📜
Do you know the reason a lot of men are so convinced that transgender women are hyper-sexual?
Because they secretly watch transgender porn and they cope with their repression by projecting that all transgender women are actually like that in real life instead of it being the opposite: Those men fetishize transgender women while simultaneously making it so difficult for them to find normal employment that they force them into some form of sex work.
Historically this took the form of angry parents disowning their transgender children, forcing them to be homeless, and then the only work they can find is as a prostitute. Disowned cisgender women have obviously faced this same problem historically.
Thank God we have OnlyFans now to cut out the exploitative middleman, because up until 5 seconds ago that meant finding some kind of pimp to "protect" you just to put food on the table.
Then they have the nerve to act like that was the transgender women's intention the entire time as opposed to them exploiting a vulnerable demographic as their secret fetish totem.
😑
Do you know the reason a lot of men are so convinced that transgender women are hyper-sexual?
Because they secretly watch transgender porn and they cope with their repression by projecting that all transgender women are actually like that in real life instead of it being the opposite: Those men fetishize transgender women while simultaneously making it so difficult for them to find normal employment that they force them into some form of sex work.
Historically this took the form of angry parents disowning their transgender children, forcing them to be homeless, and then the only work they can find is as a prostitute. Disowned cisgender women have obviously faced this same problem historically.
Thank God we have OnlyFans now to cut out the exploitative middleman, because up until 5 seconds ago that meant finding some kind of pimp to "protect" you just to put food on the table.
Then they have the nerve to act like that was the transgender women's intention the entire time as opposed to them exploiting a vulnerable demographic as their secret fetish totem.
😑
👆
tldr, if you have a problem with transgender women doing porn, maybe stop watching it and give those people jobs already if you're so concerned.
Otherwise, people have to eat and pay their rent.
😐
tldr, if you have a problem with transgender women doing porn, maybe stop watching it and give those people jobs already if you're so concerned.
Otherwise, people have to eat and pay their rent.
😐
📜
Even when transgender women do indulge in some form of sexual-fetish fantasy before we start our transitions, does it not strike these people as odd that so many in our community have a "chastity" fetish?
Obviously someone deliberately not having orgasms or using their penis as their "fetish" should be a clue that maybe sex is not our main concern, it's the fact that we still have our "little head" constantly trying to tell us what to do and we don't have access to the medications that would shut it up yet.
😐
Even when transgender women do indulge in some form of sexual-fetish fantasy before we start our transitions, does it not strike these people as odd that so many in our community have a "chastity" fetish?
Obviously someone deliberately not having orgasms or using their penis as their "fetish" should be a clue that maybe sex is not our main concern, it's the fact that we still have our "little head" constantly trying to tell us what to do and we don't have access to the medications that would shut it up yet.
😐
📜
What do you choose to see when you look at other people?
Monsters?
Scared children who cling to wealth and power because at heart they are afraid of the "Monsters" of Powerlessness, Lack, Fear of Missing Out, and ultimately Death?
Monsters aren't real, but children who are afraid of monsters are. Some children never grow out of their childhood fears.
What do you choose to see when you look at other people?
❓
What do you choose to see when you look at other people?
Monsters?
Scared children who cling to wealth and power because at heart they are afraid of the "Monsters" of Powerlessness, Lack, Fear of Missing Out, and ultimately Death?
Monsters aren't real, but children who are afraid of monsters are. Some children never grow out of their childhood fears.
What do you choose to see when you look at other people?
❓
👆
It should be stated that this applies equally to the left as well as to the right, even though I am particularly miffed at the right at the moment for obvious reasons.
It's still important to take a breath sometimes and remind one's self that they are dealing with other human beings who are just as confused as you or anybody else about what's going on, and are, in most cases, doing the best that they could figure out at the time.
Everybody gets dumped here naked and afraid and scrabbling in the dirt looking for answers; and at some point we all got told that we have a ticking clock over our heads that is running out, so we hyper-focus on acquiring resources in order to sustain ourselves; and then at some point we got told that there isn't enough, so we hyper-focus on acquiring power in order to sustain our access to resources.
After generations of this kind of thinking it becomes a sort of entrenched cargo-cult culture based around the acquisition of money and power in order to feel more "secure" than the next guy, but at the root of it is that same childhood fear of lack and powerlessness in all of us.
A lot of societal problems could be solved if enough people took a deep breath, stopped arguing with each other and collectively decided that they choose not to have a ticking clock over their head, that they are not powerless so long as they have a voice and can speak their mind, and that there is, in the grand scheme of things, more than enough to go around for everyone in this world without simply making everyone equally poor.
