Translate the following sentence from a reading passage. A beautiful structure has been used)
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
As products grow in number and range, companies are seeking ways to market them in newer lights, one of which is singling out their products from others by bringing public attention to their novelty. Several other reasons can be cited why this is happening, and to me, it is as much of a positive development as it is a negative one.
I believe there are two main reasons that might explain why more focus is placed on the originality of a product when advertising. The first, arguably most obvious, reason has to do with consumer behavior. Newer products tend to generate more interest among consumers which will in turn increase sales, hence bringing more income. Every time a new line of Apple products is unveiled, the CEO, Tim Cook, emphasizes how different they are from the older versions as well as their competitors’ in terms of their function range and quality. This move goes a long way to keeping customers interested and boosting sales figures. The second reason also speaks to the psychology of the consumer. By installing new features in their products, businesses can make them more desirable than those of their competitors; a customer whose is undecided between two options might simply gravitate towards the one with newer qualities.
In my view, such a trend should be recognized as being both negative and positive. On a positive note, this development will ultimately benefit the economy as sales grow and people start spending more since more consumption leads to job creation in transportation and production sectors to meet the increasing demand from the costumer. However, some unscrupulous businesses might try to sell people products that are practically identical to other products available in the market that come with better quality and prices. In this case, the result is often consumer dissatisfaction that might manifest itself in their future choice not to buy a product of that kind.
In conclusion, it is fair to say that the marketing strategy in question is devised based primarily on consumer behavior, and I am still of the opinion that it should be regarded as both positive and negative development.
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
As products grow in number and range, companies are seeking ways to market them in newer lights, one of which is singling out their products from others by bringing public attention to their novelty. Several other reasons can be cited why this is happening, and to me, it is as much of a positive development as it is a negative one.
I believe there are two main reasons that might explain why more focus is placed on the originality of a product when advertising. The first, arguably most obvious, reason has to do with consumer behavior. Newer products tend to generate more interest among consumers which will in turn increase sales, hence bringing more income. Every time a new line of Apple products is unveiled, the CEO, Tim Cook, emphasizes how different they are from the older versions as well as their competitors’ in terms of their function range and quality. This move goes a long way to keeping customers interested and boosting sales figures. The second reason also speaks to the psychology of the consumer. By installing new features in their products, businesses can make them more desirable than those of their competitors; a customer whose is undecided between two options might simply gravitate towards the one with newer qualities.
In my view, such a trend should be recognized as being both negative and positive. On a positive note, this development will ultimately benefit the economy as sales grow and people start spending more since more consumption leads to job creation in transportation and production sectors to meet the increasing demand from the costumer. However, some unscrupulous businesses might try to sell people products that are practically identical to other products available in the market that come with better quality and prices. In this case, the result is often consumer dissatisfaction that might manifest itself in their future choice not to buy a product of that kind.
In conclusion, it is fair to say that the marketing strategy in question is devised based primarily on consumer behavior, and I am still of the opinion that it should be regarded as both positive and negative development.
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍3⚡1
Research indicates that physical training can help to improve memory.
Anonymous Quiz
55%
TRUE
27%
FALSE
18%
NOT GIVEN
Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem. What are the causes of this? How can this problem be solved?
The issue many metropolises are facing is one of overpopulation. While there are some driving forces of this phenomenon, a number of measures can be taken to deal with this concern.
Two principal reasons appear to explain why big cities are attractive to people although these areas have high population density. The main cause is job opportunities in major municipal areas. Cities usually have higher minimum wages, offer a wider job variety and better career prospects for people, making them seem an ideal place to live. Another cause of overpopulation is easy access to facilities. Unlike rural or suburban areas, urban places have excellent transport infrastructure, high quality education, developed healthcare, and entertainment options, all of which are the factors that add to people’s satisfaction and happiness.
Turning to possible solutions to overpopulation, perhaps a major step would be to equalize remuneration of workers everywhere. If governments implement this suggestion, we will probably deter many people from moving to cities in search of a better life, as money is an extremely, if not the most, essential motivator. Besides motivating financially, states can also improve the quality of life in rural or suburban areas. Once people are provided with as good facilities as there are in major urban areas, they are less likely to move. Finally, if these two measures have little to no impact, the best way to discourage movement to cities is by increasing the level of taxes in these places. Not only will this make the city life an expensive luxury, but also it will promote depopulation in metropolitan areas as a consequence.
Overall, the causes of overpopulation in cities have primarily to do with employment and amenities. However, the government can take a number of steps to tackle this issue.
293 words 40 min
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
The issue many metropolises are facing is one of overpopulation. While there are some driving forces of this phenomenon, a number of measures can be taken to deal with this concern.
Two principal reasons appear to explain why big cities are attractive to people although these areas have high population density. The main cause is job opportunities in major municipal areas. Cities usually have higher minimum wages, offer a wider job variety and better career prospects for people, making them seem an ideal place to live. Another cause of overpopulation is easy access to facilities. Unlike rural or suburban areas, urban places have excellent transport infrastructure, high quality education, developed healthcare, and entertainment options, all of which are the factors that add to people’s satisfaction and happiness.
Turning to possible solutions to overpopulation, perhaps a major step would be to equalize remuneration of workers everywhere. If governments implement this suggestion, we will probably deter many people from moving to cities in search of a better life, as money is an extremely, if not the most, essential motivator. Besides motivating financially, states can also improve the quality of life in rural or suburban areas. Once people are provided with as good facilities as there are in major urban areas, they are less likely to move. Finally, if these two measures have little to no impact, the best way to discourage movement to cities is by increasing the level of taxes in these places. Not only will this make the city life an expensive luxury, but also it will promote depopulation in metropolitan areas as a consequence.
Overall, the causes of overpopulation in cities have primarily to do with employment and amenities. However, the government can take a number of steps to tackle this issue.
293 words 40 min
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍4🔥1
Scientists have found a way of protecting astronauts from solar radiation.
Anonymous Quiz
47%
TRUE
34%
FALSE
18%
NG
👍1
Andrew Howard thinks there is little that can be done to reduce accidents.
Anonymous Quiz
21%
T
33%
F
47%
NG
It is said that people should be encouraged to get married before they are 30, as this is best both for the individual and for society. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people feel that getting married prior to turning 30 is most beneficial for society and the newlyweds themselves. While this may be true to a certain extent, I think that age is just a number when it comes to building a happy family.
There are both personal and social benefits when people get married in their 20s. This is the age when people are curious and adventurous, so they are in a constant search of excitement and novelty. This, in effect, can be a cause of social ills like drug abuse, drinking, and prostitution, as we see in the instances of some western countries. However, if people have a family to look after, they will have to shoulder various household responsibilities and earn money to meet the needs; completely different positive priorities at this stage in their life. On a societal level, the chances are that couples will have healthier children if they get married before 30, for after this time, people’s physical strength weakens and physicians generally do not recommend having a baby after 35. Risking babies’ life or compromising its or a mother’s health are not sensible decisions when there is an alternative.
Whereas establishing a family early in life seems to be a worthwhile decision, it is may not always be the right one. In the first place, reaching maturity differs from one person to another. This implies that some of them may not be able to cope with relationship-wise issues, unable to make important decisions and therefore not be able to guarantee the security of their family. Not only immaturity, but also finances can be a serious issue in the lives of newlyweds due to their hasty decision to get married. This is because people during their 20s are usually taking their first steps in the world of work having graduated from universities, which means that they are less likely in a good financial condition. Being unable to deal with financial challenges of family, young couples tend to resort to divorce. The consequences may even be disastrous if they have children. In this sense, it is a change for the worse for both the individuals and society.
A marriage before the age of 30 does present a number of benefits; in my view, however, people’s maturity and financial condition should determine the age to build a family.
392 words
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Some people feel that getting married prior to turning 30 is most beneficial for society and the newlyweds themselves. While this may be true to a certain extent, I think that age is just a number when it comes to building a happy family.
There are both personal and social benefits when people get married in their 20s. This is the age when people are curious and adventurous, so they are in a constant search of excitement and novelty. This, in effect, can be a cause of social ills like drug abuse, drinking, and prostitution, as we see in the instances of some western countries. However, if people have a family to look after, they will have to shoulder various household responsibilities and earn money to meet the needs; completely different positive priorities at this stage in their life. On a societal level, the chances are that couples will have healthier children if they get married before 30, for after this time, people’s physical strength weakens and physicians generally do not recommend having a baby after 35. Risking babies’ life or compromising its or a mother’s health are not sensible decisions when there is an alternative.
Whereas establishing a family early in life seems to be a worthwhile decision, it is may not always be the right one. In the first place, reaching maturity differs from one person to another. This implies that some of them may not be able to cope with relationship-wise issues, unable to make important decisions and therefore not be able to guarantee the security of their family. Not only immaturity, but also finances can be a serious issue in the lives of newlyweds due to their hasty decision to get married. This is because people during their 20s are usually taking their first steps in the world of work having graduated from universities, which means that they are less likely in a good financial condition. Being unable to deal with financial challenges of family, young couples tend to resort to divorce. The consequences may even be disastrous if they have children. In this sense, it is a change for the worse for both the individuals and society.
A marriage before the age of 30 does present a number of benefits; in my view, however, people’s maturity and financial condition should determine the age to build a family.
392 words
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍7
Some people believe that nowadays too much money is being spent on weddings and birthdays. Why do you think it is happening? What can be done to improve this situation?
Special occasions like birthdays and weddings are crucial events in people’s lives, so they, these days, are trying to celebrate them extravagantly. Although some reasons might explain why they do so, a number of measures can be suggested to tackle this social issue.
Focusing on the causes of spending too much money on weddings and birthdays, perhaps the most obvious one is people’s desire to show off. Not only is this true for the wealthy who have important connections among whom hosts want to stand out, but also it is being a common case among the general public who seek respect and recognition. Another reason for this attitude is the intention to mark a crucial date in one’s life. Weddings, for instance, are usually celebrated once in a lifetime, so couples want to make sure that this event is remembered by their relatives, friends and close-knits; thus, organizing parties and ceremonies in a luxurious fashion spending large sums of money.
Turning to possible solutions to this “sumptuous” way of celebrating events, the most effective one seems to be passing laws to deter people from doing so. Organizing birthday parties may not be as costly as organizing weddings, but still if people’s financial conditions are not sound, there is a risk of them getting into debt. If the government introduces laws to limit the number of attendees to these parties, hosts can economize significantly on spending. Besides enforcing laws, the government also can educate the public to be more prudent. This is most effectively done at schools. As a result, education of this kind will nurture more conscious, thrifty, and sensible adults, in the long run.
The causes of spending excessive amounts of money on opulent celebrations like weddings and birthdays are twofold. However, this trend can be addressed by the government initiatives of introducing laws and public education.
308 words 38 min
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Special occasions like birthdays and weddings are crucial events in people’s lives, so they, these days, are trying to celebrate them extravagantly. Although some reasons might explain why they do so, a number of measures can be suggested to tackle this social issue.
Focusing on the causes of spending too much money on weddings and birthdays, perhaps the most obvious one is people’s desire to show off. Not only is this true for the wealthy who have important connections among whom hosts want to stand out, but also it is being a common case among the general public who seek respect and recognition. Another reason for this attitude is the intention to mark a crucial date in one’s life. Weddings, for instance, are usually celebrated once in a lifetime, so couples want to make sure that this event is remembered by their relatives, friends and close-knits; thus, organizing parties and ceremonies in a luxurious fashion spending large sums of money.
Turning to possible solutions to this “sumptuous” way of celebrating events, the most effective one seems to be passing laws to deter people from doing so. Organizing birthday parties may not be as costly as organizing weddings, but still if people’s financial conditions are not sound, there is a risk of them getting into debt. If the government introduces laws to limit the number of attendees to these parties, hosts can economize significantly on spending. Besides enforcing laws, the government also can educate the public to be more prudent. This is most effectively done at schools. As a result, education of this kind will nurture more conscious, thrifty, and sensible adults, in the long run.
The causes of spending excessive amounts of money on opulent celebrations like weddings and birthdays are twofold. However, this trend can be addressed by the government initiatives of introducing laws and public education.
308 words 38 min
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍4
People's shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than any other factors.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that age is the most determining factor when it comes to buying habits of consumers. I believe that one’s income level, gender and place of residence play a greater role in their shopping habits.
I believe how much a person earns is arguably the main driver behind their shopping habits. In fact, most studies into consumer behavior found that shopping frequency and volume start to grow once people pass a certain level of income threshold, and shopping becomes a fairly affordable activity allowed by higher earnings. This argument can further be illustrated by growing consumerism in the richer countries of the world.
The second most driving variable in the equation of shopping habits, in my view, is gender. There is a deep-seated idea that women shop more often and for longer periods of time than men do. The explanation, so far, lies in the fact that most female shoppers view shopping as a social activity whereas to men it is more of a necessity.
Another factor at work seems to be where one resides, urban or rural area. People in cities tend to shop more frequently since access to shopping facilities is greater there than in villages where people might have to shop every two weeks. Also, rural dwellers are sometimes required to commute large distances to accomplish this chore.
In conclusion, although some people assert that purchasing habits are mostly driven by age, I reiterate that personal income, gender and one’s locality should be perceived to be the primary contributors to these habits.
#task2
#under40mins
#Mukhammadali_Issues
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that age is the most determining factor when it comes to buying habits of consumers. I believe that one’s income level, gender and place of residence play a greater role in their shopping habits.
I believe how much a person earns is arguably the main driver behind their shopping habits. In fact, most studies into consumer behavior found that shopping frequency and volume start to grow once people pass a certain level of income threshold, and shopping becomes a fairly affordable activity allowed by higher earnings. This argument can further be illustrated by growing consumerism in the richer countries of the world.
The second most driving variable in the equation of shopping habits, in my view, is gender. There is a deep-seated idea that women shop more often and for longer periods of time than men do. The explanation, so far, lies in the fact that most female shoppers view shopping as a social activity whereas to men it is more of a necessity.
Another factor at work seems to be where one resides, urban or rural area. People in cities tend to shop more frequently since access to shopping facilities is greater there than in villages where people might have to shop every two weeks. Also, rural dwellers are sometimes required to commute large distances to accomplish this chore.
In conclusion, although some people assert that purchasing habits are mostly driven by age, I reiterate that personal income, gender and one’s locality should be perceived to be the primary contributors to these habits.
#task2
#under40mins
#Mukhammadali_Issues
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
❤2👍2
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits, I believe that the drawbacks it brings about are far more significant.
To begin with the positives of the sentencing to death, a crucial one is that it minimizes crime rates in a country. This is because it strikes fear into the hearts of criminals, and make them think twice before offending. This type of punishment is also likely to be an effective way of dealing with recidivists – re-offenders. Having been sentenced a number of times after committing serious crimes, such as rape, treason and murder, prison sentences may seem normal and too light for them. If a law were passed to legalize capital punishment, we would perhaps see a significant decline in the rate of these crimes as it would teach a valuable lesson to others.
Despite the arguments presented above, I feel that it is not a sensible decision to make for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is morally unacceptable to take a life. People might have committed a crime accidentally or while protecting themselves, so punishment by execution is just another murder, an unjustified one sometimes. Besides being morally wrong, the death verdict causes further problems like psychological traumas to family members of criminals, which will be followed by years of depression and stress. Giving people another opportunity to correct themselves or giving them lengthy prison sentences could be effective alternatives to harsh punishments of electrocution, hanging, and lethal injections. Above all, who are we to judge?
The death penalty has both pros and cons. However, while it might seem justifiable as an effective deterrent of crime, in my view, it is unacceptable on ethical grounds. Overall, the advantages are outweighed by the negatives.
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits, I believe that the drawbacks it brings about are far more significant.
To begin with the positives of the sentencing to death, a crucial one is that it minimizes crime rates in a country. This is because it strikes fear into the hearts of criminals, and make them think twice before offending. This type of punishment is also likely to be an effective way of dealing with recidivists – re-offenders. Having been sentenced a number of times after committing serious crimes, such as rape, treason and murder, prison sentences may seem normal and too light for them. If a law were passed to legalize capital punishment, we would perhaps see a significant decline in the rate of these crimes as it would teach a valuable lesson to others.
Despite the arguments presented above, I feel that it is not a sensible decision to make for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is morally unacceptable to take a life. People might have committed a crime accidentally or while protecting themselves, so punishment by execution is just another murder, an unjustified one sometimes. Besides being morally wrong, the death verdict causes further problems like psychological traumas to family members of criminals, which will be followed by years of depression and stress. Giving people another opportunity to correct themselves or giving them lengthy prison sentences could be effective alternatives to harsh punishments of electrocution, hanging, and lethal injections. Above all, who are we to judge?
The death penalty has both pros and cons. However, while it might seem justifiable as an effective deterrent of crime, in my view, it is unacceptable on ethical grounds. Overall, the advantages are outweighed by the negatives.
#task2
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍7
👍1🌚1
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
The death penalty is a contentious issue in many states and countries around the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Whether capital punishment should be practiced or not is controversial in most countries. Although it has some benefits,…
Intro: 'Whether x or not' sounds slightly awkward to me as a starter - good
Body 1: What is 'of the sentencing to death'... sounds awkward - 'it make'? - nice, but 'to others' at the end isn't really on the same point as what you were making... you were speaking in the context of existing criminals, not potential ones
Body 2: what is 'it' referring to in the topic sentence... also, I wouldn't characterise capital punishment as a 'decision' - 'and an...' - why is it morally unacceptable to take a life?? A lot of people would argue with that... is there something we can add to support this claim other than "trust me". - 'the death penalty' (not verdict) - 'punishments such as' - The last sentence is a bit isolated... it's kind of a third point... I think it could be worked into the 'morally unacceptable' point somehow
Conclusion: good
Overall: This was high level stuff, but it had slight imperfections in a few places. I feel like this would get straight 8s.
Feedback was provided by Beyden James (IELTS 9.0 with 8.5 in W).
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Body 1: What is 'of the sentencing to death'... sounds awkward - 'it make'? - nice, but 'to others' at the end isn't really on the same point as what you were making... you were speaking in the context of existing criminals, not potential ones
Body 2: what is 'it' referring to in the topic sentence... also, I wouldn't characterise capital punishment as a 'decision' - 'and an...' - why is it morally unacceptable to take a life?? A lot of people would argue with that... is there something we can add to support this claim other than "trust me". - 'the death penalty' (not verdict) - 'punishments such as' - The last sentence is a bit isolated... it's kind of a third point... I think it could be worked into the 'morally unacceptable' point somehow
Conclusion: good
Overall: This was high level stuff, but it had slight imperfections in a few places. I feel like this would get straight 8s.
Feedback was provided by Beyden James (IELTS 9.0 with 8.5 in W).
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️