Nemesis Collective is a feminist identitarian group that opposes the Muslim colonization of Europe.
Litterbox88 hallucinates that, since they are anti-Muslim, they must be Jewish astroturfed, then actual Jewesses, thus Quentin somehow had it coming for being on their side.
This paranoid fantasist once opined that I am "a well-known counter-jihadist," so no, I don't take anything he says seriously.
Litterbox88 hallucinates that, since they are anti-Muslim, they must be Jewish astroturfed, then actual Jewesses, thus Quentin somehow had it coming for being on their side.
This paranoid fantasist once opined that I am "a well-known counter-jihadist," so no, I don't take anything he says seriously.
👍29👎3💯3🤣1
Spencer Quinn on why he is sticking up for Trump amidst the Epstein scandal.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/sticking-up-for-trump/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/sticking-up-for-trump/
🤣14👍4💔1
Beau Albrecht on a recent fentanyl bust at a middle school in Minnesota.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/more-bad-news-from-minnesota/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/more-bad-news-from-minnesota/
🤣1
Forwarded from Martin Sellner (english)
Restore vs Reform: best case
In the best-case scenario, Farage becomes the new center, while @RestoreBritain_ serves as the UK’s patriotic-progressive flank. This would shift the entire political discourse in Britain to the right.
a) In the first phase, it is crucial for Restore to establish a sharp profile and criticize Farage and Reform from the right.
b) That pressure would force Farage to abandon strategic ambiguity and clarify his positions. He would lose patriotic voters he has taken for granted simply because there was no credible alternative to his right.
c) At the same time, his public moderation would allow him to expand further into territory traditionally occupied by the legacy parties. In this dynamic, the right would not cannibalize itself or split the vote, but broaden its overall influence within British politics.
> Farage could attract moderate and even center-left voters who choose him as a moderate option compared to a more assertive Restore. Meanwhile, the ideological core of the movement would consolidate around Restore, positioning it as the driving force with escalation dominance on the right.
This would "terraform" the whole political environment in the UK and shift public opinion to normalize Remigration.
If you want I can also draft the worst case.
In the best-case scenario, Farage becomes the new center, while @RestoreBritain_ serves as the UK’s patriotic-progressive flank. This would shift the entire political discourse in Britain to the right.
a) In the first phase, it is crucial for Restore to establish a sharp profile and criticize Farage and Reform from the right.
b) That pressure would force Farage to abandon strategic ambiguity and clarify his positions. He would lose patriotic voters he has taken for granted simply because there was no credible alternative to his right.
c) At the same time, his public moderation would allow him to expand further into territory traditionally occupied by the legacy parties. In this dynamic, the right would not cannibalize itself or split the vote, but broaden its overall influence within British politics.
> Farage could attract moderate and even center-left voters who choose him as a moderate option compared to a more assertive Restore. Meanwhile, the ideological core of the movement would consolidate around Restore, positioning it as the driving force with escalation dominance on the right.
This would "terraform" the whole political environment in the UK and shift public opinion to normalize Remigration.
If you want I can also draft the worst case.
👍17👎4🤔2💯1
Part 2 of Greg Johnson's discussion of Aristotle and the contemplative life.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/idle-thoughts-part-2/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/idle-thoughts-part-2/
❤3🤔1
Since I am blacklisted at X but allowed on Substack, I have decided to do more on Substack. Please follow me and recommend me to others.
Thanks!
Greg Johnson
https://newnationalism.substack.com/
Thanks!
Greg Johnson
https://newnationalism.substack.com/
Substack
The New Nationalism | Greg Johnson | Substack
The New Nationalism is a way to follow the work of Greg Johnson & friends on Substack. Click to read The New Nationalism, by Greg Johnson, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers.
👍16❤1🔥1
David Zsutty presents evidence to refute Epstein Denial.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/refuting-epstein-denial/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/refuting-epstein-denial/
🔥8
Stephen Paul Foster on how "hate speech" is a tool of Zionist domination, and especially on social media like TikTok.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/hate-speech-as-a-tool-of-zionist-domination/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/hate-speech-as-a-tool-of-zionist-domination/
💯16❤1👍1
Morris van de Camp reviews Saleha Mohsin's Paper Soldiers: How the Weaponization of the Dollar Changed the World Order.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/battles-between-banking-systems/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/battles-between-banking-systems/
👍4
Steven Tucker on how anti-racism in English football has turned Manchester United's Sir Jim Ratcliffe into the new Morrissey.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/manchester-benighted/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/manchester-benighted/
👍7
F. Roger Devlin's classic Sexual Utopia in Power is back in an Expanded Edition from Counter-Currents, now available at a special pre-order price.
Like many political revolutions, the sexual revolution of the 1960s began with a euphoric feeling of liberation. But when utopian programs clash with dissenters — and with reality itself — the result is chaos, which revolutionaries seek to quash with repression and terror. In Sexual Utopia in Power, F. Roger Devlin explores today’s sexual dystopia, with its loose morals and confused sexual roles; its soaring rates of divorce, celibacy, and childlessness; and the increasingly arbitrary and punitive attempts to regulate and police it. Devlin shows that the breakdown of monogamy results in promiscuity for the few, loneliness for the majority, and unhappiness for all.