😐
It should be stated that this applies equally to the left as well as to the right, even though I am particularly miffed at the right at the moment for obvious reasons.
It's still important to take a breath sometimes and remind one's self that they are dealing with other human beings who are just as confused as you or anybody else about what's going on, and are, in most cases, doing the best that they could figure out at the time.
Everybody gets dumped here naked and afraid and scrabbling in the dirt looking for answers; and at some point we all got told that we have a ticking clock over our heads that is running out, so we hyper-focus on acquiring resources in order to sustain ourselves; and then at some point we got told that there isn't enough, so we hyper-focus on acquiring power in order to sustain our access to resources.
After generations of this kind of thinking it becomes a sort of entrenched cargo-cult culture based around the acquisition of money and power in order to feel more "secure" than the next guy, but at the root of it is that same childhood fear of lack and powerlessness in all of us.
A lot of societal problems could be solved if enough people took a deep breath, stopped arguing with each other and collectively decided that they choose not to have a ticking clock over their head, that they are not powerless so long as they have a voice and can speak their mind, and that there is, in the grand scheme of things, more than enough to go around for everyone in this world without simply making everyone equally poor.
😐
📜
It should also be noted that, as stated before, history comes in waves, and just as the overall stock market trends generally upwards over time while having periodic dips in value (and with the occasional crash,) historical progress works much the same way; think of it as "three steps forward, one step back."
Utopia overnight would be a bit much to expect, however with the pace of technological advancement we are going to inevitably move towards an economic model where most production is automated; whether that be food or manufactured goods.
At that point we're going to be forced to figure out some form of distributional economy that doesn't result in homeless vets on the street corner and where everybody is respected simply for being there, because it's not like the people are going away, and they are all still going to need food, shelter and basic life necessities. Also, the fact of the matter is that we already throw out gigantic amounts of food simply because we still feel the need to have physical places to go to have our food displayed to us instead of stored until needed or produced on the spot like deli bread. That doesn't even take into account the food we throw away because we keep it at our house instead of order the amount we need exactly when we need it and, say, have a drone deliver it.
At some point we have to remember that the entire point of civilization in the first place was to get out of the fields and back to the garden.
You can still make cool things and trade things and build a name for yourself in a garden, but it should always be about the people in it, otherwise why bother banding together as a group in the first place? Civilization is a fight against what the Bible called the curse of nature. Essentially, the curse of living in a disorganized jungle until you can figure out how to reconstruct the garden yourselves.
That's at least the ideal of a perfect civilization.
Like I said, it won't come overnight, which is where the more extreme elements of the left have been getting impatient in recent history, whereas the right has been stubborn because they still retain that "protestant work ethic" thing from childhood that makes them feel like capitalism is an article of religious faith, even if it's causing insane amounts of wealth and power to accrue in a tiny amount of hands while people struggle to make ends meet at the bottom.
Hell, even a lot of billionaires say it's time for some sort of wealth tax.
Did it ever occur to you how you got convinced to say no to those people?
I mean, I never even wanted to be a billionaire; it sounds like a lot of work. So why would that affect any of us?
It's a relative handful of people within each country that have that kind of power. I see no issue with considering that power an antitrust issue and simply lowering their level of wealth as opposed to taking it all. Taking it all would be the reflexively anarchistic way to handle it, however this kind of thinking tends towards "get-evenism" of the style endemic to things like the French Revolution, and it's easier just cap it at some arbitrary number at or above one billion dollars just so they can retain the title of "billionaire" and retain face.
Really, the mission I see moving forward is to slowly advance the ball of the idea of a wealth cap that is high enough that it doesn't discourage competition and rewards the seeking of prowess, mastery, and prestige as positive public goods while still fundamentally limiting the ability of those with extreme wealth to concentrate power moving forward.
CONT:
It should also be noted that, as stated before, history comes in waves, and just as the overall stock market trends generally upwards over time while having periodic dips in value (and with the occasional crash,) historical progress works much the same way; think of it as "three steps forward, one step back."
Utopia overnight would be a bit much to expect, however with the pace of technological advancement we are going to inevitably move towards an economic model where most production is automated; whether that be food or manufactured goods.
At that point we're going to be forced to figure out some form of distributional economy that doesn't result in homeless vets on the street corner and where everybody is respected simply for being there, because it's not like the people are going away, and they are all still going to need food, shelter and basic life necessities. Also, the fact of the matter is that we already throw out gigantic amounts of food simply because we still feel the need to have physical places to go to have our food displayed to us instead of stored until needed or produced on the spot like deli bread. That doesn't even take into account the food we throw away because we keep it at our house instead of order the amount we need exactly when we need it and, say, have a drone deliver it.
