๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
853 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Mere Non-Lowering Of Indian Flag After Sunset Not An Offence, But Violation Of Flag Code: Kerala High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-national-flag-sunrise-sunset-flag-code-not-offence-299941
Flag Code, 2002 contains executive instructions of the Central Government and, therefore, it is not a law within the meaning of Article 13(3)(a) of the Constitution of India. It is a model code of conduct to be followed compulsorily by all the citizens of India. Penal consequences cannot be invoked unless there is a statutory provision for the same..

The Fundamental right to fly the National Flag is not absolute but a qualified one, being subject to
reasonable restrictions under Clause (2) of Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

1. The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Act of 1971 regulate the use of the National Flag [Union of India v. Naveen Jindal & Another (2004).

2. Section 2 of the Act of 1971 deals with the insults to the Indian National Flag and Constitution of India.

Vinu C. Kunjappan v. State of Kerala 2025 (Ker HC)


@CurrentLegalGK
โค3๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
pdf_upload-361394.pdf
94.3 KB
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS
v.
MAHENDRA PRASAD JAKHMOLA & ORS.

2019

Worker contracter and principle employer relationship.

2 core tests
1. Who gives wage?
2. Who controls manner of work.
โ€”-------------------โ€”

Lawyer client relationship?

BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS
vs.
D.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES
2024.

#ICA@CurrentLegalGK
โค2
๐ŸŒ… #Quote@CurrentLegalGK

เคธ เคคเฅ เคฆเฅ€เคฐเฅเค˜เค•เคพเคฒเคจเฅˆเคฐเคจเฅเคคเคฐเฅเคฏเคธเคคเฅเค•เคพเคฐเคพเคธเฅ‡เคตเคฟเคคเฅ‹ เคฆเฅƒเคขเคญเฅ‚เคฎเคฟเคƒเฅฅ

That practice becomes firmly grounded when pursued for a long time, without interruption, and with sincere devotion.

~Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Sutra 1.14
โค10โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ™2โšก1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Incestuous Sexual Violence Committed By Parent Requires Severest Punishment : Supreme Court Upholds Father's POCSO Conviction https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/incestuous-sexual-violence-committed-by-parent-requires-severest-punishment-supreme-court-upholdsโ€ฆ
Constitutional vision to protect dignity of women

โ€œ
Yatra nฤryastu pลซjyante ramante tatra devatฤแธฅ, yatraitaastu na pลซjyante sarvฤstatra aphalฤแธฅ kriyฤแธฅ.โ€

i.e., "Where women are honoured, divinity flourishes; and where they are dishonoured, all acts become fruitless.",
 

โ€œThis verse reflects not merely a cultural principle but a constitutional vision. The dignity of women is non-negotiable, and our legal system must not permit repeated intrusion into that dignity under the guise of misplaced sympathy or alleged procedural fairness.โ€, the court said.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ง Principle of Sentencing in incestuous offences
"When a child is forced to suffer at the hands of her own father, the law must speak in a voice that is resolute and uncompromising. There can be no mitigation in sentencing for crimes that subvert the very notion of family as a space of security," 

๐Ÿ’ฐ Directed State of HP to award compensation under victim comopensation scheme. (cited nipun saxena case)
โ€œThis Court reiterates that justice must not be limited to conviction, it must, where the law so permits, include restitution. In awarding this compensation, we reaffirm the constitutional commitment to protect the rights and dignity of child survivors, and to ensure that the justice delivered is substantive, compassionate, and complete.โ€


BHANEI PRASAD @ RAJU
VS.
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2025

@CurrentLegalGK
โค3๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ˜1