People's shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than any other factors.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that age is the most determining factor when it comes to buying habits of consumers. I believe that one’s income level, gender and place of residence play a greater role in their shopping habits.
I believe how much a person earns is arguably the main driver behind their shopping habits. In fact, most studies into consumer behavior found that shopping frequency and volume start to grow once people pass a certain level of income threshold, and shopping becomes a fairly affordable activity allowed by higher earnings. This argument can further be illustrated by growing consumerism in the richer countries of the world.
The second most driving variable in the equation of shopping habits, in my view, is gender. There is a deep-seated idea that women shop more often and for longer periods of time than men do. The explanation, so far, lies in the fact that most female shoppers view shopping as a social activity whereas to men it is more of a necessity.
Another factor at work seems to be where one resides, urban or rural area. People in cities tend to shop more frequently since access to shopping facilities is greater there than in villages where people might have to shop every two weeks. Also, rural dwellers are sometimes required to commute large distances to accomplish this chore.
In conclusion, although some people assert that purchasing habits are mostly driven by age, I reiterate that personal income, gender and one’s locality should be perceived to be the primary contributors to these habits.
#task2
#under40mins
#Mukhammadali_Issues
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that age is the most determining factor when it comes to buying habits of consumers. I believe that one’s income level, gender and place of residence play a greater role in their shopping habits.
I believe how much a person earns is arguably the main driver behind their shopping habits. In fact, most studies into consumer behavior found that shopping frequency and volume start to grow once people pass a certain level of income threshold, and shopping becomes a fairly affordable activity allowed by higher earnings. This argument can further be illustrated by growing consumerism in the richer countries of the world.
The second most driving variable in the equation of shopping habits, in my view, is gender. There is a deep-seated idea that women shop more often and for longer periods of time than men do. The explanation, so far, lies in the fact that most female shoppers view shopping as a social activity whereas to men it is more of a necessity.
Another factor at work seems to be where one resides, urban or rural area. People in cities tend to shop more frequently since access to shopping facilities is greater there than in villages where people might have to shop every two weeks. Also, rural dwellers are sometimes required to commute large distances to accomplish this chore.
In conclusion, although some people assert that purchasing habits are mostly driven by age, I reiterate that personal income, gender and one’s locality should be perceived to be the primary contributors to these habits.
#task2
#under40mins
#Mukhammadali_Issues
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
❤2👍2
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits, I believe that the drawbacks it brings about are far more significant.
To begin with the positives of the sentencing to death, a crucial one is that it minimizes crime rates in a country. This is because it strikes fear into the hearts of criminals, and make them think twice before offending. This type of punishment is also likely to be an effective way of dealing with recidivists – re-offenders. Having been sentenced a number of times after committing serious crimes, such as rape, treason and murder, prison sentences may seem normal and too light for them. If a law were passed to legalize capital punishment, we would perhaps see a significant decline in the rate of these crimes as it would teach a valuable lesson to others.
Despite the arguments presented above, I feel that it is not a sensible decision to make for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is morally unacceptable to take a life. People might have committed a crime accidentally or while protecting themselves, so punishment by execution is just another murder, an unjustified one sometimes. Besides being morally wrong, the death verdict causes further problems like psychological traumas to family members of criminals, which will be followed by years of depression and stress. Giving people another opportunity to correct themselves or giving them lengthy prison sentences could be effective alternatives to harsh punishments of electrocution, hanging, and lethal injections. Above all, who are we to judge?
The death penalty has both pros and cons. However, while it might seem justifiable as an effective deterrent of crime, in my view, it is unacceptable on ethical grounds. Overall, the advantages are outweighed by the negatives.
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits, I believe that the drawbacks it brings about are far more significant.
To begin with the positives of the sentencing to death, a crucial one is that it minimizes crime rates in a country. This is because it strikes fear into the hearts of criminals, and make them think twice before offending. This type of punishment is also likely to be an effective way of dealing with recidivists – re-offenders. Having been sentenced a number of times after committing serious crimes, such as rape, treason and murder, prison sentences may seem normal and too light for them. If a law were passed to legalize capital punishment, we would perhaps see a significant decline in the rate of these crimes as it would teach a valuable lesson to others.
