Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2024 - Criminal Minor Acts
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgments-criminal-minor-acts-half-yearly-digest-2024-268936
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgments-criminal-minor-acts-half-yearly-digest-2024-268936
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2024 - Criminal Minor Acts
Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006If a case is registered against an accused for food adulteration under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (βIPCβ), then by virtue of the overriding effect of Section 89...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2024 - Criminal Minor Acts https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgments-criminal-minor-acts-half-yearly-digest-2024-268936
Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2024 - Criminal Minor Acts.pdf
250.4 KB
π― 6 monthly digest criminal minors
JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT, NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT
@CurrentLegalGK
JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT, NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT
@CurrentLegalGK
π1
Police will not register FIRs and magistrates cannot: Welcome to the regime of new criminal laws
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/police-wont-register-firs-magistrates-cannot-regime-of-new-criminal-laws
@CurrentLegalGK
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/police-wont-register-firs-magistrates-cannot-regime-of-new-criminal-laws
@CurrentLegalGK
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
Police will not register FIRs and magistrates cannot: Welcome to the regime of new criminal laws
The Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), replacing the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), made certain significant changes regarding taking cog
β€1
Why Regular Civil Courts or Family Courts Are In Better Position Than Writ Courts To Deal With Child Custody Cases? Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/why-regular-civil-courts-or-family-courts-are-in-better-position-than-writ-courts-to-deal-with-child-custody-cases-supreme-court-explains-268929
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/why-regular-civil-courts-or-family-courts-are-in-better-position-than-writ-courts-to-deal-with-child-custody-cases-supreme-court-explains-268929
www.livelaw.in
Why Regular Civil Courts or Family Courts Are In Better Position Than Writ Courts To Deal With Child Custody Cases? Supreme Courtβ¦
In a significant judgment where the Supreme Court deprecated the High Court's order of disturbing the custody of the toddler (child between the age group of 1 to 3 years) in a Writ Proceeding, it...
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Why Regular Civil Courts or Family Courts Are In Better Position Than Writ Courts To Deal With Child Custody Cases? Supreme Court Explains https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/why-regular-civil-courts-or-family-courts-are-in-better-position-than-writ-courtsβ¦
π¦
π Reasonsβ
πThe Court can frequently interact with the child. Practically, all Family Courts have a child centre/play area.
πA child can be brought to the play centre, where the judicial officer can interact with the child.
Access can be given to the parties to meet the child at the same place.
πMoreover, the Court dealing with custody matters can record evidence.
πThe Court can appoint experts to make the psychological assessment of the child.
πIf an access is required to be given to one of the parties to meet the child, the Civil Court or Family Court is in a better position to monitor the same.
πPrinciples for habeas corpus writs dealing with child custody
1. Prerogative/extraordinary remedy.
2. HC has discretion not to exercise it even if it finds that custody of the child by the respondents was illegal (welfare of children to not to disturb custody)
3. Paramount consideration is the welfare of the minor.
4. Court cannot ignore the doctrine of parens patriae (state acts as parent when rea parent neglects), the order cannot be exercised mechanically or child cannot be treated as property.
@CurrentLegalGK
Why instead of Writ Courts the Regular Civil Courts or Family Courts are in an advantageous position for dealing with child custody cases.π Reasonsβ
πThe Court can frequently interact with the child. Practically, all Family Courts have a child centre/play area.
πA child can be brought to the play centre, where the judicial officer can interact with the child.
Access can be given to the parties to meet the child at the same place.
πMoreover, the Court dealing with custody matters can record evidence.
πThe Court can appoint experts to make the psychological assessment of the child.
πIf an access is required to be given to one of the parties to meet the child, the Civil Court or Family Court is in a better position to monitor the same.
πPrinciples for habeas corpus writs dealing with child custody
1. Prerogative/extraordinary remedy.
2. HC has discretion not to exercise it even if it finds that custody of the child by the respondents was illegal (welfare of children to not to disturb custody)
3. Paramount consideration is the welfare of the minor.
4. Court cannot ignore the doctrine of parens patriae (state acts as parent when rea parent neglects), the order cannot be exercised mechanically or child cannot be treated as property.
Case - Somprabha Rana & Ors. versus The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2024Law - Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 & Article 226
@CurrentLegalGK
π6π3
Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Arrest Of Accused Who Wrongly Sought Pre-Arrest Bail Under CrPC, Grants Time To File Under BNSS
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-crpc-wrongly-invoked-file-under-bnss-interim-relief-269054
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-crpc-wrongly-invoked-file-under-bnss-interim-relief-269054
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Arrest Of Accused Who Wrongly Sought Pre-Arrest Bail Under CrPC, Grants Time To File Under BNSS https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-crpc-wrongly-invoked-file-under-bnssβ¦
"unintentionally choosing a wrong legal remedy should not become a technical hindrance for exercising Constitutional and statutory rights in pursuit of Justice. Given this, the appropriate relief under these compelling circumstances is limited protection and relief to exercise the correct option."
