Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
#reading
The Cranfield study concentrated on the environmental effects of transporting cut flowers.
Anonymous Quiz
31%
T
33%
F
36%
NG
π113πΏ28π16β‘14π13π10β€βπ₯4π4π€―3π3π«‘2
The bar chart provides information on the quantity of films shot in five different countries over three consecutive years: 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Three out of the five countries witnessed an increase in their film production. The number of films produced by country B stood at 50 in the initial year. After a negligible rise in the following year, this figure climbed markedly to finish at 70. However, a lot fewer films were shot in countries C and E in 2007, at about 8-9 each. Over the next two years, while the former's film production output slightly more than doubled, the latter's changed minimally by only around 3 units.
By contrast, countries A and D saw their film releases fall. Staying stable during the first two years, the quantity for country A dropped by roughly 8 units to reach 80 in 2009. The other nation, meanwhile, showed a slightly different pattern of change: after a dip from 15 to just under 10 between 2007 and 2008, its figure slightly rose to approximately 13 in the final year.
In general, countries A and B released significantly more films compared with the other three nations. While the number of films produced by countries B, C and E showed an upward trend over the period, the reverse was true for countries A and D. It is also apparent that the most significant growth was observed in country B, but it was country A that had the highest figure in each year.
#task1 #bar #alisher_types #mock_writing #classwork #aGoodOne
P.S.: It was my exam question back on December 25, 2022.
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
Three out of the five countries witnessed an increase in their film production. The number of films produced by country B stood at 50 in the initial year. After a negligible rise in the following year, this figure climbed markedly to finish at 70. However, a lot fewer films were shot in countries C and E in 2007, at about 8-9 each. Over the next two years, while the former's film production output slightly more than doubled, the latter's changed minimally by only around 3 units.
By contrast, countries A and D saw their film releases fall. Staying stable during the first two years, the quantity for country A dropped by roughly 8 units to reach 80 in 2009. The other nation, meanwhile, showed a slightly different pattern of change: after a dip from 15 to just under 10 between 2007 and 2008, its figure slightly rose to approximately 13 in the final year.
In general, countries A and B released significantly more films compared with the other three nations. While the number of films produced by countries B, C and E showed an upward trend over the period, the reverse was true for countries A and D. It is also apparent that the most significant growth was observed in country B, but it was country A that had the highest figure in each year.
#task1 #bar #alisher_types #mock_writing #classwork #aGoodOne
P.S.: It was my exam question back on December 25, 2022.
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π104β€80β12β‘12π10π4π―3π3π¨βπ»3π³2π1
The line chart provides information on the number of international conferences organized in three different cities between 1965 and 2010.
In cities A and B, the number of international conferences witnessed a fall. The figure for the former declined sharply from 35 to 20 during the decade, before rising to 30 in 1985 and fluctuating to finish at 20. Meanwhile, city B's change wasn't as dramatic, and this city witnessed mild fluctuations and a decrease of around 10 conferences over the period to reach 20 in 2010.
By contrast, the other city showed the reversed pattern of change. After soaring from 0 in 1965 to around 27 in 1995, the number of conferences in city C dipped to just under 25 in 2005 and picked up again, amounting to slightly under 30 in 2010.
Overall, there were fluctuations in the quantities of all the three cities, but those of cities A and B declined over the period, whereas the figure for city C increased markedly. It is also apparent that city C showed the most significant change over the time frame to take the lead by the end, while initially dominant city (A) ended up organizing the least conferences.
#task1 #alisher_types #line #classwork #aGoodOne
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
In cities A and B, the number of international conferences witnessed a fall. The figure for the former declined sharply from 35 to 20 during the decade, before rising to 30 in 1985 and fluctuating to finish at 20. Meanwhile, city B's change wasn't as dramatic, and this city witnessed mild fluctuations and a decrease of around 10 conferences over the period to reach 20 in 2010.
By contrast, the other city showed the reversed pattern of change. After soaring from 0 in 1965 to around 27 in 1995, the number of conferences in city C dipped to just under 25 in 2005 and picked up again, amounting to slightly under 30 in 2010.
