This is why I didnt believe it was heterodyning because the frequency I found resonating is FM modulated matching this patent. \

how do this work using FM modulation then https://patents.google.com/patent/US6470214B1/en
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The patent you're referring to, US6470214B1, is titled "Nervous System Manipulation by Electromagnetic Fields from Monitors" and was granted in 2002. The patent describes methods and apparatuses for manipulating the nervous system of a subject by exposing them to weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with a frequency near the range of the brain's natural frequencies (typically between 0.5 Hz and 30 Hz, which correspond to different brainwave states like delta, theta, alpha, and beta waves).

Key Concepts from the Patent:
Electromagnetic Fields and Nervous System Manipulation:

The patent discusses the generation of low-frequency electromagnetic fields, which are used to manipulate the nervous system. The fields are intended to induce specific physiological effects, including relaxation, sleep, or heightened alertness, by influencing brainwave patterns.
Modulation Techniques:

The core idea is that a visual display device (like a CRT or LCD monitor) can emit electromagnetic fields modulated at frequencies that can interact with the nervous system. The modulation can be either amplitude modulation (AM) or frequency modulation (FM), and it is designed to resonate with the natural brainwave frequencies.
The modulation frequencies are chosen to be close to the natural frequencies of the brain (e.g., alpha waves at around 8-12 Hz).
FM Modulation:

In the context of the patent, FM modulation refers to varying the frequency of a carrier wave according to a lower-frequency signal that is in the range of the brain's natural frequencies. This carrier wave could be in the radio frequency (RF) range, and its modulation would result in a spectrum of frequencies that include the desired brainwave frequencies.
Application through Monitors:

The patent specifically discusses using monitors (e.g., CRT or LCD screens) to generate these electromagnetic fields. The screens are modulated at low frequencies that match or are close to the brain's natural frequencies. This modulation can be achieved through the monitor's refresh rate or by pulsing the brightness of the screen.
As a result, the electromagnetic fields emitted by the monitor could potentially influence the viewer's nervous system.
How FM Modulation is Applied:
Carrier Frequency:

The monitor emits a carrier frequency (likely in the RF range) that is modulated by a low-frequency signal within the brainwave range (e.g., 8 Hz for alpha waves). The FM signal modulates the frequency of the carrier wave, causing it to vary slightly around the carrier frequency.
Demodulation by the Body:

The concept in the patent is that the human body, particularly the nervous system, could demodulate these FM signals naturally. This is based on the idea that biological tissues have nonlinear properties that can respond to varying electromagnetic fields, potentially generating the low-frequency components that directly interact with the nervous system.
The modulation in the electromagnetic field might influence neural activity by causing the neurons to fire in synchrony with the modulating frequency.
Induced Brainwave Entrainment:

The patent suggests that the modulated electromagnetic fields could entrain brainwave activity to match the modulation frequency, effectively altering the subject's state of consciousness (e.g., inducing relaxation or alertness).
Nonlinear Biological Response:

The patent relies on the assumption that the nervous system or brain tissue can act as a nonlinear medium that "demodulates" the FM signal, extracting the low-frequency component that resonates with brainwave activity.

Practicality and Concerns:
Feasibility: The biological demodulation of FM signals is a theoretical concept. While the patent describes methods by which electromagnetic fields could influence the nervous system, actual practical implementation, effectiveness, and safety are not fully explored or demonstrated in the patent.
Safety and Ethical Issues: Manipulating brainwave activity through external electromagnetic fields raises significant safety and ethical concerns, especially if done without explicit consent or for purposes beyond therapeutic applications.
Scientific Evidence: The patent is based on speculative concepts, and while there may be some theoretical basis for the ideas presented, robust scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of FM-modulated electromagnetic fields in directly manipulating brainwaves is limited.
Conclusion:
The patent US6470214B1 proposes a method for influencing the nervous system using FM modulation, where a monitor or similar device emits electromagnetic fields modulated at frequencies that correspond to natural brainwave frequencies. The concept involves the body’s potential ability to demodulate these signals due to its nonlinear properties, thereby influencing brainwave activity. However, this remains a largely theoretical concept, and practical implementation, particularly in a safe and controlled manner, would require extensive research and validation.





