Some people commenting just cannot understand this. They did not use buckets or bedpans at all, they didn't care. They just pooped on the floor. No attempt was made to poop in pans by hundreds of guests. The most reasonable explanation is all of them in the palace were not used to this requirement and the original owners were not present to keep the power running. There is not a single architect in any era in time that would ever be ok with people defecating on their new floors. In no time period is this ever acceptable. These "royals" were the lower population that eventually replaced the original royals in the history books, hence them having no idea how to properly run the palace and properly take care of their stool (almost as if they were so used to not needing to do such a thing).

The palace was originally built without any toilets. The palace was huge, so it made defecating outside a cumbersome journey. No attempt was made by the architects to pump water inside the palace (for any reason) even though they set up a whole elaborate fountain system right outside. No attempt was made to use bedpans, no attempt was made to install toilets of any kind whatsoever. Our conclusion is not something many of you want to entertain, but this situation leads only in this direction. The original owners and inhabitants of this palace did not need to defecate. There is no other explanation.

A message to everyone new to this study:

Do not be quick to boast how much you think you know about history. Anything that threatens the profit of large international companies will never be taught in your school. Our modern understanding of history is a careful reinterpretation of past events in order to conceal the "glitches in the matrix".

The mainstream historical timeline is ruthlessly driven into our heads because the electrical power business depends on us believing there isn't a much better alternative.

They want you to think that electrical lighting is only 150 years old. They want you to think that man first flew in the air only 250 years ago. They want you to think the United States was a "brand new" country. They want you to think everyone pooped in pans and buckets.

If people figured out that high-class families have been using electrical lights over a hundred years before it was introduced to the world, people would freak out.

Learn more here

Imagine what the history books will say 50 years from now about the last 50 years. History is always derived from mainstream media reports of the events and mainstream historians. It is important to think about this when it comes to big historical events that provide power to words like 'racist' and 'antisemite.' The same people that control the media now, controlled the media then. As they say if the news is fake, imagine history.

Dropping this text in here for anyone interested...

Original Sin Explained Scientifically - "Old Age" Explained - Satan Explained - The Purpose of Jesus Explained - How To Become Immortal

The information in this documentary is important to understand going forward:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6R4JBpHjsYBT

It is a very technical video and there are several things he theorizes which I do not agree with, BUT he has presented an extremely important understanding involving fungus that everyone should be aware of. Prepare yourselves, a biological entity coming from the sky that very closely resembles SATAN is mentioned. This video may be a black pill to some of you, BUT once you realize what is being described here, you will know that the end of days contains a white pill to end all white pills...

1/4

I will give the TLDR points in a concise manner:

>One singular force slowly eats every single living and non-living thing on earth
>It has a central entity controlling it which was said to have fallen from the sky
>The same force that rusts metal also rots fruit, rust is a fungus
>This force is mildew in its entirety, which is connected to a gigantic underground fungal network
>All fungus are connected and they behave like a hivemind, having one consciousness
>Not only does this force touch everything on earth, but it is INSIDE everything on earth
>An apple will eventually rot...from the INSIDE
>Essentially, the apple was corrupted from the very beginning of its inception
>Virtually all living things share this common problem, including us
>This is in essence Original Sin, not some legal binding, it is the origin for our tendency to sin
>And yes, this is why demons are able to communicate with us (black goo, parasites, etc)
>This is the reason trees die of "old age"
>The fungus isn't spreading to the tree because the tree is dying, the tree is dying BECAUSE of the fungus
>In short, trees grow until they die of cancer (literally!)
>This exact issue also causes OUR aging process
>In other words, "aging" is the result of the fungus slowly rotting our insides
>Death by "old age" is actually death by the fungus
>This very fungal corruption exists in everyone and like the apple that rots from the inside, WE WERE BORN WITH THIS CORRUPTION and it will eventually rot US from the inside...

This is what ultimately causes death. All of our internal bodily failures are the result of this. Funny enough, this very same corruption according to Revelation 20:14, Revelation 21:4, 1 Corinthians 15:26, and 2 Timothy 1:10, will be completely removed at the end of this age.

We know what truly causes death, and we know death as a concept will be removed. So we know exactly what is going to be destroyed when He returns...