Overall, there were fluctuations in the quantities of all the three cities, but those of cities A and B declined over the period, whereas the figure for city C increased markedly. It is also apparent that city C showed the most significant change over the time frame to take the lead by the end, while initially dominant city (A) ended up organizing the least conferences.
#task1 #alisher_types #line #classwork #aGoodOne
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
β85π68β€11β€βπ₯5π₯5β‘4π³4π4π3π2π2
Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Some suggest the most effective way of solving rising traffic and pollution issues would be raising the price of petrol. I, however, do not share the same view as I believe issues around traffic and pollution can be addressed in more sensible ways.
In my view, an increase in petrol price may not be the answer to concerns over traffic and pollution. From an economic standpoint, a change in petrol price is offset by todayβs improving living standards. People generally make a better living today than in the past due to the booming world economy, so they would for the most part not be affected by expensive gas prices. There is also social component to consider. Not only is car ownership seen as a means of travelling, but also as an indication of individualβs social ranking. Seeing as people tend to attach considerable social significance to their personal vehicle, attempts to discourage them to minimize their car use through increased fuel prices are likely to fail.
Since higher petrol prices are not the most optimal solution, it is important to consider some alternative methods of tackling traffic problem and its impact on air quality. One such measure would be car-pooling. This so-called car sharing scheme can slash traffic volume and the release of pollutants into the air as car use efficiency could be maximized. To put it into perspective, rather than have every traveler travel alone, multiple commuters could be transported in one vehicle. What makes this idea more appealing than public transport is access to relatively more space and conveniences such as air-conditioning. Additionally, government should make cars less affordable through rigorous taxes and tariffs. This added cost of purchasing a personal vehicle would discourage car ownership in the first place, hence curbing/curtailing traffic and pollution levels.
In conclusion, improved living standards and social aspect of owning a car are why increasing the price of fuel may not the best solution to traffic and pollution problems. Instead, people should be encouraged to share their personal vehicle through car-pooling systems or discouraged to own a car by imposing levies on cars.
#task2
350 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Some suggest the most effective way of solving rising traffic and pollution issues would be raising the price of petrol. I, however, do not share the same view as I believe issues around traffic and pollution can be addressed in more sensible ways.
In my view, an increase in petrol price may not be the answer to concerns over traffic and pollution. From an economic standpoint, a change in petrol price is offset by todayβs improving living standards. People generally make a better living today than in the past due to the booming world economy, so they would for the most part not be affected by expensive gas prices. There is also social component to consider. Not only is car ownership seen as a means of travelling, but also as an indication of individualβs social ranking. Seeing as people tend to attach considerable social significance to their personal vehicle, attempts to discourage them to minimize their car use through increased fuel prices are likely to fail.
Since higher petrol prices are not the most optimal solution, it is important to consider some alternative methods of tackling traffic problem and its impact on air quality. One such measure would be car-pooling. This so-called car sharing scheme can slash traffic volume and the release of pollutants into the air as car use efficiency could be maximized. To put it into perspective, rather than have every traveler travel alone, multiple commuters could be transported in one vehicle. What makes this idea more appealing than public transport is access to relatively more space and conveniences such as air-conditioning. Additionally, government should make cars less affordable through rigorous taxes and tariffs. This added cost of purchasing a personal vehicle would discourage car ownership in the first place, hence curbing/curtailing traffic and pollution levels.
In conclusion, improved living standards and social aspect of owning a car are why increasing the price of fuel may not the best solution to traffic and pollution problems. Instead, people should be encouraged to share their personal vehicle through car-pooling systems or discouraged to own a car by imposing levies on cars.
#task2
350 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π164β‘24β€22π₯10β6π5β€βπ₯3π2π³2π1π€1
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
#reading
π106π19π’13β€12β‘8π8π4π³3π3π―3π2
The bar chart provides information about the number of albums that artists were able to sell in the US in the year 2020. Meanwhile, the table presents the total streams from various platforms recorded for BTS top hits in March of the same year.
Overall, BTS was seen to have the greatest number of album sales in the US in 2020, while Lil Nas X had the lowest sales figure among the seven artists in the report. It is also clear that BTS top hits were mostly streamed on YouTube and played the least on Apple Music.
