You said, "mask mandatory." Is there a problem?
https://x.com/AetherCzar/status/2120523533394800989
https://x.com/AetherCzar/status/2120523533394800989
π₯7
Forwarded from Matt Ehret and the Canadian Patriot Press
Is the Big Bang a scientific fact, or a jesuitical fiction? The entire model requires we assume the red shift of other galaxies to be simply the effect of the Doppler effect... but are there other, better explanations? In this lecture, I explore that question in some detail focusing on the work of Halton Arp, and an array of pioneering optical biophysicists and embryologists you may never have heard about. https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-fraud-of-big-bang-cosmology
Substack
The Fraud of Big Bang Cosmology
Over the last 80 years, a debate has been manufactured between two fallacious extremes.
π₯1π€1
Looks like I picked the wrong age to have switched from IPAs to Lagers.
https://miri.substack.com/p/patrick-stewart-and-the-kennedy-conspiracy?r=lp6h7&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
"Lagers donβt generally meet the threshold, but ales do, and in particular, IPAs. IPAs are very high in extremely bioavailable silica, and flush aluminium out very effectively.
"Consequently, there is even a known association between drinking beer and a lower risk of Alzheimerββs disease."
https://miri.substack.com/p/patrick-stewart-and-the-kennedy-conspiracy?r=lp6h7&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
Substack
Patrick Stewart and the Kennedy Conspiracy
In common with, it seems, nearly the entire Western world, I was rather saddened to hear last week of the demise of veteran actor, Patrick Stewart.
π€2
Forwarded from The Sandwhich Press
"Believing the British model of society and rule to be the most advanced in human history and of course being Darwanists (sic), the inner core of Rhodesβ group of elites saw it almost as their duty to impose this on the rest of the world."
https://angrywarhawk.substack.com/p/the-anglo-american-establishment?r=4m6zdn&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
https://angrywarhawk.substack.com/p/the-anglo-american-establishment?r=4m6zdn&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
Substack
The Anglo-American Establishment part 1
The fight for world domination
Forwarded from Insider Paper
Scientists in 1960 predicted Friday 13th November 2026 will be βDoomsday'
READ: https://insiderpaper.com/doomsday-on-13-november-2026-prediction/
Follow @InsiderPaper for more news
READ: https://insiderpaper.com/doomsday-on-13-november-2026-prediction/
Follow @InsiderPaper for more news
π€4
Forwarded from Vox Day
Sad Puppies: A Retrospective
In which Brad Torgerson, who took up the Sad Puppies mantle when Larry Correia retired from the science fiction award scene, shares his thoughts on our successful nuking of the Hugo Awards. One of the most fascinating things about the past ten years has been watching different people who werenβt part of Sad Puppies speak [β¦]
https://voxday.net/2026/11/11/sad-puppies-a-retrospective/
In which Brad Torgerson, who took up the Sad Puppies mantle when Larry Correia retired from the science fiction award scene, shares his thoughts on our successful nuking of the Hugo Awards. One of the most fascinating things about the past ten years has been watching different people who werenβt part of Sad Puppies speak [β¦]
https://voxday.net/2026/11/11/sad-puppies-a-retrospective/
π€1
"A vast body of practical antenna and wireless experience sits locked away in engineering textbooks and patents that are never read by most physicists. Instead, physicists form their intuition of electromagnetic behavior from Feynman diagrams and that intuition is at odds with how electromagnetic fields and energy actually behave."
https://aetherczar.substack.com/p/when-antennas-throw-and-catch-curveballs#:~:text=A%20vast%20body,energy%20actually%20behave.
https://aetherczar.substack.com/p/when-antennas-throw-and-catch-curveballs#:~:text=A%20vast%20body,energy%20actually%20behave.
Substack
When Antennas Throw and Catch Curveballs
Conventional Wisdom Has Trouble With This One
π₯4
It has named CFO Colette Kress as interim CEO.