Despite the arguments presented above, I feel that it is not a sensible decision to make for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is morally unacceptable to take a life. People might have committed a crime accidentally or while protecting themselves, so punishment by execution is just another murder, an unjustified one sometimes. Besides being morally wrong, the death verdict causes further problems like psychological traumas to family members of criminals, which will be followed by years of depression and stress. Giving people another opportunity to correct themselves or giving them lengthy prison sentences could be effective alternatives to harsh punishments of electrocution, hanging, and lethal injections. Above all, who are we to judge?
The death penalty has both pros and cons. However, while it might seem justifiable as an effective deterrent of crime, in my view, it is unacceptable on ethical grounds. Overall, the advantages are outweighed by the negatives.
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍7
👍1🌚1
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits,…
Intro: 'Whether x or not' sounds slightly awkward to me as a starter - good
Body 1: What is 'of the sentencing to death'... sounds awkward - 'it make'? - nice, but 'to others' at the end isn't really on the same point as what you were making... you were speaking in the context of existing criminals, not potential ones
Body 2: what is 'it' referring to in the topic sentence... also, I wouldn't characterise capital punishment as a 'decision' - 'and an...' - why is it morally unacceptable to take a life?? A lot of people would argue with that... is there something we can add to support this claim other than "trust me". - 'the death penalty' (not verdict) - 'punishments such as' - The last sentence is a bit isolated... it's kind of a third point... I think it could be worked into the 'morally unacceptable' point somehow
Conclusion: good
Overall: This was high level stuff, but it had slight imperfections in a few places. I feel like this would get straight 8s.
Feedback was provided by Beyden James (IELTS 9.0 with 8.5 in W).
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Body 1: What is 'of the sentencing to death'... sounds awkward - 'it make'? - nice, but 'to others' at the end isn't really on the same point as what you were making... you were speaking in the context of existing criminals, not potential ones
Body 2: what is 'it' referring to in the topic sentence... also, I wouldn't characterise capital punishment as a 'decision' - 'and an...' - why is it morally unacceptable to take a life?? A lot of people would argue with that... is there something we can add to support this claim other than "trust me". - 'the death penalty' (not verdict) - 'punishments such as' - The last sentence is a bit isolated... it's kind of a third point... I think it could be worked into the 'morally unacceptable' point somehow
Conclusion: good
Overall: This was high level stuff, but it had slight imperfections in a few places. I feel like this would get straight 8s.
Feedback was provided by Beyden James (IELTS 9.0 with 8.5 in W).
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits,…
A model by Beyden James.
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a lot of controversy surrounding the practice of capital punishment across the world. Although the death penalty does have some benefits, I am of the opinion that it is not appropriate for any government to have the power to kill in this way.
There are several advantages associated with the application of the death penalty for extreme crimes. First of all, the death penalty could be considered to be the ultimate form of justice. For example, in the case of families who have had a loved one murdered, they might feel that true justice can only be found in taking the life of the murderer. Secondly, killing a convicted criminal is the most effective way of keeping people safe from those who have committed heinous actions. There are probably thousands of cases wherein murderers have completed their prison sentences or received parole and have killed again.
However, the drawbacks of capital punishment outweigh its advantages. This is because capital punishment is a tool of the government which is not always used on guilty people. In the United States alone, over 300 executed apparent criminals were later proven innocent. It should also be acknowledged that capital punishment has been used on political prisoners and for actions that are no longer considered crimes, such as holding particular religious beliefs. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that countries who have stopped the practice of killing criminals do not suffer increases in crime as a result. This is evidenced by countries such as Denmark who are currently closing prisons due to a lack of felons.
In conclusion, while the death penalty in some cases can provide justice and protection, it is clear that it is often misused and is not required to prevent serious crimes. Therefore, I believe that it should not be a part of the justice system.
