Counter-Currents
6.19K subscribers
1.67K photos
93 videos
5 files
7.37K links
Download Telegram
Kathryn S. on the emergence of what she terms Gothic Science Fiction, such as H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds, as a literary premonition of the horrors of modern war that authors of twentieth-century war literature, such as Ernst Jünger, were to capture in prose that is eerily reminiscent of scenes once considered the stuff of fantasy. https://counter-currents.com/2022/04/many-strange-terrible-days-part-1/
🤔2
And if there's an insufficient supply of gas chamber memes . . . hey rabbi, whatcha doin'?

I prefer free speech as a hard principle, to stop these totalitarian gaslighters dead in their tracks.
🤔14
Forwarded from American Krogan
This is true, but Musk is also the new Trump for the Right.
🤔20
The TRS network interrupts their regular "How de-Nazifying Ukraine is really a good thing, goy" programming to celebrate Hitler's birthday.

https://t.me/mpeinovich/1865
🤔14
Forwarded from Distributist Public
Picture worth a thousand words (ht Richard Hanania).
🤔3
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
Tonight on The Writers’ Bloc, we’ll be hosting the one and only John Morgan, who’ll join us to review a selection of articles from April - The Best Month Ever at Counter-Currents.

Tune in at 10:00 CET, 5pm EST, 1pm PST to our Dlive and Odysee channels. Send us your questions, comments and donations to Entropy.
🤔1
Forwarded from .
As the Russian invasion continues to flounder and vastly underperform relative to the expectations the world had, pro-Russian "Nationalists" in the West will look for any straw they can grasp to uphold the prestige of the Kremlin.

Their narrative will be as follows:

"Ukraine did not win the war/give Russia so much trouble. It was NATO weaponry. If not for arms and aid from the West, Russia would have steamrolled Ukraine."

It is undeniable that Western aid played a major role in the war. However, weaponry without soldiers to wield it is useless, and money and resources alone do not win wars. When you hear them make this argument, which they will, this is how you should respond:

"So why did the Taliban manage to survive for two decades against the most powerful and wealthy military machine in human history (America/NATO), and why did the Afghanistan National Army crumble before the Taliban? The soldiers of the ANA were the highest paid soldiers on the planet, and the ANA was propped up with billions of dollars in military resources and decades of American training. When you compare the military aid given to the ANA in contrast to the austerity of the Taliban, with the military aid given to Ukraine in contrast to the Russian military machine, the ANA were given far more resources in comparison to their opponent. In the short and medium term, Ukraine is still fighting with a smaller military budget than Russia, and with a smaller pool of military aged males. Therefore the most decisive factor in this war, especially in the first months, is the morale and skill of the Ukrainian soldier."

Also, when they make the argument about NATO involvement, the underlying motivation of that argument is huffing and puffing about how unfair it is that the world did not sit idle while Russia invaded Ukraine. As Counter Currents points out in the post I will link below, that is not how great power politics/reality works. This is like a National Socialist huffing and puffing about how unfair it was that international jewry did not just let Hitler kick them out of one of Europe's most important nations, and cause a ripple-effect within the very heart of Western Civilization which would have resulted in their expulsion from our homes and lives. Yes, the "Allied" powers had more resources than Germany, but no, it is not "unfair" that the jewish powers fought to preserve their insidious and evil goal of world domination. I understand their motives even if I vehemently oppose them, something Alex McNabb of TRS seemingly does not understand by the way (I'll link another post of mine below the CC one to explain this reference of mine for those of you who are new to the channel).

The underlying premise of the argument about NATO involvement winning the Ukrainian war is motivated from a place of childish resentment that your enemy isn't doing what you want them to do. As usual, the pro-Russian "Nationalists" in the West don't have a leg to stand on when their claims are critically examined.

https://t.me/countercurrents/1861

https://t.me/JamesArants/55
🤔16👎1
Forwarded from American Krogan
If this is sincere, it's just evidence of how detached White billionaires are from the average person's reality. Musk is probably surrounded by people who go through a series of selective pressures before arriving at his... let's call it, "life space."

He probably never deals with racial/ethnic aggregates or group dynamics in a way that the average person does. His daily life experience might be such that he only ever interacts with "the best" individuals from each group. Thus, from his perspective, the "far Left" and the "far Right" are entirely unreasonable.

When those of us who experience the absolute worst of diversity, or even just its aggregate effects, express ourselves and our life experiences, many White normies and Elites simply can't relate, because their experience is curated.
🤔20