@BellumActaNews
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯1π€1
Forwarded from Eva Karene Bartlett (Yeva)
If the below is true, the Yankee administration are laughable idiots. Actually, they are either way.
Andrei Rudenko:
"βοΈWashington has decided to make a "mind-blowing" offer that will supposedly solve all problems, for everyone. According to The Economist, American negotiators want to impose on Russia a "peace through redrawing the map": to change the administrative borders of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions so that Moscow can declare "full control" over Donbass, while Kiev would ostensibly not cede any of the cities it currently holds.
The scheme is as simple as a trick up a cheat's sleeve: if cities like Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, and other territories controlled by Ukraine are formally removed from the Donetsk region, Russia will be able to claim that it has achieved its goal β "liberated" all of Donbass. In reality, nothing will change: Russian cities will not come under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, Kiev will retain control over the cities and people, but will agree to a change in the internal structure of the country.
βͺοΈIf such an offer was indeed made, it indicates that Washington is approaching negotiations unprofessionally. They treat the Kremlin like a bunch of fools. In other words, "you're having squabbles over territory, so let's just move the borders and quickly resolve everything." And then Moscow will declare itself the victor, but the names of the cities Sloviansk and Kramatorsk will not be mentioned in Russia, so as not to confuse the people. It looks very ridiculous. It's like if, in 1945, Germany had offered the USSR: "Guys, don't cross our borders and stop. But take a couple of cities and name them Berlin and Potsdam. We'll even help you build a wooden Reichstag, burn it down, and be happy. And you can say that you captured Berlin, that you defeated Germany. We'll conclude a peace agreement with you, but the Wehrmacht will remain with us, along with the SS and Gestapo. Is that okay?" No, it's not.
The West just can't understand that this is not about territories. The West stubbornly tries to portray everything as if Russia wants to seize something. But first, it's not about conquest, but about liberating historically Russian lands, and that is a fundamental point. Second, a lot depends not only on square kilometers, but also on guaranteeing the protection of the rights of Russians and Russian-speaking people, and the protection of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Have you forgotten? And that's a shame, because Moscow remembers this. Today, Ukraine is a neo-Nazi pen that generates hatred of everything Russian, and it is unacceptable to leave things in this state: this bomb will explode sooner or later, but on our territory. Another key point is Ukraine's non-bloc status. It will not be in NATO under any circumstances, and if it tries to join, it will cease to exist. Because NATO in Ukraine is an existential threat to Russia. This has been said many times, for decades. But Kiev and the West pretended to be fools, acting as if they didn't understand spoken words.
And one more extremely important point: what about the fact that these territories are already part of the Russian Federation? They are already our new territories (actually, they are old ones). They are part of the republics and regions of the Russian Federation. Their inclusion was formalized in international treaties in 2022, ratified by the Federation Council, and enshrined in federal constitutional laws. According to the laws adopted, the borders of the new entities are determined by their borders on the day of their formation. Should we also "move" the Constitution along with the borders? What else do you want us to do, gentlemen negotiators?
βΎοΈBut it should be understood that this idea, allegedly proposed by the Americans, is being written about not by just any newspaper, but by The Economist, a British publication. And Great Britain has its own interests in this matter, so it is quite possible that this is a leak from London, and there is nothing to be surprised about; the British are quite the provocateurs. But if the United States has put such an offer on the table, there are doubts about whether they understand what they are doing."
https://t.me/RtrDonetsk/39999
Andrei Rudenko:
"βοΈWashington has decided to make a "mind-blowing" offer that will supposedly solve all problems, for everyone. According to The Economist, American negotiators want to impose on Russia a "peace through redrawing the map": to change the administrative borders of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions so that Moscow can declare "full control" over Donbass, while Kiev would ostensibly not cede any of the cities it currently holds.
