👍 ryanofsky approved a pull request: "Convert ArgsManager::GetDataDir to a read-only function"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27073)
Code review ACK 64c105442ce8c10900ea6fbecdbcfebe42f2d387. Only comment changes since last review

✅ achow101 closed an issue: "bitcoin-cli needlessly creates empty ~/.bitcoin/wallets directory"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20070)

🚀 achow101 merged a pull request: "Convert ArgsManager::GetDataDir to a read-only function"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27073)

💬 TheCharlatan commented on pull request "refactor / kernel: Move non-gArgs chainparams functionality to kernel":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26177#issuecomment-1442521535)
Rebased.

📝 achow101 opened a pull request: "util: Remove duplicate include"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151)
Duplicate `#include <utility>` is upsetting the linter.

👍 theStack approved a pull request: "util: Remove duplicate include"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151)
ACK e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35

👍 john-moffett approved a pull request: "util: Remove duplicate include"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151)
ACK e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35

⚠️ orenyomtov opened an issue: "Add support for sighash flags in PSBT (like SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY)"
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/712)
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
When using Bitcoin Core's GUI to sign a PSBT that has a UTXO with `sighash=SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY`, it throws following error:
```
Specified sighash value does not match value stored in PSBT
```

**Describe the solution you'd like**
I'd like it to successfully sign PSBTs containing `sighash=SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY`

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
The current non-idea workaround is to use the console window as desc
...

💬 jarolrod commented on pull request "Deduplicate bitcoind and bitcoin-qt init code":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27150#issuecomment-1442770016)
concept ack

💬 davidgumberg commented on pull request "util: Remove duplicate include":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151#issuecomment-1442845959)
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151/commits/e8462690a9ff0b4155c31981fd97be16663ebb35

💬 fanquake commented on pull request "Deduplicate bitcoind and bitcoin-qt init code":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27150#issuecomment-1443202476)
Concept ACK - #27073 has now been merged.

🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "util: Remove duplicate include"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27151)

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "Deduplicate bitcoind and bitcoin-qt init code":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27150#issuecomment-1443297209)
Concept ACK.

⚠️ fanquake opened an issue: "interpreter: split PrecomputedTransactionData::Init() or rename `force`"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27152)
Potential followup from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27122#pullrequestreview-1307630323:

> I do wonder if it makes sense to rename force to something like signing_context or even more drastically split Init up into two obvious types ConsensusInit/SigningInit to make things clearer to future readers.

Seems like there might also be scope to make some of the `Init()` inline commentary clearer, given other review comments in #27122.

cc @instagibbs @ajtowns @roconnor-blockstream.
...

📝 fanquake opened a pull request: "guix: pass `--enable-initfini-array` to release GCC"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27153)
This returns us to pre-Guix behaviour, where the compilers we were using to build releases, were configured with this option.

🚀 glozow merged a pull request: "Remove MarcoFalke fingerprint, update trusted-git-root"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27135)

💬 MarcoFalke commented on issue "test: p2p_message_capture.py fails with undefined sanitizer":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27149#issuecomment-1443500021)
Closing for now. Let us know if this is still an issue with the suppressions file.

The doc questions should be handled in 17834

✅ MarcoFalke closed an issue: "test: p2p_message_capture.py fails with undefined sanitizer"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27149)

💬 fanquake commented on issue "[POC] [RFC] build: Separate GUI application build system":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24911#issuecomment-1443520838)
Closing for now, as I don't think there is anything actionable here. We aren't going to add new dependencies any time soon, if ever, and we aren't going to shuffle code/directories around (the linked branch) in this repository to facilitate easier rebasing in an experimental gui-fork.

✅ fanquake closed an issue: "[POC] [RFC] build: Separate GUI application build system"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24911)