What's your go-to hard news source or aggregator? I'm looking for something like Drudge, but not Drudge.
I saw someone post about the dystopia of people advertising their OnlyFans accounts in public... A few years ago, I saw someone advertising a sex worker solidarity event on a sign directly next to a children's playground. A few days later, someone put up stickers of anime porn on the parking meter on eye level with children. This is how real people behave in the real world. Needless to say, this was the historically gay neighborhood.
Forwarded from Scott Greer
“1/6 was worse than 9/11” is obviously a ridiculous take but it’s more useful than believing the truth. The regime no longer cares about Muslims, so there’s no pressing reason for 9/11 commemoration. 1/6, on the other hand, justifies the regime’s current priorities. 1/6 serves the mission of disenfranchising Middle America, so you will eventually see “1/6 was worse than 9/11” become the consensus.
I have a nagging feeling like there was something I was supposed to do this morning? Or something I wanted to say? I don't know.
Remember, these are the people who whine and cry that they're powerless and oppressed and if only you give them more money, they can lobby the most powerful companies in the world to do their bidding.
I don't know why people don't think a whole article from the SPLC about Twitter enabling the far-right from two days ago, where Twitter outright said it made mistakes, has anything to do with that Twitter ban.
People really sleep on the SPLC's power. Yes, the ADL tweeted about Nick today and ran an article about him yesterday. The SPLC, however, has been running an entire series trying to explicitly pressure Twitter into banning Nick over the past few days.
Just two days ago, the SPLC ran an article about Twitter's "embrace" of the supposed far-right. In that article, Twitter said they made a mistake. Just yesterday, the SPLC said its analysis revealed Twitter isn't doing enough because it keeps Nick on the site.
By ignoring the SPLC's active lobbying of Twitter, you're missing what's happening right in front of you.
Just two days ago, the SPLC ran an article about Twitter's "embrace" of the supposed far-right. In that article, Twitter said they made a mistake. Just yesterday, the SPLC said its analysis revealed Twitter isn't doing enough because it keeps Nick on the site.
By ignoring the SPLC's active lobbying of Twitter, you're missing what's happening right in front of you.
Blows my mind that people think a campaign to lobby Twitter to ban Nick has nothing at all to do with his ban.