The scheme is as simple as a trick up a cheat's sleeve: if cities like Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, and other territories controlled by Ukraine are formally removed from the Donetsk region, Russia will be able to claim that it has achieved its goal β "liberated" all of Donbass. In reality, nothing will change: Russian cities will not come under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, Kiev will retain control over the cities and people, but will agree to a change in the internal structure of the country.
βͺοΈIf such an offer was indeed made, it indicates that Washington is approaching negotiations unprofessionally. They treat the Kremlin like a bunch of fools. In other words, "you're having squabbles over territory, so let's just move the borders and quickly resolve everything." And then Moscow will declare itself the victor, but the names of the cities Sloviansk and Kramatorsk will not be mentioned in Russia, so as not to confuse the people. It looks very ridiculous. It's like if, in 1945, Germany had offered the USSR: "Guys, don't cross our borders and stop. But take a couple of cities and name them Berlin and Potsdam. We'll even help you build a wooden Reichstag, burn it down, and be happy. And you can say that you captured Berlin, that you defeated Germany. We'll conclude a peace agreement with you, but the Wehrmacht will remain with us, along with the SS and Gestapo. Is that okay?" No, it's not.
The West just can't understand that this is not about territories. The West stubbornly tries to portray everything as if Russia wants to seize something. But first, it's not about conquest, but about liberating historically Russian lands, and that is a fundamental point. Second, a lot depends not only on square kilometers, but also on guaranteeing the protection of the rights of Russians and Russian-speaking people, and the protection of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Have you forgotten? And that's a shame, because Moscow remembers this. Today, Ukraine is a neo-Nazi pen that generates hatred of everything Russian, and it is unacceptable to leave things in this state: this bomb will explode sooner or later, but on our territory. Another key point is Ukraine's non-bloc status. It will not be in NATO under any circumstances, and if it tries to join, it will cease to exist. Because NATO in Ukraine is an existential threat to Russia. This has been said many times, for decades. But Kiev and the West pretended to be fools, acting as if they didn't understand spoken words.
And one more extremely important point: what about the fact that these territories are already part of the Russian Federation? They are already our new territories (actually, they are old ones). They are part of the republics and regions of the Russian Federation. Their inclusion was formalized in international treaties in 2022, ratified by the Federation Council, and enshrined in federal constitutional laws. According to the laws adopted, the borders of the new entities are determined by their borders on the day of their formation. Should we also "move" the Constitution along with the borders? What else do you want us to do, gentlemen negotiators?
βΎοΈBut it should be understood that this idea, allegedly proposed by the Americans, is being written about not by just any newspaper, but by The Economist, a British publication. And Great Britain has its own interests in this matter, so it is quite possible that this is a leak from London, and there is nothing to be surprised about; the British are quite the provocateurs. But if the United States has put such an offer on the table, there are doubts about whether they understand what they are doing."
https://t.me/RtrDonetsk/39999
Telegram
Π Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ V
βοΈΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠΎΠ½ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ» ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Β«ΡΠΌΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΌΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅Β» ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
. ΠΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ The Economist, Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Β«ΠΌΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΒ»: ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉβ¦
π3
@BellumActaNews
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"A new independent report argues that increased access to better-protected airfields is as important, if not more so, than buying advanced tanker aircraft when it comes to meeting future U.S. aerial refueling demands. The authors, in part, call for the U.S. military to invest in new hardened shelters that are large enough for tankers to fit inside."
https://www.twz.com/news-features/hardened-shelters-critical-to-survival-of-usafs-tanker-fleet-study
https://www.twz.com/news-features/hardened-shelters-critical-to-survival-of-usafs-tanker-fleet-study
TWZ
Hardened Shelters Critical To Survival Of USAF's Tanker Fleet: Study
An independent assessment calls for new action to prevent critical aerial refueling assets from being neutralized before they even get in the air.
π€2
Electromagnetism for Electronic Engineers... https://archive.org/details/electromagnetism0000cart/page/n3/mode/2up