💬 andrewtoth commented on pull request "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384286749)
Is there a realistic case where only one core is available?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384286749)
Is there a realistic case where only one core is available?
💬 furszy commented on pull request "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384304328)
Only the rpi zero comes to mind. It seems like a simple change anyway. I wouldn’t overthink it too much.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384304328)
Only the rpi zero comes to mind. It seems like a simple change anyway. I wouldn’t overthink it too much.
💬 l0rinc commented on pull request "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384308993)
Or maybe a dockerized container
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384308993)
Or maybe a dockerized container
💬 andrewtoth commented on pull request "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384316530)
Done!
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#discussion_r2384316530)
Done!
🤔 pablomartin4btc reviewed a pull request: "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#pullrequestreview-3275123515)
ACK dda5228e02ca6a839bf87ae7dbd133547563816a
I thought some of the top longest tests would require a diff (>) `par=`, but it looks alright.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#pullrequestreview-3275123515)
ACK dda5228e02ca6a839bf87ae7dbd133547563816a
I thought some of the top longest tests would require a diff (>) `par=`, but it looks alright.
💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "ci: Turn CentOS config into Alpine musl config":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33480#issuecomment-3342049302)
Concept ACK
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33480#issuecomment-3342049302)
Concept ACK
👍 l0rinc approved a pull request: "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#pullrequestreview-3275207076)
Code review ACK dda5228e02ca6a839bf87ae7dbd133547563816a
Q: does this affect the `"-par=1"` cases in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/9a04635432183c437829339dbf10e7d702581010/test/functional/p2p_segwit.py#L221 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/6980852416040bdddf111df3cea3ec50639f010a/test/functional/feature_proxy.py#L385?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#pullrequestreview-3275207076)
Code review ACK dda5228e02ca6a839bf87ae7dbd133547563816a
Q: does this affect the `"-par=1"` cases in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/9a04635432183c437829339dbf10e7d702581010/test/functional/p2p_segwit.py#L221 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/6980852416040bdddf111df3cea3ec50639f010a/test/functional/feature_proxy.py#L385?
💬 151henry151 commented on pull request "build: Move CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_RPATH from CMake to Guix script":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33470#discussion_r2384416750)
Got it, made that change.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33470#discussion_r2384416750)
Got it, made that change.
🤔 katesalazar reviewed a pull request: "ci: check if file or directory already exists for ${HOME}/.bitcoin instead of failing"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#pullrequestreview-3275898775)
I don't like how dummy file is now explained much before created.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#pullrequestreview-3275898775)
I don't like how dummy file is now explained much before created.
💬 katesalazar commented on pull request "ci: check if file or directory already exists for ${HOME}/.bitcoin instead of failing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2385070435)
The dummy file explanation is much early.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2385070435)
The dummy file explanation is much early.
💬 katesalazar commented on pull request "ci: check if file or directory already exists for ${HOME}/.bitcoin instead of failing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2385066324)
You can't leave this line unchanged.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2385066324)
You can't leave this line unchanged.
💬 0xhlin commented on issue "v30.0 Testing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33368#issuecomment-3342908639)
Thanks for this amazing project!
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33368#issuecomment-3342908639)
Thanks for this amazing project!
💬 andrewtoth commented on pull request "test: set par=2 in default config for functional test framework":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#issuecomment-3343177555)
> Q: does this affect the "-par=1" cases
No, extra args override args in the configuration file.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33485#issuecomment-3343177555)
> Q: does this affect the "-par=1" cases
No, extra args override args in the configuration file.
💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "ci: Turn CentOS config into Alpine musl config":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33480#issuecomment-3343829884)
tACK
---
It may be worth mentioning that this change fixed an issue (I was unable to isolate) on CentOS using HexStr() formatting a custom signetchallenge to display in the rpcconsole.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33480#issuecomment-3343829884)
tACK
---
It may be worth mentioning that this change fixed an issue (I was unable to isolate) on CentOS using HexStr() formatting a custom signetchallenge to display in the rpcconsole.
💬 cedwies commented on pull request "tests: cover abortrescan() in-flight True path with dynamic-tail retry":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33131#discussion_r2386173084)
Thank you for checking in. I lost focus of this PR, but I am still thinking about how to design this test without a race condition. I'll try to find a solution within the next days, or else I am going to close this PR.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33131#discussion_r2386173084)
Thank you for checking in. I lost focus of this PR, but I am still thinking about how to design this test without a race condition. I'll try to find a solution within the next days, or else I am going to close this PR.
💬 RandyMcMillan commented on pull request "rpcconsole: display signet challenge":
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/896#issuecomment-3343837654)
rebase on top of gui/master
temporarily cherry-pick PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29838 to fix an issue.
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/896#issuecomment-3343837654)
rebase on top of gui/master
temporarily cherry-pick PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29838 to fix an issue.
💬 kevkevinpal commented on pull request "ci: check if file or directory already exists for ${HOME}/.bitcoin instead of failing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2386185640)
Updated now in [3f5596f](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486/commits/3f5596fd137b8833501ac4bd5ab9793f9485c9da)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2386185640)
Updated now in [3f5596f](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486/commits/3f5596fd137b8833501ac4bd5ab9793f9485c9da)
💬 kevkevinpal commented on pull request "ci: check if file or directory already exists for ${HOME}/.bitcoin instead of failing":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2386185788)
I removed the explanation in [3f5596f](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486/commits/3f5596fd137b8833501ac4bd5ab9793f9485c9da) now we can have this explanation here since it is more accurate
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486#discussion_r2386185788)
I removed the explanation in [3f5596f](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33486/commits/3f5596fd137b8833501ac4bd5ab9793f9485c9da) now we can have this explanation here since it is more accurate
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "guix: documented shasum gathering command":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33472#discussion_r2386223955)
Please keep `uname -m`, as different build platforms may produce different output, which could lead to cross-platform non-reproducibility:
```
uname -m && ...
```
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33472#discussion_r2386223955)
Please keep `uname -m`, as different build platforms may produce different output, which could lead to cross-platform non-reproducibility:
```
uname -m && ...
```
💬 hebasto commented on pull request "guix: documented shasum gathering command":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33472#discussion_r2386224466)
`$(git rev-parse --short=12 HEAD)` won't work for tags. However, that's not the case for pull requests.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33472#discussion_r2386224466)
`$(git rev-parse --short=12 HEAD)` won't work for tags. However, that's not the case for pull requests.