⚠️ mraassina34 opened an issue: "PROFESSIONAL BITCOIN RECOVERY EXPERT META TECH RECOVERY PRO"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33089)
### Please describe the feature you'd like to see added.

I am Mel Raassina, an Australian citizen. I am recounting my ordeal in the hopes of preventing others from becoming victims of crypto investment fraud. A few months ago, I was ensnared by a deceptive crypto investment scheme connected to a brokerage firm. I had made a substantial investment when Bitcoin prices were appreciating, believing it to be a sound venture. Regrettably, I was defrauded of AUD 420,000, and the broker subsequently bl
...

💬 fanquake commented on pull request "ci: limit max stack size to 512 KiB":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33079#discussion_r2240182138)
Given it's in miniscript tests, I'm assuming it was "fixed" in the same refactor as msan. Will check in any case.

✅ fanquake closed an issue: "PROFESSIONAL BITCOIN RECOVERY EXPERT META TECH RECOVERY PRO"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33089)

💬 sipa commented on pull request "Reduce minrelaytxfee to 100 sats/kvB":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32959#issuecomment-3132991908)
Concept ACK.

💬 fanquake commented on pull request "doc: move `cmake -B build -LH` up in Unix build docs":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33088#issuecomment-3132995620)
@stickies-v might follow up with any Windows doc changes.

🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "doc: move `cmake -B build -LH` up in Unix build docs"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33088)

✅ fanquake closed an issue: "ci: Lower and unify default stack size"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29840)

🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "ci: limit max stack size to 512 KiB"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33079)

👍 fanquake approved a pull request: "guix: warn SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH set in guix-codesign"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33073#pullrequestreview-3068095587)
ACK 1bed0f734b3f2dd876193b5cad303bfab1d250d5

💬 willcl-ark commented on pull request "Migrate CI to hosted Cirrus Runners":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32989#issuecomment-3133043442)
> This means the code was [953c90d](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/953c90d7649c076e6e43418f50c33b3ae5f82608) vs [3219847](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/321984705dbcc5982013c8cfb52389cf3f2e75f6)

Dang, I must have rebased on upstream/master (out of habit) to drop that top commit. Thanks for catching.

🚀 fanquake merged a pull request: "guix: warn SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH set in guix-codesign"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33073)

💬 fanquake commented on pull request "guix: warn SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH set in guix-codesign":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33073#issuecomment-3133068173)
Backported to `29.x` in #33074.

💬 furszy commented on pull request "index: initial sync speedup, parallelize process":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26966#discussion_r2240255267)
> [b360102](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b36010261921adc74e61bdcbc91ba6b7778bad9a)
>
> Wonder if it should be specified that threadpool is **shared** among all indexers (that support multithreading)

Done as suggested.

💬 fanquake commented on pull request "guix: warn SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH set in guix-codesign":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33073#issuecomment-3133128929)
Backported to `28.x` in #33076.

🤔 glozow reviewed a pull request: "wallet, rpc: add anti-fee-sniping to `send` and `sendall`"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28944#pullrequestreview-3068216620)
ACK aac0b6dd79b0db1e9d42a6f466709a61cfd1f69f

💬 darosior commented on pull request "Reduce minrelaytxfee to 100 sats/kvB":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32959#issuecomment-3133154267)
@delta1 i would suggest picking up https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13990 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13922. In this order, or make a good argument why it would be fine to lower the settings without first making the fee estimation work be compatible.

Feel free to ping me for review, i think this is important it makes it into the next release. I'm managing expectations however since, as it's been pointed out multiple times already, this is a lot less trivial than some pe
...

🚀 glozow merged a pull request: "wallet, rpc: add anti-fee-sniping to `send` and `sendall`"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28944)

💬 delta1 commented on pull request "Reduce minrelaytxfee to 100 sats/kvB":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32959#issuecomment-3133195798)
@darosior thanks I intend to make fee estimation work correctly as well

💬 jonatack commented on pull request "cli: return local services in -netinfo":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31886#discussion_r2240344928)
good eye, done

💬 theuni commented on pull request "rpc: use CScheduler for relocking wallet and remove RPCTimer":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32862#issuecomment-3133226979)
Looks like https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/111048 to me?