✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Support for non-immediate periodic tasks with variable runtime"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18488)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Support for non-immediate periodic tasks with variable runtime":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18488#issuecomment-2411476159)
This feature request does not seem to have attracted much attention from other contributors. As such, it does not seem important enough to keep it sitting around idle in the list of open issues. Closing due to lack of interest.

Pull requests with improvements are always welcome.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Asmap: avoid connecting to certain AS"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26353)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Asmap: avoid connecting to certain AS":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26353#issuecomment-2411483782)
Closing this in favour of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19129

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Make all RPCs take a blockhash argument / allow rpc leasing?"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24471)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Make all RPCs take a blockhash argument / allow rpc leasing?":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24471#issuecomment-2411491484)
There doesn't seem to be much action on implementing this feature.

Please feel free to submit a pull request if this is something that you still want. This could be done for specific RPCs.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "[brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "[brainstorm] DoS protection for blocks":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530#issuecomment-2411500758)
It's been long enough with enough re-architecting that this can be closed and re-opened via a new issue if necessary.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "fuzz: focused process_messages fuzz harness with swarm testing"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22628)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "fuzz: focused process_messages fuzz harness with swarm testing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22628#issuecomment-2411508831)
Closing this as it has not had any activity in a while. If you are interested in continuing discussion on this, or you feel that it is sufficiently important, please leave a comment so that it can be reopened.

💬 achow101 commented on issue "[Idea] Wallet UTXO Pruning":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19942#issuecomment-2411524016)
> I have a few branches in my repo (no PRs yet) for doing TXO tracking.

See #27286 and #27865

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Optional late, block submission, difficulty test"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22119)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Optional late, block submission, difficulty test":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22119#issuecomment-2411528848)
Would `submitheader` work for this use-case?

Please comment here to have this issue re-opened if not.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Remove RegisterValidationInterface()"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26210)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Remove RegisterValidationInterface()":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26210#issuecomment-2411532600)
Closing this as it has not had any activity in a while. If you are interested in continuing discussion on this, or you feel that it is sufficiently important, please leave a comment so that it can be reopened.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Run coverage functional tests in parallel"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26736)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Run coverage functional tests in parallel":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26736#issuecomment-2411536967)
This was probably resolved by `cmake`.

If this is not the case then please leave a message here and we can reopen it.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Bitcoind to use RPC authentication cookie from file"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20387)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Bitcoind to use RPC authentication cookie from file":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20387#issuecomment-2411544506)
It seems like the consensus is that one should use `rpcauth` in this situation.

Let us know if you feel this should be reopened.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "interpreter: split PrecomputedTransactionData::Init() or rename `force`"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27152)