"Can the Hitlerites be regarded as nationalists? No, they cannot. Actually, the Hitlerites are now not nationalists but imperialists. As long as the Hitlerites were engaged in assembling the German lands and reuniting the Rhine district, Austria, etc., it was possible with a certain amount of foundation to call them nationalists. But after they seized foreign territories and enslaved European nations-the Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Norwegians, Danes, Dutch, Belgians, French, Serbs, Greeks, Ukrainians, Byelorussians, the inhabitants of the Baltic countries, etc.—and began to reach out for world domination, the Hitlerite party ceased to be a nationalist party, because from that moment it became an imperialist party, a party of annexation and oppression."

- Josif Stalin

It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way

- Marx to Engels, 1857

Hegel mogs Nietzsche's genealogy of morality with master-slave dialectics

"Uhm actually the masters with their morality were the good guys but got overthrown by je- I mean, priests who fomented the masses into imposing Christianity-"

"The master might impose his rule upon the slave, but in using the slave to work for him, the master becomes dependent on the slave. Only the slave can reach true self-consciousness, the master is unable to bring history forward."

This is true

Yeah I'm a centrist, why do you ask?