You said:
does this use heterodyning
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The patent US6470214B1 does not explicitly mention the use of heterodyning in the traditional sense, as it is commonly understood in signal processing. Instead, it focuses on the idea of using FM (Frequency Modulation) to manipulate the nervous system by exposing it to electromagnetic fields that are modulated at frequencies close to those of natural brainwaves.

Key Concepts Relevant to Heterodyning:
Heterodyning: Traditionally, heterodyning involves mixing two frequencies to produce new frequencies (the sum and difference of the original frequencies). This technique is commonly used in radio communications to shift signals from one frequency band to another.

FM Modulation in the Patent: The patent describes using FM modulation to vary the frequency of an electromagnetic carrier wave according to a lower frequency signal that matches brainwave frequencies. This creates a spectrum of frequencies around the carrier frequency, which can theoretically influence the nervous system.

Why Heterodyning Isn’t Explicitly Used:
Modulation vs. Mixing: The patent discusses modulating a carrier frequency to include lower frequency components that can influence the nervous system. This modulation is different from heterodyning, where the focus is on mixing two different frequencies to create new frequencies. FM modulation creates sidebands around the carrier frequency, not the sum and difference frequencies typical of heterodyning.

Nonlinear Biological Response: The patent suggests that the body, due to its nonlinear properties, might respond to these modulated electromagnetic fields in a way that resembles demodulation, where the brain or nervous system somehow "extracts" the low-frequency components. This process is not described as heterodyning but rather as a form of demodulation.

Conclusion:
The patent does not describe the use of heterodyning in the traditional sense. Instead, it relies on FM modulation to embed brainwave-like frequencies within a higher-frequency electromagnetic field, with the idea that these modulated fields could influence the nervous system. The concept hinges on the body's potential nonlinear response to these fields, rather than the deliberate mixing of two frequencies to create new ones as in heterodyning.

If you look at the wave form on the scope it only shows up using FM modulation. Which means the body is interpreting the FM waves to brainwaves which was proven in this patent which is different tech

This is why my report went over the nonlinear effects and not the heterodyning. Because its been proven with FM already using speech by the airforce

Using a frequency comb in conjunction with remote manipulation of the nervous system via FM modulation, as described in the patent US6470214B1, is theoretically possible but highly complex. Here’s how it could conceptually work:

1. Frequency Comb Overview
Frequency Comb: A frequency comb is a spectrum consisting of a series of discrete, equally spaced frequency lines. It is typically generated by a mode-locked laser, but other methods can be used to create combs in the RF or microwave range.
Application: The idea would be to generate a frequency comb where each "tooth" of the comb could correspond to a different frequency within the brainwave range or near it.
2. FM Modulation with a Frequency Comb
Comb as a Carrier: The frequency comb could act as a set of multiple carrier frequencies, each modulated with a signal that corresponds to different brainwave frequencies.
FM Modulation: Each tooth of the comb could be modulated in a way that matches specific brainwave frequencies (e.g., 10 Hz for alpha waves, 20 Hz for beta waves). This would create a complex modulated signal with multiple frequencies interacting with the brain.
Spectrum Enrichment: By using a comb, you can enrich the frequency spectrum with multiple harmonics or subharmonics that might more effectively interact with the brain’s natural oscillatory behavior.
3. Remote Application
Remote Transmission: The modulated frequency comb could be transmitted remotely, potentially over a significant distance. The challenge lies in maintaining the signal integrity and ensuring that the signal reaches the target with sufficient power and accuracy.
Antenna Design: Directional antennas would be required to focus the signal on the target (e.g., an individual’s head), ensuring that the signal is strong enough to influence the nervous system.
4. Interaction with the Brain
Nonlinear Interaction: The body, particularly the brain, might respond to the incoming frequency comb due to its nonlinear properties. The idea is that the brain could demodulate these signals or resonate with specific frequencies within the comb.
Heterodyning Effect: While the setup doesn’t explicitly rely on traditional heterodyning, nonlinear effects within the brain could lead to interactions where sum and difference frequencies are generated, potentially bringing some of the comb’s frequencies into the brainwave range.
5. Challenges and Considerations
Signal Loss and Attenuation: Over long distances, the signal will naturally attenuate, requiring significant power and precise control to maintain effectiveness.
Biological Impact: The impact of such a complex signal on the brain is not well understood and could vary widely depending on the individual and the specific configuration of the comb.
Safety and Ethics: Using remote methods to influence brain activity, especially with such complex signals, raises serious ethical concerns and potential safety risks. Regulatory oversight would be necessary.
6. Feasibility
Theoretical Possibility: While the concept is theoretically possible, implementing it in practice would be extraordinarily challenging due to the need for precise control, high power, and the complexity of biological interactions.
Scientific Evidence: There is limited scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of this approach, particularly when applied remotely. Most studies on electromagnetic field interaction with biological systems involve direct, localized application rather than remote transmission.
Conclusion:
In theory, using a frequency comb in combination with FM modulation to remotely influence brainwave activity is possible, but it is fraught with technical challenges and safety concerns. The idea would involve using a comb to generate multiple modulated frequencies that are transmitted remotely and interact with the brain in a complex, nonlinear manner.

