💬 fanquake commented on issue "Master doesn't compile on MacOS X 10.13 High Sierra":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28206#issuecomment-1663634124)
Think we can close this for now, as it's not a bug, and I don't think there's anything we can do. @feed3r feel free to keep commenting if you have further questions etc.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28206#issuecomment-1663634124)
Think we can close this for now, as it's not a bug, and I don't think there's anything we can do. @feed3r feel free to keep commenting if you have further questions etc.
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "Master doesn't compile on MacOS X 10.13 High Sierra"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28206)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28206)
💬 MarcoFalke commented on pull request "ci: Move ASan USDT to persistent_worker":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28161#issuecomment-1663639215)
There may be a language barrier here, so I am wondering if anything is left to be done here or if there are any outstanding suggestions or questions. Just to clarify, that this pull does not aim to change any behavior of the CI system. The second commit is a mandatory "refactor" needed for the persistent worker on CIRRUS_CI to work.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28161#issuecomment-1663639215)
There may be a language barrier here, so I am wondering if anything is left to be done here or if there are any outstanding suggestions or questions. Just to clarify, that this pull does not aim to change any behavior of the CI system. The second commit is a mandatory "refactor" needed for the persistent worker on CIRRUS_CI to work.
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "ci: Move ASan USDT to persistent_worker":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28161#issuecomment-1663643891)
> There may be a language barrier here, so I am wondering if anything is left to be done here or if there are any outstanding suggestions or questions.
I'm [OK](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28161#pullrequestreview-1558764134) with this PR in its current state.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28161#issuecomment-1663643891)
> There may be a language barrier here, so I am wondering if anything is left to be done here or if there are any outstanding suggestions or questions.
I'm [OK](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28161#pullrequestreview-1558764134) with this PR in its current state.
💬 ismaelsadeeq commented on pull request "mempool: Persist with XOR":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#discussion_r1282947793)
Will previous versions be able to read the mempool dump version 2? `mempool.dat` suppose to be both backward and forward-compatible between versions
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#discussion_r1282947793)
Will previous versions be able to read the mempool dump version 2? `mempool.dat` suppose to be both backward and forward-compatible between versions
💬 josibake commented on pull request "Silent Payments: sending":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28201#issuecomment-1663670668)
> Maybe add a quick summary in the description with the main implementation differences relative to #24897. It seems a big one is that this doesn't require an index!
updated! I added the summary in #27827 and added links back to the parent PR in each of the child PRs.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28201#issuecomment-1663670668)
> Maybe add a quick summary in the description with the main implementation differences relative to #24897. It seems a big one is that this doesn't require an index!
updated! I added the summary in #27827 and added links back to the parent PR in each of the child PRs.
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "lint: remove pkg_resources usage":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28208#issuecomment-1663679742)
I guess `packages_distributions` isn't actually available until 3.10. Will ignore and come back to this later.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28208#issuecomment-1663679742)
I guess `packages_distributions` isn't actually available until 3.10. Will ignore and come back to this later.
✅ fanquake closed a pull request: "lint: remove pkg_resources usage"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28208)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28208)
📝 fanquake converted_to_draft a pull request: "CONTRIBUTING: Caution against using AI/LLMs (ChatGPT, Copilot, etc)"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28175)
There's been at least a few instances where someone tried to contribute LLM-generated content, but such content has a dubious copyright status.
Our contributing policy already implicitly rules out such contributions, but being more explicit here might help.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28175)
There's been at least a few instances where someone tried to contribute LLM-generated content, but such content has a dubious copyright status.
Our contributing policy already implicitly rules out such contributions, but being more explicit here might help.
💬 josibake commented on pull request "Silent Payments: Implement BIP352":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28122#discussion_r1282961735)
I've updated the BIP to recommend upping the character limit to 1023, as having a limit of 117 would cause issues with forward compatibility with future silent payment addresses. I've also removed regtest from the BIP, as I don't think it's correct to define Bitcoin Core specific conventions in BIPs. Regarding "tsp" vs "sprt", I don't really have a strong opinion here, but would prefer to follow the convention in Bitcoin Core. If we end up moving Bitcoin Core to use the same HRP for all networks
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28122#discussion_r1282961735)
I've updated the BIP to recommend upping the character limit to 1023, as having a limit of 117 would cause issues with forward compatibility with future silent payment addresses. I've also removed regtest from the BIP, as I don't think it's correct to define Bitcoin Core specific conventions in BIPs. Regarding "tsp" vs "sprt", I don't really have a strong opinion here, but would prefer to follow the convention in Bitcoin Core. If we end up moving Bitcoin Core to use the same HRP for all networks
...
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "CONTRIBUTING: Caution against using AI/LLMs (ChatGPT, Copilot, etc)":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28175#issuecomment-1663685355)
Moved to draft for now, as there's not consensus to merge as-is, and in any case, this is waiting on further legal opinions.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28175#issuecomment-1663685355)
Moved to draft for now, as there's not consensus to merge as-is, and in any case, this is waiting on further legal opinions.
💬 MarcoFalke commented on pull request "mempool: Persist with XOR":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#discussion_r1282968177)
See my previous comment: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#issuecomment-1663626986
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#discussion_r1282968177)
See my previous comment: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#issuecomment-1663626986
💬 MarcoFalke commented on pull request "mempool: Persist with XOR":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#discussion_r1282970013)
Obviously, no existing software that can only read version `1`, can thus not read version `2`.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28207#discussion_r1282970013)
Obviously, no existing software that can only read version `1`, can thus not read version `2`.
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282831868)
removed comment block
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282831868)
removed comment block
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282832651)
Done
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282832651)
Done
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282920253)
Sure, changed.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282920253)
Sure, changed.
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282889026)
Added
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282889026)
Added
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282853373)
added
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282853373)
added
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282834565)
Done, and renamed to `assert_no_immediate_response`
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282834565)
Done, and renamed to `assert_no_immediate_response`
💬 glozow commented on pull request "test: tx orphan handling":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282919246)
changed so we grab the utxos before making any transactions, so they all have to be confirmed and not related
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28199#discussion_r1282919246)
changed so we grab the utxos before making any transactions, so they all have to be confirmed and not related