💬 TheCharlatan commented on pull request "Add functional test for IPC interface":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33201#discussion_r2324220680)
That seems fine, though it would be good to get the fee bumping functionality tested here (in a follow up).
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33201#discussion_r2324220680)
That seems fine, though it would be good to get the fee bumping functionality tested here (in a follow up).
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290#discussion_r2324239243)
Let's go for that approach then.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290#discussion_r2324239243)
Let's go for that approach then.
✅ Sjors closed a pull request: "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290)
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290#issuecomment-3257244295)
Closing in favour of https://github.com/bitcoin-core/libmultiprocess/pull/205.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290#issuecomment-3257244295)
Closing in favour of https://github.com/bitcoin-core/libmultiprocess/pull/205.
⚠️ Sjors opened an issue: "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33315)
Placeholder for the closed PR #33290.
Currently being worked on in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/libmultiprocess/pull/205
After which we'll need a subtree update.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33315)
Placeholder for the closed PR #33290.
Currently being worked on in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/libmultiprocess/pull/205
After which we'll need a subtree update.
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290#issuecomment-3257248291)
#33315 could be added to the v30 milestone so we don't forget.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33290#issuecomment-3257248291)
#33315 could be added to the v30 milestone so we don't forget.
💬 l0rinc commented on pull request "net: Prevent node from binding to the same `CService`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#issuecomment-3257251460)
ACK 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#issuecomment-3257251460)
ACK 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454
💬 w0xlt commented on pull request "net: Prevent node from binding to the same `CService`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#discussion_r2324248666)
Good catch, fixed in 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454. Thanks.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#discussion_r2324248666)
Good catch, fixed in 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454. Thanks.
💬 Sjors commented on pull request "multiprocess: Don't require bitcoin -m argument when IPC options are used":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33229#discussion_r2324249003)
No access to `self.logger` here?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33229#discussion_r2324249003)
No access to `self.logger` here?
💬 w0xlt commented on pull request "net: Prevent node from binding to the same `CService`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#discussion_r2324249155)
Done in 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454. Thanks.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#discussion_r2324249155)
Done in 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454. Thanks.
💬 yuvicc commented on pull request "net: Prevent node from binding to the same `CService`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#discussion_r2324251766)
> @yuvicc, this still needs fixing
Ahh, I thought that was non-blocking.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#discussion_r2324251766)
> @yuvicc, this still needs fixing
Ahh, I thought that was non-blocking.
💬 yuvicc commented on pull request "net: Prevent node from binding to the same `CService`":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#issuecomment-3257261379)
re-ACK 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33231#issuecomment-3257261379)
re-ACK 4d4789dffad55b96f1cb96b718cc6923f5344454
💬 TheCharlatan commented on pull request "Add functional test for IPC interface":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33201#discussion_r2324373849)
This (and the `template3` declaration above) should go too, right?
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33201#discussion_r2324373849)
This (and the `template3` declaration above) should go too, right?
⚠️ AbelLykens opened an issue: "builds: add README with build flags"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33316)
### Please describe the feature you'd like to see added.
For the torrents for Bitcoin Core, as well as the [downloads on the site](https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-29.1/), it would be useful to have a (small) readme with some information what the different binaries/targzs are.
<img width="423" height="745" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/222b0a0c-6f18-417d-9903-ffa4aa1f2abb" />
Apparently there are **unsigned**, **signed**, **debug** and **codesigning** ver
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33316)
### Please describe the feature you'd like to see added.
For the torrents for Bitcoin Core, as well as the [downloads on the site](https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-29.1/), it would be useful to have a (small) readme with some information what the different binaries/targzs are.
<img width="423" height="745" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/222b0a0c-6f18-417d-9903-ffa4aa1f2abb" />
Apparently there are **unsigned**, **signed**, **debug** and **codesigning** ver
...
💬 fanquake commented on pull request "Add functional test for IPC interface":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33201#discussion_r2324551484)
v2.1.0 has been tagged: https://github.com/capnproto/pycapnp/releases/tag/v2.1.0.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33201#discussion_r2324551484)
v2.1.0 has been tagged: https://github.com/capnproto/pycapnp/releases/tag/v2.1.0.
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "depends: strip when installing qt binaries"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33304)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33304)
🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "doc: archive v29.1 release notes"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33309)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33309)
✅ fanquake closed an issue: "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33315)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33315)
💬 fanquake commented on issue "build: suggest -DENABLE_IPC=OFF when missing capnp":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33315#issuecomment-3257701571)
Thanks, but I don't think we need a separate issue to track the subtree update, which wont be forgotten.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33315#issuecomment-3257701571)
Thanks, but I don't think we need a separate issue to track the subtree update, which wont be forgotten.
📝 purpleKarrot opened a pull request: "draft: CMake Goals and Guidelines"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33317)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33317)