Mistakenly applied wrong law (crpc) got the Relief from court.
@CurrentLegalGK
Mistakenly applied wrong law (crpc) got the Relief from court.
@CurrentLegalGK
π4β€2π₯2
π
Till now I have won more than 5.99 Billions in KBC, yet they are not paying me. π₯
#MCQ
#JOCKS
@CurrentLegalGK
From Greater Nicobar Members of Which tribe voted for first time in 2024 General elections.
Till now I have won more than 5.99 Billions in KBC, yet they are not paying me. π₯
KBC GK = Bollywood + Cricket
and I am weak in both π
#MCQ
#JOCKS
@CurrentLegalGK
π€£10π€©4π2π1π1
Bharatiya_Nagarik_Suraksha_Sanhita_BNSS_And_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pdf
446.4 KB
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) And Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Monthly Digestβ August 2024
Important - https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3577?comment=306574
@CurrentLegalGK
Important - https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3577?comment=306574
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π₯2
π― #Tip
Essential ingredients of provisions and Landmark judgments ratio of any subject is nothing but the heart of every law exam.
@CurrentLegalGK
Essential ingredients of provisions and Landmark judgments ratio of any subject is nothing but the heart of every law exam.
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯4
#Question
What is an Express Notice under TPA whether the term is used in any of the provisions?
@CurrentLegalGK
What is an Express Notice under TPA whether the term is used in any of the provisions?
@CurrentLegalGK
Forwarded from ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’ (Abhi Tiwari)
π§ π€―π MENTALLY ILL PERSON CAN/CANNOT ENTER INTO SALE DEEDRequirement for transfer of property is majority + soundness of mind then how people suffering from coma, autism, cerebral palsy can transfer their Property???
β
Sale under Mental Health Act,1987βObject: Provide Better treatment &
Provisions for property.
βMental ill person: Person who is in need of treatment due to any mental disorder other than "mental retardation" (which is covered under a separate statute).
βAppointment of Guardian and Manager.
~ Possession of property is must.
~ District Court appointing
1) A Guardian under Section 53 to take care of his person; and
2) A Manager under Section 54 for the management of his property.
(Both can be the same person)
~ Manager could mortgage, create any charge on, or, transfer by sale, gift, exchange or otherwise, any immovable property of the mentally ill person OR lease out any such property for a period exceeding five years, only after obtaining permission of the District Court in that behalf.
~ Signature in deed by manager.
~ Entering into Contract.
~ Could be sued for mismanagement of sums received from property.
βBut ==> new act repealed 1987 Act
~ 2017 Act, has no provision or an alternate mechanism for adjudication of matters pertaining to property of Mentally ill person.
β
The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, (βRPwD Act, 2016)βPerson with Disability:- Person with long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment which, in interaction with barriers, hinders his full and effective participation in society equally with others.
βLimited Guardianshipβ means a system of joint decision which operates on mutual understanding and trust between the guardian and the person with disability, which shall be limited to a specific period and for specific decision and situation and shall operate in accordance to the will of the person with disability. (Appointed by Designated authority or District court)
β’ No provision of sale, gift, lease etc
β’ No absolute power by guardian (limited)
β
Guardian Under National Trust Act,1999No concept of manager, only guardian appointed by local committee, which frame some duties like management of property or furnish accounts of immovabale property
βSale or dealing with property of person with disability, falls outside the purview of the said Act.
β
Recent Trends and case laws Till date there is no law relating to appointment of guardian of a person who is in coma or a vegetative state.
βDoctrine of Parens Patriae"State to provide a parent who can take decision on behalf of such needy person, in case of no law court act as state under article 12"
π¨ββοΈRita Arvind Kakodkar v Maharashtra, 2022, appointed a sister of a widowed brother as his guardian at law and of his property and assets, following guidelines:-
1. Sale with court permission
2. Money to be deposited in brothers bank account.
So there is no proper law which sets out procedure for sale of property of mentally ill person, and relatives of person has to suffer.
β
SuggestionsWe need a
uniform mechanism under one statue, setting out unequivocal process of sale of immovable properties of all persons incapable of taking legal decisions, through manager/guardian, be it mentally ill persons, people in comatose state or otherwise.Also read- G. Babu v. The District Collector and Ors. 2023
#Discernible_Topics
@CurrentLegalGK
π6π4β€2π₯1
π #Tip for
π
°οΈπ
±οΈ Letter by Letter Approach
π― Believe me this will give you 10 times improvement everytime you do this.
β‘ Step 1. Write slowly and give best efforts in 200 Words from anywhere.
β‘ Step 2. Now see which letter looks bad to you (self analyse)
β‘ Step 3. See same letter in your peers handwriting (cursive and separate letter treated differently)
β‘ Step 4. Use that letter style in your handwriting which you copied and keep doing untill comes in habit (it will come within 3 days)
β‘ Step 5. Repeat the above and ask others for analysis after 5 repetitions.
#Tip@CurrentLegalGK
Handwritingπ― Believe me this will give you 10 times improvement everytime you do this.