⚡️@alisherposts⚡️
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a lot of controversy surrounding the practice of capital punishment across the world. Although the death penalty does have some benefits, I am of the opinion that it is not appropriate for any government to have the power to kill in this way.
There are several advantages associated with the application of the death penalty for extreme crimes. First of all, the death penalty could be considered to be the ultimate form of justice. For example, in the case of families who have had a loved one murdered, they might feel that true justice can only be found in taking the life of the murderer. Secondly, killing a convicted criminal is the most effective way of keeping people safe from those who have committed heinous actions. There are probably thousands of cases wherein murderers have completed their prison sentences or received parole and have killed again.
However, the drawbacks of capital punishment outweigh its advantages. This is because capital punishment is a tool of the government which is not always used on guilty people. In the United States alone, over 300 executed apparent criminals were later proven innocent. It should also be acknowledged that capital punishment has been used on political prisoners and for actions that are no longer considered crimes, such as holding particular religious beliefs. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that countries who have stopped the practice of killing criminals do not suffer increases in crime as a result. This is evidenced by countries such as Denmark who are currently closing prisons due to a lack of felons.
In conclusion, while the death penalty in some cases can provide justice and protection, it is clear that it is often misused and is not required to prevent serious crimes. Therefore, I believe that it should not be a part of the justice system.
⚡️@alisherposts⚡️
👍4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why am I seeing this video now?
It is like the YouTube algorithm waited for me to graduate before showing me this lifehack🤦♂️. (btw, I just tried it and it worked!)
It is like the YouTube algorithm waited for me to graduate before showing me this lifehack🤦♂️. (btw, I just tried it and it worked!)
In the world of the internet, people write product reviews of products and services.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
When shopping online or using the services of a business, consumers today can comment on many different aspects of the products and services they receive. I believe this trend should be perceived as both positive and negative developments.
To begin with the positive aspects of this trend, the first and most obvious one is that customer reviews inform people on the quality of a particular product. While in the past people could only find out about the quality of a product after testing it personally, today it is possible to learn a lot about an item simply by reading the reviews left by people who often have no ulterior motive of promoting the product. Another way this trend can be viewed as a positive one can be seen in the service industry. Customer feedback in this industry can be employed to improve services rendered to customers by measuring worker performance to indicate how well they are doing their jobs. When I was employed in the restaurant business, I learnt that work shifts can be allocated among servers depending on how many positive comments they receive on the social media pages of the business.
However, one should also acknowledge the negative changes that online commenting can have on businesses. It, in some cases, can be used to drive down the sales of a particular product with the intention of driving a competitor out of business. One recent example of such a case was when some people commented online that the beverage manufacturer Coca-Cola uses ingredients disapproved of in some cultures. Those comments, which eventually spread out all over the Internet, cost the company north of 4 billion dollars in sales. Aside from hurting sales, corporate groups might conspire into creating echo chambers where scathing comments are made about a business and its services and products in an attempt to blemish its reputation, especially in the service industry.
In conclusion, while being informative on products’ quality and improvements in services explain why online consumer feedback might be good, its power to affect businesses and their reputation can be cited as negative effects of this phenomenon.
#task2
#Mukhammadali_Issues
⚡️ @alisherposts ⚡️
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
When shopping online or using the services of a business, consumers today can comment on many different aspects of the products and services they receive. I believe this trend should be perceived as both positive and negative developments.
To begin with the positive aspects of this trend, the first and most obvious one is that customer reviews inform people on the quality of a particular product. While in the past people could only find out about the quality of a product after testing it personally, today it is possible to learn a lot about an item simply by reading the reviews left by people who often have no ulterior motive of promoting the product. Another way this trend can be viewed as a positive one can be seen in the service industry. Customer feedback in this industry can be employed to improve services rendered to customers by measuring worker performance to indicate how well they are doing their jobs. When I was employed in the restaurant business, I learnt that work shifts can be allocated among servers depending on how many positive comments they receive on the social media pages of the business.
