💬 starius commented on pull request "Extend signetchallenge to set target block spacing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29365#issuecomment-2566090827)
Rebased the PR, including https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31468 and resolving the conflict in `test/functional/feature_signet.py`.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29365#issuecomment-2566090827)
Rebased the PR, including https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31468 and resolving the conflict in `test/functional/feature_signet.py`.
💬 starius commented on pull request "Extend signetchallenge to set target block spacing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29365#discussion_r1899891585)
Thanks for the proposal! I reworked the change of feature_signet.py test. Instead of modifying the existing test case, I added a new one with the wrapped signet challenge.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29365#discussion_r1899891585)
Thanks for the proposal! I reworked the change of feature_signet.py test. Instead of modifying the existing test case, I added a new one with the wrapped signet challenge.
📝 starius opened a pull request: "txmempool: fix typos in comments"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31584)
Fixed typos identified by codespell lint in CI.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31584)
Fixed typos identified by codespell lint in CI.
🤔 Pitan1993 requested changes to a pull request: "scripted-diff: Type-safe settings retrieval"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31260#pullrequestreview-2526132864)
2024-12-14T00:04:24.9747967Z Cleaning up orphan processes
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31260#pullrequestreview-2526132864)
2024-12-14T00:04:24.9747967Z Cleaning up orphan processes
💬 Pitan1993 commented on pull request "scripted-diff: Type-safe settings retrieval":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31260#issuecomment-2566096091)
e12edf7661384f593b5868b3f3374613773019d9
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31260#issuecomment-2566096091)
e12edf7661384f593b5868b3f3374613773019d9
📝 mikeknack86 opened a pull request: "Create docker-image.yml"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585)
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improv
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585)
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improv
...
👍1
🤔 mikeknack86 reviewed a pull request: "Create docker-image.yml"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585#pullrequestreview-2526149918)
[](url)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585#pullrequestreview-2526149918)
[](url)
✅ achow101 closed a pull request: "Create docker-image.yml"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585)
📝 achow101 locked a pull request: "."
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585)
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improv
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31585)
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improv
...
💬 davidgumberg commented on pull request "refactor: Remove redundant edge case in fee rate rounding logic":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31572#discussion_r1899948765)
Why the second `if` statement?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31572#discussion_r1899948765)
Why the second `if` statement?
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "doc: Install `net/py-pyzmq` port on FreeBSD for `interface_zmq.py`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31526#issuecomment-2566279518)
Also see the recent nightly builds:
- https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/12554769828/job/35003929128
- https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/12554769828/job/35003929381
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31526#issuecomment-2566279518)
Also see the recent nightly builds:
- https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/12554769828/job/35003929128
- https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/12554769828/job/35003929381
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "rpc: add gettarget , target getmininginfo field and show next block info":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31583#discussion_r1900019991)
Done and also added test coverage for nBits.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31583#discussion_r1900019991)
Done and also added test coverage for nBits.
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "rpc: add gettarget , target getmininginfo field and show next block info":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31583#issuecomment-2566298895)
Rebased and split things across more commits.
I also realized that `getmininginfo`, `getdifficulty` and `gettarget` always refer to the tip, rather than the upcoming block which is what miners actually care about. So added a `next` argument to `getdifficulty` and `gettarget` and a `next` object to `getmininginfo`. You'll have to test this manually, because regtest doesn't have difficulty adjustment.
I might push a test that uses the testnet4 genesis block and the rule that difficulty reset
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31583#issuecomment-2566298895)
Rebased and split things across more commits.
I also realized that `getmininginfo`, `getdifficulty` and `gettarget` always refer to the tip, rather than the upcoming block which is what miners actually care about. So added a `next` argument to `getdifficulty` and `gettarget` and a `next` object to `getmininginfo`. You'll have to test this manually, because regtest doesn't have difficulty adjustment.
I might push a test that uses the testnet4 genesis block and the rule that difficulty reset
...
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "doc: Install `net/py-pyzmq` port on FreeBSD for `interface_zmq.py`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31526#issuecomment-2566305211)
lgtm ACK 0a76c292ac8fa29166a7ec6efda1fafce86af0d3
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31526#issuecomment-2566305211)
lgtm ACK 0a76c292ac8fa29166a7ec6efda1fafce86af0d3
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "refactor: Remove redundant edge case in fee rate rounding logic":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31572#issuecomment-2566313057)
> Addresses #31558. This fix improves code readability.
I don't think it does. Someone will need to investigate why the behavior is not symmetric for negative feerates and whether making it symmetric is a bugfix. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31558#issuecomment-2560984394:
> I haven't checked if such a change is a bugfix or behavior change for prioritisetransaction, so it would be good to check that as well.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31572#issuecomment-2566313057)
> Addresses #31558. This fix improves code readability.
I don't think it does. Someone will need to investigate why the behavior is not symmetric for negative feerates and whether making it symmetric is a bugfix. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31558#issuecomment-2560984394:
> I haven't checked if such a change is a bugfix or behavior change for prioritisetransaction, so it would be good to check that as well.
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "txmempool: fix typos in comments":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31584#issuecomment-2566317181)
lgtm ACK 34e8ee23b83eeecb1c4022b48e7b8db45a60ffdd
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31584#issuecomment-2566317181)
lgtm ACK 34e8ee23b83eeecb1c4022b48e7b8db45a60ffdd
📝 hebasto opened a pull request: "doc: Update NetBSD Build Guide"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31586)
This PR:
1. Updates the documented NetBSD version.
2. Adds the optional ZeroMQ package to align the guide with other *BSD systems.
3. Updates the Python version to meet the minimum requirement specified in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30527.
4. Suggests to Install [`net/py-zmq`](https://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/net/py-zmq/index.html) package to enable the `interface_zmq.py` functional test.
5. Fix a formatting issue.
See also the recent NetBSD nightly
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31586)
This PR:
1. Updates the documented NetBSD version.
2. Adds the optional ZeroMQ package to align the guide with other *BSD systems.
3. Updates the Python version to meet the minimum requirement specified in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30527.
4. Suggests to Install [`net/py-zmq`](https://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/net/py-zmq/index.html) package to enable the `interface_zmq.py` functional test.
5. Fix a formatting issue.
See also the recent NetBSD nightly
...
👍 hebasto approved a pull request: "txmempool: fix typos in comments"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31584#pullrequestreview-2526353028)
ACK 34e8ee23b83eeecb1c4022b48e7b8db45a60ffdd.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31584#pullrequestreview-2526353028)
ACK 34e8ee23b83eeecb1c4022b48e7b8db45a60ffdd.
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "rpc: add gettarget , target getmininginfo field and show next block info":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31583#issuecomment-2566337776)
Added a helper function `NextEmptyBlockIndex`, which also fixes the missing nBits value on mainnet and signet.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31583#issuecomment-2566337776)
Added a helper function `NextEmptyBlockIndex`, which also fixes the missing nBits value on mainnet and signet.
💬 jaeheonshim commented on pull request "refactor: Remove redundant edge case in fee rate rounding logic":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31572#discussion_r1900111243)
Sorry, that `if` statement is unnecessary. I must have missed it.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31572#discussion_r1900111243)
Sorry, that `if` statement is unnecessary. I must have missed it.