Bitcoin Core Github
44 subscribers
120K links
Download Telegram
🚀 glozow merged a pull request: "[26.x] archive 26.1 release notes + backports"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29899)
💬 pablomartin4btc commented on pull request "Bugfix on TransactionsView - Disable if privacy mode is set during wallet selection":
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/815#issuecomment-2129195803)
> This one-line change works without anything else:
>
> [#815 (review)](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/815#pullrequestreview-2072577992)

Sorry, I made another mistake, thanks for double checking.

To other reviewers: please hold on till next push, thanks.
💬 stickies-v commented on pull request "Encapsulate warnings in generalized node::Warnings and remove globals":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30058#issuecomment-2129201031)
Oops, forgot to update bitcoin-chainstate.cpp again. Force pushed to fix that, and also slightly improved function signatures to use `(kernel::Warning id, const bilingual_str& message)` instead of `(kernel::Warning id, const bilingual_str& warning)`.
📝 fjahr opened a pull request: "doc, rpc: Release notes and follow-ups for #29612"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30167)
This adds release notes for #29612 and addresses post-merge review comments.
💬 fjahr commented on pull request "rpc: Optimize serialization and enhance metadata of dumptxoutset output":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29612#discussion_r1613276102)
I addressed this in #30167 using the member field. Using params-serialization wouldn't have made much of a difference given how we use this code right now, I think.
💬 fjahr commented on pull request "rpc: Optimize serialization and enhance metadata of dumptxoutset output":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29612#discussion_r1613276463)
done in #30167
💬 fjahr commented on pull request "rpc: Optimize serialization and enhance metadata of dumptxoutset output":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29612#discussion_r1613276609)
Added a test for this in #30167
💬 fjahr commented on pull request "rpc: Optimize serialization and enhance metadata of dumptxoutset output":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29612#issuecomment-2129225055)
Added release notes and dddressed post-merge comments in #30167
💬 pablomartin4btc commented on pull request "Bugfix on TransactionsView - Disable if privacy mode is set during wallet selection":
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/815#discussion_r1613302049)
Sorry, that was because `setWalletActionsEnabled` was not working properly, and `setWalletActionsEnabled` was not working because I misread your suggestion and I was still calling the function `enableHistoryAction` incorrectly instead of just using directly `historyAction->setEnabled`. It fixed now in 260d6eb. Thanks!
💬 willcl-ark commented on pull request "ci: add markdown link check job":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30034#discussion_r1613305686)
Removed in 4b7d9842691046b01f0c08d69f924ddb62ccc4c6
💬 pablomartin4btc commented on pull request "Bugfix on TransactionsView - Disable if privacy mode is set during wallet selection":
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/815#issuecomment-2129275595)
Updates:
- Incorporated @luke-jr's [suggestion](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/815#issuecomment-2127782169), simplifying the fix.
👍 maflcko approved a pull request: "doc, rpc: Release notes and follow-ups for #29612"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30167#pullrequestreview-2076606115)
lgtm, apart from the assert
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "doc, rpc: Release notes and follow-ups for #29612":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30167#discussion_r1613303760)
nit: Why not use the prams from chainman? Seems more consistent, because the chainstate is also used from chainman. (Same nit on all other places)
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "doc, rpc: Release notes and follow-ups for #29612":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30167#discussion_r1613308886)
Not sure about turning an internal logic error in serialization into a node crash. Seems best to remove this line, because `.value()` will already handle the internal logic error correctly by throwing an exception.
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "ci: add markdown link check job":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30034#issuecomment-2129283769)
re-utACK 4b7d9842691046b01f0c08d69f924ddb62ccc4c6
💬 laanwj commented on pull request "net: Replace libnatpmp with built-in PCP+NATPMP implementation":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#issuecomment-2129306509)
Do you know what's the minimum FreeBSD version it can be compiled on? Let's bump the version to that.
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "net: Replace libnatpmp with built-in PCP+NATPMP implementation":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#issuecomment-2129309096)
> Do you know what's the minimum FreeBSD version it can be compiled on? Let's bump the version bound to that.

I'll spin up some more recent VMs to test, probably next week though.
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "net: Replace libnatpmp with built-in PCP+NATPMP implementation":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#issuecomment-2129331327)
For testing, something like https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30164 could be used
👍 willcl-ark approved a pull request: "[27.x] Backports and rc1"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30092#pullrequestreview-2076707734)
ACK cb6def3855427b613357696ba16a431c7964dbcc

Reviewed that all backports were unmodified, and that associated PR #'s match.

Lightly reviewed release notes and manpage and they look good to me.
💬 maflcko commented on issue "prune shall not delete blocks it did not download":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30163#issuecomment-2129349133)
> > Using the same blocksdir for two different nodes is not supported. Nodes may download blocks in a different order and save them to different locations in the blocksfiles. This will lead to an error at some point, latest when one of the nodes can't find a block where it believes to be one.
> > Currently, I don't think what you are trying to achieve is possible without copying blocks.
>
> Hm, my experience differs: using this regularly and never ran into issues. Since the external HDD cont
...