However, one should also acknowledge the negative changes that online commenting can have on businesses. It, in some cases, can be used to drive down the sales of a particular product with the intention of driving a competitor out of business. One recent example of such a case was when some people commented online that the beverage manufacturer Coca-Cola uses ingredients disapproved of in some cultures. Those comments, which eventually spread out all over the Internet, cost the company north of 4 billion dollars in sales. Aside from hurting sales, corporate groups might conspire into creating echo chambers where scathing comments are made about a business and its services and products in an attempt to blemish its reputation, especially in the service industry.
In conclusion, while being informative on products’ quality and improvements in services explain why online consumer feedback might be good, its power to affect businesses and their reputation can be cited as negative effects of this phenomenon.
#task2
#Mukhammadali_Issues
⚡️ @alisherposts ⚡️
👍3
Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss and GYO.
There are hypotheses that extra-terrestrial forms of life exist. While some researchers of the cosmos believe that humans should contact them, I support others who argue against it.
On the one hand, sending messages to other galaxies can be an answer to many questions that humans are struggling to find. No one, for example, knows exactly how the universe was created, or about the origin of species. The only pieces of information are theories that need to be backed up by facts. If technology allows us to send signals to outer space with the intention of communicating with other intelligent creatures like ourselves, we will perhaps be able to establish grounds for the existing assumptions, know about the lives of those aliens and possibly predict the destiny of our planet.
However, I would argue that this contact is insensible and can even be detrimental. Firstly, a huge amount of money spent on this purpose may not justify itself as, so far, we have not received any replies to high-frequency signals transmitted to all known planets to human beings. These efforts might also go in vain because we do not even know for sure about the existence of other life forms; even if we do, their way of communication might completely differ from ours. Ultimately, to what extent are we ready to accept reply signals from aliens? What would happen if we did receive one? These are ethical questions and can cause fear and concern since we would be unaware of their intentions.
In conclusion, although the existence of aliens can help us address our long-standing questions, I side with the opponents of extra-terrestrial communication for social, financial and ethical reasons.
280 words 36 minutes
#task2
⚡️ @alisherposts ⚡️
There are hypotheses that extra-terrestrial forms of life exist. While some researchers of the cosmos believe that humans should contact them, I support others who argue against it.
On the one hand, sending messages to other galaxies can be an answer to many questions that humans are struggling to find. No one, for example, knows exactly how the universe was created, or about the origin of species. The only pieces of information are theories that need to be backed up by facts. If technology allows us to send signals to outer space with the intention of communicating with other intelligent creatures like ourselves, we will perhaps be able to establish grounds for the existing assumptions, know about the lives of those aliens and possibly predict the destiny of our planet.
However, I would argue that this contact is insensible and can even be detrimental. Firstly, a huge amount of money spent on this purpose may not justify itself as, so far, we have not received any replies to high-frequency signals transmitted to all known planets to human beings. These efforts might also go in vain because we do not even know for sure about the existence of other life forms; even if we do, their way of communication might completely differ from ours. Ultimately, to what extent are we ready to accept reply signals from aliens? What would happen if we did receive one? These are ethical questions and can cause fear and concern since we would be unaware of their intentions.
In conclusion, although the existence of aliens can help us address our long-standing questions, I side with the opponents of extra-terrestrial communication for social, financial and ethical reasons.
280 words 36 minutes
#task2
⚡️ @alisherposts ⚡️
👍2
Do you want to get your essay checked for FREE?
If yes, great. Welcome to the round#3 of our old meme battle!
Leave a MEME in the comments section below.
The sender of the funniest meme will have their essay checked by me.
You have till midnight. The winner will be announced tomorrow evening and will win the chance to get comprehensive feedback on their essay.
P.S. Just send your favourite meme, or the one you find particularly funny. Don't bother putting yourself through the trouble of finding a funny meme.
If yes, great. Welcome to the round#3 of our old meme battle!
Leave a MEME in the comments section below.
The sender of the funniest meme will have their essay checked by me.
You have till midnight. The winner will be announced tomorrow evening and will win the chance to get comprehensive feedback on their essay.
P.S. Just send your favourite meme, or the one you find particularly funny. Don't bother putting yourself through the trouble of finding a funny meme.