In detail, with 573,000 album sales, BTS was on top of the US charts, followed by Billie Eilish and Jonas Brothers, selling more than 400,000 albums each. It can also be noted that Ariana Grande was able to record a total of 297,000 album sales, almost three times as much as that of Taylor Swift. The artists with the lowest documented figures were 21 Savage and Lil Nas X at 17,000 and 7,000, respectively.
In terms of the number of streams for BTS top hits in various platforms, YouTube was observed to have the greatest number at 2.36 billion in March 2020. Spotify was also able to register a moderately high figure of 960 million, less than half that for YouTube, whereas QQ and Apple Music had significantly lower numbers, with the total streams not exceeding 80 million.
WORD COUNT: 234.
Written by Brian Martin.
Do you guys think that this report deserves a band 9.0?
Overall, BTS was seen to have the greatest number of album sales in the US in 2020, while Lil Nas X had the lowest sales figure among the seven artists in the report. It is also clear that BTS top hits were mostly streamed on YouTube and played the least on Apple Music.
In detail, with 573,000 album sales, BTS was on top of the US charts, followed by Billie Eilish and Jonas Brothers, selling more than 400,000 albums each. It can also be noted that Ariana Grande was able to record a total of 297,000 album sales, almost three times as much as that of Taylor Swift. The artists with the lowest documented figures were 21 Savage and Lil Nas X at 17,000 and 7,000, respectively.
In terms of the number of streams for BTS top hits in various platforms, YouTube was observed to have the greatest number at 2.36 billion in March 2020. Spotify was also able to register a moderately high figure of 960 million, less than half that for YouTube, whereas QQ and Apple Music had significantly lower numbers, with the total streams not exceeding 80 million.
WORD COUNT: 234.
Written by Brian Martin.
Do you guys think that this report deserves a band 9.0?
β158π113β‘22β€18πΏ14π₯9π₯°5π―5π5π³4π2
ββNeed help with exam registrationββ
No worries. We got your backπͺ
Contact us at @ieltsregister to sign up for your IELTS exam (IDP/BC) with few clicks.
Here's what to expect:
β Free & hassle-free exam registration help service
β Reliable: you will make the payment at your bank π¦ or online directly to the test centerπ«
β Get to have a FREE 10-minute counseling session (a video/audio call) with a double NINERπ€―π€―
β Confidential: No disclosure of personal and confidential information
βΌοΈONLY CONFIRMED registrations will be eligible for an interviewβΌοΈ
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
No worries. We got your backπͺ
Contact us at @ieltsregister to sign up for your IELTS exam (IDP/BC) with few clicks.
Here's what to expect:
β Free & hassle-free exam registration help service
β Reliable: you will make the payment at your bank π¦ or online directly to the test centerπ«
β Get to have a FREE 10-minute counseling session (a video/audio call) with a double NINERπ€―π€―
β Confidential: No disclosure of personal and confidential information
βΌοΈONLY CONFIRMED registrations will be eligible for an interviewβΌοΈ
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π203π₯28π€10π10β€8β‘8πΏ8π―7π6π€―4π³3
Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want.
Is this a good way to raise children?
What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?
It is true that some parents are quick to please their children and allow them leeway in their behavior. I personally consider this parental approach to be unwise, as it can have some negative implications for a childβs future.
The parenting style in question should generally be avoided for two reasons. The most evident problem with having no restrictions as a child is the possibility of a childβs being spoiled. Children whose wishes are granted unconditionally often become pampered and develop an inflated sense of superiority. This, in turn, makes them ungrateful and fussy children. Additionally, allowing children excessive autonomy in their conduct creates chances for developing bad habits. When unsupervised and unguided, children may be exposed to bad influences on the Internet such as explicit and violent content. They are also at risk of being involved with school bullies and gangs. In no way can a parenting style be justified if it does not involve any amount of supervision.
Having explored some problems with this so-called βfreeβ parenting style, it is important to discuss how it can impact a childβs future. First of all, children who receive excessive attention and enjoy complete freedom are likely to have difficulties as adults. This is because when children are constantly appeased by their parents and never questioned, they develop a frivolous attitude. Care-free children, in turn, dismiss their future studies and job, without which they will experience financial hardships when they are legally independent. More concerning is the possibility of a child growing to become an anti-social individual. Because some parents do not hold their children accountable and make them abide by rules and societal norms, children become ill-behaved. In some extreme cases, poor supervision reinforces criminal behavior in children, which makes them would-be offenders.
In conclusion, parental approach involving excessive pleasing and no supervision is undesirable seeing as it sets children up for failure as an adult and makes them prone to immoral behavior.
#task2
323 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
Is this a good way to raise children?
What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?
It is true that some parents are quick to please their children and allow them leeway in their behavior. I personally consider this parental approach to be unwise, as it can have some negative implications for a childβs future.
The parenting style in question should generally be avoided for two reasons. The most evident problem with having no restrictions as a child is the possibility of a childβs being spoiled. Children whose wishes are granted unconditionally often become pampered and develop an inflated sense of superiority. This, in turn, makes them ungrateful and fussy children. Additionally, allowing children excessive autonomy in their conduct creates chances for developing bad habits. When unsupervised and unguided, children may be exposed to bad influences on the Internet such as explicit and violent content. They are also at risk of being involved with school bullies and gangs. In no way can a parenting style be justified if it does not involve any amount of supervision.
Having explored some problems with this so-called βfreeβ parenting style, it is important to discuss how it can impact a childβs future. First of all, children who receive excessive attention and enjoy complete freedom are likely to have difficulties as adults. This is because when children are constantly appeased by their parents and never questioned, they develop a frivolous attitude. Care-free children, in turn, dismiss their future studies and job, without which they will experience financial hardships when they are legally independent. More concerning is the possibility of a child growing to become an anti-social individual. Because some parents do not hold their children accountable and make them abide by rules and societal norms, children become ill-behaved. In some extreme cases, poor supervision reinforces criminal behavior in children, which makes them would-be offenders.
In conclusion, parental approach involving excessive pleasing and no supervision is undesirable seeing as it sets children up for failure as an adult and makes them prone to immoral behavior.
#task2
323 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π205π41π₯16β‘14π€―10π10π7β€βπ₯5π5β4π1
Some parents believe that a child should not waste time by reading entertainment books, instead, they should spend time reading educational books only.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some parents are of the view that books children read should be educational rather than entertaining as entertainment books can be a waste of time. Though educational books are superior to entertainment ones in many respects, I take issue with the idea that the latter waste childrenβs time.
Admittedly, educational books can be more beneficial to children than their entertainment counterparts. Knowledge-based books are crucial for better academic attainment. Having read books related to their school curriculum such as textbooks and encyclopedias, children can develop an extensive understanding of school subjects. As a result, they perform well in their school exams, which is essential for their future academic success. Furthermore, entertainment books such as comic books and fantasy novels lack relevance to the real world. This is because these books contain imaginary characters and events, which bear neither resemblance nor importance to those in the actual world. In this sense, entertainment genre offers no extrinsic value to children.
I, on the other hand, consider that entertainment books confer many advantages to young minds. Primarily, books in this genre help foster imagination in children. This is because when reading fantasy books, children are compelled to conjure up images in their mind and engage their imagination. Enhanced imagination, in turn, is critical for their overall mental development. More than just improving their imagination, reading non-educational books provide a much-needed break for children. Academic subjects at schools can be mentally taxing and monotonous, so books outside the school curriculum would serve as an escape from the challenge and monotony of school. This is important for balanced and efficient learning experience at school.
In conclusion, while I partly agree with parents who prefer educational books over entertaining ones for their children, I do not consider the latter to be useless as entertainment books boost childrenβs imagination and serve a crucial recreational purpose.
#task2
308 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostβ‘οΈ
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some parents are of the view that books children read should be educational rather than entertaining as entertainment books can be a waste of time. Though educational books are superior to entertainment ones in many respects, I take issue with the idea that the latter waste childrenβs time.
Admittedly, educational books can be more beneficial to children than their entertainment counterparts. Knowledge-based books are crucial for better academic attainment. Having read books related to their school curriculum such as textbooks and encyclopedias, children can develop an extensive understanding of school subjects. As a result, they perform well in their school exams, which is essential for their future academic success. Furthermore, entertainment books such as comic books and fantasy novels lack relevance to the real world. This is because these books contain imaginary characters and events, which bear neither resemblance nor importance to those in the actual world. In this sense, entertainment genre offers no extrinsic value to children.
I, on the other hand, consider that entertainment books confer many advantages to young minds. Primarily, books in this genre help foster imagination in children. This is because when reading fantasy books, children are compelled to conjure up images in their mind and engage their imagination. Enhanced imagination, in turn, is critical for their overall mental development. More than just improving their imagination, reading non-educational books provide a much-needed break for children. Academic subjects at schools can be mentally taxing and monotonous, so books outside the school curriculum would serve as an escape from the challenge and monotony of school. This is important for balanced and efficient learning experience at school.
In conclusion, while I partly agree with parents who prefer educational books over entertaining ones for their children, I do not consider the latter to be useless as entertainment books boost childrenβs imagination and serve a crucial recreational purpose.
#task2
308 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostβ‘οΈ
π222π₯36β€23π12β‘9π9β€βπ₯7π³7β6π―4π2
Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing.
Why do you think it is happening?
How can this problem be solved?
Using public transport is becoming increasingly more expensive these days. While there are some reasons that can explain why this is the case, a number of effective measures can be taken to mitigate this problem.
The causes of a rise in public transport fees are varied. First, the majority of vehicles utilized in the public transport sector still run on petrol that is prohibitively expensive in many countries. This trend is compounded by political instability in some parts of the world, which makes the import-export of fuel difficult, bringing about fuel deficiencies and cost increases. Aside from this, the public transport industry has to cover their running expenses, such as employee wages, road maintenance, and research and development. All these costs require heavy investment and translate into a rise in public transport fares.
To remedy the problem of escalating public transport fares, governments and policymakers can take several steps. The former, first of all, can reconsider their support of public transport sector. They, for instance, can cancel taxes imposed on the imports of petrol from overseas. This should minimize the cost of fuel for buses and trains, thereby allowing a reduction in transport fees. Additionally, politicians can make a difference by enacting laws that promote the introduction and use of green public vehicles, such as electric trains and buses. While the costs of purchase can be extremely expensive, this is a far-sighted approach and all the expenses will be paid off in a short amount of time given their cheap operation costs.
In conclusion, the principal causes of increasing costs of public transport are expensive fuel and running costs. Nevertheless, several solutions, such as government-supported fuel imports and the incorporation of electric vehicles, can tackle the issue.
#task2 #alisher_types #classwork #mixed_type
#oneofmybests
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
Why do you think it is happening?
How can this problem be solved?
Using public transport is becoming increasingly more expensive these days. While there are some reasons that can explain why this is the case, a number of effective measures can be taken to mitigate this problem.
The causes of a rise in public transport fees are varied. First, the majority of vehicles utilized in the public transport sector still run on petrol that is prohibitively expensive in many countries. This trend is compounded by political instability in some parts of the world, which makes the import-export of fuel difficult, bringing about fuel deficiencies and cost increases. Aside from this, the public transport industry has to cover their running expenses, such as employee wages, road maintenance, and research and development. All these costs require heavy investment and translate into a rise in public transport fares.
To remedy the problem of escalating public transport fares, governments and policymakers can take several steps. The former, first of all, can reconsider their support of public transport sector. They, for instance, can cancel taxes imposed on the imports of petrol from overseas. This should minimize the cost of fuel for buses and trains, thereby allowing a reduction in transport fees. Additionally, politicians can make a difference by enacting laws that promote the introduction and use of green public vehicles, such as electric trains and buses. While the costs of purchase can be extremely expensive, this is a far-sighted approach and all the expenses will be paid off in a short amount of time given their cheap operation costs.
In conclusion, the principal causes of increasing costs of public transport are expensive fuel and running costs. Nevertheless, several solutions, such as government-supported fuel imports and the incorporation of electric vehicles, can tackle the issue.
#task2 #alisher_types #classwork #mixed_type
#oneofmybests
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π103π84β€18π18β‘9β8π4π³3β€βπ₯2π2π1
The line graph describes how much electricity was produced from four energy sources in France from 1980 to 2012. Units are measured in terawatt hours.
