👍 hebasto approved a pull request: "doc: suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on FreeBSD"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#pullrequestreview-2019686831)
ACK d457d8b20aa2fd09df319bd087ad0a69925be158.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#pullrequestreview-2019686831)
ACK d457d8b20aa2fd09df319bd087ad0a69925be158.
💬 vasild commented on pull request "doc: suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on FreeBSD":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#issuecomment-2074812682)
`d457d8b20a...dace02f99d`: update the commit message with the numbers from the latest run, sorry for the noise. I think this should be settled now.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#issuecomment-2074812682)
`d457d8b20a...dace02f99d`: update the commit message with the numbers from the latest run, sorry for the noise. I think this should be settled now.
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "doc: Fix gen-manpages to check build options":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29457#discussion_r1577785469)
This is hardcoding component names / variables, and they are likely to change during the switchover.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29457#discussion_r1577785469)
This is hardcoding component names / variables, and they are likely to change during the switchover.
👍 hebasto approved a pull request: "doc: suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on FreeBSD"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#pullrequestreview-2019705702)
re-ACK dace02f99d4a8785567732c0d687517175765bfd.
I've got the following diff for the change since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#pullrequestreview-2019686831):
```
$ git range-diff master d457d8b20aa2fd09df319bd087ad0a69925be158 dace02f99d4a8785567732c0d687517175765bfd
1: d457d8b20a ! 1: dace02f99d doc: suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on FreeBSD
@@ Commit message
The previously suggested `qt5` package is a meta p
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#pullrequestreview-2019705702)
re-ACK dace02f99d4a8785567732c0d687517175765bfd.
I've got the following diff for the change since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932#pullrequestreview-2019686831):
```
$ git range-diff master d457d8b20aa2fd09df319bd087ad0a69925be158 dace02f99d4a8785567732c0d687517175765bfd
1: d457d8b20a ! 1: dace02f99d doc: suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on FreeBSD
@@ Commit message
The previously suggested `qt5` package is a meta p
...
👍 BrandonOdiwuor approved a pull request: "Bugfix - don't allow multiple dialogs for same tx in TransactionView"
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/817#pullrequestreview-2019747892)
Tested ACK b26d2e81ec6ac4b5bd97bc7f7ec0c44e502b6a18
Tested successfully on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS. Only one dialogue is created per transaction and the clicked transaction is brought to the foreground
[Screencast from 24-04-2024 03:35:10 ALASIRI.webm](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/15610188/396507fc-bb8c-4773-8e74-68ac51c6b582)
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/817#pullrequestreview-2019747892)
Tested ACK b26d2e81ec6ac4b5bd97bc7f7ec0c44e502b6a18
Tested successfully on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS. Only one dialogue is created per transaction and the clicked transaction is brought to the foreground
[Screencast from 24-04-2024 03:35:10 ALASIRI.webm](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/15610188/396507fc-bb8c-4773-8e74-68ac51c6b582)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "rpc: Reword SighashFromStr error message"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29870)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29870)
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "rpc: Reword SighashFromStr error message":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29870#issuecomment-2074891924)
Backported in #29888.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29870#issuecomment-2074891924)
Backported in #29888.
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "doc: Suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on OpenBSD"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29947)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29947)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "doc: suggest only necessary Qt packages for installation on FreeBSD"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29932)
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "fuzz, rpc: Internal bug in `finalizepsbt` "CHECK_NONFATAL(last - first == 32)" "
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29851)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29851)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "sign: don't assume we are parsing a sane TapMiniscript"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29853)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29853)
✅ hebasto closed a pull request: "ci: Workaround Microsoft mirror issue for GitHub Action"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29951)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29951)
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "ci: Workaround Microsoft mirror issue for GitHub Action":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29951#issuecomment-2074923286)
https://github.com/microsoft/linux-package-repositories/issues/130
Closing.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29951#issuecomment-2074923286)
https://github.com/microsoft/linux-package-repositories/issues/130
Closing.
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "sign: don't assume we are parsing a sane TapMiniscript":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29853#issuecomment-2074931006)
Backported to 27.x in #29888.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29853#issuecomment-2074931006)
Backported to 27.x in #29888.
⚠️ maflcko opened an issue: "Require thread_local"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29952)
After dbfca4a815d2dbef69f3b634c24b875bc1d22afc from the 23.x release (and fe1b3256888bd0e70d0c9655f565e139ec87b606 from 25.x), I think the `--disable-threadlocal` can now be dropped, as those commits removed the need for it?
cc @hebasto @fanquake
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29952)
After dbfca4a815d2dbef69f3b634c24b875bc1d22afc from the 23.x release (and fe1b3256888bd0e70d0c9655f565e139ec87b606 from 25.x), I think the `--disable-threadlocal` can now be dropped, as those commits removed the need for it?
cc @hebasto @fanquake
💬 hernanmarino commented on pull request "test: Assumeutxo: snapshots with less work should not be loaded":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29428#issuecomment-2074934165)
> Please delete the hidden comment in the pull description, because this will end up in the merge commit.
Oh, sorry that. Deleted.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29428#issuecomment-2074934165)
> Please delete the hidden comment in the pull description, because this will end up in the merge commit.
Oh, sorry that. Deleted.
💬 fanquake commented on issue "Require thread_local":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29952#issuecomment-2074938316)
Possibly. Someone will first need to test it on FreeBSD and mingw-w64. Given we still assume those implementations to be broken.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29952#issuecomment-2074938316)
Possibly. Someone will first need to test it on FreeBSD and mingw-w64. Given we still assume those implementations to be broken.
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "SEE ALSO section for all man pages"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29558)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29558)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "contrib: list other binaries in manpage output"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29585)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29585)
💬 maflcko commented on issue "Require thread_local":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29952#issuecomment-2074959708)
I couldn't get wine running locally, so my testing failed. But given that we require a C++20 compiler, I'd be surprised if there is still a platform out there that hasn't fully implemented C++11 at this point.
I presume, at least for the mingw issue, the existing unit tests should detect the issue, as I presume the `RenameEnMasse` unit test is equivalent to the C++ shared in the linked gist?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29952#issuecomment-2074959708)
I couldn't get wine running locally, so my testing failed. But given that we require a C++20 compiler, I'd be surprised if there is still a platform out there that hasn't fully implemented C++11 at this point.
I presume, at least for the mingw issue, the existing unit tests should detect the issue, as I presume the `RenameEnMasse` unit test is equivalent to the C++ shared in the linked gist?