💬 eragmus commented on pull request "datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878252246)
> > "Bitcoin works on economic incentives"
>
> is not just some magical phrase you can throw around and make your assertions true. the incentives for full node runners are becoming smaller and smaller every single day. this demonstrably hurts decentralization of bitcoin. you people would care about that if you actually cared about the state of the mempool, but instead you are concern trolling that setting a filter to EVENLY DISTRIBUTE COST for all transactions will kill the mempool. Your fall
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878252246)
> > "Bitcoin works on economic incentives"
>
> is not just some magical phrase you can throw around and make your assertions true. the incentives for full node runners are becoming smaller and smaller every single day. this demonstrably hurts decentralization of bitcoin. you people would care about that if you actually cared about the state of the mempool, but instead you are concern trolling that setting a filter to EVENLY DISTRIBUTE COST for all transactions will kill the mempool. Your fall
...
💬 PerpetualWar commented on pull request "datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878254839)
It is highly troubling to see this discord between people involved in bitcoin.
As someone who recently joined the community, I find it unsettling.
My stance is that monetary proposition of bitcoin is the one and only thing that core team must be focused on, but now I see that goal is lost, intentionally or not.
Everyone like to spout 'decentralization', but how is pushing people to sidechains not centralization is beyond me.
I find argument that everything will be solved with L2/L3, especia
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878254839)
It is highly troubling to see this discord between people involved in bitcoin.
As someone who recently joined the community, I find it unsettling.
My stance is that monetary proposition of bitcoin is the one and only thing that core team must be focused on, but now I see that goal is lost, intentionally or not.
Everyone like to spout 'decentralization', but how is pushing people to sidechains not centralization is beyond me.
I find argument that everything will be solved with L2/L3, especia
...
💬 eragmus commented on pull request "datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878267117)
> It is highly troubling to see this discord between people involved in bitcoin.
>
> As someone who recently joined the community, I find it unsettling.
Bitcoin is a decentralized system, so discord is natural. The guy above is particularly nasty though, but this is not the norm in the discussion thread if you read the rest of it.
> My stance is that monetary proposition of bitcoin is the one and only thing that core team must be focused on, but now I see that goal is lost, intentionall
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878267117)
> It is highly troubling to see this discord between people involved in bitcoin.
>
> As someone who recently joined the community, I find it unsettling.
Bitcoin is a decentralized system, so discord is natural. The guy above is particularly nasty though, but this is not the norm in the discussion thread if you read the rest of it.
> My stance is that monetary proposition of bitcoin is the one and only thing that core team must be focused on, but now I see that goal is lost, intentionall
...
💬 torkelrogstad commented on pull request "rpc: validate fee estimation mode case insensitive":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29175#issuecomment-1878320908)
Thanks for the excellent review @ismaelsadeeq , very much appreciated. You're correct in your findings! I've updated the logic, and added functional tests for this
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29175#issuecomment-1878320908)
Thanks for the excellent review @ismaelsadeeq , very much appreciated. You're correct in your findings! I've updated the logic, and added functional tests for this
💬 desi-bitcoiner commented on pull request "datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878334784)
I hope the following information helps in adding clarity to the thought process of folks who advocate otherwise:
"Satoshi made only 1 mistake, which I believe is the root of the confusion among some Bitcoiners who defend spam.
He used the same name bitcoin - to define two different elements: the asset, and the network.
Although they are interdependent, they possess very distinct properties.
The network is decentralized, permission-less, and resistant to censorship - not the asset.
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408#issuecomment-1878334784)
I hope the following information helps in adding clarity to the thought process of folks who advocate otherwise:
"Satoshi made only 1 mistake, which I believe is the root of the confusion among some Bitcoiners who defend spam.
He used the same name bitcoin - to define two different elements: the asset, and the network.
Although they are interdependent, they possess very distinct properties.
The network is decentralized, permission-less, and resistant to censorship - not the asset.
...
💬 maflcko commented on issue "ubsan: misaligned-pointer-use in crc32c/src/crc32c_arm64.cc":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29178#issuecomment-1878395056)
```
# git bisect bad
228d6a2969e4fcee573c9df7aad31550eab9c8d4 is the first bad commit
commit 228d6a2969e4fcee573c9df7aad31550eab9c8d4
Author: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Nov 20 13:37:44 2023 +0000
build: Fix regression in "ARMv8 CRC32 intrinsics" test
The `vmull_p64` is a part of the Crypto extensions from the ACLE. They
are optional extensions, so they get enabled with a `+crypto` for
architecture flags.
configur
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29178#issuecomment-1878395056)
```
# git bisect bad
228d6a2969e4fcee573c9df7aad31550eab9c8d4 is the first bad commit
commit 228d6a2969e4fcee573c9df7aad31550eab9c8d4
Author: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Nov 20 13:37:44 2023 +0000
build: Fix regression in "ARMv8 CRC32 intrinsics" test
The `vmull_p64` is a part of the Crypto extensions from the ACLE. They
are optional extensions, so they get enabled with a `+crypto` for
architecture flags.
configur
...