At some point we have to remember that the entire point of civilization in the first place was to get out of the fields and back to the garden.
You can still make cool things and trade things and build a name for yourself in a garden, but it should always be about the people in it, otherwise why bother banding together as a group in the first place? Civilization is a fight against what the Bible called the curse of nature. Essentially, the curse of living in a disorganized jungle until you can figure out how to reconstruct the garden yourselves.
That's at least the ideal of a perfect civilization.
Like I said, it won't come overnight, which is where the more extreme elements of the left have been getting impatient in recent history, whereas the right has been stubborn because they still retain that "protestant work ethic" thing from childhood that makes them feel like capitalism is an article of religious faith, even if it's causing insane amounts of wealth and power to accrue in a tiny amount of hands while people struggle to make ends meet at the bottom.
Hell, even a lot of billionaires say it's time for some sort of wealth tax.
Did it ever occur to you how you got convinced to say no to those people?
I mean, I never even wanted to be a billionaire; it sounds like a lot of work. So why would that affect any of us?
It's a relative handful of people within each country that have that kind of power. I see no issue with considering that power an antitrust issue and simply lowering their level of wealth as opposed to taking it all. Taking it all would be the reflexively anarchistic way to handle it, however this kind of thinking tends towards "get-evenism" of the style endemic to things like the French Revolution, and it's easier just cap it at some arbitrary number at or above one billion dollars just so they can retain the title of "billionaire" and retain face.
Really, the mission I see moving forward is to slowly advance the ball of the idea of a wealth cap that is high enough that it doesn't discourage competition and rewards the seeking of prowess, mastery, and prestige as positive public goods while still fundamentally limiting the ability of those with extreme wealth to concentrate power moving forward.
CONT:
CONT:
Thinking in big picture format like this tends to de-radicalize knee jerk responses on both sides, as none of these things are achievable from where we are at by any other means than slow advocacy.
That's not to say that that advocacy can't be loud and angry, but crossing the line of that, as we've seen with the 2020 riots, tends to create an equal but opposite response towards the right, and now the right is pushing the envelope with authoritarian behavior just as the left did since before Trump got there.
The best you can do is to lean into the absurdity of the situation, try to laugh in the face of trying times, and try to cheer up those who can't see that far down the road.
Things are ultimately going to be fine on this planet.
Birth pangs are natural when the human race is in the process of birthing a new world for itself.
😐
Thinking in big picture format like this tends to de-radicalize knee jerk responses on both sides, as none of these things are achievable from where we are at by any other means than slow advocacy.
That's not to say that that advocacy can't be loud and angry, but crossing the line of that, as we've seen with the 2020 riots, tends to create an equal but opposite response towards the right, and now the right is pushing the envelope with authoritarian behavior just as the left did since before Trump got there.
The best you can do is to lean into the absurdity of the situation, try to laugh in the face of trying times, and try to cheer up those who can't see that far down the road.
Things are ultimately going to be fine on this planet.
Birth pangs are natural when the human race is in the process of birthing a new world for itself.
😐
📜
The more time I spend meditating on the core of human behavior and trying to get God's direct input, the more it tends to break down to some very basic rules for life:
Don't Panic. On a long enough time scale, everything will always be alright eventually.
Be Kind, because you don't know what's going on, and everybody else has about as much idea what's going on as you do, so you might as well hedge your spiritual bets by extending the benefit of the doubt that other people are just as confused as you.
The Weak should not be burdened or sacrificed to serve the Strong.
Help other life when you see it in distress, and try to extend this to as much life as possible (a person is a person no matter how small.)
Respect the weirdness and personal uniqueness of others as the spice of life. You can't have cultural variety or move the intellectual ball of civilization forward without weird people.
Don't bother your neighbors about their sexual proclivities/activities so long as they are both consensual and done in appropriate spaces where children won't accidentally see them.
All belief is Dumbo's Feather, therefore choice of spiritual symbolism or use of spiritual totem objects is irrelevant so long as the practitioner's intention is for the highest good of all. Do not bother people about their personal religious, spiritual, or magical practices so long as they are kind to their neighbors and their practice is done in the spirit of kindness.
Above all Be Kind.
That's generally the overall vibe I'm getting from what I'd call "The Source" these days.
People really need to loosen up and embrace other people as they are a lot more, because nobody is going anywhere, and the advancement of technology is going to put everyone out of non-voluntary work eventually, so we'll have to figure out what exactly the point of being human actually is once we don't have any "lack" based arguments to have with each other.
