💬 achow101 commented on pull request "wallet: Disable creating and loading legacy wallets":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31250#discussion_r2060519499)
They are removed in #28710
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31250#discussion_r2060519499)
They are removed in #28710
💬 achow101 commented on pull request "wallet: Disable creating and loading legacy wallets":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31250#discussion_r2060520098)
Added a commit to #28710 to remove
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31250#discussion_r2060520098)
Added a commit to #28710 to remove
💬 achow101 commented on pull request "wallet: Disable creating and loading legacy wallets":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31250#discussion_r2060520569)
added a commit to #28710 to remove
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31250#discussion_r2060520569)
added a commit to #28710 to remove
💬 achow101 commented on pull request "Remove the legacy wallet and BDB dependency":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710#issuecomment-2830837640)
Rebased and added a couple commits for followups from #31250
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710#issuecomment-2830837640)
Rebased and added a couple commits for followups from #31250
👋 achow101's pull request is ready for review: "Remove the legacy wallet and BDB dependency"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710)
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "Remove the legacy wallet and BDB dependency":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710#discussion_r2060528559)
`clang_cxx_11.patch` also needs deleting.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710#discussion_r2060528559)
`clang_cxx_11.patch` also needs deleting.
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "Remove the legacy wallet and BDB dependency":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710#issuecomment-2830856375)
There's also a `libdb++-dev` instance in `workflows/ci.yml` & `deadlock:libdb` in tsan suppressions.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28710#issuecomment-2830856375)
There's also a `libdb++-dev` instance in `workflows/ci.yml` & `deadlock:libdb` in tsan suppressions.
📝 monlovesmango opened a pull request: "doc: Fix fuzz test_runner.py path"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32353)
This commit fixes the path listed in the documentation for the fuzz testing test_runner.py. Previously the --help option worked but running fuzz tests from the documented path did not.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32353)
This commit fixes the path listed in the documentation for the fuzz testing test_runner.py. Previously the --help option worked but running fuzz tests from the documented path did not.
💬 darosior commented on pull request "miner: timelock the coinbase to the mined block's height":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155#issuecomment-2830913121)
> I think you lost the comment announced here: [#32155 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155#discussion_r2056629920)
>
> Other than it looks good.
I did not: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155/commits/67267b147f8c48e0775602395fba9db0105dccf4#diff-6b810fb346def9cc80a9d9ab75184dd9f41c4ac63493135a7bdfcb98f75b1ce8R39
> Failure in `interface_usdt_coinselection` seems to be an instance of #32322.
Yes. Rebased on master to avoid the unrelated CI failure after i
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155#issuecomment-2830913121)
> I think you lost the comment announced here: [#32155 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155#discussion_r2056629920)
>
> Other than it looks good.
I did not: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155/commits/67267b147f8c48e0775602395fba9db0105dccf4#diff-6b810fb346def9cc80a9d9ab75184dd9f41c4ac63493135a7bdfcb98f75b1ce8R39
> Failure in `interface_usdt_coinselection` seems to be an instance of #32322.
Yes. Rebased on master to avoid the unrelated CI failure after i
...
💬 l0rinc commented on pull request "[IBD] multi-byte block obfuscation":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31144#issuecomment-2830957054)
For now I've reverted the assert that checks the deserialized key size, since I couldn't reproduce the fuzz failure locally (or when I could, even master failed for the same command).
Will continue trying, but without the assert it's closer to the previous state, so it should be fine as it is as well.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31144#issuecomment-2830957054)
For now I've reverted the assert that checks the deserialized key size, since I couldn't reproduce the fuzz failure locally (or when I could, even master failed for the same command).
Will continue trying, but without the assert it's closer to the previous state, so it should be fine as it is as well.
💬 jesterhodl commented on pull request "[29.x] qt: 29.1 translations update":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32352#issuecomment-2830993573)
So I rerun the script and found some more issues and updated Transifex.
v29 is not translated 100% yet from what I see, but at least the worst offenders: spam, typos, gross errors should be fixed now.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32352#issuecomment-2830993573)
So I rerun the script and found some more issues and updated Transifex.
v29 is not translated 100% yet from what I see, but at least the worst offenders: spam, typos, gross errors should be fixed now.
💬 kevkevinpal commented on pull request "doc: Fix fuzz test_runner.py path":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32353#issuecomment-2830999023)
ACK [61f238e](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32353/commits/61f238e84ac6d24d8f420c2eabcbb2980d7fcb1e)
---
This is the error I get if I try running `test_runner.py` from the non build dir
```
./test/fuzz/test_runner.py ../qa-assets/fuzz_corpora
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/mnt/shared_drive/DEVDIR/bitcoin/./test/fuzz/test_runner.py", line 407, in <module>
main()
File "/mnt/shared_drive/DEVDIR/bitcoin/./test/fuzz/test_runner.py", line 102, in main
confi
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32353#issuecomment-2830999023)
ACK [61f238e](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32353/commits/61f238e84ac6d24d8f420c2eabcbb2980d7fcb1e)
---
This is the error I get if I try running `test_runner.py` from the non build dir
```
./test/fuzz/test_runner.py ../qa-assets/fuzz_corpora
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/mnt/shared_drive/DEVDIR/bitcoin/./test/fuzz/test_runner.py", line 407, in <module>
main()
File "/mnt/shared_drive/DEVDIR/bitcoin/./test/fuzz/test_runner.py", line 102, in main
confi
...
