🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "test: fix test abort for high timeout values (and `--timeout-factor 0`)"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25950)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25950)
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "p2p_disconnect_ban intermittent issue"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26808)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26808)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "test: fix intermittent issue in `p2p_disconnect_ban`"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27128)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27128)
💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "docs: add ramdisk guide for running tests on OSX":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27124#discussion_r1112159104)
agree with Sjors
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27124#discussion_r1112159104)
agree with Sjors
⚠️ fanquake opened an issue: "failure in feature_bip68_sequence.py"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27129)
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5552802257174528?logs=ci#L3998
```bash
node0 2023-02-16T16:55:28.505405Z [httpworker.3] [rpc/request.cpp:179] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=sendrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2023-02-16T16:55:28.506156Z [httpworker.3] [txmempool.cpp:644] [check] [mempool] Checking mempool with 58 transactions and 123 inputs
test 2023-02-16T16:55:28.513000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27129)
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5552802257174528?logs=ci#L3998
```bash
node0 2023-02-16T16:55:28.505405Z [httpworker.3] [rpc/request.cpp:179] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=sendrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2023-02-16T16:55:28.506156Z [httpworker.3] [txmempool.cpp:644] [check] [mempool] Checking mempool with 58 transactions and 123 inputs
test 2023-02-16T16:55:28.513000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "build: use _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27027)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27027)
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "depends: harden libevent":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27118#issuecomment-1437292856)
Rebased on top of #27027.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27118#issuecomment-1437292856)
Rebased on top of #27027.
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "decodescript miniscript functionality tops out at 520 bytes"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27111)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27111)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "rpc: Use a FlatSigningProvider in decodescript to allow inferring descriptors for scripts larger than 520 bytes"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27113)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27113)
💬 MarcoFalke commented on issue "failure in feature_bip68_sequence.py":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27129#issuecomment-1437297559)
Maybe due to the miniwallet change?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27129#issuecomment-1437297559)
Maybe due to the miniwallet change?
💬 TheCharlatan commented on pull request "compat: move (win) S_* defines into bdb":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26832#issuecomment-1437302293)
I feel like I'm missing some context here. Why move these out of compat? There are also other symbols like `WSAEAGAIN` that are only used in one other file.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26832#issuecomment-1437302293)
I feel like I'm missing some context here. Why move these out of compat? There are also other symbols like `WSAEAGAIN` that are only used in one other file.
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "rpc: fix successful broadcast count in `submitpackage` error msg"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27127)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27127)
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "ci: A few fixes of `ccache` issues":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27084#issuecomment-1437320675)
Most of the changes here look straight forward enough, and clearly improve `ccache` usage, but this is blocked on at least an answer to this question: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27084#discussion_r1104757809.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27084#issuecomment-1437320675)
Most of the changes here look straight forward enough, and clearly improve `ccache` usage, but this is blocked on at least an answer to this question: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27084#discussion_r1104757809.
📝 fanquake review_request_removed a pull request: "wallet: be able to specify a wallet name and passphrase to migratewallet"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26595)
`migratewallet` currently operates on wallets that are already loaded, however this is not necessarily required, and in the future, not possible once the legacy wallet is removed. So we need to also be able to give the wallet name to migrate.
Additionally, the passphrase is required when migrating a wallet. Since a wallet may not be loaded when we migrate, and as we currently unload wallets when migrating, we need the passphrase to be given to `migratewallet` in order to migrate encrypted wal
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26595)
`migratewallet` currently operates on wallets that are already loaded, however this is not necessarily required, and in the future, not possible once the legacy wallet is removed. So we need to also be able to give the wallet name to migrate.
Additionally, the passphrase is required when migrating a wallet. Since a wallet may not be loaded when we migrate, and as we currently unload wallets when migrating, we need the passphrase to be given to `migratewallet` in order to migrate encrypted wal
...
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "wallet: be able to specify a wallet name and passphrase to migratewallet":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26595#issuecomment-1437342993)
@pinheadmz review?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26595#issuecomment-1437342993)
@pinheadmz review?
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "every other change address is unused"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "wallet: reuse change dest when re-creating TX with avoidpartialspends"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053)
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "wallet: reuse change dest when re-creating TX with avoidpartialspends":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053#issuecomment-1437347735)
Added to #26878 for backporting into 24.x.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053#issuecomment-1437347735)
Added to #26878 for backporting into 24.x.
📝 fanquake review_request_removed a pull request: "wallet: reuse change dest when re-creating TX with avoidpartialspends"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053)
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051
When the wallet creates a transaction internally, it will also create an alternative that spends using destination groups and see if the fee difference is negligible. If it costs the user the same to send the grouped version, we send it (even if the user has `avoidpartialspends` set to `false` which is default). This patch ensures that the second transaction creation attempt re-uses the change destination selected by the first attempt. Ot
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053)
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051
When the wallet creates a transaction internally, it will also create an alternative that spends using destination groups and see if the fee difference is negligible. If it costs the user the same to send the grouped version, we send it (even if the user has `avoidpartialspends` set to `false` which is default). This patch ensures that the second transaction creation attempt re-uses the change destination selected by the first attempt. Ot
...
📝 fanquake review_request_removed a pull request: "wallet: reuse change dest when re-creating TX with avoidpartialspends"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053)
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051
When the wallet creates a transaction internally, it will also create an alternative that spends using destination groups and see if the fee difference is negligible. If it costs the user the same to send the grouped version, we send it (even if the user has `avoidpartialspends` set to `false` which is default). This patch ensures that the second transaction creation attempt re-uses the change destination selected by the first attempt. Ot
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27053)
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051
When the wallet creates a transaction internally, it will also create an alternative that spends using destination groups and see if the fee difference is negligible. If it costs the user the same to send the grouped version, we send it (even if the user has `avoidpartialspends` set to `false` which is default). This patch ensures that the second transaction creation attempt re-uses the change destination selected by the first attempt. Ot
...