What is true democracy for India

@CurrentLegalGK

2 Essential Components of Democracy

@CurrentLegalGK

PAST 15 YEARS AIBE SOLVED PYQS

AIBE EXAM PREVIOUS QUESTION PAPERS

@CurrentLegalGK

Any rules regarding how the 3 years of practice will be ascertained?

Is it mandatory to practice before district and sessions courts or the trial courts and not before tribunals or special courts.

These questions will be of prime importance.

@CurrentLegalGK

Ending Modern-Day Untouchability – Kashmir Observer
https://kashmirobserver.net/2025/01/27/ending-modern-day-untouchability/

👨‍🎓🎓 NLU v. Non NLU

State recognised inequalities.

Justice VG Arun remarked, “There is no logical basis for the assumption that professionalism and competence is the fiefdom of only those passing from elite institutions.”

#Vacancy@CurrentLegalGK

सुरक्षित और वाहन-योग्य सड़कों का अधिकार अनुच्छेद 21 के तहत जीवन के मौलिक अधिकार का हिस्सा: सुप्रीम कोर्ट
https://hindi.livelaw.in/supreme-court/right-to-safe-motorable-roads-part-of-fundamental-right-to-life-under-article-21-supreme-court-299367

#Hindi@CurrentLegalGK

Inclusion Of Leprosy As Ground For Divorce 'Embarrassing', Says Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-discriminatory-laws-leprosy-as-ground-for-divorce-embarrassing-union-states-to-take-remedial-action-299351

Police Summons Under Section 35 BNSS Can't Be Served Electronically : Supreme Court Reiterates
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/police-summons-under-section-35-bnss-cant-be-served-electronically-supreme-court-reiterates-299354

ENGINEERING PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED

                   v.
MSA GLOBAL LLC (OMAN)
               2025

Topic: Anti Arbitration Injunction

Relied on

O.N.G.C. v. Western Co. of North America, 1987

AND HELD

Thus, the aforesaid decision categorically lays down a precedent for restraining a party from proceeding before a foreign-seated arbitral  proceeding, provided the case is of such gravity that it warrants such extraordinary interference. It equally settles that such a restraining order could be passed by the High Court as well and Section 41(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 would have no bearing on this power of the High Court. No doubt, the case indicates that such a remedy is to be provided in extraordinary and rare situations wherein the denial of this relief would effectively result into a patently unjust and unconscionable outcome for the plaintiff.

Dabhol Power Company

Court held that neither Section 5 nor Section 45 of the 1996 Act ousts the jurisdiction of this Court from issuing an injunction if it finds that the arbitral proceedings against the plaintiff in a foreign country are oppressive and call for interference.

#Arbitration@CurrentLegalGK

Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI
[July 2025]
Reiterated January 2025 Order which reaffirmed 2022 order and Delhi High Court guidelines in
Rakesh Kumar v. Vijayanta

No whatsapp/email notices under 35 BNSS/41A CrPC

Why no electronic mode in section 35 BNSS?

Section 35 has substantive element in it i.e. the liberty of an individual is involved (when there is non compliance of notice) and personal liberty is a part of Article 21 of constitution.

Any attempt to interpret the provision as a mere procedural one, would amount to rewriting the provision itself.

The Legislature, in its wisdom, has specifically excluded the service of a notice under Section 35 of the BNSS, 2023 from the ambit of procedures permissible through electronic communication, that have been delineated under Section 530 of the BNSS, 2023.

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK

AI on trial , discussion on the book on the subject AI and law.

https://youtu.be/vx_OoNQWpHE?feature=shared

National-Strategy-for-Artificial-Intelligence. NITI AYOG

Global all country AI law tracker as of june 2025.


https://iapp.org/resources/article/global-ai-legislation-tracker/?utm_source=perplexity

artificial intelligence
#AI@CurrentLegalGK

Presidential References In India: A Rich Past, A Fraught Present
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/supreme-court-judgment-tamilnadu-governor-case-presidential-reference-critical-analysis-299415

😉😎 3 Pertinent Questions to be answered by you all in the comments 👇

1. Whether SC is bound to give opinion?

2. Whether opinion given under Article 143 is a law under Article 141?

3. Whether SC can overturn or even elaborate or change a judgment using Article 143.

Read more:
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/5862

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

FACTS: Where a complainant had simultaneously pursued a civil suit for specific performance of a property agreement while lodging an FIR alleging cheating (Section 420 IPC) and criminal breach of trust (Section 406 IPC) against the landowners.

LAW: “In the absence of the element of criminality, if both civil and criminal cases are allowed to continue, it will definitely amount to abuse of the process of the Court, which the Courts have always tried to prevent by putting a stop to any such criminal proceeding, where civil proceedings have already been instituted with regard to the same issue, and the element of criminality is absent. If such element is absent, the prosecution in question would have to be quashed.”, the court observed.

HELD: Quashed criminal proceedings.

S.N. VIJAYALAKSHMI
v.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
[2025 SC]

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK