As you can see in the comments section, there is much discussion going on around who the authors of the essays are. We will make a post revealing which essay is whose after they get 1K views each.
Stay tuned!
(You can leave your guesses down here👇)
Stay tuned!
(You can leave your guesses down here👇)
👍3
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts pinned «Yep, the poll result speaks for itself) Enjoy! #nobodysaiditisgonnabeeasy #learnEnglish #motivation #gratitude https://telegra.ph/From-0-to-85-or-GRATITUDE-11-10 🌐🌐🌐Sharing is caring: @alisherposts»
What better feeling can there be than getting stuck in traffic and one of your favorite songs coming up on the radio?
#MondayMood
#MondayMood
😁5
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
Essay B The availability of advanced translation tools on computers today might lead some people to believe that learning other languages is not as necessary as it used to be. While I find this assertion to be true to some extent, I hold the view that people…
The essay A was written by Alisher.
The essay B was written by Muhammadali.
The essay B was written by Muhammadali.
I can see that there is still a debate going on on who the writers of the essays are even after we made it public. In this light, I would like to dispel some stereotypes and baseless labelling regarding the styles of the writers.
Just because a writer used to use certain ways to write essays, it does not mean they will stick with those ways forever. We all have room to grow (no matter how good we are), and it is so apparent from the fact that there are some grammatical and word use mistakes in both of those essays (this is because they were written under exam conditions with time constraint and no use of a dictionary). How good of an essay we can produce depends on a shed load of factors ranging from the topic to the person's mood on that day.
The idea here is not to determine whose essay is better, instead it is to identify flaws in our writing (basically from your reactions) and to try to avoid them next time we write an essay. This way, we intend to provide you with quality essays that you might refer to as a learning guide.
At the end of the end, we are all benefiting from this experience as most of you can bear witness to that.
Peace✌️
Just because a writer used to use certain ways to write essays, it does not mean they will stick with those ways forever. We all have room to grow (no matter how good we are), and it is so apparent from the fact that there are some grammatical and word use mistakes in both of those essays (this is because they were written under exam conditions with time constraint and no use of a dictionary). How good of an essay we can produce depends on a shed load of factors ranging from the topic to the person's mood on that day.
The idea here is not to determine whose essay is better, instead it is to identify flaws in our writing (basically from your reactions) and to try to avoid them next time we write an essay. This way, we intend to provide you with quality essays that you might refer to as a learning guide.
At the end of the end, we are all benefiting from this experience as most of you can bear witness to that.
Peace✌️
Firecrackers set off celebrating the opening of a Disney Land-like recreational park in Tashkent
❤2
Good morning people, I wrote an essay on a very interesting topic:
Many countries around the world are turning to renewable forms of energy to supply their power needs.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Many countries are replacing their traditional sources of energy with renewable ones to meet their needs. Although there are some drawbacks of this switch, I hold that it is an overall positive trend.
Focusing on the negatives first, perhaps the main one would be huge expenses associated with alternative sources of energy. Governments need to invest a large proportion of their budget if they are to install wind turbines, solar panels and build dams to generate hydro power. For such developing countries as Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and even Russia, where the most basic social needs of education and healthcare are not as advanced as those of developed countries, spending large sums of money on renewable energy may seem unreasonable. Secondly, because renewable energy supplies are relatively new domains of knowledge, where will these countries find expertise to help implement this change? The key to solving this is again leading us to finance, which developing countries tend to lack.
In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I would argue that this is a positive development for various reasons. For one, with our current fossil fuel consumption rates, we are not going far. Sooner or later, the riches of the earth will run out, leaving us no chance but to resort to alternative sources of power, so if it is certain that we turn to them, there is no point procrastinating to do so. In addition to this, it is true that the environment is suffering significantly from burning fossil fuels like coal, gas and petrol. Shifting to renewable types of power is to provide our future generations with cleaner air to breath, purer water to drink, avoiding illnesses associated with pollution from using traditional sources of power, and saving wildlife as we have seen oil spills and their concomitant consequences.
While changing our sources of power to renewable ones might seem as an insurmountable challenge financially, I maintain that we gain more than we lose from this development for personal and environmental reasons.
#task2
Expert feedback:
Wow... this was really nice... you are in the high side of 7, potentially even 8 with this. There are a few little changes I would make to some of the wording, but the changes would only be minor. Well done. Really nice. I'd personally give it a bunch of 8s.
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
Many countries around the world are turning to renewable forms of energy to supply their power needs.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Many countries are replacing their traditional sources of energy with renewable ones to meet their needs. Although there are some drawbacks of this switch, I hold that it is an overall positive trend.
Focusing on the negatives first, perhaps the main one would be huge expenses associated with alternative sources of energy. Governments need to invest a large proportion of their budget if they are to install wind turbines, solar panels and build dams to generate hydro power. For such developing countries as Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and even Russia, where the most basic social needs of education and healthcare are not as advanced as those of developed countries, spending large sums of money on renewable energy may seem unreasonable. Secondly, because renewable energy supplies are relatively new domains of knowledge, where will these countries find expertise to help implement this change? The key to solving this is again leading us to finance, which developing countries tend to lack.
In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I would argue that this is a positive development for various reasons. For one, with our current fossil fuel consumption rates, we are not going far. Sooner or later, the riches of the earth will run out, leaving us no chance but to resort to alternative sources of power, so if it is certain that we turn to them, there is no point procrastinating to do so. In addition to this, it is true that the environment is suffering significantly from burning fossil fuels like coal, gas and petrol. Shifting to renewable types of power is to provide our future generations with cleaner air to breath, purer water to drink, avoiding illnesses associated with pollution from using traditional sources of power, and saving wildlife as we have seen oil spills and their concomitant consequences.
While changing our sources of power to renewable ones might seem as an insurmountable challenge financially, I maintain that we gain more than we lose from this development for personal and environmental reasons.
#task2
Expert feedback:
Wow... this was really nice... you are in the high side of 7, potentially even 8 with this. There are a few little changes I would make to some of the wording, but the changes would only be minor. Well done. Really nice. I'd personally give it a bunch of 8s.
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
👍6😍2🥰1
Gruesome image!
To help you understand how gruesome it is, imagine being stuck with #Dovud in a room and watching an entire season of FRIENDS together. Other than the tasteless jokes of the show, you would have to put up with his unapologetic manner of untiringly correcting you.
I am just kidding, Dovud. You know we all love you.
To help you understand how gruesome it is, imagine being stuck with #Dovud in a room and watching an entire season of FRIENDS together. Other than the tasteless jokes of the show, you would have to put up with his unapologetic manner of untiringly correcting you.
I am just kidding, Dovud. You know we all love you.
❤2😁1
In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It has become common to see people use e-books instead of traditional paper books. Although there are some drawbacks to this, I believe that the benefits of electronic books are more significant.
To begin with, it should be noted that e-readers come with certain downsides. When reading a book on a device, readers may not be able to interact with the book the way they would if read a paper copy of it; e-books fail to facilitate real book reading experience like flipping through the pages, bending some corners to help pick up from where they left. Another problem is the high possibility of being distracted, which is often the case with children who are easily drawn to pop-ups that appear on their devices. In addition to this, because one can easily switch from one app to another when using an e-reader, they would be more inclined to do some other activities such as playing mobile games.
Despite these drawbacks, I still believe that people can benefit from e-books in a number of ways. One feature that makes e-readers appealing to most people is the comforts they provide. They are portable in nature and take up as little as few megabytes as opposed to paper books that sometimes require bags to carry them. The idea of using an e-reader also has to do with the fact that no paper is used in its production, so people concerned about the environment would be more likely to choose them over traditional books. Finally, e-books allow users to make the most of them as they have in-built functions like highlighting, underlining, and taking screenshots.
In conclusion, regardless of the negative aspects of utilizing electronic books, I find them to be more advantageous for the reasons given above.
#task2
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It has become common to see people use e-books instead of traditional paper books. Although there are some drawbacks to this, I believe that the benefits of electronic books are more significant.
To begin with, it should be noted that e-readers come with certain downsides. When reading a book on a device, readers may not be able to interact with the book the way they would if read a paper copy of it; e-books fail to facilitate real book reading experience like flipping through the pages, bending some corners to help pick up from where they left. Another problem is the high possibility of being distracted, which is often the case with children who are easily drawn to pop-ups that appear on their devices. In addition to this, because one can easily switch from one app to another when using an e-reader, they would be more inclined to do some other activities such as playing mobile games.
Despite these drawbacks, I still believe that people can benefit from e-books in a number of ways. One feature that makes e-readers appealing to most people is the comforts they provide. They are portable in nature and take up as little as few megabytes as opposed to paper books that sometimes require bags to carry them. The idea of using an e-reader also has to do with the fact that no paper is used in its production, so people concerned about the environment would be more likely to choose them over traditional books. Finally, e-books allow users to make the most of them as they have in-built functions like highlighting, underlining, and taking screenshots.
In conclusion, regardless of the negative aspects of utilizing electronic books, I find them to be more advantageous for the reasons given above.
#task2
👍7👏2🔥1
Yet another 7.0. I am grateful)
Sarvinoz had a solid foundation of English, but it didn’t stop her to work even harder. Congratulations on your amazing achievement👏🏻.
Don’t forget to thank your prior teachers too. Good luck 🍀. May Allah (SWT) bless you!
#results #2021
⚡ @alisherposts ⚡
Sarvinoz had a solid foundation of English, but it didn’t stop her to work even harder. Congratulations on your amazing achievement👏🏻.
Don’t forget to thank your prior teachers too. Good luck 🍀. May Allah (SWT) bless you!
#results #2021
⚡ @alisherposts ⚡
👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
An answer to the IELTS speaking questions: Do you like birds?, Do you like trees? How often do you look at the sky?
Early morning at 04:17.
⚡ @alisherposts ⚡
Early morning at 04:17.
⚡ @alisherposts ⚡
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that artists should be given financial help by the government while others may not share the same idea. To my mind, given the difficulty and importance of their work, artists deserve extra support from the government in addition to the money they make individually.
On the one hand, artists can make a living on their own by selling their art pieces. Today, there are quite a few ways artists can use to advertise their art products and find patrons who might be interested in buying them. The Internet is one of those places where visual artists as well as musicians have access to platforms that allow them to find prospective buyers, negotiate a price and sell their art there. A musician, for instance, is able to make a profit off their songs by uploading them onto a platform called Spotify. Although they have to agree to the terms and conditions of the platform and share in the profits, they are often left with more money than they would make otherwise.
On the other hand, in my view, there are two key reasons why government should be willing to support artists financially. The first reason lies in the idea that the artists of a country have the power to make its standing stronger in the global arena by promoting the culture and lifestyle of this region. The USA is a good example of a country where much priority is given to many forms of art such as dancing, singing, and acting, hence the country’s culture and lifestyle are spreading across the world faster than those of other countries where arts receive little attention. The second reason has to do with how supporting artists is good for the nurturing of a sense of art in people. Giving artists grants and some other privileges would show people that art is as important as other areas and that artistic qualities should be sought after for personal fulfillment. In my country, Uzbekistan, the government encourages young people to be more involved in art contests by offering large sums of money or free access to higher education as a reward in an attempt to cultivate appreciation for art in them.
In conclusion, I am in favor of financial support from the government to artists as they do much to contribute to their country’s prominence and help develop a taste for art in people.
#task2
It is believed that artists should be given financial help by the government while others may not share the same idea. To my mind, given the difficulty and importance of their work, artists deserve extra support from the government in addition to the money they make individually.
On the one hand, artists can make a living on their own by selling their art pieces. Today, there are quite a few ways artists can use to advertise their art products and find patrons who might be interested in buying them. The Internet is one of those places where visual artists as well as musicians have access to platforms that allow them to find prospective buyers, negotiate a price and sell their art there. A musician, for instance, is able to make a profit off their songs by uploading them onto a platform called Spotify. Although they have to agree to the terms and conditions of the platform and share in the profits, they are often left with more money than they would make otherwise.
On the other hand, in my view, there are two key reasons why government should be willing to support artists financially. The first reason lies in the idea that the artists of a country have the power to make its standing stronger in the global arena by promoting the culture and lifestyle of this region. The USA is a good example of a country where much priority is given to many forms of art such as dancing, singing, and acting, hence the country’s culture and lifestyle are spreading across the world faster than those of other countries where arts receive little attention. The second reason has to do with how supporting artists is good for the nurturing of a sense of art in people. Giving artists grants and some other privileges would show people that art is as important as other areas and that artistic qualities should be sought after for personal fulfillment. In my country, Uzbekistan, the government encourages young people to be more involved in art contests by offering large sums of money or free access to higher education as a reward in an attempt to cultivate appreciation for art in them.
In conclusion, I am in favor of financial support from the government to artists as they do much to contribute to their country’s prominence and help develop a taste for art in people.
#task2
👍3⚡1
Intelligence is the most important quality for a leader.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
⚡️@alisherposts ⚡️
⚡1
The answer to the question shared above is True.
Although I do not find this answer to be entirely right, I am still gonna try to look at the situation from the author's perspective. Obviously, the first sentence here is a sort of a hook, a statement one writes at the start of their writing to pique the reader's curiosity. From the way the author poses his question we can easily tell that he doesn't need our answer, and that he has set out to find an answer to this question himself by examining the current trends related to academic cheating in the proceeding paragraphs. Once we read the second paragraph and the example given there, we might start to get the impression that some students do "fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one".
But it is little hasty to make that conclusion yet. If you take your time to read the whole passage (which has been shared by a thoughtful subscriber on the discussion chat), you can see that towards the end of it, at the last sentence of the last paragraph, Dr. Allan envisages that one day people all around the world might be needing a computer to tell an original idea from an unoriginal one, which is to say that it hasn't yet happened. The statement in the question, on the other hand, says that students are already unable to do it.
Another problem here is the phrasing of the question which makes it seem like a fact rather than a statement. To help you understand what I am trying to say, look at the following four sentences and tell me in the comments section which one of these would serve as a good statement for the question to accept "True" as an answer.
V1:"Students fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
V2:"Some students fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
V3:"Students today fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
V4:"Students will be unable to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
Although I do not find this answer to be entirely right, I am still gonna try to look at the situation from the author's perspective. Obviously, the first sentence here is a sort of a hook, a statement one writes at the start of their writing to pique the reader's curiosity. From the way the author poses his question we can easily tell that he doesn't need our answer, and that he has set out to find an answer to this question himself by examining the current trends related to academic cheating in the proceeding paragraphs. Once we read the second paragraph and the example given there, we might start to get the impression that some students do "fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one".
But it is little hasty to make that conclusion yet. If you take your time to read the whole passage (which has been shared by a thoughtful subscriber on the discussion chat), you can see that towards the end of it, at the last sentence of the last paragraph, Dr. Allan envisages that one day people all around the world might be needing a computer to tell an original idea from an unoriginal one, which is to say that it hasn't yet happened. The statement in the question, on the other hand, says that students are already unable to do it.
Another problem here is the phrasing of the question which makes it seem like a fact rather than a statement. To help you understand what I am trying to say, look at the following four sentences and tell me in the comments section which one of these would serve as a good statement for the question to accept "True" as an answer.
V1:"Students fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
V2:"Some students fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
V3:"Students today fail to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
V4:"Students will be unable to differentiate between an original idea and a borrowed one"
👍2