Forwarded from Файні помиї 🍎🍕🍥 🙏 (кавунова піптса ✙➔)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁2
Forwarded from Машинний викладач ∆ | #УкрТґ
THE MOTIVES OF SCIENTISTS
87. Science and technology provide the most important examples of surrogate activities. Some scientists claim that they are motivated by “curiosity” or by a desire to “benefit humanity.” But it is easy to see that neither of these can be the principal motive of most scientists. As for “curiosity,” that notion is simply absurd. Most scientists work on highly specialized problems that are not the object of any normal curiosity. For example, is an astronomer, a mathematician or an entomologist curious about the properties of isopropyltrimethylmethane? Of course not. Only a chemist is curious about such a thing, and he is curious about it only because chemistry is his surrogate activity. Is the chemist curious about the appropriate classification of a new species of beetle? No. That question is of interest only to the entomologist, and he is interested in it only because entomology is his surrogate activity. If the chemist and the entomologist had to exert themselves seriously to obtain the physical necessities, and if that effort exercised their abilities in an interesting way but in some nonscientific pursuit, then they wouldn’t give a damn about isopropyltrimethylmethane or the classification of beetles. Suppose that lack of funds for postgraduate education had led the chemist to become an insurance broker instead of a chemist. In that case he would have been very interested in insurance matters but would have cared nothing about isopropyltrimethylmethane. In any case it is not normal to put into the satisfaction of mere curiosity the amount of time and effort that scientists put into their work. The “curiosity” explanation for the scientists’ motive just doesn’t stand up.
Indeed, the question to consider when choosing one’s occupation is: if the circumstances were different, would you be the same person with the same wants? If instead of going to the Faculty of Mathematics you end up at the Department of Linguistics, would your approach still be mostly numerical? Would you still be trying to build models and employ statistical analysis, however unfavourable the environment? If going into History instead of Finance, would you still be more interested in financial crises that caused distresses rather than motivations of individuals or groups? Or would you pick up the interest that you have encountered and follow it they way you have been taught?
Citation: The Unabomber Manifesto
87. Science and technology provide the most important examples of surrogate activities. Some scientists claim that they are motivated by “curiosity” or by a desire to “benefit humanity.” But it is easy to see that neither of these can be the principal motive of most scientists. As for “curiosity,” that notion is simply absurd. Most scientists work on highly specialized problems that are not the object of any normal curiosity. For example, is an astronomer, a mathematician or an entomologist curious about the properties of isopropyltrimethylmethane? Of course not. Only a chemist is curious about such a thing, and he is curious about it only because chemistry is his surrogate activity. Is the chemist curious about the appropriate classification of a new species of beetle? No. That question is of interest only to the entomologist, and he is interested in it only because entomology is his surrogate activity. If the chemist and the entomologist had to exert themselves seriously to obtain the physical necessities, and if that effort exercised their abilities in an interesting way but in some nonscientific pursuit, then they wouldn’t give a damn about isopropyltrimethylmethane or the classification of beetles. Suppose that lack of funds for postgraduate education had led the chemist to become an insurance broker instead of a chemist. In that case he would have been very interested in insurance matters but would have cared nothing about isopropyltrimethylmethane. In any case it is not normal to put into the satisfaction of mere curiosity the amount of time and effort that scientists put into their work. The “curiosity” explanation for the scientists’ motive just doesn’t stand up.
Indeed, the question to consider when choosing one’s occupation is: if the circumstances were different, would you be the same person with the same wants? If instead of going to the Faculty of Mathematics you end up at the Department of Linguistics, would your approach still be mostly numerical? Would you still be trying to build models and employ statistical analysis, however unfavourable the environment? If going into History instead of Finance, would you still be more interested in financial crises that caused distresses rather than motivations of individuals or groups? Or would you pick up the interest that you have encountered and follow it they way you have been taught?
Citation: The Unabomber Manifesto