💬 maflcko commented on pull request "[DO NOT MERGE] testnet4 including PoW difficulty adjustment fix":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29775#issuecomment-2047753470)
> Is it really realistic that someone with just their CPU would be able to mine a block

Yes, I am not sure what would be the problem. All you have to do is to set the time +20min and mine a block on your laptop. If you don't want to try it yourself, you can come by to watch it on my laptop.



> Since some people consider the blockstorms an interesting feature of Testnet3

After a quick chat with @murchandamus, an alternative fix would be to require the pre-retarget block to have the "c
...

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "rpc: Wrong `gettransaction` info for a coinjoin":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14136#issuecomment-2047754057)
@achow101 is this still a problem with descriptor wallets?

✅ 0xB10C closed an issue: "Discussion: Potential USDTs (User Static Defined Traces) for Core "
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20981)

💬 0xB10C commented on issue "Discussion: Potential USDTs (User Static Defined Traces) for Core ":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20981#issuecomment-2047756417)
Can probably close this as there hasn't been much activity. Many of the tracepoints proposed here have been implemented in some form - other's haven't sparked enough interest.

💬 maflcko commented on issue "rpc: Wrong `gettransaction` info for a coinjoin":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14136#issuecomment-2047757278)
Yes, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18919

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Add RPC to set transaction comment"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12594)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Add RPC to set transaction comment":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12594#issuecomment-2047760392)
This issue hasn't had activity in a while and appears to have gone stale so I'm going to close it for now.

Feel free to open a new issue or comment here if you are still experiencing this problem so we can investigate further.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Misleading error/reject message: mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Signature must be zero for failed CHECK(MULTI)SIG operation)"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11891)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Misleading error/reject message: mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Signature must be zero for failed CHECK(MULTI)SIG operation)":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11891#issuecomment-2047764658)
The feature request didn't seem to attract much attention in the past. Also, the issue seems not important enough right now to keep it sitting around idle in the list of open issues.

Pull requests with improvements are always welcome.

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Could the wallet count unconfirmed non-mempool change?":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11887#issuecomment-2047770240)
Related to private broadcast @vasild ?

💬 glozow commented on issue "policy: allow RBF descendant carveout whenever conflicts exist, not just when number of conflicts == 1":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16819#issuecomment-2047781108)
AFAIK, #27677 gets rid of RBF carveout / fixes this, as it instead calculates what the mempool would look like after removing the replacees and adding the new transaction(s)?

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "depends: Evaluate potential improvements"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18821)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "depends: Evaluate potential improvements":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18821#issuecomment-2047798129)
The feature request didn't seem to attract much attention in the past. Also, the issue seems not important enough right now to keep it sitting around idle in the list of open issues.

Pull requests with improvements are always welcome.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "Allow JSON RPC "batches" for multiwallet"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18715)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "Allow JSON RPC "batches" for multiwallet":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18715#issuecomment-2047800194)
The feature request didn't seem to attract much attention in the past. Also, the issue seems not important enough right now to keep it sitting around idle in the list of open issues.

Pull requests with improvements are always welcome.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "[RFC] Dealing with RPCs that have a lot of positional options"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22575)

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "ignored getblocktxn takes longer to detect than is possible"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22295)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "ignored getblocktxn takes longer to detect than is possible":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22295#issuecomment-2047804953)
We think this issue is now resolved, please feel free to comment here or open another issue if you disagree.

✅ willcl-ark closed an issue: "make keeps redoing some of the earlier done work."
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22134)

💬 willcl-ark commented on issue "make keeps redoing some of the earlier done work.":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22134#issuecomment-2047808171)
There doesn't seem to be much interest in implementing this feature.

Please feel free to submit a pull request if this is something that you still want.