💬 ryanofsky commented on pull request "ipc: Handle unclean shutdowns better":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32345#issuecomment-2831035109)
Updated e8372fa3a606d35146c72fc61663e17c67a4621a -> a56468ab0bf2154159919a2c3feba9974486d10e ([`pr/ipc-stop.1`](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/ipc-stop.1) -> [`pr/ipc-stop.2`](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/ipc-stop.2), [compare](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/compare/pr/ipc-stop.1..pr/ipc-stop.2)) to fix draftbot typos and CI failures, though I could not reproduce the previous releases AppInitMain failure in local CI so it could still be broken
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32345#issuecomment-2831035109)
Updated e8372fa3a606d35146c72fc61663e17c67a4621a -> a56468ab0bf2154159919a2c3feba9974486d10e ([`pr/ipc-stop.1`](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/ipc-stop.1) -> [`pr/ipc-stop.2`](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/ipc-stop.2), [compare](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/compare/pr/ipc-stop.1..pr/ipc-stop.2)) to fix draftbot typos and CI failures, though I could not reproduce the previous releases AppInitMain failure in local CI so it could still be broken
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "[29.x] qt: 29.1 translations update":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32352#issuecomment-2831070314)
> So I rerun the script and found some more issues and updated Transifex. v29 is not translated 100% yet from what I see, but at least the worst offenders: spam, typos, gross errors should be fixed now.
Thank you! Updated.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32352#issuecomment-2831070314)
> So I rerun the script and found some more issues and updated Transifex. v29 is not translated 100% yet from what I see, but at least the worst offenders: spam, typos, gross errors should be fixed now.
Thank you! Updated.
👍 hebasto approved a pull request: "Replace stray tfm::format to cerr with qWarning"
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/868#pullrequestreview-2794899658)
ACK edd46566bd66cea7d7f4116429fe1c11d2187ba2, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/868#pullrequestreview-2794899658)
ACK edd46566bd66cea7d7f4116429fe1c11d2187ba2, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "miner: timelock the coinbase to the mined block's height":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155#issuecomment-2831098171)
Code review ACK a58cb3b1c12c8cb75a87375c50f94c4605bb805d
I'm a bit reluctant to have this merged while BIP54 is in limbo (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1800).
Additionally I think it's worth waiting a few weeks (?) to see if someone responds to https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/great-consensus-cleanup-revival/710/85 about the use of `nLockTime` as an extranonce.
Let's add this to the v30 milestone though. Unless by that time someone advocates a different approach, it's better to just
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32155#issuecomment-2831098171)
Code review ACK a58cb3b1c12c8cb75a87375c50f94c4605bb805d
I'm a bit reluctant to have this merged while BIP54 is in limbo (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1800).
Additionally I think it's worth waiting a few weeks (?) to see if someone responds to https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/great-consensus-cleanup-revival/710/85 about the use of `nLockTime` as an extranonce.
Let's add this to the v30 milestone though. Unless by that time someone advocates a different approach, it's better to just
...
🤔 darosior reviewed a pull request: "test: avoid stack overflow in `FindChallenges` via manual iteration"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32351#pullrequestreview-2794937685)
Concept ACK. Should this marked as Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32341?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32351#pullrequestreview-2794937685)
Concept ACK. Should this marked as Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32341?
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "build: Fix `macdeployqtplus` after switching to Qt 6":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32287#discussion_r2060709771)
Thanks! Adjusted.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32287#discussion_r2060709771)
Thanks! Adjusted.
✅ glozow closed a pull request: "Package Relay 1/3: Introduce TxDownloadManager and improve orphan-handling"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28031)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28031)
💬 glozow commented on pull request "Package Relay 1/3: Introduce TxDownloadManager and improve orphan-handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28031#issuecomment-2831177590)
Closing because this is pretty completed (yay!). TxDownloadManager was added in #30110, and the multi-announcer orphan handling was added in #31397. We just need the last 2 commits to make txdownloadman internally thread-safe, but I believe we have somebody working on it.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28031#issuecomment-2831177590)
Closing because this is pretty completed (yay!). TxDownloadManager was added in #30110, and the multi-announcer orphan handling was added in #31397. We just need the last 2 commits to make txdownloadman internally thread-safe, but I believe we have somebody working on it.