Please watch this video. They are trying to break our spirits. We need to get together, in the outdoors, lots of us, for picnics or gatherings or celebrations or whatever. We have around 8 weeks of potential good weather. Protests aren’t working but maybe this idea will

https://odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/CA--43-Naomi-Wolf:0

Yes to all the free breathers out there! Thank you for resisting

..

New mask is 92% more effective at stopping the spread of Covid 19 🤣🤣🤣

The Irish Channel 🇮🇪

Supporting Citizen Journalism

👉 Follow us here on Telegram @Irish_channel

👉 Join the Chat here @Irish_Chat

👉 Website https://www.theirishchannel.com


Thank you 🙏

Just some low-level tricksters...

Dr David Martin:

"Anthony Fauci has spent 191 billion dollars for the bio-weaponisation of viruses against humanity"

Truth 💣

It sounds like this guy forgot a few of his lines!!

This seems very much like a fake agitator playing the Q-Anon, right-wing extremist.

They want blood in the streets. ⚡️

Covid was an IQ test. So was Candace Owens' transvestigation into Brigitte Macron. Proof always required. That's how we figure stuff out and debate openly and freely. If there's no evidence, only empty speculation, then it's only right to admit that instead of jumping on a bandwagon to hell. Good to see another account call out her trickery. This is how audiences need to respond in general instead of being so naive and trusting of the wife of a former Bullingdon Club president who's clearly an intelligence operative. It's not that hard to figure out.

The good thing about the Brigitte Macron psy-op from my perspective is that it smoked out all the operatives on the this side of the fence trying to trick their audiences into believing and more to the point repeating nonsense. Look at 'Michael' Freepress desperately attempting to convince his readers that his list of female politicians are men. They're women. Only those who don't require evidence are easily duped by these kind of operatives. They say, 'but he says some good stuff, so it doesn't matter if he throws this kind of thing in every now and again'. It does matter. Consistency is key. No curve balls. PS: I run this channel alone.

If we're not sure about a certain narrative presented to us and there's not enough evidence to reach a solid conclusion then Tom Secker's approach is the best one to take. By all means, form a hypotheses but remain open to new information and to changing your opinion if presented with updated evidence. There are traps laid for us everywhere to make us look untrustworthy and insane. We can't afford to jump to conclusions, no matter how tempting or how strong the chorus. That's why we help each other out along the way. That's why the comments are open.

This is why the Manchester Arena bombing story is a good case study and why I've picked it apart for everyone to analyse for themselves. I lost thousands of subscribers for my stance but who cares? I'm not after numbers. I'm not selling anything. People mistakenly believed Richard D Hall was on their side, working as an independent investigative journalist but he misled them to a false conclusion, giving Marianna Spring an excuse to lambast what she calls 'disaster trolls'. If the info was correct she'd steer clear. The only reason she covered Agent Hall's content is because it's wrong and makes conspiracy theorists look like idiots, as Tom Secker warned. Richard D Hall was implanted on this side specifically to gain trust then to mislead. These guys play the long game. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65201949

The people repeating the lie that no one was injured in the Manchester Arena bombing look untrustworthy and insane, deservedly so. That means when they talk about the Covid hoax or excess deaths, their peers won't have any faith in their critical thinking abilities. They allowed themselves to be fed dodgy information from an obvious agent, all because of misplaced trust. Many will still defend RDH because he says some stuff they agree with but that's not good enough. He failed to produce sufficient evidence that there was no bomb and no injuries at the Manchester Arena. His audience should have been capable of stress testing his evidence to see if it was worthy but they didn't do their due diligence. This is an important case study to figure out how millions of people were deceived by an intelligence operative and why it's important to avoid pack mentality and ask good questions. This is war, after all. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd1epkrdj15o

Reminder this is NOT investigative journalism. This is Stalinist style gimmickry designed to mislead.

Anyone know what happened here? https://www.independent.ie/regionals/wexford/news/wexford-deaths/tributes-pour-in-following-sudden-death-of-wexford-teen-he-had-the-power-to-bring-everyone-together/a413385843.html