Am Neumarkt 😱
289 subscribers
89 photos
3 videos
17 files
523 links
Machine learning and other gibberish
Archives: https://datumorphism.leima.is/amneumarkt/
Download Telegram
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12505

Very interesting research on voting mechanism. They built a theory to understand how the freemason member selection procedures shape the community. The Freemason only integrates a member if the member is accepted by all of the current members.
Gangster capitalism and the American theft of Chinese innovation – TechCrunch
https://techcrunch.com/2020/09/20/gangster-capitalism-and-the-american-theft-of-chinese-innovation/
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16047306/how-is-docker-different-from-a-virtual-machine/36368012#36368012

"Docker for Mac uses https://github.com/moby/hyperkit to emulate the hypervisor capabilities and Hyperkit uses hypervisor.framework in its core. Hypervisor.framework is Mac's native hypervisor solution. Hyperkit also uses VPNKit and DataKit to namespace network and filesystem respectively."

hmmm I guess this is why docker on mac uses a lot of resources compared to its linux version
https://www.libscie.org/

hypergraph is out of alpha.
Hypergraph is a decentralized tool to help researchers manage their work. Everything in your research, from notes to data to publications to proposals , is linked together for better discovery and reproducibility.
https://greenelab.github.io/scihub-manuscript/v/8fcd0cd665f6fb5f39bed7e26b940aa27d4770ba/

I am a lit bit scared whenever I think about how it accesses the papers. It is a black box and we have no idea if scihub is doing this in a way that is accepted by every researcher.
On the other hand, it is not easy to live without scihub. There are legal alternatives like unpaywall and kopernio but they are way behind the game.
What shall we do? Require the author of scihub to open source the code? Continue using a black box that may hurt other people? I don't know.
What a boring Friday. I started to experiment on a plastic ring to find out the probabilities of it standing on the edges when dropped from heights. The diameter of this ring is much larger than its width (diameter/width ~ 2). In the beginning, the result was trivial. Then the results started to look weird to me. The probability of it standing on its edges is higher than falling flat down.
Is this an angular momentum problem?
(Why didn't I continue with the experiment? I stepped on it and it shattered.......)