Overall, electricity generation from nuclear energy grew substantially, making it the primary energy source for the better part of the period. Similarly, the amount of electricity produced from clean energy increased, albeit to a smaller extent. In contrast, thermal and hydroelectric power figures dropped noticeably.
Focusing on increases, in 1980, the production of electricity from nuclear power stood at roughly 70 TW-h. It grew considerably over the next 25 years, reaching a peak of about 425 TW-h in 2005. From 2005 to 2011, the amount of electricity from nuclear energy fluctuated between about 420 and just under 400 TW-h before stabilizing at around 405 TW-h in 2012. Another energy source which grew in use for electricity production was renewables. Virtually no electricity was produced from renewable energy sources until 1996. Following that year, a small amount of electricity was generated from clean energy, and it grew gradually to 25 TW-h in 2012.
As for the remaining sources of electricity, initially ranking first, thermal energy made up 120 TW-h of electricity produced in France. This figure, however, had declined to a low of nearly 45 TW-h by 1988. Following that, it oscillated between 30 and 55 TW-h until 2011, after which it levelled off at just under 50 TW-h in the final year. The amount of electricity from hydroelectric power generally fell, going from approximately 70 TW-h in 1980 to just over 50 TW-h in 2012 after decades of instability.
#task1
263 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
Overall, electricity generation from nuclear energy grew substantially, making it the primary energy source for the better part of the period. Similarly, the amount of electricity produced from clean energy increased, albeit to a smaller extent. In contrast, thermal and hydroelectric power figures dropped noticeably.
Focusing on increases, in 1980, the production of electricity from nuclear power stood at roughly 70 TW-h. It grew considerably over the next 25 years, reaching a peak of about 425 TW-h in 2005. From 2005 to 2011, the amount of electricity from nuclear energy fluctuated between about 420 and just under 400 TW-h before stabilizing at around 405 TW-h in 2012. Another energy source which grew in use for electricity production was renewables. Virtually no electricity was produced from renewable energy sources until 1996. Following that year, a small amount of electricity was generated from clean energy, and it grew gradually to 25 TW-h in 2012.
As for the remaining sources of electricity, initially ranking first, thermal energy made up 120 TW-h of electricity produced in France. This figure, however, had declined to a low of nearly 45 TW-h by 1988. Following that, it oscillated between 30 and 55 TW-h until 2011, after which it levelled off at just under 50 TW-h in the final year. The amount of electricity from hydroelectric power generally fell, going from approximately 70 TW-h in 1980 to just over 50 TW-h in 2012 after decades of instability.
#task1
263 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π135β€21β‘15β12π€©8π8π₯4π€2π€2π1π«‘1
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
We don't normally recommend other channels unless they got a big audience and more importantly, useful content. But we decided to make an exception to this rule and recommend a channel - a small, yet insightful one. Parviz, who is a former student of oursβ¦
Yet another impressive achievement by Mr. Parviz, a former student and a proud member of Ad Astra team.
Having secured IELTS band 8.5 at the age of 16, he wasted no time diving into the SAT world. And he proved once again his excellence in English as well as Math with this insane result. (Not gonna lie, I envy this guy a little)
Parviz is big on educational and personal growth. And he wishes to keep learning and sharing what he's learnt with other like-minded people. So, he's gonna be launching his SAT program soon.
Yeah, you heard it right.
β‘οΈSAT program is now available at Ad Astraβ‘οΈ
Stay tuned for his admission post
Follow Parviz at https://t.me/ielts_and_beyond
#SAT_adastra
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
β¨@ad_astra_school β¨
Having secured IELTS band 8.5 at the age of 16, he wasted no time diving into the SAT world. And he proved once again his excellence in English as well as Math with this insane result. (Not gonna lie, I envy this guy a little)
Parviz is big on educational and personal growth. And he wishes to keep learning and sharing what he's learnt with other like-minded people. So, he's gonna be launching his SAT program soon.
Yeah, you heard it right.
β‘οΈSAT program is now available at Ad Astraβ‘οΈ
Stay tuned for his admission post
Follow Parviz at https://t.me/ielts_and_beyond
#SAT_adastra
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
β¨@ad_astra_school β¨
π201π86β‘24π₯20β€17π11π8β€βπ₯4π4π2π2
Forwarded from Ad Astra School (Mukhammadali)
Got a surprise visit by our former summer admission students today. Can't believe it's already been a year. We did some catching up, talked about good old days, shared personal visions for the future and finally, posed for this little photo.
Just wanted to thank these guys for brightening up our boring weekend. It was real bliss to have you.
Once an Ad Astrian, forever an Ad Astrianβ€οΈβ€οΈ
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
β¨@ad_astra_school β¨
Just wanted to thank these guys for brightening up our boring weekend. It was real bliss to have you.
Once an Ad Astrian, forever an Ad Astrianβ€οΈβ€οΈ
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
β¨@ad_astra_school β¨
β€216π79β€βπ₯22β‘17π11π₯8π3π2π2π€£1π1
Forwarded from Ad Astra School (Mukhammadali)
SAT program is now available at Ad Astra Schoolπ₯³π₯³
Admission test date: June 21, Wednesday
Program launch date: June 26, Monday
Our admission will be in TWO stages:
Stage I - A Math test (25 out of 38 β a passing score)
Stage II - A 5-10-minute-long freestyle interview (we'll shortlist students based on their test results)
βΌοΈKeep in mind that you will have to bring your IELTS certificate on the Admission test dayβΌοΈ
What to expect from the program:
πa 3-4-month-long comprehensive program featuring pre-SAT and SAT classes
πmedium-sized groups (about 10-12 students)
π6 classes a week, each lasting about 2 hours
πa free mock test(English&Math) session every week
πall classes are taught by Parviz SAT 1560 (English 770/800, Math 790/800) + IELTS Band 8.5
πa 15-minute-long private consultation every week
π free textbooks
The tuition fee is 800,000 soums/month
(advance payment)
Class timing: 12:00-14:00
πAdmission Registration Linkπ
https://forms.gle/jREK8Rh2isMoSu4MA
Admission test date: June 21, Wednesday
Program launch date: June 26, Monday
Our admission will be in TWO stages:
Stage I - A Math test (25 out of 38 β a passing score)
Stage II - A 5-10-minute-long freestyle interview (we'll shortlist students based on their test results)
βΌοΈKeep in mind that you will have to bring your IELTS certificate on the Admission test dayβΌοΈ
What to expect from the program:
πa 3-4-month-long comprehensive program featuring pre-SAT and SAT classes
πmedium-sized groups (about 10-12 students)
π6 classes a week, each lasting about 2 hours
πa free mock test(English&Math) session every week
πall classes are taught by Parviz SAT 1560 (English 770/800, Math 790/800) + IELTS Band 8.5
πa 15-minute-long private consultation every week
π free textbooks
The tuition fee is 800,000 soums/month
(advance payment)
Class timing: 12:00-14:00
πAdmission Registration Linkπ
https://forms.gle/jREK8Rh2isMoSu4MA
π192β€20β‘12π11β€βπ₯9π8π5π4π3π₯3π€3
Alisher&Mukhammadali posts
The flow chart illustrates the production of sugar. A total of 7 distinct stages are involved in the process, ranging from growing sugar canes to drying and cooling. To manufacture sugar, a range of specialized equipment and human labor are required. Atβ¦
The diagram provides information about the production process of sugar from sugar canes.
The initial stages of sugar production happen on the field. First of all, sugar canes are planted, and after about 12-18 months they ripen. At the following stage, the grown sugar canes are harvested, and this can be done in 2 ways: mechanically and manually. In the former, two pieces of machinery - a combine harvester and a tractor with a trailer - are employed simultaneously to harvest the yield, whereas in the latter, plantation laborers harvest sugar canes with the help of sickles.
The remaining phases of the process involve treating sugar canes and obtaining sugar. Having been harvested, sugar canes go through a device called crusher with a couple of wheels on the sides and an opening on the top. This device converts sugar canes into juice, which is collected in a round container next to the machine. The juice is then purified with a funnel-like limestone filter, before being put into an evaporator. In there, the liquid is heated and condensed to obtain syrup. Subsequently, the substance is transferred to a centrifuge that rotates in a counter-clockwise direction and makes sugar crystals, which are then dried and cooled in a barrel in the ultimate stage.
Overall, this process takes place in two locations, commencing with growing sugar canes and culminating with drying and cooling the end-product: sugar. It is also apparent that there are a total of seven stages involved in this linear process that require the use of specialized pieces of machinery and some external influence.
#task1 #alisher_types #process #aGoodOne
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
The initial stages of sugar production happen on the field. First of all, sugar canes are planted, and after about 12-18 months they ripen. At the following stage, the grown sugar canes are harvested, and this can be done in 2 ways: mechanically and manually. In the former, two pieces of machinery - a combine harvester and a tractor with a trailer - are employed simultaneously to harvest the yield, whereas in the latter, plantation laborers harvest sugar canes with the help of sickles.
The remaining phases of the process involve treating sugar canes and obtaining sugar. Having been harvested, sugar canes go through a device called crusher with a couple of wheels on the sides and an opening on the top. This device converts sugar canes into juice, which is collected in a round container next to the machine. The juice is then purified with a funnel-like limestone filter, before being put into an evaporator. In there, the liquid is heated and condensed to obtain syrup. Subsequently, the substance is transferred to a centrifuge that rotates in a counter-clockwise direction and makes sugar crystals, which are then dried and cooled in a barrel in the ultimate stage.
Overall, this process takes place in two locations, commencing with growing sugar canes and culminating with drying and cooling the end-product: sugar. It is also apparent that there are a total of seven stages involved in this linear process that require the use of specialized pieces of machinery and some external influence.
#task1 #alisher_types #process #aGoodOne
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
π206π₯17π16β€15β‘8β€βπ₯7β5π5π4π³4π3
The line graph compares how unemployment rate among young people aged 15-24 changed over a 12-year period (2000-2012) in five European countries.
Overall, the rate of unemployment grew noticeably in all European countries with the exception of Germany. Of a particular note are Italy and Germany, where unemployment rates were highest and lowest respectively for the better part of the period.
In detail, youth unemployment underwent a drastic rise in Britain and Sweden. In 2000, the rate of unemployment stood at 10% in Britain, which had doubled by 2008. This figure grew to about 27% in 2009, but it had fallen to a quarter three years later. Similarly, Sweden also saw its youth unemployment rate climb. While initially the rate stood at just over a tenth, it had gone up twofold by the end of the period.
The figures for the other countries also changed, albeit to a varying degree. The proportion of unemployed youth was just under 30% in Italy in 2000, which dropped to a fifth in 2008. This was followed by an exponential rise, hitting an all-time high of nearly 36% in 2012. The unemployment rate among young people also went up in France, going from 20% in 2000 to 25% in 2012. Finally, despite some fluctuations, the rate of youth unemployment remained unchanged in Germany, at about 10%.
#task1
222 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
Overall, the rate of unemployment grew noticeably in all European countries with the exception of Germany. Of a particular note are Italy and Germany, where unemployment rates were highest and lowest respectively for the better part of the period.
In detail, youth unemployment underwent a drastic rise in Britain and Sweden. In 2000, the rate of unemployment stood at 10% in Britain, which had doubled by 2008. This figure grew to about 27% in 2009, but it had fallen to a quarter three years later. Similarly, Sweden also saw its youth unemployment rate climb. While initially the rate stood at just over a tenth, it had gone up twofold by the end of the period.
The figures for the other countries also changed, albeit to a varying degree. The proportion of unemployed youth was just under 30% in Italy in 2000, which dropped to a fifth in 2008. This was followed by an exponential rise, hitting an all-time high of nearly 36% in 2012. The unemployment rate among young people also went up in France, going from 20% in 2000 to 25% in 2012. Finally, despite some fluctuations, the rate of youth unemployment remained unchanged in Germany, at about 10%.
#task1
222 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues
β‘οΈ@alisherpostsβ‘οΈ
β‘119π98β€βπ₯14β9β€7π7π₯4π³4π₯°3π3π€2