needs moderation: The comment "Exactly, hence my recommendation" lacks context and specificity, which makes it unclear how it contributes constructively to the discussion. It should provide more detail on the recommendation being referred to.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33018#discussion_r2218064237
Exactly, hence my recommendation

needs moderation: The comment "Ok, agree, please resolve the comment" does not provide a professional or technical critique related to the code and instead suggests resolving a comment without any technical justification or discussion, which does not contribute to the code review process.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33018#discussion_r2218071890
Ok, agree, please resolve the comment

needs moderation: The message appears to contain random and garbled text, which is likely spam and not relevant to the discussion.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33018#issuecomment-3095031799
' DQ at need f cc 2iooo9 to be in work iiiiiiii iroieeieeieowwiereo W e

On Mon, 21 July 2025, 12:02 pm Andrew Toth, ***@***.***>
wrote:

> ***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
> ------------------------------
>
> In src/coins.h
> <https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33018#discussion_r2218067867>:
>
> > * - spent, not FRESH, DIRTY (e.g. a coin is spent and spentness needs to be flushed to the parent)
> */
> struct CCoinsCacheEntry
> {
> private:
> /**
>
...

needs moderation: The comment criticizes the person rather than focusing solely on the technical content or ideas, which violates the policy of discussing ideas, not people.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33001#issuecomment-3095471139
@OrangeDoro Every LLM generated point in your comment is wrong and completely misses the point. This is trivial to see, if you took a look at the previous comments and commit messages.

needs moderation: The comment "Done, thanks" is vague and does not provide any technical insight or context related to the code changes.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32279#discussion_r2219911902
Done, thanks

needs moderation: The prompt begins with "ref" and follows with a URL link. It lacks context or information, appearing to be an off-topic or possible spam entry.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33037
ref https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32521

needs moderation: The comment seems to focus on the technical aspects of the code, but mentioning "wanted to get rid of this in one of my PRs before" slightly hints at personal achievements rather than focusing solely on the current change.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31144#discussion_r2223587480
in the follow-up we don't have another `Read` anymore and `Write` has a constant `return true` (wanted to get rid of this in one of my PRs before)

needs moderation: The comment speculates about the author's motives and capabilities by implying they used a language model to write code, which could be seen as criticism of an individual rather than the technical aspects of the code change.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33035#issuecomment-3104989559
What is the purpose of this test? There are already multiple tests that do exactly what you have added, there is nothing useful being added here.

Please do not use a LLM to write your code.

needs moderation: The comment "Absolutely" is vague and does not provide any constructive feedback or discussion related to the code change. It does not contribute to a professional or technical discussion.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26966#discussion_r2226285266
Absolutely

needs moderation: The prompt appears to be spam as it is a single word or name without context.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32931#issuecomment-3110253591
Babu8090

needs moderation: The prompt does not provide enough context to determine if it is relevant or appropriate, and it could be spam.:
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/876#pullrequestreview-3049876903
****

needs moderation: The comment assumes the submission is LLM generated and criticizes the submitter for lack of understanding, potentially violating the rule about not speculating about people's motives or capabilities.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33055#issuecomment-3113970375
Thanks, but there is no need to open an LLM generated pull request without any description and motivation. Please do not submit LLM generated stuff that you do not understand yourself.

needs moderation: The comment could benefit from clarification, as it currently lacks professional tone and might imply speculation about the learning model without directly addressing technical aspects or solutions.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33055#issuecomment-3113984652
Mmmm, it was not LLM generated. I understood what I did since it was not a significant but good practice change. I can open it with an explenation if you want.

needs moderation: The comment speculates about the origins of the code (LLM generated) and makes a blanket statement that it is wrong without focusing on specific technical details.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33055#issuecomment-3114023892
If it wasn't LLM generated, it is still wrong, because the value is never `None`. And if it was, it would have already been handled properly.

Needs moderation: This appears to be a link to a CI log, not a comment about the code or a discussion on ideas. It's important to maintain relevance to the repository's focus on technical discussions and code development.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33015#issuecomment-3114133331
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6439525662064640?logs=ci#L1711

needs moderation: The prompt appears to contain a cryptocurrency address, which is typically considered spam and can be reported.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32275#issuecomment-3114239525
13R2tNud3W6e7RLPRwpwkPJND4A4W9mpTG

needs moderation: The comment is unclear and incomplete. It does not provide enough context about what was added back and how it relates to the code change, which might lead to confusion.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33029#discussion_r2229351697
I have added it back

needs moderation: The prompt seems unrelated to the Bitcoin Core project and more related to hardware configuration, potentially leading the discussion off-topic.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32733#issuecomment-3114802238
My RPi 4 only has 4GB of RAM and I am only running off of the SSD with no SD card installed.

needs moderation: The comment "Done" is not descriptive and does not provide any meaningful feedback or discussion related to the code changes. It's important to ensure comments contribute constructively to the conversation.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28333#discussion_r2229646929
Done

needs moderation: The comment reflects on a personal thought or decision without linking it to a specific technical idea or decision, which could lead to speculation about motives or capabilities.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29136#discussion_r2230329744
I'm regretting that assumption in the context of multisig :-)