines - The Hindu
https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/looking-beyond-suicide-helplines/article70029425.ece

Rajasthan High Court Stays Cheating FIR Against Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone For Endorsing 'Defective' Car
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-fir-shah-rukh-khan-deepika-padukone-defective-car-303524

Darshan Singh
v.
State of Punjab
2010

10 Principles governing Right of Private Defence.

#BNS@CurrentLegalGK

#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
#QUESTION@CurrentLegalGK

Now that 377 IPC is no more an offence why do we still have section 38(d) and 140(4) under BNS.

Reserved Category Candidates Availing Age Relaxation Barred From Migrating To General Category Seats If Rules Forbid : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/reserved-category-candidates-availing-age-relaxation-barred-from-migrating-to-general-category-seats-if-rules-forbid-supreme-court-303357

Ratio: “Whether a reserved candidate who has availed relaxation in fees/upper age limit to participate in open competition with general candidates may be recruited against unreserved seats would depend on the facts of each case. That is to say, in the event there is no embargo in the recruitment rules/employment notification, such reserved candidates who have scored higher than the last selected unreserved candidate shall be entitled to migrate and be recruited against unreserved seats. However, if an embargo is imposed under relevant recruitment rules, such reserved candidates shall not be permitted to migrate to general category seats

Relied: The Court also referred to Saurav Yadav v. State of UP (2020), clarifying that candidates can only be migrated to unreserved seats when no special concession has been availed and no bar exists in the recruitment framework.

Facts: Since a bar to migration existed in the present case, the Court overturned the High Court's decision and denied the migration to the Respondents to the general seats.

UNION OF INDIA v. SAJIB ROY

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

*सुप्रीम कोर्ट बोला- पूरे देश को साफ हवा का हक:* दिल्ली-NCR ही क्यों, देशभर में पटाखे बैन होने चाहिए; दिल्ली के लिए पॉलिसी नहीं बना सकते
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/pMFjXyDbBWb

To be a constitutional lawyer in India today
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/to-be-a-constitutional-lawyer-in-india-today

🏡 Right to shelter discussed.

📍Landmark—
SHANTISTAR BUILDERS
v.
NK TOTAME,
1990
This recognition casts a corresponding duty on the State to ensure access to adequate housing, particularly for weaker sections.

🗓️Recent—
MANSI BRAR FERNANDES
v.
SHUBHA SHARMA
2025
Reiterated, for housing.

Question ❓
Is it possible to impose positive duty on State under the ambit of the language of Article 21? State has to make shelter for persons.

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

Right To Seek Remission Applicable Even When Convict Sentenced To Imprisonment For Remainder Of Life : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-seek-remission-applicable-even-when-convict-sentenced-to-imprisonment-for-remainder-of-life-supreme-court-303650