💬 fjahr commented on pull request "doc: explain what the wallet password does":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28974#issuecomment-2069900043)
ACK 55b13ecd2e00ad2dbfd44c34d7de6f616590adf8

💬 levantah commented on issue "Release schedule for 27.0":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29028#issuecomment-2069950412)
Thank you @fanquake , @bitcoin please delete the previous comment and this one the same way. And Thanks.

💬 levantah commented on issue "Release schedule for 27.0":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29028#issuecomment-2069955306)
And happy Passover!

💬 fjahr commented on pull request "test: Fix intermittent timeout in p2p_tx_download.py":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29933#issuecomment-2070011950)
We should probably re-run the multiprocess job at least 2 more times manually here to ensure this actually fixes it and it wasn't just lucky this one time.

💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "Feature: Use different datadirs for different signets":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29838#issuecomment-2070016254)
i concur with @tdb3 - use underscores for signet paths.

💬 maflcko commented on pull request "doc: add LLVM instruction for macOS < 13":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29934#discussion_r1575006254)
nit: According to Wikipedia, Big Sur is "Unsupported as of September 26, 2023." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_Big_Sur)

Maybe just say macOS Monterey 12 (and earlier), or drop Big Sur?

💬 maflcko commented on pull request "test: Fix intermittent timeout in p2p_tx_download.py":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29933#issuecomment-2070020844)
It is already re-run 10 times. You can double check by navigating to the Cirrus CI page for this pull request.

🤔 glozow reviewed a pull request: "test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_handshake.py"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29898#pullrequestreview-2015211017)
ACK 6b02c11d667adff24daf611f9b14815d27963674

💬 fjahr commented on pull request "test: Fix intermittent timeout in p2p_tx_download.py":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29933#issuecomment-2070033655)
> It is already re-run 10 times. You can double check by navigating to the Cirrus CI page for this pull request.

Thanks, ACK fa6c300a9926a1d35fdd0a80f59ea39769bd2596

🚀 glozow merged a pull request: "test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_handshake.py"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29898)

💬 achow101 commented on pull request "test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_handshake.py":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29898#issuecomment-2070050583)
ACK 6b02c11d667adff24daf611f9b14815d27963674

💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "Feature: Use different datadirs for different signets":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29838#issuecomment-2070059159)
I concur with @Sjors.

💬 achow101 commented on pull request "net: Decrease nMaxIPs when learning from DNS seeds":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29850#issuecomment-2070059206)
ACK f2e3662e57eca1330962faf38ff428a564d50a11

💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "Feature: Use different datadirs for different signets":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29838#issuecomment-2070074983)
Ensure the signet path prefix is shared with the wallet so it can find the appropriate wallets for each signet. Treating the global signet as “just another signet” ought to simplify the wallet logic as well as avoiding a bug where the wallet doesn’t distinguish between global signet and custom signets.

✅ achow101 closed an issue: "Decreasing nMaxIPs when learning from DNS seeds"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16070)

🚀 achow101 merged a pull request: "net: Decrease nMaxIPs when learning from DNS seeds"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29850)

💬 josibake commented on pull request "Silent payment index (for light wallets and consistency check)":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28241#discussion_r1575031937)
Added a new function `GetSerializedSilentPaymentsPublicData` that returns a `CPubKey`.

💬 josibake commented on pull request "Silent payment index (for light wallets and consistency check)":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28241#discussion_r1575032154)
also lol at the `// TODO` comment

💬 mzumsande commented on pull request "validation: improve performance of CheckBlockIndex":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28339#discussion_r1575035825)
fixed

💬 mzumsande commented on pull request "validation: improve performance of CheckBlockIndex":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28339#discussion_r1575039039)
> I agree it could potentially be confused with the active chain in new code, and that would be a bug.

I added a comment in `CheckBlockIndex()` describing why these can differ.