💬 kallerosenbaum commented on issue "bitcoin-qt generates bad psbt":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27697#issuecomment-1553009843)
If I convert the test3.psbt.txt (binary) file to a base64 file, I can then read the base64 into bitcoin core.
```
$ cat test3.psbt.txt|base64 -w0 > test3.psbt
```

⚠️ fanquake opened an issue: "crash on macOS 12.6.5"
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/731)
Moved from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27681.


### What version of Bitcoin Core are you using?

V22.0.0 and 24.0.1.

### Operating system and version

Mac osx 12.6.5

### Machine specifications

2.8 dual core i5 8 gb ram high speed internet
1tb drive

```bash
Translated Report (Full Report Below)
-------------------------------------

Process: Bitcoin-Qt [844]
Path: /Applications/Bitcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Bitcoin-Qt
Ident
...

💬 fanquake commented on issue "Mac osx 12.6.5 ":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27681#issuecomment-1553024681)
Moved over to https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/731.

✅ fanquake closed an issue: "Mac osx 12.6.5 "
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27681)

💬 fanquake commented on issue "bitcoin-qt generates bad psbt":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27697#issuecomment-1553027002)
Ok. Could continue discussion with an issue in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui if still relevant?

cc @achow101

💬 ddykeman1 commented on issue "Mac osx 12.6.5 ":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27681#issuecomment-1553045708)
thank u all do I have to forward this or haves it been done

💬 fanquake commented on issue "Mac osx 12.6.5 ":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27681#issuecomment-1553046960)
> thank u all do I have to forward this or haves it been done

A new issue has been opened, https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/731, thanks.

🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "test: Return dict in MiniWallet::send_to"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27640)

👍 fanquake approved a pull request: "build: Bump minimum supported GCC to g++-9"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27662#pullrequestreview-1432713153)
ACK fa953f15bfcf95df9aa9c91e1c4b56a205f4d1ae

💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Parallel compact block downloads, take 3":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27626#issuecomment-1553089898)
ACK 2d12fab42cc0f11d5ede96c7eb71a496931df0b5. I've reviewed the test as well and have been running this branch live, and it looks good to me.

I think it'd be good to merge this sooner than later so we can get some experience running this in master before it appears in a release, so that we can get a sense of whether we want to institute any better bandwidth management before deploying.

💬 instagibbs commented on pull request "Parallel compact block downloads, take 3":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27626#issuecomment-1553102278)
"jq: command not found" weird one, probably just restart?

💬 fanquake commented on pull request "Parallel compact block downloads, take 3":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27626#issuecomment-1553108896)
> "jq: command not found" weird one, probably just restart?

Rebase should do it. Added recently for IWYU in the tidy job.

💬 instagibbs commented on pull request "Parallel compact block downloads, take 3":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27626#issuecomment-1553109478)
rebased

👋 hebasto's pull request is ready for review: "build: Detect USDT the same way how it is used in the code"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27458)

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "build: Detect USDT the same way how it is used in the code":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27458#issuecomment-1553110399)
> What are we doing here?

Reworked. The PR description has been updated.

💬 jamesob commented on pull request "assumeutxo (2)":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27596#issuecomment-1553127188)
Thanks for testing, @theStack!

> So far so good, everything went quite smooth and nothing unexpected happened! The only disappointment was finding that apparently the provided prune target of 800MB was not respected:

Yes, this is unfortunately expected behavior. Since you have `-blockfilterindex` enabled and the background sync hasn't yet completed, prune locks are preventing any pruning from happening on the snapshot chainstate. I mentioned this obliquely here: https://github.com/bitcoin/
...

💬 pinheadmz commented on pull request "net: Allow inbound whitebind connections to more aggressively evict peers when slots are full":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27600#issuecomment-1553133230)
Thanks @stickies-v nits addressed! 🙏

💬 MarcoFalke commented on pull request "Enhanced error messages for invalid network prefix during address parsing.":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27260#issuecomment-1553133965)
Needs rebase on current master, if still relevant

💬 MarcoFalke commented on pull request "Add a "tx output spender" index":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24539#issuecomment-1553136911)
(Needs rebase)

💬 MarcoFalke commented on pull request "Improve display address handling for external signer":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24313#issuecomment-1553138296)
Needs rebase