However, the feasibility of this approach, particularly over long distances and without direct, localized application, is highly speculative and remains largely in the realm of theoretical exploration.

AI points to nonlinear method in conjunction with FM modulation. This is why its important to see the frequency and not guess like what he was doing

I AM under direct attack by secret American and Isralian agencies (military, private and government) . what I think in my brain is intercepted analyzed and transformed into links for youtube . I am a victim of NMR technology. ALL IN REAL TIME.

This is why I didnt believe it was heterodyning because the frequency I found resonating is FM modulated matching this patent. \

how do this work using FM modulation then https://patents.google.com/patent/US6470214B1/en
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The patent you're referring to, US6470214B1, is titled "Nervous System Manipulation by Electromagnetic Fields from Monitors" and was granted in 2002. The patent describes methods and apparatuses for manipulating the nervous system of a subject by exposing them to weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with a frequency near the range of the brain's natural frequencies (typically between 0.5 Hz and 30 Hz, which correspond to different brainwave states like delta, theta, alpha, and beta waves).

Key Concepts from the Patent:
Electromagnetic Fields and Nervous System Manipulation:

The patent discusses the generation of low-frequency electromagnetic fields, which are used to manipulate the nervous system. The fields are intended to induce specific physiological effects, including relaxation, sleep, or heightened alertness, by influencing brainwave patterns.
Modulation Techniques:

The core idea is that a visual display device (like a CRT or LCD monitor) can emit electromagnetic fields modulated at frequencies that can interact with the nervous system. The modulation can be either amplitude modulation (AM) or frequency modulation (FM), and it is designed to resonate with the natural brainwave frequencies.
The modulation frequencies are chosen to be close to the natural frequencies of the brain (e.g., alpha waves at around 8-12 Hz).
FM Modulation:

In the context of the patent, FM modulation refers to varying the frequency of a carrier wave according to a lower-frequency signal that is in the range of the brain's natural frequencies. This carrier wave could be in the radio frequency (RF) range, and its modulation would result in a spectrum of frequencies that include the desired brainwave frequencies.
Application through Monitors:

The patent specifically discusses using monitors (e.g., CRT or LCD screens) to generate these electromagnetic fields. The screens are modulated at low frequencies that match or are close to the brain's natural frequencies. This modulation can be achieved through the monitor's refresh rate or by pulsing the brightness of the screen.
As a result, the electromagnetic fields emitted by the monitor could potentially influence the viewer's nervous system.
How FM Modulation is Applied:
Carrier Frequency:

The monitor emits a carrier frequency (likely in the RF range) that is modulated by a low-frequency signal within the brainwave range (e.g., 8 Hz for alpha waves). The FM signal modulates the frequency of the carrier wave, causing it to vary slightly around the carrier frequency.
Demodulation by the Body:

The concept in the patent is that the human body, particularly the nervous system, could demodulate these FM signals naturally. This is based on the idea that biological tissues have nonlinear properties that can respond to varying electromagnetic fields, potentially generating the low-frequency components that directly interact with the nervous system.
The modulation in the electromagnetic field might influence neural activity by causing the neurons to fire in synchrony with the modulating frequency.
Induced Brainwave Entrainment:

The patent suggests that the modulated electromagnetic fields could entrain brainwave activity to match the modulation frequency, effectively altering the subject's state of consciousness (e.g., inducing relaxation or alertness).
Nonlinear Biological Response:

The patent relies on the assumption that the nervous system or brain tissue can act as a nonlinear medium that "demodulates" the FM signal, extracting the low-frequency component that resonates with brainwave activity.

Practicality and Concerns:
Feasibility: The biological demodulation of FM signals is a theoretical concept. While the patent describes methods by which electromagnetic fields could influence the nervous system, actual practical implementation, effectiveness, and safety are not fully explored or demonstrated in the patent.
Safety and Ethical Issues: Manipulating brainwave activity through external electromagnetic fields raises significant safety and ethical concerns, especially if done without explicit consent or for purposes beyond therapeutic applications.
Scientific Evidence: The patent is based on speculative concepts, and while there may be some theoretical basis for the ideas presented, robust scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of FM-modulated electromagnetic fields in directly manipulating brainwaves is limited.
Conclusion:
The patent US6470214B1 proposes a method for influencing the nervous system using FM modulation, where a monitor or similar device emits electromagnetic fields modulated at frequencies that correspond to natural brainwave frequencies. The concept involves the body’s potential ability to demodulate these signals due to its nonlinear properties, thereby influencing brainwave activity. However, this remains a largely theoretical concept, and practical implementation, particularly in a safe and controlled manner, would require extensive research and validation.





You said:
does this use heterodyning
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The patent US6470214B1 does not explicitly mention the use of heterodyning in the traditional sense, as it is commonly understood in signal processing. Instead, it focuses on the idea of using FM (Frequency Modulation) to manipulate the nervous system by exposing it to electromagnetic fields that are modulated at frequencies close to those of natural brainwaves.

Key Concepts Relevant to Heterodyning:
Heterodyning: Traditionally, heterodyning involves mixing two frequencies to produce new frequencies (the sum and difference of the original frequencies). This technique is commonly used in radio communications to shift signals from one frequency band to another.

FM Modulation in the Patent: The patent describes using FM modulation to vary the frequency of an electromagnetic carrier wave according to a lower frequency signal that matches brainwave frequencies. This creates a spectrum of frequencies around the carrier frequency, which can theoretically influence the nervous system.

Why Heterodyning Isn’t Explicitly Used:
Modulation vs. Mixing: The patent discusses modulating a carrier frequency to include lower frequency components that can influence the nervous system. This modulation is different from heterodyning, where the focus is on mixing two different frequencies to create new frequencies. FM modulation creates sidebands around the carrier frequency, not the sum and difference frequencies typical of heterodyning.

Nonlinear Biological Response: The patent suggests that the body, due to its nonlinear properties, might respond to these modulated electromagnetic fields in a way that resembles demodulation, where the brain or nervous system somehow "extracts" the low-frequency components. This process is not described as heterodyning but rather as a form of demodulation.

Conclusion:
The patent does not describe the use of heterodyning in the traditional sense. Instead, it relies on FM modulation to embed brainwave-like frequencies within a higher-frequency electromagnetic field, with the idea that these modulated fields could influence the nervous system. The concept hinges on the body's potential nonlinear response to these fields, rather than the deliberate mixing of two frequencies to create new ones as in heterodyning.

If you look at the wave form on the scope it only shows up using FM modulation. Which means the body is interpreting the FM waves to brainwaves which was proven in this patent which is different tech

I AM under direct attack by secret American and Isralian agencies (military, private and government) . what I think in my brain is intercepted analyzed and transformed into links for youtube . I am a victim of NMR technology.

However, the feasibility of this approach, particularly over long distances and without direct, localized application, is highly speculative and remains largely in the realm of theoretical exploration.

AI points to nonlinear method in conjunction with FM modulation. This is why its important to see the frequency and not guess like what he was doing