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "refactor: Make CWalletTx sync state type-safe":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206#discussion_r1442693589)
This is part of #29042.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206#discussion_r1442693589)
This is part of #29042.
💬 brunoerg commented on pull request "p2p: Allow whitelisting outgoing connections":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27114#discussion_r1442715945)
I think we can avoid passing them in `Initialize` by setting them in `AddWhitelistPermissionFlags`.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27114#discussion_r1442715945)
I think we can avoid passing them in `Initialize` by setting them in `AddWhitelistPermissionFlags`.
👍 TheCharlatan approved a pull request: "rpc: Remove deprecated -rpcserialversion"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28890#pullrequestreview-1805703512)
lgtm ACK fa46cc22bc696e6845915ae91d6b68e36bf4c242
> If there is a use-case, likely a per-RPC flag can be added, if needed.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28890#pullrequestreview-1805703512)
lgtm ACK fa46cc22bc696e6845915ae91d6b68e36bf4c242
> If there is a use-case, likely a per-RPC flag can be added, if needed.
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "util: remove Boost posix_time usage from GetTime*":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21110#issuecomment-1878453838)
> As std::chrono::parse is available now,
I'm not sure if that is true? See discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29081#issuecomment-1857683898. Happy for you to submit a PR in any case.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21110#issuecomment-1878453838)
> As std::chrono::parse is available now,
I'm not sure if that is true? See discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29081#issuecomment-1857683898. Happy for you to submit a PR in any case.
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "rpc: Remove deprecated -rpcserialversion"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28890)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28890)
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "rpc,rest,zmq: faster getblock, NotifyBlock and rest_block by reading raw block":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26415#discussion_r1442732727)
rpc ser-flags were removed
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26415#discussion_r1442732727)
rpc ser-flags were removed
👍 fanquake approved a pull request: "build: Fix check whether `-latomic` needed"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29177#pullrequestreview-1805731949)
ACK f8ca1357c8205ceff732dcfb0d2bad79b40b611b
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29177#pullrequestreview-1805731949)
ACK f8ca1357c8205ceff732dcfb0d2bad79b40b611b
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "build: Fix check whether `-latomic` needed"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29177)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29177)
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "build: Bump clang minimum supported version to 15":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29165#discussion_r1442736791)
Thanks, fixed.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29165#discussion_r1442736791)
Thanks, fixed.
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "build: Bump clang minimum supported version to 15":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29165#issuecomment-1878479956)
rebased
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29165#issuecomment-1878479956)
rebased
💬 maflcko commented on issue "fuzz: Fix timeouts":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28812#issuecomment-1878490116)
So currently, I think, the remaining ones are:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28226#issuecomment-1837969022
* https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/issues/158
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28657#issuecomment-1874012428
* and possibly https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28812#issuecomment-1855815358 ?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28812#issuecomment-1878490116)
So currently, I think, the remaining ones are:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28226#issuecomment-1837969022
* https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/issues/158
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28657#issuecomment-1874012428
* and possibly https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28812#issuecomment-1855815358 ?
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "ci: Use DEBUG=1 in depends for MSAN jobs":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27495#issuecomment-1878505456)
Pushed again as oss-fuzz closed the equivalent issue as flaky/not-reproducible, however it definitely still happens:
```bash
2024-01-05T1Uninitialized bytes in strlen at offset 113 inside [0xe0900000a05c, 114)
==35245==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0xaaaad75d2440 in sqlite3Strlen30 /ci_container_base/depends/work/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/sqlite/3380500-6ac42047a53/sqlite3.c:32670:28
#1 0xaaaad75fd278 in mkFullPathname /ci_container_base/depends/work/
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27495#issuecomment-1878505456)
Pushed again as oss-fuzz closed the equivalent issue as flaky/not-reproducible, however it definitely still happens:
```bash
2024-01-05T1Uninitialized bytes in strlen at offset 113 inside [0xe0900000a05c, 114)
==35245==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0xaaaad75d2440 in sqlite3Strlen30 /ci_container_base/depends/work/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/sqlite/3380500-6ac42047a53/sqlite3.c:32670:28
#1 0xaaaad75fd278 in mkFullPathname /ci_container_base/depends/work/
...
👍 hebasto approved a pull request: "build: Bump clang minimum supported version to 15"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29165#pullrequestreview-1805775946)
ACK fac4cf24588c281b12f9f64aa6f0a4dda1a645b7.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29165#pullrequestreview-1805775946)
ACK fac4cf24588c281b12f9f64aa6f0a4dda1a645b7.
💬 dergoegge commented on pull request "fuzz: set `nMaxOutboundLimit` in connman target":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29172#discussion_r1442763249)
Maybe call `CConnan::Init` instead of introducing this new test only setter?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29172#discussion_r1442763249)
Maybe call `CConnan::Init` instead of introducing this new test only setter?