🤔 pablomartin4btc reviewed a pull request: "rpc: add getdescriptoractivity"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30708#pullrequestreview-2278000353)
Concept ACK

Performed some light testing with the given examples from the top description.

For more complex cases/ non standard descriptors, as mentioned by @furszy, perhaps it's worth it to analyze them later at some point.

🤔 pablomartin4btc reviewed a pull request: "rpc: add `revelant_blocks` to `scanblocks status`"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30713#pullrequestreview-2278003474)
Concept ACK (coming from #30708).

💬 ryanofsky commented on pull request "build: Fix linking for `fuzz` target when building with MSan":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30778#discussion_r1742403459)
Very helpful, thanks. I think I would write comment as "Set CMAKE_{C,CXX}_FLAGS_DEBUG options to empty so CMake's default options for debug builds do not interfere with MSAN flags"

📝 maflcko opened a pull request: "doc: Clarify libbitcoin_consensus in design/libraries.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802)
Now that the shared library has been removed in commit 80f8b92f4f2311b9e9a25361c9dd973244e6f95c, update the documentation to drop the no-longer applicable prefix "Stable...".

💬 Sjors commented on issue "Testnet4 consensus failure due to timewarp related "softfork"":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30786#issuecomment-2327029294)
It's too hot to turn on my S9 :-)

💬 maflcko commented on pull request "build: Introduce CMake-based build system":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1742404263)
Fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802

💬 maflcko commented on pull request "build: Introduce CMake-based build system":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1742404977)
Fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802

👍 TheCharlatan approved a pull request: "doc: Clarify libbitcoin_consensus in design/libraries.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802#pullrequestreview-2278039267)
ACK fad22fcc83bc009a8c3892cac3570cd399ae28f7

📝 hebasto opened a pull request: "build: Minor build syystem fixes and amendments"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803)
This PR addresses the following comments:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1742342524
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1728692369
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1736110362

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "build: Introduce CMake-based build system":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1742421067)
Fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803.

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "build: Introduce CMake-based build system":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1742421343)
Fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803.

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "build: Introduce CMake-based build system":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454#discussion_r1742421605)
Fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803.

🤔 hebasto reviewed a pull request: "doc: Clarify libbitcoin_consensus in design/libraries.md"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802#pullrequestreview-2278050191)
Concept ACK.

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "doc: Clarify libbitcoin_consensus in design/libraries.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802#discussion_r1742425451)
Why `libbitcoin_node` removed? The diagram below still shows this dependency.

👍 maflcko approved a pull request: "build: Minor build system fixes and amendments"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803#pullrequestreview-2278054511)
review ACK c393acadf213ddf58a69759eaf341595ccbf4889

💬 maflcko commented on pull request "build: Minor build system fixes and amendments":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803#discussion_r1742427765)
```suggestion
# However, as of 2024, mainstream distributions do not yet provide
# CMake config files for ZeroMQ packages.
# If they do in the future, find_package(ZeroMQ) may be used instead.
```

nit: Could remove the TODO above and clarify that it is waiting on the distros.

💬 maflcko commented on pull request "doc: Clarify libbitcoin_consensus in design/libraries.md":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30802#discussion_r1742432173)
Well, it is used by everything that uses common. Probably best to just refer to the diagram.

Let me know if I should remove the "used by" completely.

💬 Sjors commented on pull request "Stratum v2 Template Provider (take 3)":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29432#issuecomment-2327073294)
I pushed the rebase, so that stratum v2 miner will produce valid testnet4 blocks. See #29775. Tagged [sv2-tp-0.1.8 ](https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/releases/tag/sv2-tp-0.1.8) and will binaries shortly.

💬 hebasto commented on pull request "build: Minor build system fixes and amendments":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30803#discussion_r1742434506)
Thanks! Reworked per your feedback.

🤔 glozow reviewed a pull request: "[WIP] Cluster mempool implementation"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28676#pullrequestreview-2277909745)
had a look at some tests that are disabled or have TODOs