💬 darosior commented on pull request "policy: uncap datacarrier by default":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406#issuecomment-2964062229)
@paulscode this is a fair concern, although it was addressed multiple times already (including in this very thread).

I addressed it in my [writeup about community concerns](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/addressing-community-concerns-and-objections-regarding-my-recent-proposal-to-relax-bitcoin-cores-standardness-limits-on-op-return-outputs/1697#p-5007-data-stored-in-an-op_return-output-doesnt-need-to-be-chunked-like-it-does-in-an-inscription-this-presents-a-risk-for-node-runners-as-it-allows-an
...

💬 darosior commented on issue "Please restrict Data Carrier/OP Return to < 80 bytes please before releasing 3":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33298#issuecomment-3254037664)
I'd like to point out this concern was already addressed at length [here](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/addressing-community-concerns-and-objections-regarding-my-recent-proposal-to-relax-bitcoin-cores-standardness-limits-on-op-return-outputs/1697#p-5007-data-stored-in-an-op_return-output-doesnt-need-to-be-chunked-like-it-does-in-an-inscription-this-presents-a-risk-for-node-runners-as-it-allows-anyone-to-store-unobfuscated-data-on-their-disk-22), [here](https://gnusha.org/pi/bitcoindev/aBUlEOBqqrO
...