and now, a poll for those gifted kids™
would you rather have...
would you rather have...
Anonymous Poll
51%
extra money
25%
extra spoons
23%
"im gay, i cant choose"
30%
extra button
-i have a book i want to read
-the ceiling light is currently off
-i have my window open, and its already night outside
-if i close my window, heat will increase. today has been another 40ºc day. hot.
-if i turn on the light with the window open, it will be mosquito time (derogatory)
-if i stay in the dark, i cant read the book
i have to choose between mosquitos, heat, or not being able to read. this is beyond tragic, tortuous even
-the ceiling light is currently off
-i have my window open, and its already night outside
-if i close my window, heat will increase. today has been another 40ºc day. hot.
-if i turn on the light with the window open, it will be mosquito time (derogatory)
-if i stay in the dark, i cant read the book
i have to choose between mosquitos, heat, or not being able to read. this is beyond tragic, tortuous even
reminder for the admins of eta channel telegram channels to not just remind other ppl to drink water, but to also do it themselves
(copypasted from somewhere)
"Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did."
"Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did."
somewhere in this world, there is an IT department that lazyly decided to blacklist all urls containing "girls" in the domain name, and is therefore blocking the users of their network from browsing any spicegirls forum while on company time