Jordan Peterson once said humanity would get bored in Heaven and start breaking the furniture, but I think this is a rather pessimistic view.
It sounds very much like the Joker's speech at the end of The Dark Knight.
Personally I'd like to have more faith in humanity than that.
😐
The more time I spend meditating on the core of human behavior and trying to get God's direct input, the more it tends to break down to some very basic rules for life:
Don't Panic. On a long enough time scale, everything will always be alright eventually.
Be Kind, because you don't know what's going on, and everybody else has about as much idea what's going on as you do, so you might as well hedge your spiritual bets by extending the benefit of the doubt that other people are just as confused as you.
The Weak should not be burdened or sacrificed to serve the Strong.
Help other life when you see it in distress, and try to extend this to as much life as possible (a person is a person no matter how small.)
Respect the weirdness and personal uniqueness of others as the spice of life. You can't have cultural variety or move the intellectual ball of civilization forward without weird people.
Don't bother your neighbors about their sexual proclivities/activities so long as they are both consensual and done in appropriate spaces where children won't accidentally see them.
All belief is Dumbo's Feather, therefore choice of spiritual symbolism or use of spiritual totem objects is irrelevant so long as the practitioner's intention is for the highest good of all. Do not bother people about their personal religious, spiritual, or magical practices so long as they are kind to their neighbors and their practice is done in the spirit of kindness.
Above all Be Kind.
That's generally the overall vibe I'm getting from what I'd call "The Source" these days.
People really need to loosen up and embrace other people as they are a lot more, because nobody is going anywhere, and the advancement of technology is going to put everyone out of non-voluntary work eventually, so we'll have to figure out what exactly the point of being human actually is once we don't have any "lack" based arguments to have with each other.
Jordan Peterson once said humanity would get bored in Heaven and start breaking the furniture, but I think this is a rather pessimistic view.
It sounds very much like the Joker's speech at the end of The Dark Knight.
Personally I'd like to have more faith in humanity than that.
😐
📜
You know the best part about a mass spiritual ascension?
The art gets better.
🤓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0lY85E6PYQ
You know the best part about a mass spiritual ascension?
The art gets better.
🤓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0lY85E6PYQ
YouTube
HENGE - Ascending
https://ffm.to/henge-ascending
From the new album 'Journey To Voltus B'
Set to be released on 31st January 2025
Animation by Antony Barkworth-Knight.
From the new album 'Journey To Voltus B'
Set to be released on 31st January 2025
Animation by Antony Barkworth-Knight.
📜
See?
Life is all about the stories we decide to tell ourselves.
😐
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA3iscoypcY
See?
Life is all about the stories we decide to tell ourselves.
😐
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA3iscoypcY
YouTube
KINGDOM - Animated Short Film
KINGDOM is an audio-visual experience that serves as a template for empowerment. It models the path of awakening in the face of adversity, becoming whole, and confronting inner and outer darkness in order to transform it. The film's visual and musical arrangement…
👇
It is bad enough to out anyone who confides in you that they are queer, but it is absolutely unconscionable to report children to their parents for confiding in you that they are queer.
Good God, obviously if a child is uncomfortable telling their parents they are queer then they have a reason for that.
Trying to deliberately get children in trouble with abusive or untrustworthy parents is absolutely outrageous.
Thankfully this will likely be overturned on appeal, but who in their right mind would think that it is okay to treat a child this way when they try to confide in a teacher?
🤨
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/12/bush-judge-rules-that-christian-teachers-can-out-trans-kids-if-they-want-to/
It is bad enough to out anyone who confides in you that they are queer, but it is absolutely unconscionable to report children to their parents for confiding in you that they are queer.
Good God, obviously if a child is uncomfortable telling their parents they are queer then they have a reason for that.
Trying to deliberately get children in trouble with abusive or untrustworthy parents is absolutely outrageous.
Thankfully this will likely be overturned on appeal, but who in their right mind would think that it is okay to treat a child this way when they try to confide in a teacher?
🤨
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/12/bush-judge-rules-that-christian-teachers-can-out-trans-kids-if-they-want-to/
LGBTQ Nation
Bush judge rules that Christian teachers can out trans kids if they want to
He said a district policy banning teachers from disclosing private information about trans kids violated the teachers' religious exercise rights.
📜
At what point is it going to click for these people that they are the ones abusing children?
Do they even stop for a single moment to ask the children what they think of all of this?
Good God.
Queer children are terrified of these people.
🤦♂️
At what point is it going to click for these people that they are the ones abusing children?
Do they even stop for a single moment to ask the children what they think of all of this?
Good God.
Queer children are terrified of these people.
🤦♂️