💬 fjahr commented on pull request "mining: bugfix: Fix duplicate coinbase tx weight reservation":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31384#discussion_r1942047954)
nit: I find it a bit confusing to mention policy here. While these values are stored in the policy file, this reads a bit like blocks wouldn't propagate when exceeding the values set there. But maybe that's just me...

💬 fjahr commented on pull request "mining: bugfix: Fix duplicate coinbase tx weight reservation":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31384#discussion_r1942057070)
This is repeating what is already explained above.

💬 ryanofsky commented on issue "test: 32-bit Clang `ipc_test` failure at `-O0`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31772#issuecomment-2635384042)
I tried to repeat previous steps rebuilding depends and test_bitcoin in container to figure out what I was doing that caused the test to stop crashing, but it seems to crash reliably, so I can't work out what I other changes I might have made while trying -fabi-version flags in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31772#issuecomment-2634917217 that would have caused it not to crash.

Additionally, I went back to original build and debugged it with GDB, and could easily step through and see
...

✅ pinheadmz closed an issue: "bitcoind debug log file is growing without limit"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31795)

⚠️ lilin998 opened an issue: "signet /README.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798)
MINER="./contrib/signet/miner"
GRIND="./build/src/bitcoin-util grind"
$MINER calibrate --grind-cmd="$GRIND"
nbits=1e00f403 for 25s average mining time


CLI="./build/src/bitcoin-cli -conf=mysignet.conf"
ADDR=$($CLI -signet getnewaddress)
NBITS=1e00f403
$MINER --cli="$CLI" generate --grind-cmd="$GRIND" --address="$ADDR" --nbits=$NBITS


PSBT signing failed


How to solve this problem PSBT signing failed

💬 pinheadmz commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635518680)
> PSBT signing failed

This happens when the wallet does not have the private key to sign valid signet blocks that satisfy the challenge

✅ lilin998 closed an issue: "signet /README.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798)

⚠️ lilin998 reopened an issue: "signet /README.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798)
MINER="./contrib/signet/miner"
GRIND="./build/src/bitcoin-util grind"
$MINER calibrate --grind-cmd="$GRIND"
nbits=1e00f403 for 25s average mining time


CLI="./build/src/bitcoin-cli -conf=mysignet.conf"
ADDR=$($CLI -signet getnewaddress)
NBITS=1e00f403
$MINER --cli="$CLI" generate --grind-cmd="$GRIND" --address="$ADDR" --nbits=$NBITS


PSBT signing failed


How to solve this problem PSBT signing failed

💬 lilin998 commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635526553)
> > PSBT 签名失败
>
> 当钱包没有私钥来签署满足挑战的有效签名块时，就会发生这种情况

root@iZt4n4iibil3u7hsxshmuwZ:~/bitcoin# bitcoin-cli -signet -conf=/root/bitcoin/mysignet.conf getwalletinfo
{
"walletname": "mysignet_wallet",
"walletversion": 169900,
"format": "sqlite",
"balance": 0.00000000,
"unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000,
"immature_balance": 0.00000000,
"txcount": 4,
"keypoolsize": 4000,
"keypoolsize_hd_internal": 3999,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"private_keys_enabled": true,
"avoid_reuse": false,
"
...

💬 lilin998 commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635527325)
This seems to have a private key.

💬 pinheadmz commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635528630)
do you have the correct `signetchallenge` in `bitcoin.conf`?

💬 lilin998 commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635529178)
> 你有正确的`signetchallenge`吗`bitcoin.conf`？



> do you have the correct `signetchallenge` in `bitcoin.conf`?
server=1
daemon=1
txindex=1

[signet]
rpcuser=myuser
rpcpassword=mypassword
rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0
rpcbind=127.0.0.1
rpcport=38332
signet=1

💬 pinheadmz commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635536220)
What are you trying to accomplish? If you want to start a brand new signet chain you need to add `signetchallenge=...` in `bitcoin.conf` with a BIP325 challenge: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0325.mediawiki#specification

💬 lilin998 commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635538514)



> What are you trying to accomplish? If you want to start a brand new signet chain you need to add `signetchallenge=...` in `bitcoin.conf` with a BIP325 challenge: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0325.mediawiki#specification

I want to dig up some sbtc test coins

💬 pinheadmz commented on issue "signet /README.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798#issuecomment-2635540094)
You will not be able to generate blocks on the default signet chain because you do not have the correct private key. You can try one of the other methods listed here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/signet/README.md

✅ pinheadmz closed an issue: "signet /README.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31798)

👍 ryanofsky approved a pull request: "depends: Avoid hardcoding `host_prefix` in toolchain file"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31358#pullrequestreview-2594540306)
Code review ACK d9c8aacce38ab593ea9277976eb64ccadd7d062f

✅ ryanofsky closed a pull request: "ci: build multiprocess on most jobs"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30975)

📝 ryanofsky reopened a pull request: "ci: build multiprocess on most jobs"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30975)
This builds most of the CI jobs with multiprocess enabled.

Two jobs run the functional test suite, one with depends and one with the regular build.

The Windows job does not use multiprocess since that's not supported yet.

The previous version of this PR changed the `depends` system to build libmultiprocess by default as one of the final steps for #31098 - but based discussion here and on IRC it was decided it's too early to ship it.

💬 luke-jr commented on pull request "multiprocess: Add libmultiprocess git subtree":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31741#issuecomment-2635647339)
Concept NACK: there's no rationale for why this can't always be external.