2/4

1 Corinthians 15:42-44
So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.

What perishes things?

1 Corinthians 15:50
I declare to you, brothers and sisters, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.


The Greek word Paul uses for perishable is phthora, where according to Strong's Concordance means corruption, destruction, decay, ROTTENNESS, DECOMPOSITION

In fact take a look at what HELPS Word-Studies Cognate: 5356 defines phthora as: DESTRUCTION FROM INTERNAL CORRUPTION

Furthermore, guess what Congate 5351 defines phtheírō as? Decomposition due to the CORRUPTING INFLUENCE OF SIN


1 Corinthians 15:51-55
Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed— in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality. When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: “Death has been swallowed up in victory.”

“Where, O death, is your victory?

Where, O death, is your sting?”

What is he really referring to when he says death?

Romans 5:12
Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned—

Sin causes death? What exactly is sin? What exactly is Original Sin?

And what exactly is death?

2 Corinthians 4:10-12
We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body. For we who are alive are always being given over to death for Jesus’ sake, so that his life may also be revealed in our mortal body. So then, death is at work in us, but life is at work in you.

What did Paul mean by this?

Romans 6:22
But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life.

>Set free from sin
>The result is eternal life

What really causes death?

Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Upon being free of sin, we do not die? Does sin cause death? WHAT IS SIN?


So according to the bible...

>We were all born with a corruption
>This corruption will eventually kill us
>It was contracted by our ancestor
>And causes our unhealthy compulsions
>Upon being free of this corruption, we do not die

What are we really being saved from?

3/4

Some Extra Information

Take a look at Bible Hub's explanation of Original Sin. It is quite interesting that they appear to be just completely in the dark when it comes to the specifics of what they're talking about. I have underlined all notable details:

Q-16: DID ALL MANKIND FALL IN ADAM'S FIRST TRANSGRESSION?
A: The covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his posterity, all mankind descending from him, by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in his first transgression.

'By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin,' &c. Rom 5:12.

Adam being a representative person, while he stood, we stood; when he fell, we fell, We sinned in Adam; so it is in the text, In whom all have sinned.'

Adam was the head of mankind, and being guilty, we are guilty, as the children of a traitor have their blood stained. Omnes unus ille Adam fuerunt. All of us,' says Augustine, sinned in Adam, because we were part of Adam.'

How on earth could a person write this entire passage and not connect the dots and realize that it is a genetic defect? Did it ever occur to them that they are referring to a hereditary biological corruption?

If when Adam fell, all mankind fell with him; why, when one angel fell, did not all fall?

The case is not the same. The angels had no relation to one another. They are called morning-stars; the stars have no dependence one upon another; but it was otherwise with us, we were in Adam's loins; as a child is a branch of the parent, we were part of Adam; therefore when he sinned, we sinned.

The answer is literally right there in their own words and they appear to be completely blind to it!

In fact, take a look at how they attempt to explain why Adam's descendants get his sin:

How is Adam's sin made ours?

(1.) By imputation. The Pelagians of old held, that Adam's transgression is hurtful to posterity by imitation only, not by imputation. But the text, In whom all have sinned,' confutes that.

(2.) Adam's sin is ours by propagation. Not only is the guilt of Adam's sin imputed to us, but the depravity and corruption of his nature is transmitted to us, as poison is carried from the fountain to the cistern. This is that which we call original sin. In sin did my mother conceive me.

They literally said "posterity" in their explanation, yet they are somehow still unaware! Don't get me wrong, their explanations are fine, but for some reason, they appear to have absolutely zero idea as to what Original Sin is.

What's odd is the writer weirdly used the analogy of "poison is carried from the fountain to the cistern" to explain this instead of the much more obvious analogy of a father's defect carrying hereditarily to his son, which funny enough is almost exactly what is actually going on!

For whatever reason, the very people explaining Original Sin, who use the terms posterity, branch of a parent, and the children of, to describe it seem to not have a single hint of a suspicion that it is a biological defect passed down hereditarily! Wow, unreal!

4/4

Admin reveal at 10,000

Alright

Admin reveal

Most people can't even hear 20hz to 20khz....only small children