β‘ Step 1. Write slowly and give best efforts in 200 Words from anywhere.
β‘ Step 2. Now see which letter looks bad to you (self analyse)
β‘ Step 3. See same letter in your peers handwriting (cursive and separate letter treated differently)
β‘ Step 4. Use that letter style in your handwriting which you copied and keep doing untill comes in habit (it will come within 3 days)
β‘ Step 5. Repeat the above and ask others for analysis after 5 repetitions.
First fix this then practice a lot of writing to speed by fixing timer.
#Tip@CurrentLegalGK
π10π4β€3β€βπ₯2π―1
Surrogate Mothers Likely To Be Paid Anyway, Better To Have A System To Regulate : Supreme Court In Challenge To Ban On Commercial Surrogacy
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-protection-of-surrogate-mothers-plea-against-prohibition-on-commercial-surrogacy-269196
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-protection-of-surrogate-mothers-plea-against-prohibition-on-commercial-surrogacy-269196
www.livelaw.in
Surrogate Mothers Likely To Be Paid Anyway, Better To Have A System To Regulate : Supreme Court In Challenge To Ban On Commercialβ¦
While hearing the pleas challenging certain surrogacy laws, the Supreme Court today emphasized the need to safeguard the interests of surrogate mothers, even though commercial surrogacy is...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Surrogate Mothers Likely To Be Paid Anyway, Better To Have A System To Regulate : Supreme Court In Challenge To Ban On Commercial Surrogacy https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-protection-of-surrogate-mothers-plea-against-prohibition-on-commercialβ¦
Acknowledging Dewan's submission, Justice Nagarathna said that there can be something like a "surrogate bank". "The plan will not really work in the sense they are still going to be paid. Atleast we can regulate it", the judge added.
@CurrentLegalGK
@CurrentLegalGK
π€©2π1
βEffective consultationβ: How SC ruling underlines process of HC judgesβ appointment π
#collegium_system #himachal_pradesh_high_court #sc_collegium #supreme_court_collegium
#collegium_system #himachal_pradesh_high_court #sc_collegium #supreme_court_collegium
The Indian Express
βEffective consultationβ: How SC ruling underlines process of HC judgesβ appointment
The SC had in both the Second and Third Judges cases highlighted the importance of considering seniority among judges while making recommendations for appointments.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
βEffective consultationβ: How SC ruling underlines process of HC judgesβ appointment π #collegium_system #himachal_pradesh_high_court #sc_collegium #supreme_court_collegium
The court said that collegiums for High Court appointments would include the
1. Chief Justice of India (CJI) and the
2. two seniormost judges of the Supreme Court.
This collegium would be required to consult the βChief Justice and senior judgesβ of the HC concerned, the βseniormostβ SC judge from that HC, as well as any SC judges who were βknowledgeableβ about that HC.
As a part of this process, the Chief Justice of the HC must consult two other seniormost judges at the HC β together forming the High Court collegium β
And send their recommendations, with reasons, to the Chief Minister, the Governor, and the CJI.
The Governor, based on the advice of the Chief Minister, will send the proposal to the Minister of Law and Justice at the Centre, who will conduct a background check and send the entire material to the CJI, who will consider it with the rest of the SC collegium.
@CurrentLegalGK
1. Chief Justice of India (CJI) and the
2. two seniormost judges of the Supreme Court.
This collegium would be required to consult the βChief Justice and senior judgesβ of the HC concerned, the βseniormostβ SC judge from that HC, as well as any SC judges who were βknowledgeableβ about that HC.
As a part of this process, the Chief Justice of the HC must consult two other seniormost judges at the HC β together forming the High Court collegium β
And send their recommendations, with reasons, to the Chief Minister, the Governor, and the CJI.
The Governor, based on the advice of the Chief Minister, will send the proposal to the Minister of Law and Justice at the Centre, who will conduct a background check and send the entire material to the CJI, who will consider it with the rest of the SC collegium.
@CurrentLegalGK
π4π2π1
JETIR1810906.pdf
386.4 KB
π€¬ π¬π§πΊπΈ
Burden of proof and fault liability.
In the UK, the falsity of a defamatory statement is presumed, and the defendant must prove that the statement is true.
In the USA, the plaintiff must prove that the statement is false. This reversal of burden makes it easier to bring a defamation case in the UK.
In UK no need to prove Negligency or Recklessnes or knowledge there is strict liability..
In U.S.A Knowledge (actual malice) or Negligence need to be proved depending on whom the person suing Public official or private person
@CurrentLegalGK
UK v. USA Defamation laws.Burden of proof and fault liability.
In the UK, the falsity of a defamatory statement is presumed, and the defendant must prove that the statement is true.
In the USA, the plaintiff must prove that the statement is false. This reversal of burden makes it easier to bring a defamation case in the UK.
In UK no need to prove Negligency or Recklessnes or knowledge there is strict liability..
In U.S.A Knowledge (actual malice) or Negligence need to be proved depending on whom the person suing Public official or private person
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π4π―2