https://counter-currents.com/product/sexual-utopia-in-power-expanded-edition/
Like many political revolutions, the sexual revolution of the 1960s began with a euphoric feeling of liberation. But when utopian programs clash with dissenters — and with reality itself — the result is chaos, which revolutionaries seek to quash with repression and terror. In Sexual Utopia in Power, F. Roger Devlin explores today’s sexual dystopia, with its loose morals and confused sexual roles; its soaring rates of divorce, celibacy, and childlessness; and the increasingly arbitrary and punitive attempts to regulate and police it. Devlin shows that the breakdown of monogamy results in promiscuity for the few, loneliness for the majority, and unhappiness for all.
https://counter-currents.com/product/sexual-utopia-in-power-expanded-edition/
💔7👍5💯4
Forwarded from Martin Sellner (english)
Lowe vs. Farage - Easy Wins
Some people asked me how this could work. It is esay imo.. Until now, Farage has been playing politics on easy mode with endless lives. He only had to say “stop the boats,” and that was enough:
-> Angry British voters filled in the rest themselves:
“This is the man who will stop Islamization, end grooming gangs, and ultimately send migrants home.”
-x That ambiguity is now gone. In every direct confrontation between Lowe and Farage, Restore can win simply by forcing clarity and exposing the gaps. It’s not complicated:
Farage: “I was the first to say ‘stop the boats,’ and that has been my clear line ever since.”
Lowe: “What about the boats that have already arrived? Do you support mass deportations, as outlined in our plan?”
Farage: …
Lowe: “Mr. Farage, do you agree that there is an ongoing replacement of English culture and an Islamization of Britain, including through legal immigration?”
Farage: …
Lowe: “Mr. Farage, considering grooming gangs, child marriages, and halal slaughter, do you really believe Islam is an integral part of Britain and that this diversity makes us stronger?”
Farage: …
These are just examples that come to mind within two minutes. Give it a full day of research. Identify every pressure point where Farage has distanced himself from hard positions. Frame those issues in clear, popular language. Then make him clarify & backpaddle, again and again.
With every encounter, Farage’s image as a “rebel” weakens. The tiger begins to look like a domesticated kitten, while
@RupertLowe10
positions himself as the lion of mass deportations.
Lowe has no centrist voter base to protect, no foreign candidates to appease. He can move freely and aggressively. Farage, by contrast, is constrained, cautious, and, despite his performance, deeply wary of losing ground.
Some people asked me how this could work. It is esay imo.. Until now, Farage has been playing politics on easy mode with endless lives. He only had to say “stop the boats,” and that was enough:
-> Angry British voters filled in the rest themselves:
“This is the man who will stop Islamization, end grooming gangs, and ultimately send migrants home.”
-x That ambiguity is now gone. In every direct confrontation between Lowe and Farage, Restore can win simply by forcing clarity and exposing the gaps. It’s not complicated:
Farage: “I was the first to say ‘stop the boats,’ and that has been my clear line ever since.”
Lowe: “What about the boats that have already arrived? Do you support mass deportations, as outlined in our plan?”
Farage: …
Lowe: “Mr. Farage, do you agree that there is an ongoing replacement of English culture and an Islamization of Britain, including through legal immigration?”
Farage: …
Lowe: “Mr. Farage, considering grooming gangs, child marriages, and halal slaughter, do you really believe Islam is an integral part of Britain and that this diversity makes us stronger?”
Farage: …
These are just examples that come to mind within two minutes. Give it a full day of research. Identify every pressure point where Farage has distanced himself from hard positions. Frame those issues in clear, popular language. Then make him clarify & backpaddle, again and again.
With every encounter, Farage’s image as a “rebel” weakens. The tiger begins to look like a domesticated kitten, while
@RupertLowe10
positions himself as the lion of mass deportations.
Lowe has no centrist voter base to protect, no foreign candidates to appease. He can move freely and aggressively. Farage, by contrast, is constrained, cautious, and, despite his performance, deeply wary of losing ground.
👍20
Karel Veliky's Sadonazism in Film, Part 4 which was originally published in Czech is now available in English courtesy of a translation by Ondrej Mann.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/sadonazism-in-film-part-4/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/sadonazism-in-film-part-4/
🔥2
“Gentlemen, despite the heroic efforts of Michael Tracey, Richard Hanania, Patrick Casey, Nick Fuentes, and others among you, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor fell today, a victim of CHUD moralism. We must re-double our efforts to quash this moral panic. As you go forth, always remember that we are fighting for the most vulnerable. Politicians, bankers, and crowned heads are counting on you. Not one of the Q-tards we fight is ever troubled by the question, ‘What kind of world are we leaving for Goldman-Sachs?’ That’s what makes us better than them.”
—Some group chat somewhere on X
—Some group chat somewhere on X
🤣24💯4💔1
Greg Johnson wouldn't exonerate the people in the Epstein files even if they were innocent. Here's why.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/why-the-truth-about-epstein-doesnt-matter/
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/why-the-truth-about-epstein-doesnt-matter/
🤔3🤣1
On this past weekend's Counter-Currents Radio Greg Johnson and David Zsutty discussed the bizarre behavior and possible motives of Jeffrey Epstein’s apologists on the Right.
Now available for your streaming or downloading pleasure. https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/counter-currents-radio-podcast-no-676/
Now available for your streaming or downloading pleasure. https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/counter-currents-radio-podcast-no-676/
🤣10🔥2👍1
"Satanism & Modern Cults"
From Jonathan Bowden's rare early book Suck, now online for your edification!
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/jonathan-bowdens-suck-part-3/
From Jonathan Bowden's rare early book Suck, now online for your edification!
https://counter-currents.com/2026/02/jonathan-bowdens-suck-part-3/
❤7👍3